Home » Archives by category » News (Page 7149)
Jennifer Aniston: Viral Video for Smartwater!

Jennifer Aniston tries her hand at making a viral video in this new clip for Smartwater. The 42-year-old actress teamed up with YouTube star Keenan Cahill and some “internet boys” to help her come up with the perfect ad to showcase Smartwater. Be sure to watch what happens as Jen tries to teach a parrot how to Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Just Jared Discovery Date : 07/03/2011 16:25 Number of articles : 10

Continue reading …

Kennedy Center

No Comment

Kennedy Center Celebrates India By Stephanie Green This month you can travel across the globe without even updating your passport. Maximum INDIA is the Kennedy Center’s celebration of the culture, cuisine, music, literature, and even jewelry of India that have fascinated the world for centuries . Arts Blog caught up with Alicia Adams , vice president of international programming and dance at the Kennedy Center, and curator of this festival, for an online Q & A. Arts Blog: What is it about India that is so enchanting, especially to Americans? Adams: So much about India is fascinating. When I was planning the festival, I thought maximum INDIA was a fitting title because everything about India is maximum: the intensity of color, heat, people; the gods, the spices in the food, the languages. . . We hope to represent the vibrancy and richness of the culture and its people. Arts Blog: How will the various artistic mediums be presented and exhibited for guests? Adams: There will be exhibitions/ installations throughout the building by major Indian visual artists. They will be in the major halls including Hall of States, Hall of Nations plus in all public spaces on the Terrace level. We have even had an Indian architect to redesign the jazz club into what we are calling the Monsoon Club. He created a carpet in the ceiling using 1 million threads to create the effect of a monsoon frozen in time. Film and literature series will be presented in our theaters and there will be forums and various education programs to augment the actual screening of the film. Arts Blog: What can people learn about India that they did not know before, even people who have been lucky enough to visit? Adams: India is a country of 1.2 billion people with unimaginable beauty, humanity and diversity. We hope to have people come away from this festival with more knowledge about the country and the culture through participating in the wide range of arts that we are presenting. Source : The Washington Post

Continue reading …

Pulaski Day

No Comment

Casimir Pulaski Day 2011: Chicago, Cook County Businesses Closed Monday is Casimir Pulaski Day, which honors a man who is considered a war hero in both the United States and Poland. The Illinois General Assembly declared the first Monday in March to be Pulaski Day in 1977 to honor the Revolutionary War hero who reportedly saved General George Washington’s life in 1777. The holiday also seeks to honor the heritage of Polish-Americans–as Chicago has the largest Polish population outside of Warsaw. Chicago Public Schools are closed Monday, along with Chicago libraries and Cook County courts. Some suburban and Catholic schools remain open. Parking meters must be fed, banks and financial markets remain open, federal courts remain open and mail delivery continues. There is no garbage pickup in Chicago. The Sabina P. Logisz Great Hall of the Polish Museum of America is holding a Pulaski Day celebration at 10 a.m. which will feature speeches by Gov. Pat Quinn, Mayor Richard M. Daley and Polish American leaders. The event will also feature Polish entertainment, a scholarship presentation and a wreath-laying ceremony. A reception follows. The museum is located at 984 N. Milwaukee Ave. in Chicago. Related Searches : casimir pulaski day, casimir pulaski Cuortesy : The Huffington Post

