The winning couple in Thailand’s Valentine’s Day kissathon hope get a world record certified by Guinness, for their smooch that lasted more than 46 hours. (Feb. 15)
Continue reading …Algerian police thwarted a rally by thousands of pro-democracy supporters on Saturday, breaking up the crowd into isolated groups to keep them from marching. These are the latest images from the capital Algiers.
Continue reading …Photo: Isla Palenque courtesy of Amble Resorts We try to treat our interns pretty well here at TreeHugger, but I’m fairly certain we’ve never asked them to kick their flip flops off on the beach and run Hasselhoff-style into the warm surf. That’s not to say they don’t have fun, but if you’re looking for an equally fun internship that does involve running into the ocean, get ready to get excited. … Read the full story on TreeHugger
Continue reading …Oregon Democrat David Wu recently won a seventh term to Congress, but several former staffers think he’d be better off in a psychiatric hospital instead of on the House floor. That’s not an exaggeration, as the Oregonian explains. Staffers were so worried about his increasingly erratic behavior during the campaign—…
Continue reading …Bill Maher and Tavis Smiley got into a heated debate Friday about the difference between the treatment of women in America versus in Muslim countries. When Smiley continually asserted on HBO's “Real Time” that women are maltreated here, Maher said, “It's such bulls–t,” and eventually ended the discussion by scolding the PBS host, “When you tolerate intolerance, you’re not really being a liberal” (video follows with partial transcript and commentary): BILL MAHER: I think it’s fair to say Muslim men have a bad attitude about women in general, and I would just like to say to them that you’re never going to have this revolution happen unless there is also a sexual revolution that goes with it. Smiley at that point shook his head leading Maher to ask, “Really, Tavis. Muslim men don’t have a problem with women?” SMILEY: No, I’m not going to argue that. MAHER: Good. SMILEY: Let me say up front, I agree with you. MAHER: I was going to cut your head off. SMILEY: No, no, no. Better my head than what Kevin. I was going to say that first of all, obviously what happened to Lara Logan is reprehensible, horrific, we can’t find a language to describe what happened to her. But having said that, if our democracy, Bill, if, if, if our readiness for democracy in this country is based upon, determined by, demonstrated by our respect for women, then we ain’t ready for democracy… MAHER: That is a false equivalence. SMILEY: No, no, no, no, no. MAHER: Please. SMILEY: Absolutely not. MAHER: Are you serious? You think this country, the men in this country have an attitude that even comes close to… SMILEY: I’m suggesting to you if you think that the way we treat women in this country, with patriarchy still alive and well, sexism still alive and well, is determinative or demonstrative of how well our democracy runs, I think you don’t understand how maltreated women are still in this society. That’s all I’m saying. MAHER: What I’m saying is you have no perspective. You have no perspective. SMILEY: I’m saying you have no perspective. MAHER: No. Go ahead. MICHELLE CARUSO-CABRERA, CNBC: I was just, if you look at the history of the United States I would say that actually democracy leads to better attitudes toward women because when the United States was founded of course, women couldn’t vote, African-Americans couldn’t vote, and we got there eventually. So, I think you’ve got it reversed. MAHER: No I don’t. 19 of 22 Arab countries, women cannot vote. In Egypt, women if you want to divorce your husband you have to go to court. If a man wants to divorce his wife if he just has to say that, what they call the triple telac (?) or something, I divorce thee, I divorce thee, I divorce thee. That must happen like on the first fight. It must be so… KEVIN SMITH, FILMMAKER: I’ve been trying that twelve years of marriage. Doesn’t work. Don’t work. MAHER: In Saudi Arabia, women cannot drive a car, sail a boat, fly a plane, which is why their tampon ads are just horseback riding. [ Laughter ] A bit later, Smiley fine-tuned his point, “I don’t disagree with the fact that they got a long way to go. What I’m trying to suggest to you is that when we have these conversations about how they treat women, as if somehow we treat women better in this country, it demonizes Muslims.” Maher vehemently disagreed stating, “It’s not demonizing. That’s saying I’m prejudiced. I’m saying I’m not prejudiced. That’s pre-judging. I’m not pre-judging, I’m judging. I’m judging. They’re worse. What’s wrong with just saying that? You’re a cultural relativist. It’s not relative.” After the discussion was interrupted by a heckler in the audience who ended up being removed from the studio, Smiley actually, “It might surprise us to go into our papers in this country every day and to see stories just like this of how women are maltreated in this country every single day.” Maher countered, “It’s such bulls—t. I mean, in this country, we treat women badly because they don’t get equal pay, or someone calls you sugar tits, or something like that. I don’t think it’s comparable to cutting their heads off, not letting them drive, not letting them work.” As the debate continued, Smiley pompously asserted, “I would rather have us stop acting like that we know the answers to everything, that we’re always right, that our way is always better, that we don’t make mistakes.” “We don’t know the answers to everything,” replied Maher, “But I do know we treat women better.” The discussion ended with Maher scolding Smiley, “When you tolerate intolerance, you’re not really being a liberal.” Although a delicious smack down, it was also rather ironic, for tolerating intolerance is the basis of liberalism, and Maher epitomizes it virtually every time he opens his mouth. He may have been on the right side of this argument, but if a conservative had taken his position, it seems a metaphysical certitude Maher would have been saying virtually the same things Smiley was. Makes you wonder if Maher was just playing devil's advocate for the entertainment value. We'll know the next time he points accusatory fingers at Americans to support Muslims. Stay tuned.
