Decision will infuriate Tory rightwingers unhappy at what they believe is Strasbourg judges’ interference in UK rights Conservative hopes of pulling out of the European convention on human rights in response to its perceived interference in issues such as UK prisoners’ votes have been dashed by Liberal Democrat objections. Nick Clegg has won a battle to prevent the inclusion of total withdrawal from the convention in the terms of reference of an expected seven-strong commission of inquiry in UK human rights law. The decision will infuriate Tory rightwingers angered at the way in which they believe the Strasbourg judges have interfered with UK rights. Some Tory backbenchers have argued that withdrawal is not as complex as some human rights lawyers claim. The commission, due to be announced shortly, will discuss reform of the court’s procedures, and the possibility of a British bill of rights acting as a supplement, but not as a replacement for the European convention. It would also look at a bill’s relationship with the Human Rights Act that incorporates the European convention into British law. It has also been agreed that the commission will also report to Kenneth Clarke, the justice secretary, and to Clegg, who is the man charged with responsibility for constitutional affairs. The two men are probably the politicians in cabinet most sympathetic to the convention’s aims, even if both are open to reform. The decision effectively leaves prime minister David Cameron with the option of preparing his own party’s proposals for the 2015 general election manifesto. Clegg won his battle largely because the coalition agreement, negotiated in haste in the immediate aftermath of the general election, makes it clear that the coalition should not seek to withdraw from the convention. It states: “We will establish a commission to investigate the creation of a British Bill of Rights that incorporates and builds on all our obligations under the European convention on human rights, ensures that these rights continue to be enshrined in British law, and protects and extends British liberties.” The passage was negotiated between Cameron and Clegg right at the end of the coalition talks by the time Cameron was actually installed in Downing Street. This angered some Tories who feel the prime minister needlessly sold the pass on the issue when he was already in a strong negotiating position. But a year ago Tory backbench distaste for the convention’s interference had not reached its current intensity, largely due to the court’s decisions to require Britain to give prisoners the vote, a decision that Cameron said made him feel sick. Britain is appealing against the decision in the wake of the large Commons vote against the proposal. There are senior Liberal Democrat lawyers such as Lord Carlile who are critical of the delays in the court, and the quality of some of its judges. Among those expected to sit on the committee are the Liberal Democrat Lord Lester, the Labour peer Baroness Kennedy and the eurosceptic barrister Martin Howe. Clarke has said he favours reform of the court, set up by the Council of Europe after the second world war. But there is disagreement on how easy it will be to negotiate its reforms. Lord Woolf, Britain’s most senior judge between 2000 and 2005 said: “We have got a stark option: either we accept the European convention, or we don’t accept it and decide to leave the Council of Europe. “It’s very difficult to do what Mr Clarke indicated he would like to do when he’s chairman of the relative body, because there are 47 signatories in Europe which are signatories to the European convention as well as ourselves”. Human rights Human Rights Act Council of Europe Nick Clegg David Cameron Conservatives Liberal Democrats Kenneth Clarke Patrick Wintour guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Move which sees soldiers called in to protect strategic sites likely to inflame tensions between rulers and Shia majority Saudi Arabian troops have crossed into Bahrain after the tiny Gulf state’s rulers asked for help from neighbouring Sunni Arab states to quell a two-month uprising that threatens their 200-year-old political dynasty. Riyadh said it had responded to a “security threat” by deploying its military in the streets of its tiny near-neighbour. The Saudi troops have been asked to protect strategic sites, such as bridges and government buildings. Bahrain’s rulers said the Saudi forces had crossed the 16-mile causeway linking Saudi Arabia with the Arab world’s smallest state as part of a contingent of troops from the Gulf Co-operation Council. Saudi authorities did not give details on the size of the force, which some reports estimate to be about 1,000-strong. The move is likely to inflame tensions between the regime and Bahrain’s Shia majority, which has laid siege to central Manama since mid-February and has, in recent days, marched on key government buildings and palaces. As news of the Saudi intervention spread throughout Manama, the landmark Pearl