Continue reading …

Schedule M

No Comment

Schedule M : The 2010 Tax Credit Explained [VIDEO] by Mary Phillips-Sandy “M” may stand for “money.” Part of the 2009 stimulus package was President Barack Obama’s Making Work Pay tax credit, or Schedule M, which adjusted federal withholding tables to increase take-home pay by up to $400 for working individuals and up to $800 for working married couples. As the New York Times reported last year, this caused confusion for taxpayers, many of whom didn’t know they had to complete a brand-new Schedule M IRS form in order to claim the credit on their returns. The situation got even messier for retirees who could claim the Making Work Pay credit, but only after deducting it from other federal tax credits. Guess what? You may need to deal with Schedule M again for the 2010 tax year. According to the IRS, the Making Work Pay credit and adjusted withholding tables remained in effect in 2010. The refundable credit was available for self-employed people, and was reduced for higher-income earners, starting at $75,000 for individuals and $150,000 for couples filing jointly. In order to claim the credit, anyone who files a form 1040 or 1040A needs to complete and file a Schedule M form to calculate how the credit impacted their paychecks and tax liability. (A simplified worksheet is built in to the 1040EZ.) One more twist, since life with the U.S. tax code is never simple: The 2009 stimulus included a $250 tax cut for retirees, which had to be accounted for via Schedule M. That was a one-time-only deal, so it’s not an issue for 2010. Here’s an IRS insider explaining how the Making Work Pay credit, well, works: Recovery: Making Work Pay – 2010 Courtesy : AOL News

Continue reading …
Depp’s ‘Rango’ Corrals Top Spot at Box Office

The animated film ‘Rango,’ featuring the voice of Johnny Depp, lassoes the top spot at the weekend box office. (March 7)

Continue reading …
Raw Video: Skiing on Watermelons

Watermelon skiing isn’t for the faint hearted, nor is it for those with feeble bones. But that’s not stopping folks in Queensland, Australia from giving it a whirl. (March 7)

Continue reading …
Mike Huckabee morphs into Dan Quayle and then tries to downplay his critiques of Natalie Portman

Click here to view this media Mike Huckabee smiles like a nice guy and looks like a nice guy, but when it comes to his views on being a single mother, he’s not such a nice guy. You’ve probably heard about his remarks concerning Natalie Portman having a baby, but Heavens to Betsy, she’s not married… During her speech, Portman thanked “Black Swan” co-star turned fiance Benjamin Millepied for “the most wonderful gift,” — their baby, due later this year . Huckabee took issue with that statement, and the entire premise of her pregnancy, in an interview with conservative radio host Michael Medved on Monday. After a set up from Medved saying that most wonderful gift should have been “a wedding ring,” Huckabee slammed the star actress — and then all single mothers. You know Michael, one of the things that’s troubling is that people see a Natalie Portman or some other Hollywood starlet who boasts of, ‘Hey look, you know, we’re having children, we’re not married, but we’re having these children, and they’re doing just fine.’ But there aren’t really a lot of single moms out there who are making millions of dollars every year for being in a movie. And I think it gives a distorted image that yes, not everybody hires nannies, and caretakers, and nurses. Most single moms are very poor, uneducated, can’t get a job, and if it weren’t for government assistance, their kids would be starving to death and never have health care. And that’s the story that we’re not seeing, and it’s unfortunate that we glorify and glamorize the idea of out of children wedlock. You know, right now, 75 percent of black kids in this country are born out of wedlock. 61 percent of Hispanic kids — across the board, 41 percent of all live births in America are out of wedlock births. And the cost of that is simply staggering. He failed to mention that Natalie has a fiance, but forget the facts, Huckabee needed a platform to become the new Dan Quayle and trot out his insipid Murphy Brown argument all over again so he could attacks single mothers everywhere. That didn’t work out too well for Qualye, who was being groomed by Bill Kristol to become a “Ken Doll” matinee idol for Conservatives. Huckabee released a statement that was pretty much the same thing he said on Huckabee’s weekend FOX show. Natalie is an extraordinary actor, very deserving of her recent Oscar and I am glad she will marry her baby’s father,” Huckabee said. “My comments were about the statistical reality that most single moms are very poor, under-educated, can’t get a job, and if it weren’t for government assistance, their kids would be starving to death. That’s the story that we’re not seeing, and it’s unfortunate that society often glorifies and glamorizes the idea of having children out of wedlock.” So after being called out on it, he tried to downplay what he said, heaped lavish praise all over Natalie, but said he was only talking about the problems single mothers face. Back to reality, how does Portman’s acceptance speech glorify and glamorize having children out of wedlock? It’s ludicrous and anyone that could draw that analogy is seriously delusional. The assault on women continues with great fury by conservatives since the Tea Party got popular, and it’s a f**ked up thing to be doing.”The family,” which Huckabee says is the true form of government, is being tarnished because of Natalie Portman? In other words, he took the cowardly way out. He must have been truly offended by Portman being pregnant and not married so he should have backed up what he said. We all make mistakes, but being as public a figure as he is, this was calculated. He apologized for his “Obama is from Kenya” crap earlier last week: On Monday, the ex-governor mistakenly suggested in an interview that President Obama had grown up in Kenya. Huckabee later insisted he had simply misspoke, saying Kenya when he had meant Indonesia, and he slammed the media for the “sensationalized” way reporters covered his remarks. Notice the victim-apology. In the end, he’s really the victim because the media reported what he said which is a typical ploy. David Neiwert busted him on that twisted crap too last week. Click here to view this media Huckabee just digs that hole in Kenya deeper. Why not just admit he got his misinformation from Fox? Of course, it didn’t exactly help his cause that he blatantly lied on O’Reilly’s show, claiming he had described Obama’s Indonesian childhood in his book — which has no mention of it at all! Why are these supposed Christian Conservatives so frakkin’ nasty? Why do they need all these lies to make their arguments?

