Home » Archives by category » News (Page 7973)
Rep. Kucinich Requests A Visit With Bradley Manning

enlarge I’m glad Kucinich is looking into this. He’s one of the few members I’d trust to tell the truth: Ohio congressman Dennis Kucinich has asked the Defense Secretary Robert Gates for a visit with an Army private suspected of giving classified material to WikiLeaks. Kucinich, a Democrat who is a member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, sent a letter Friday to Gates asking for a visit with Pfc. Bradley Manning. Manning is being held in a Marine Corps brig in Quantico, Va. Kucinich says he is concerned about reports of Manning’s treatment while in custody. Manning’s lawyer has filed a complaint with the Quantico commander about the conditions Manning is being held under. You can read the letter here .

Continue reading …

Video 6

No Comment
Video 6

http://www.youtube.com/v/wlQGIuWGBWI?f=user_uploads&app=youtube_gdata Read more: Video 6

Continue reading …

Unless this is an elaborate hoax, a tech-savvy girl has gotten a very new-fashioned sort of revenge on her old flame—via Google. She manipulated the search function so it coughs up repeated images of him when his name is typed in, each with a mocking (and sometimes pretty nasty)…

Continue reading …
Evan Thomas: Enough Justices Think ObamaCare Won’t Work To ‘Throw It Out’

As NewsBusters reported in January, Newsweek's Editor at Large Evan Thomas believes ObamaCare “is a disaster.” On Friday's “Inside Washington,” Thomas went even further with his criticism of this law calling it a “flawed bill” and claiming, “I think enough justices perceive that it’s not going to work, that will incline them to reach this high constitutional principle and throw it out” (video follows with transcript and commentary): EVAN THOMAS, NEWSWEEK: It’s, it’s a flawed bill. I mean, it does good things. It does help people who were denied insurance, but it has a fundamental flaw in it, which is that it doesn’t deal with the underlying problems of the healthcare system, because they, Congress ducked on the big issue of… NINA TOTENBERG, NPR: But that’s not the constitutional issue. GORDON PETERSON, HOST: But the question is, is it unconstitutional in ordering people, demanding that people buy health insurance? Is that unconstitutional? MARK SHIELDS: I am not a lawyer and I’m not going to play one on television, but it, it’s, it isn’t asking people to buy a Ford automobile or to buy a Sony television, or demanding that they do it. It is saying you buy this, in fact that judge in Florida acknowledged that the bill and the law depends upon the mandate. Without the mandate, that the law does not work. PETERSON: Right. SHIELDS: But, what it is saying is you buy this because it’s in the public good. It’s going to prevent early illness, early death. It’s going to prevent widespread illness and suffering, and that’s the purpose of it. CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: Yeah, but that doesn’t answer the constitutional issue. TOTENBERG: No. KRAUTHAMMER: Of course it’s in the public good, or it wouldn’t have been attempted in the first place. But the Constitution says there are some things in the public good that the Congress cannot do because we have the limited government and powers are restricted. And the question is, is this over the line? The view I have is that the Commerce Clause has been expanded for 80 years, and there's now a sense in the country, interestingly over the last two years I think in part as a push back against Obama and the liberal agenda over the last two years, which says it isn’t only that the law is inefficient or that it’s going to bankrupt us, but there is something wrong about extending the power of the federal government to compel you to enter into a contract with a private entity, i.e. an insurance company, and to argue that if you allow this, then there are no limits whatsoever on what the Congress can actually order an individual to do. PETERSON: Does that give you a hint to which way they’ll go? TOTENBERG: No, but, here I’m just, I think this quote sort of summarizes it all. Charles Fried, who was solicitor general during the Reagan administration, said on television, “I sat at counsel table attacking the Violence Against Women Act as a violation of the Constitution, because as odious as it is to slap a woman around, I didn’t think it was, it involved the economy and regulation of the economy. But,” he said, “insurance, regulating insurance does involve the national economy and is exactly the kind of thing that the Commerce Clause contemplated.” That’s what he said anyway. THOMAS: Here’s the thing… KRAUTHAMMER: Here’s our one lawyer. THOMAS: Here’s the thing. KRAUTHAMMER: You are a lawyer. THOMAS: Yeah, but here’s what I learned in law school: The Supreme Court follows the election returns. They’ll couch it in high, constitutional principle, but in fact, their judgment will be based on the realities of how the act is working or not working. And as I think enough justices perceive that it’s not going to work, that will incline them to reach this high constitutional principle and throw it out. CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: I agree. PETERSON: What I learned in law school: the Supreme Court follows the election returns, Mark. SHIELDS: He didn’t have to go to law school. All he needed to do was read Finley Peter Dunne who said that in 1896, and that is the truth. I’d say it really is going to come down to one individual in this country of 310 million, and it’s justice Anthony Kennedy. I think we probably know… KRAUTHAMMER: He is our Mubarak. SHIELDS: He is. He’s the one who’s going to decide… KRAUTHAMMER: He decides, he decides everything. SHIELDS: Four- four, Tony Kennedy, thank you, Ronald Reagan. THOMAS: And he does follow the election returns. For the sake of the future of our nation, let's hope so. On the other, one has to wonder if people like Thomas had called this a disaster and a flawed bill while Congress was debating it, maybe the public would have had even a more negative view of the law thereby forcing their respective representatives to vote against it. Novel thought, huh?