Continue reading …Photos courtesy of John B.1 , Flickr. Beautiful, chocolate-brown Mitchell’s Satyr butterflies used to frequent up to five U.S. states. Today, this species of butterfly can only be found in 19 ” fens ,” a type of unique, low-nutrient wetland area, in southern Michigan and northern Indiana. It’s not over yet for the Mitchell’s Satyr, however, despite the destruction of habitat areas for urban and agricultural development; contamination from pesticides, fertilizers and nutrient runoff; and threats from in… Read the full story on TreeHugger
Continue reading …US Marines begin landing on Iwo Jima; President Franklin D. Roosevelt gives the US Military the authority to relocate and detain Japanese-Americans. (Feb. 19)
Continue reading …Click here to view this media While I agree with Bill Maher that we do have a problem with the costs of Medicare and Medicaid and defense spending and I agree that our budget should not be balanced on the backs of the poor, what the hell is it going to take to get through to Maher that Social Security is not to blame for the deficit? It’s running a surplus. Maybe someone can send him this article by Robert Reich — Budget baloney: Social Security isn’t to blame for deficit : Social Security won’t be a problem for another 26 years, and even then, the problem can be solved. New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, a Republican presidential hopeful, says in order to “save” Social Security the retirement age should be raised. The media are congratulating him for his putative “courage.” Deficit hawks are proclaiming Social Security one of the big entitlements that has to be cut in order to reduce the budget deficit. This is all baloney. In a former life I was a trustee of the Social Security trust fund. So let me set the record straight. Social Security isn’t responsible for the federal deficit. Just the opposite. Until last year Social Security took in more payroll taxes than it paid out in benefits. It lent the surpluses to the rest of the government. Now that Social Security has started to pay out more than it takes in, Social Security can simply collect what the rest of the government owes it. This will keep it fully solvent for the next 26 years. But why should there even be a problem 26 years from now? Back in 1983, Alan Greenspan’s Social Security commission was supposed to have fixed the system for good – by gradually increasing payroll taxes and raising the retirement age. (Early boomers like me can start collecting full benefits at age 66; late boomers born after 1960 will have to wait until they’re 67.) Greenspan’s commission must have failed to predict something. But what? It fairly accurately predicted how quickly the boomers would age. It had a pretty good idea of how fast the US economy would grow. While it underestimated how many immigrants would be coming into the United States, that’s no problem. To the contrary, most new immigrants are young and their payroll-tax contributions will far exceed what they draw from Social Security for decades. So what did Greenspan’s commission fail to see coming? Inequality. Remember, the Social Security payroll tax applies only to earnings up to a certain ceiling. (That ceiling is now $106,800.) The ceiling rises every year according to a formula roughly matching inflation. Back in 1983, the ceiling was set so the Social Security payroll tax would hit 90 percent of all wages covered by Social Security. That 90 percent figure was built into the Greenspan Commission’s fixes. The Commission assumed that, as the ceiling rose with inflation, the Social Security payroll tax would continue to hit 90 percent of total income. Today, though, the Social Security payroll tax hits only about 84 percent of total income. It went from 90 percent to 84 percent because a larger and larger portion of total income has gone to the top. In 1983, the richest 1 percent of Americans got 11.6 percent of total income. Today the top 1 percent takes in more than 20 percent. If we want to go back to 90 percent, the ceiling on income subject to the Social Security tax would need to be raised to $180,000. Presto. Social Security’s long-term (beyond 26 years from now) problem would be solved. Bingo.
Continue reading …As if things weren’t bad enough for Silvio Berlusconi, now he’s got the wife of a former world leader gossiping about him: Sarah Brown, missus to former British PM Gordon Brown, has a new book out in which she recounts the randy Italian chasing around after Naomi Campbell’s phone number…
Continue reading …A dire warning from the World Bank: Millions are being driven into extreme poverty as food prices soar. Counting the Cost speaks to the World Bank’s managing director, while Iraq takes the unusual step of combatting its food crisis by cancelling an order for US fighter jets. And Nokia teams up with Microsoft – it is either a technology dream team or an attempt to survive. We look at the changing face of the technology sector.
Continue reading …