roundabout in the centre of the capital – which has become a focal point for the protests – and a nearby overpass saw tens of thousands of demonstrators, many of whom were bracing for fresh confrontations with troops. More worrying for many observers than the spectre of new clashes is an escalation in the standoff between the Gulf states and Iran, which has strongly backed Bahrain’s Shia majority and has long been at odds with its Gulf neighbours, especially Saudi Arabia. Iran’s foreign minister, Ali Akbar, reacted immediately to the deployment, urging Bahrain’s leaders to use discipline and wisdom in defusing the steadily deteriorating security situation. Meanwhile, Bahrain’s main opposition bloc, the al-Wefaq party, described the Saudi-led intervention as a ‘declaration of war’. An opposition alliance urged United Nations intervention. “We consider the entry of any soldier or military machinery into the Kingdom of Bahrain’s air, sea or land territories a blatant occupation,” al-Wefaq said. “This real threat about the entry of Saudi and other Gulf forces into Bahrain to confront the defenceless Bahraini people puts the Bahraini people in real danger, and threatens them with an undeclared war by armed troops.” The White House said it did not consider the entry into Bahrain of Saudi Arabian security forces an invasion. “This is not an invasion of a country,” White House spokesman Jay Carney said. “We urge the government of Bahrain, as we have repeatedly, as well as other GCC countries [Oman, Qatar, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates], to exercise restraint,” Carney added. The past month has seen diplomatic relations between Washington and Bahrain’s rulers sorely tested. US officials had initially backed the demonstrators’ demands for widespread political reforms and the instalment of a constitutional monarchy, which stripped power from the regime. Their support was partly based on a shift in US Middle East policy to favouring democracy over stability, rather than the other way around — which had been stated US policy for more than 60 years. However, frenetic shuttle diplomacy between Manama and Washington, as well as urgent appeals from the Gulf states, including Saudi Arabia, has since led the US to retreat to the sidelines in the dispute. Bahraini officials earlier this month told their US counterparts that the protests could gain unstoppable momentum if they continued to be sanctioned by the US, a development that would imperil US interests. The US has long viewed Bahrain as one of its most important strategic allies in the Middle East. It bases its Fifth Fleet near Manama, and sees the kingdom as a buffer amid tensions between the US and Iran. Bahrain’s crown prince, Sheikh Salman al-Khalifa, late last month announced a dialogue with opposition parties aimed at giving the disenchanted Shia majority a greater role in the affairs of state. The talks, however, appear to have stalled, with opposition groups at odds over key demands. Some opposition members are insisting on the overthrowing of the monarchy, while al-Wefaq has limited its calls to making Bahrain more accountable by law. Shias account for around 70% of Bahrain’s population, but are not allowed to serve in large parts of the country’s establishment, like the military and the police. The regime has long-believed that its Shia population is susceptible to Iranian influence. Bahrain’s security forces are comprised almost exclusively of Sunni Arabs, many of whom have been invited from neighbouring Sunni states and given Bahraini citizenship. A common refrain among the country’s Shia groups is that the security forces safeguard the regime, but not the people. As central Manama once again seethed, troops and riot police were nowhere to be seen. Clashes in February left seven demonstrators dead. Dozens more were wounded, mainly with tear gas and rubber bullets, although live rounds were fired by troops after demonstrators were ousted from Pearl roundabout during a pre-dawn assault on 16 February. The crown prince ordered that troops surrender the roundabout three days later as part of the regime’s calls for calm. Bahrain Saudi Arabia Protest US foreign policy Middle East Iran Obama administration United States Martin Chulov guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Aubrey O’Day, the former ‘Making the Band’ star, Danity Kane singer and Diddy protege, talks about her new Oxygen reality show, ‘All About Aubrey.’ (March 14)