Continue reading …
Mubarak is still here, but there’s been a revolution in our minds, say protesters

The Day of Departure has passed, but anti-government protesters say they will stay until they get their freedoms back Hosni Mubarak’s presidential portrait still hangs in the grey concrete government office block that overshadows Tahrir Square. Demonstrators still pack the streets below, even though the largest protest of the past fortnight on Friday – declared the Day of Departure on which Mubarak would finally be driven from power – failed to see him toppled. But even as the thousands who fill Tahrir Square each day take on board that it might yet be a long haul to finally ridding themselves of a hated system, they are steeled by an ever more certain sense of victory after a week in which they have warded off the regime’s bloody efforts to break their demands for freedom, and heard their ruler finally talk about quitting. With that has come ever greater determination among the protesters to see the showdown through to the end. Tahrir Square was an unusual mixing of Egyptian society. Poorer workers and the middle class. Middle- aged parents and young idealists. Islamists and those who view Muslim politics with fear and suspicion. But there are many more men than women. Some men are quick to say that they don’t believe protests are a place for women and that at home there are six people – wives, mothers, children – who support the anti-Mubarak cause for every one of the demonstrators in the square. Amira Ismael, however, is in the square with her three-year-old son, Taha. They have been camped there for five days. Ismael’s husband, Ahmed Awad, makes periodic trips out for food, but other than that the family does not intend to move until Mubarak has departed. “I am doing this for my son,” said Ismael, an accountant. “Mubarak has to go because with Mubarak my son has no future, no life. We can’t afford to send him to the good school and Mubarak makes the government schools bad because he wants to keep the people stupid. The government is Mubarak’s government, not our government. I will stay here until Mubarak leaves. I will stay here days, months, years.” Awad is a computer technician who hasn’t been to work in days. A job is a precious thing in Egypt and he worries that he might lose it. But if he does he regards it as a price worth paying. Ahmad Mahmoud is standing in front of the shuttered entrance to the metro system holding a yellow sign with a single word spelled out in capital letters: Freedom. “I’ve been here every day for nine days,” he said. “I will come every day until he leaves because now I know we have won.” Mahmoud, a 35-year-old teacher, talks of a revolution, but what he means is not so much people on the streets toppling a hated figure as how they see their relationship with this government and all future governments. “People have changed. They were scared. They are no longer scared. We are not afraid of his system any longer and when we stopped being afraid we knew we would win,” he said. “We will not again allow ourselves to be scared of a government. We will not be afraid to say when we think the president is wrong or the government is bad. This is the revolution in our country, the revolution in our minds. Mubarak can stay for days or weeks but he cannot change that. We cannot go back.” Ahmed Mora, a biochemistry university lecturer, came to the protests late but said he, too, would see them through. “It’s time. I know there are people who are afraid. There are people who are afraid of chaos. There are people who are afraid of the Muslim Brotherhood. Many of those people are not pro-Mubarak, they are pro-stability,” he said. “But we cannot be afraid to free ourselves. I’m 30 years old and I’ve never voted in an election because they were always corrupt and fake. We are going to stay until he goes.” Not long after dawn, the thousands who keep vigil in the square through the night – a few with tents but most sleeping in the open on blankets and rugs – set about cleaning up. Some brush the street with branches snapped from the trees, others pick up the rubbish. The rocks collected for defence are piled. A man scatters water to try to keep the dust down. Newspapers are distributed and men settle on the pavements to read and sip tea. On the edge of the square, the queues to enter and join the day’s protest start to form. Soldiers check identity cards and search for weapons. Some demonstrators carry food for those who have remained in the square overnight. Once past the soldiers there is a second line of security run by the anti-Mubarak campaign where identity cards are shown again and male protesters are politely patted down. It’s an orderliness Egyptians have surprised themselves with – designed not only to minimise confrontations with the army and keep the protest peaceful, but also to suggest that it is the regime that is the source of chaos. It hasn’t been easy. A few days into the protests, a wave of looting was unleashed. The pro-democracy movement suspected that the regime might be creating disorder in the hope that ordinary Egyptians would welcome a crackdown that could be used to clear the anti-Mubarak movement from the streets. But Cairo’s residents took matters in to their own hands, policing their neighbourhoods, and the protest movement grew stronger. Every now and then, there is a crack in the order. Periodically, someone among the protesters is determined to be a security police agent or agent provocateur. Two men spotted on a balcony overlooking the square are pounced on, their hands bound with white cord before they are frogmarched, looking petrified, through a hostile crowd to soldiers who take them off to a makeshift pen. A little later, another man, in a blue shirt, is not so lucky. The kicks and blows come from every direction as one group of protesters attempts to protect him from more agitated demonstrators as they march the suspected government agent across the square to hand him over to the army. There are shouts of “hang him” from some men, young and older, venting years of anger at the vast, anonymous machinery of state repression on one of its agents suddenly alone and powerless. More reasonable protesters plead against any violence. Only with a determined effort by his protectors and help from a couple of soldiers is the man finally prised away from his attackers. Across the square, other protesters are spraying graffiti to add to the slogans and posters demanding that Mubarak go. Walls and store fronts are covered. So are the tanks blocking the roads on the edge. One sign reads “Game over”. Another says “Free speech”. A couple of effigies hang from lampposts. Ismael points and says that’s what she would like to see done to Mubarak. Sprayed close to where the tanks and soldiers are lined up in front of the Egyptian museum is another demand: “USA don’t involve. USA admin we will get with our will”. There is no particular anti-American mood among the protesters. Most of the signs and the anger are directed directly at Mubarak. But there is suspicion. The demonstrators are watching Barack Obama closely after 30 years of successive American governments backing Mubarak as a force for stability, widely seen in Egypt as a strategy to maintain peace with Israel at the expense of freedom for Egyptians. So many in the square take a skeptical view of Washington’s plan for Mubarak’s deputy and intelligence chief, Omar Suleiman, to oversee the political transition. There is suspicion of Suleiman because of his past, but there is even greater concern that he will serve American interests which, among other things, are believed to be partly about containing the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood. “When Obama said Mubarak must go, we were very happy,” said Ismael. “If Obama gets rid of Mubarak, you will see that many people in Egypt will love America. If Obama leaves it to the Egyptian people, we will love him. But if Obama tries to force us to have a government we don’t want, it will be different. We will win and then we will judge Obama by what he does and take decisions according to how he behaves.” Ismael added: “Egypt is not against America. I don’t want the Americans to tell my country what to do. All Egyptian people must decide. America has an agenda. It is not our agenda and this is our revolution.” Egypt Hosni Mubarak Middle East Chris McGreal guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Mass anti-government rally in Serbia