Continue reading …

The great battles of this turbulent era will keep going on for years to come. The ideologues who want no check whatsoever on the power of big business have declared war on the middle class, and want no one to get in their way. Governors like Scott Walker and John Kasich will brook no compromise in trying to destroy unions. Right-wing politicians who have long wanted to do away with Social Security and Medicare and pretty much all safety nets for the poor are getting more and more brazen: Speaker Boehner made clear last week his plans to go after Social Security and Medicare sooner rather than later. And it is not just economics: the extremists are coming after not just a woman’s right to choose, but even birth control itself with their attempts to shut down family planning funding. The good news is that, as I wrote in The Washington Post this weekend, these attacks on the things we hold dear are putting the “movement” back in the labor movement (and the women’s movement, and the progressive movement). We are going to march and demonstrate, we are going to recall Wisconsin legislators and, once a year has passed, the Governor. We will win a citizen’s veto ballot initiative fight in Ohio. And we will take on the ultimate patrons of conservative politicians, the billionaire extremists like the Koch brothers and the Wall Street bankers who are providing the money and pulling the strings for this attack on the middle class. Getting less attention than the open warfare in Wisconsin and other states, one of the most important fronts in the fight for a better economy and a stronger, rather than decimated, middle class is to keep challenging the banks. This past weekend, National People’s Action has been in D.C. taking on Wall Street because the big banks’ corrupt and broken business model is at the heart of what has brought our economy to its knees, and until it gets fixed, the economy won’t be fixed either. You would think these bankers — whose fraud and speculation inflated the housing bubble and then crashed our economy, who came to the American taxpayers for a bailout when they got themselves in trouble and then arrogantly rewarded themselves record bonuses while attacking any kind of regulatory reform — would at least pretend to be a little humble right now. Absolutely not. Wall Street billionaires like Pete Peterson are braying about the need for senior citizens to tighten their belts because the $14,000 the average retiree gets from Social Security is just a little too extravagant. Wall Street money is backing Republican efforts to slash Head Start and education funds, and to break the unions in Wisconsin, Ohio, and other states. These are the guys who broke the economy, but they don’t want anyone to think about that, so they are pumping money into blaming teachers, cops, and firefighters for the fiscal problems of the states and federal government. Meanwhile, when someone does try to regulate the Wall Street guys just a little, the big bank lobby loses it entirely, whines to high heaven, and begins spending money all over the place. Elizabeth Warren is under daily attack by the bankers in her very reasonable, thoughtful efforts to look out for consumers on financial issues, and the Wall Street boys’ mouthpiece in the Senate, Dick Shelby, is threatening a holy war with the White House if she is nominated to run the agency. Whether the White House caves to Shelby and Wall Street’s pressure will be one of the biggest signals going forward of how strong they will be in terms of taking on the big banks. The big bank lobby also is gearing up a massively funded campaign on the swipe-fee issue, and this to me is a very telling story of just how much power Wall Street has in Washington, D.C. I got involved in this issue during the financial