Click here to view this media Activists have identified the senior New York Police Department officer who allegedly pepper-sprayed young women at the “Occupy Wall Street” protests, and it’s not the first time he has been accused of civil rights abuses. The Guardian confirmed that the officer is Anthony Bologna, who was also accused of civil rights abuses and false arrest during the 2004 Republican National Convention in New York City. Photographs of the officer’s badge also suggested that Bologna was the person in question. A file released by the hacker group Anonymous pointed to a 2007 civil rights suit filed against Bologna. Post A. Posr, the man named as a plaintiff in that suit, was arrested during the 2004 convention although he wasn’t actively taking part in the protests. “Police contend that Posr hit the man with a rolled-up newspaper,” Posr lawyer Alan Levine told The Guardian . “He said he was just talking to the guy. Bologna ordered another officer, Camejo, to arrest Posr.” Posr was taken to a make-shift detention facility at Pier 57, where he was held until the protests were over. Officer Tulio Camejo was also named in the suit. “A bunch of us were wondering if any of the same guys were involved,” Levine recalled. Questions about Bologna appeared to go back to 2001, when the People’s Law Collective claimed that arrests he made helped to incite a Mayday riot. Chelsea Elliott, one of the pepper-sprayed activists, described her ordeal to Animal New York. “I will march again,” she said. “But I’ll wear sunglasses and a fucking bandana.”
Continue reading …While running through his usual litany of attacks on anti-Obama conservatives, MSNBC's Chris Matthews on Tuesday included the National Rifle Association as part of the “crazy far-right” who “hate” Barack Obama. Matthews began by wondering, “What is it about Obama that inspires this kind of weird, zealous hatred?” He later added, ” Well, here's something, another strain of the crazy, far- right .” After referencing birthers and other groups, the Hardball anchor played a clip of NRA President Wayne LaPierre deriding the President's stated support of the Second Amendment as a “big, fat lie.” Talking to Republican strategist Ron Christie, Matthews bizarrely responded to LaPierre's comments: ” Ron, this- the language, 'lie,' 'conspiracy,' it's almost like, I don't know, Lincoln talking about what was going on in the Civil War below the Mason-Dixon line. I mean, this is Civil War talk about a president of the United States .” Matthews' anger at the NRA for suggesting that Obama is no friend of the Second Amendment is odd. After all, Barack Obama has appointed two United States Supreme Court justices who have supported gun control. A partial transcript of the September 27 segment, which aired at 5:05pm EDT, follows: 5:01 tease CHRIS MATTHEWS: Mayor Brown, we're going to go through a long list of these crazy accusations against the President here in the beginning of the program tonight because they are unique. It's not just calling him the anti-Christ. There's people who go said he was born in some other country. We're going to get to accusations that just go across the board. What is it about Obama that inspires this kind of weird, zealous hatred? WILLIE BROWN: Well, I think you would have to start with the fact that he is unusual in that he is an African-American. That is an unusual thing for this country. We've been looking forward, as African-Americans, to this for a very long time, but we know that there is a residual amount of racism in this country. It's there. It's going to be there for a long time, and it expresses itself in many, many ways. … 5:01 MATTHEWS: Well, here's something, another strain of the crazy, far right. Here's the National Rifle Association's Wayne LaPierre, and I've known this guy a long time. I'm astounded by this new accusation that the President is leading some conspiracy. Anyway, here he is, Wayne LaPierre, head of the national- not National Public Radio- National Rifle Association, at the conservative conference if Florida last week. Let's listen to Wayne LaPierre of the National Rifle Association. WAYNE LAPIERRE: The President will offer the Second Amendment lip service and hit the campaign trail saying he's actually been good for the Second Amendment. But it's a big, fat, stinking lie. It's all part, it's all part of a massive Obama conspiracy to deceive voters and hide his true intentions to destroy the Second Amendment in our country. Before the President was even sworn into office, they met and they hatched a conspiracy of public deception to try to guarantee his re-election in 2012. MATTHEWS: You know, I got to tell you, again, Ron, this- the language, “lie,” “conspiracy,” it's almost like, I don't know, Lincoln talking about what was going on in the Civil War below the Mason-Dixon line. I mean, this is Civil War talk about a president of the United States.
Continue reading …Find out about implanted contact lenses that can help some people with severe nearsightedness, when LASIK isn’t an option.