Tens of thousands of nationalist supporters rallied against Serbia’s pro-Western government on Saturday, demanding early elections amid the Balkan country’s deepening economic crisis. About 10,000 police officers gathered near the rally in front of…

Continue reading …

The days of free checking accounts are numbered for many bank customers around the country, reports the Los Angeles Times . New rules that make it harder for banks to impose various fees mean they need to pull in money from elsewhere, so those free accounts are being phased out. Generally…

Continue reading …
The Great Man Who Loved America & its Ideals

“I wasn’t a great communicator, but I communicated great things, and they didn’t spring full-bloom from my brow — they came from the heart of a great nation.” –Ronald Wilson Reagan Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Gay Patriot Discovery Date : 05/02/2011 22:35 Number of articles : 4

Continue reading …
Janet Jackson And Fans Are “Together Again” On Her World Tour

Hmm… Is it just us, or is this not the first time Janet Jackson has made headlines on Superbowl Sunday? Far from the football-related hoopla happening stateside, Idolator’s favorite Barbie Girl made a life-sized appearance in Manila on Friday, launching her world tour in the Philippines. It’s been three years since the For Colored Girls … More » Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Idolator Discovery Date : 05/02/2011 22:10 Number of articles : 3

Continue reading …
Before Obama Was Elected, Chris Matthews Gushed Over the ‘Genius’ Who Is a ‘Miraculous Gift’

Chris Matthews, who famously fawned Over Barack Obama for creating a ” thrill ” up his leg, appeared smitten with the politician long before he reached the White House. In his book, Life's a Campaign , the MSNBC anchor enthused, “In 2007, a new-generation candidate arrived on the national stage, declaring his presidential candidacy and preaching the gospel of good news.” The 2007 book recounted Matthews' reaction to Obama's 2004 speech at the Democratic convention. On page 52, the author extolled, “There, in Boston's FleetCenter, he delivered what might have been the most inspiring speech many Americans listening that evening had ever heard.” Matthews continued, ” Obama, at that moment not elected to the U.S. Senate, was offering a miraculous gift with those words .” Foreshadowing the praise he would heap on President Obama, the Hardball host gushed, “With thoughtful eloquence, Obama was marrying the immigrant story to the African American legacy not simply by his genes, but by his genius.” “No wonder the country's youth turned to him as their hope as well as their hero,” the anchor concluded. During live coverage of the 2004 Democratic convention, Matthews offered an early version of his famous “thrill” line, saying Obama gave him a ” chill in my…legs .” Clips of both the “thrill” and the “chill” can be found below:

Continue reading …