Continue reading …Maybe if we get them to wear tea bags on their heads and show up in their Medicare funded Scooters the media will start to pay attention to them — or not. Wisconsin protests larger than any Tea Party rally : Police estimated that more than 100,000 people flooded the streets around the Wisconsin Capitol in Madison Saturday, making the turnout larger than any of the fledgling Tea Party’s rallies. The largest turnout for a Tea Party rally is the estimated crowd of 60,000 to 70,000 people who marked in Washington, D.C. during the group’s September 12, 2009 demonstration. The 2009 Tea Party rally’s crowd size is also notable for the controversy that surrounded it. ABC News published a piece claiming conservative activists had told them that 1 million to 1.5 million people turned out at the rally, when the corrected number was only a fraction of that size. According to ThinkProgress , the protests in Wisconsin have inspired demonstrations in seven other states, with some protesters even wearing “Cheesehead” hats as a nod to their Madison counterparts. Wisconsin Democrats have also vowed to make virtually every upcoming election a referendum on Gov. Walker’s anti-union administration, which they say has made Wisconsin akin to “a dictatorship.” More there so go read the rest. And as they noted at Raw Story, the above video is from ” YouTube user stumptownfilms put together a time-lapse video from footage of one day of protests in Madison last week that shows the impressive crowd sizes.” And as Steve Benen noted, It’s Not Jut Madison : The efforts of progressive activists in Wisconsin have generated considerable attention, and with good reason. But here’s hoping the activism won’t be limited to Madison. For example, you may not have heard about this gathering in Austin, Texas. Thousands of parents, teachers and other education advocates poured onto the Capitol grounds Saturday to rally against proposed state budget cuts that school districts say could force layoffs of thousands of teachers and other public education employees. Demonstrators sprawled across the statehouse grounds, carrying signs scrawled with “Save Our Schools” and “Fund the Future.” Others carried umbrellas to underscore their desire that lawmakers tap into the state’s rainy day fund to help balance the budget. “We hope that being here will make a difference,” said Nicollette Anthony, a 17-year-old from San Antonio. “But even if it doesn’t, they’ll know we tried.” Estimates of the crowd size vary, but I’ve seen some put the number at 12,000 people. (Organizers brought 11,000 stickers to hand out to those on hand, and ran out while folks were still showing up.) It’s a shame events like this don’t get more attention. A year ago at this time, a former half-term governor attended a Tea Party rally in Nevada, drew a crowd of 8,000 , and garnered national media attention, including live television coverage. But 12,000 people take a stand against deep education cuts, and it’s largely an afterthought outside the local media. Read on…
Continue reading …enlarge Ex-employee: ‘Tells me Boa is knowingly hiding Foreclosure information from Feds…’ It’s here. The first Anonymous leak from an ex-Bank of America employee has been released, so have at it. Here’s a sample: How is Balboa able to charge such inflated premiums and get away with it? It’s all very simple. First, when you call in to customer service, for say, GMAC, you’re not actually speaking to a GMAC employee. You’re actually speaking to a Bank of America associate working for Balboa Insurance who is required by their business to business contract with GMAC to state that they are, in fact, an employee of GMAC. The reasoning is that if you do not realize you’re speaking to a Bank of America/Balboa Insurance employee, you have no reason to question the validity of the information you are receiving from them. If you call your insurance agent and ask them for the lienholder information for your GMAC/Wells Fargo/etc lien (home or auto) you will be provided with their name, but the mailing address will be a PO Box at one of Balboa’s 3 main tracking locations (Moon Township/Coreaopolis, PA, Dallas/Ft Worth, TX, or Phoenix/Chandler, AZ) Anonymous also released this video (warning: turn down the volume), and has called for multiple days of national civil disobedience to shut down the Fed, March 28th and on:
Continue reading …Jay Kernis, senior producer of CNN's In the Arena program, promoted liberal writer David Sirota's thesis that ” the mythology of the 1980s still defines our thinking on everything from militarism, to greed, to race relations .” Sirota bashed 80s cultural touchstones such as The A Team and Ghostbusters for being ” hideously militaristic ” and the ” ugliness of [their] anti-government message .” Kernis interviewed the Huffington Post contributor about his new book, “Back to Our Future: How the 1980s Explain the World We Live in Now—Our Culture, Our Politics, Our Everything” in an item on his program's blog on CNN.com on Monday . The producer first asked about the writer's hypothesis that “the political and cultural references from the 1980s have not only become cool again, but may be a way to explain our present-day issues and conflicts, and even influencing our thinking today.” Sirota, who once attacked Glenn Beck as a ” right wing political terrorist ” and labeled opponents of President Obama ” a bunch of psychopaths ,” cited an apparent connection with the current Tea Party movement: Consider, for instance, the Tea Party – a revival of what the New York Times called “modern Boston