reform fight when Dick Durbin introduced an amendment to have the Federal Reserve regulate this previously completely unregulated economic bonanza for the big banks. They make $45 billion a year almost purely in profit, using their dominance to charge whatever they want to restaurant owners, hardware stores, cab drivers, non-profit groups, and every other business that takes credit and debit cards. I got involved because a little bit of regulation had the potential to save a lot of struggling small businesspeople a ton of money, with savings hopefully partially passed onto consumers. I figured moving money from the profits of big banks to the Main Street economy was a good thing to do, so I started working on the issue with retailers and other businesspeople, as well as consumer groups like U.S. PIRG. This coalition ended up getting 63 votes for Durbin’s Senate amendment, and we kept good compromise language in the final financial reform conference committee bill. I was worried that the Fed — whose regulators are notoriously close to the banking industry — would try to gut the regulations, but they came out with a reasonable and fair proposal. Because the proposal was fair, though, the Wall Street lobby went right through the roof — and got the money flowing. I talked to one retail lobbyist the other day who said he recently went to a fundraiser for a Republican House member. There were 42 banking lobbyists there with money for the Congressman, and most of the conversation was about the swipe-fee regulation. The banks are spending massively on internet advertising, on direct lobbying, on PR related to the issue. And their effort is having an effect. At a congressional hearing on the issue the other day, most of the members attending appeared to have their questions and talking points fed directly to them by the bankers. Here’s the most striking thing, though: the retailers and other business groups working on this issue are not exactly chopped liver. The resistance is not coming just from populists like me and a couple of consumer groups against the big banks — some of the businesses on our side are huge ones like Walmart and Home Depot. But Wall Street is the master of the Washington universe, and when they say jump, politicians tend to do it. Even a populist like Senator Jon Tester from Montana, who you’d think would love to be fighting against Wall Street bankers on behalf of small Montana businesses, is said to be getting ready to drop a bill on the banks’ behalf. There is growing talk that the Republicans want to take up financial reform again on the swipe fee and derivatives issues, and if that happens — Katy bar the door — the whole financial reform bill could unravel. Wall Street bankers, billionaire oilmen like the Koch brothers, and other big business special interests that are funding the Republican assault on labor and the middle class, have way too much power already. They commit financial fraud, wreck the economy, violate pollution standards, and gouge other businesses, and it never seems to matter. If labor is crushed, if middle class incomes are driven down, if even basic regulations are overturned, this country will be in a world of hurt. Let’s put the movement back in our movement, and fight these bankers and moneymen who act like every day is a holiday made just for them.

Continue reading …
113 arrested in Hong Kong protest

Hong Kong police arrested 113 protesters after an anti-budget demonstration late yesterday, as the government came under increasing pressure from activists who criticised authorities for not doing enough to help the poor. The protesters took to the streets despite a revised government plan last week to grant HK$6,000…

Continue reading …
CBS’s Erica Hill Wonders if Americans Are Being ‘Scammed’ by Oil Companies

In an interview with former Clinton Labor Secretary Robert Reich on Monday's CBS Early Show, co-host Erica Hill wondered if higher gas prices in the wake of Mideast unrest were the result of some sort of fraud: “We've seen prices skyrocket….Is the public right to feel taken advantage of in some ways here, or even scammed?” Even the liberal Reich didn't accept the premise: “Well look, a lot of this is supply and demand. The country can feel a certain sense of taken advantage of. But some of this is the demand that's coming from China. I mean, you have developing nations all over the world….And their oil needs are very high. And so they are also putting pressure on oil prices. It's not just the Middle East.” Hill's suggestion of some price-increasing conspiracy by oil companies mirrored NBC reporter Tom Costello, on Friday's Today , alluding to the Watergate scandal as he spoke of Americans being “increasingly suspicious of the oil companies.” Hill never identified Reich as liberal or even informed viewers that he served in Bill Clinton's administration. She simply introduced him as an “economist and former U.S. Labor Secretary” and promoted his latest book: “…also the author of 'Aftershock: The Next Economy and America's Future.'” At the top of the show, fellow co-host Chris Wragge touted Reich as “one of the nation's leading economists.” Earlier in the interview, Reich warned of the damaging effect higher gas prices could have on the economy: “Americans are still trying to get out of the gravitational pull of the great recession….And so, the higher gas prices at the pump undoubtedly are going to be a blow. It's not going to dramatically slow down the recovery. But it could definitely slow it down.” On Sunday's Face the Nation , New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman actually called for taxes to keep gas at $4 per gallon indefinitely, even while acknowledging the economic damage it could do. Here is a full transcript of Hill's March 7 interview with Reich: ERICA HILL: Joining us this morning from Berkeley, California, is economist and former U.S. Labor Secretary Robert Reich, who is also the author of 'Aftershock: The Next Economy and America's Future.' Good to have you with us this morning. As we just heard from [business and economics correspondent] Rebecca [Jarvis]- ROBERT REICH: Good morning, Erica. HILL: Good morning – she laid out that picture pretty well for us. The President can, of course, tap into these reserves. But if there is enough supply, as she pointed out, from an economic perspective, does it make sense to do this? REICH: It probably makes sense to do it, or at least to suggest that he will do it to effect the price of oil futures. But I'll tell you, Americans are still trying to get out of the gravitational pull of the great recession, Erica. And so, the higher gas prices at the pump undoubtedly are going to be a blow. It's not going to dramatically slow down the recovery. But it could definitely slow it down. HILL: And that perception may help a little bit. Libya, as we've talked about a number of times on this program, is the 18th largest oil producer. 18th. But we've seen prices skyrocket, as we just heard from Rebecca. Is the public right to feel taken advantage of in some ways here, or even scammed? REICH: Well look, a lot of this is supply and demand. The country can feel a certain sense of taken advantage of. But some of this is the demand that's coming from China. I mean, you have developing nations all over the world who are coming out of the recession much faster than the United States and Europe. And their oil needs are very high. And so they are also putting pressure on oil prices. It's not just the Middle East. HILL: Let's turn now and look at this latest jobs report. On Friday the Labor Department reporting that 192,000 jobs were added. Unemployment dipped to 8.9%. This had a very positive response it seemed. But you are a little bit more measured when you look at this and to you the headline here is not necessarily the jobs but the wages. Talk to us a little bit about that. [ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Employment Outlook; Reich: Mixed Messages From Job Numbers] REICH: Well, 192,000 new jobs is very good. Let's not, you know, let's not say that this is a bad trend. This is a good trend. One of the problems, however, is that the new jobs we're creating, if you look at the 1.2 million new jobs created over the last year, those jobs, in general, are paying less than the 8 million jobs we've lost between 2008 and 2009, and the beginning of 2010. And so the long-term trend is troubling. The long-term trend, Erica, is lower and lower wages and benefits. I mean you see it, a lot of people have had to give wage concessions to their employers, or provide give-backs, or say, 'Okay, we'll take a higher co-payments, deductibles on our health insurance. We don't want to, you know, we won't take quite as much pension. Or you don't have to contribute quite as much pension. Or we will be fired and we'll go on as a contract worker, and we'll do pretty much what we were doing before, but we won't have any of the benefits we had before.' And this is the story that's going on much around America, and has been going on for years now. But, the great recession accelerated it. HILL: And the concern there, of course, is that it's really hard to come back from that. Appreciate your insight this morning. Thanks for being with us. REICH: Thanks, Erica. — Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. You can follow him on Twitter here.

Continue reading …