Tea Party” revolts against taxes on the eve of the 1980s. Notably, today's iteration of this uprising regularly laces its rhetoric with revivalist paeans to the Eisenhower Era. Summarizing the sentiment, one Tea Partier said: “Things we had in the fifties were better.” This rhetoric has resonated because for many, it no longer stirs memories of the actual 1950s of Jim Crow laws, gender inequality and religious bigotry . Instead, it evokes the sanitized idea of “The Fifties” that was originally created in the 1980s through movies like Back to the Future, Stand By Me and Hoosiers, television shows like Happy Days and Laverne & Shirley , and rockabilly greaser bands like the Stray Cats. Same thing for the Tea Party's use of red-baiting language that suggests the individual is more important than the common good. Though the Cold War ended years ago and though Ayn Rand is long dead, the bromides elicit Red Dawn fears and Michael Jordan dreams from a generation that grew up being taught to see ourselves as both Soviet-oppressed Wolverines and the next superstars singularly soaring to MVP awards – as long as we will ourselves to just do it. One glaring weakness in his cultural examples is the fact that Happy Days and Laverne & Shirley are not 80s programs. They began in the mid-1970s and were past their prime when they ended their runs in the early 80s (the famous phrase “jump the shark” comes from a later-season Happy Days episode). Also, Sirota would have us believe that Tea Partiers regularly harken back to 50s (which, of course, he cast in the worst light possible) based on an extrapolation from his one anecdote. If the point was to demonize the 50s, then why hasn't he gone after the popular AMC program Mad Men? The Huffington Post writer then held up Michael J. Fox and his characters in Back to the Future and Family Ties as influences: “Those two characters perfectly represent exactly how the 1980s was revising and reimagining contemporary American history on ideological lines. Think about it: Marty McFly was a suburban teen fleeing the cartoonized dangers of modern life…into an idyllic Fifties of unity and safety . Alex P. Keaton, by contrast, spends his life lambasting his parents Sixties idealism .” However, as the MRC's recent report “Rewriting Reagan” pointed out, Family Ties actually worked in anti-Reagan jokes into the dialogue. In the process of singling out Fox, Sirota returned to his 50s talking point: This “Back to the Future”-versus-”Family Ties” war between the 1980s version of “The Fifties” (supposedly 100% unified, universally happy, optimistic, safe, etc.) and the 1980s version of “The Sixties” (supposedly 100% violent, chaotic, overly idealistic, etc.) defines our politics today. We are, for instance, supposed to forget that America in the actual 1950s was basically an apartheid state, and also had a 90% top tax bracket . Likewise, we are supposed to forget that the 1960s saw great progress on civil rights and that liberals in the 1960s ultimately helped end the Vietnam War .
Continue reading …Tablet apps from cable, fiber and satellite TV providers are suddenly a dime a dozen but despite promises of live TV streaming from several companies, the AP reports Time Warner Cable is finally ready to launch the feature first . The company’s official blog also teased the app in recent days but so far, iTunes isn’t giving any positive results. When it launches, it should enable TV watching, but only when used at home on Time Warner’s internet — you’ll need the TV and internet services to access the 30 or so channels initially available. While we keep an eye out for the app to actually arrive, you can get an idea of what it will be like by checking out the demo video from last year, embedded after the break. Continue reading Time Warner Cable’s iPad app will be the first with live TV streaming when it launches… any minute now Time Warner Cable’s iPad app will be the first with live TV streaming when it launches… any minute now originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:41:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …Agatha Christie is one of the world’s most famous mystery writers, but few people know of her life as an archaeologist. The novelist was married to successful archaeologist Max Mallowan, and spent two decades accompanying him to great digs around the world—settings that would often turn up in her…
Continue reading …New moms aren’t the only ones who may end up battling depression: Dads can face a similar problem, and those who do are more likely to spank their 1-year-olds, a study finds. Some 40% of depressed fathers reported spanking kids that age, while only 13% of dads who weren’t depressed…
Continue reading …CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News all lost viewers last year for the first time in at least 12 years, a study finds. A Pew journalism group found a combined 13.7% drop in viewership, the largest decline of any news sector, and all three networks fell for the first time…
Continue reading …