Continue reading …Mindy Kaling may be a successful writer for The Office , but what she really wants to do is write a movie. A romantic comedy, in fact, because she loves to watch people falling in love. Sadly, “the genre has been so degraded in the past twenty years that saying you…
Continue reading …What’s scarier than being locked up in a Texas prison for 26 years? Returning to a world you no longer recognize. For Randall Lee Church, 96 days of being back in society was quite enough, so he sent himself right on back to jail. Overwhelmed by his new world, on July 10, Church set an
Continue reading …Hina Rabbani Khar calls for unity in combating terrorism in wake of US claims Islamabad is supporting Afghan insurgents Pakistan’s foreign minister, Hina Rabbani Khar, has robustly defended Islamabad’s record in fighting terrorism in the wake of US allegations that the Pakistani intelligence service is closely linked to Afghan extremists and has facilitated attacks on American forces. Khar made only passing references to the US in an address to the UN general assembly. But her calls for unity in fighting terrorism, and for there to be no recriminations, was prompted by deepening suspicion in Washington at what are seen as double dealings by the Pakistani intelligence service and military in Afghanistan, particularly since Osama bin Laden was found to be hiding in Pakistan. “Given the volatility of the situation, it is perhaps understandable that there is a high level of anxiety and emotion. But we must not lose sight of the goals,” said Khar. “We must work closely and as responsible partners together in a cooperative manner and not rush to judgements or question each others intentions.” There is deep scepticism in Washington that the Pakistani military and intelligence service did not know Bin Laden’s whereabouts for years while he lived in the Pakistani town of Abbottabad, where he was killed in an American raid in May. Last week, the chairman of the US joint chiefs of staff, Admiral Mike Mullen, told Congress that the Haqqani network, a Taliban faction responsible for numerous attacks on American and Nato targets in Afghanistan, is a “veritable arm” of Pakistan’s ISI intelligence service. He accused Pakistan of providing support for the group attack on the US embassy in Kabul two weeks ago that killed 16 Afghans, and for the bombing of a Nato post earlier this month that killed five people and wounded 77 coalition soldiers. “With ISI support, Haqqani operatives planned and conducted that truck bomb attack, as well as the assault on our embassy,” Mullen told the armed services committee. Khan defended the ISI’s record, saying it had been instrumental in the capture of members of the Taliban and al-Qaida, sometimes in co-operation with the CIA. Khan said Pakistan has paid a high price in blood fighting terrorism. “Thirty thousand innocent Pakistanis have been killed: men, women and children. The ever-ready Pakistani armed forces have defended Pakistan and the rest of the world at the highest cost,” she said. “Numerous politicians have lost sons, brothers and fathers at the hands of terrorists. Our streets are filled with armed police. Terrorists have attacked our military installations, attacked the grave sites of our spiritual leaders, attacked our minorities and attacked the very idea of Pakistan. If I began recounting Pakistan’s sacrifices and Pakistan’s suffering I would keep you here until next September. “We do not take terrorism lightly. We cannot afford to take terrorism lightly. We have suffered far too much at its hands.” Khan said that Pakistan has an “irrevocable commitment to fighting terror” and will not permit its territory to be used by “militants and terrorists”. “We must demonstrate complete unity in ranks, avoid any recrimination, build greater trust,” she said. “Otherwise, I’m afraid, the terrorists are the only ones who are going to win.” Pakistan United States Afghanistan US foreign policy Global terrorism Chris McGreal guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Prosecution and defence lay out opening statements on first day of Conrad Murray manslaughter trial in Los Angeles More than two years after Michael Jackson’s death from an overdose of a powerful surgical anaesthetic, the irrepressible circus surrounding the King of Pop was back in full swing as the personal physician who attended to him in his dying hours stood trial for involuntary manslaughter. Fans with gold “MJ” armbands and T-shirts bearing the silkscreen likeness of their idol crammed the courthouse in downtown Los Angeles for a glimpse of courtroom entourage and a shot at one of the few open seats in the public gallery. Bloggers, gossip columnists and news crews were also out in force, just as they were at Jackson’s child molestation trial in 2005 and at the rehearsals for the ill-fated final tour – hauntingly named This Is It – that never took place in 2009. Inside Judge Michael Pastor’s courtroom, lawyers for the prosecution and the defence laid out their opening statements – one asserting that Conrad Murray was single-handedly responsible for Jackson’s death and the other placing the blame squarely on Jackson himself. In attendance were Jackson’s parents, Joe and Katherine, and his magician, Majestic Magnificent. The mood, however, was appropriately sombre. David Walgren, representing the district attorney’s office, offered a brisk narrative using a video monitor with still photographs, charts, extracts from voicemail and other recordings. “The acts and omissions of Michael Jackson’s personal doctor, Conrad Murray, directly led to his premature death at the age of 50,” Walgren said. “He … repeatedly acted with gross negligence, repeaedly denied appropriate care to his patient … it was Dr Murray’s repeated incompetent and unskilled acts that led to Michael Jackon’s death.” Grim photos of Jackson lying dead in a hospital bed were juxtaposed with a picture of the singer rehearsing the day before his death. Walgren offered evidence showing that Murray ordered a staggering 15.5 litres of the surgical anaesthetic propofol in the last two and half months of the singer’s life. Walgren alleged that Murray relied on the drug – which Jackson referred to as his “milk” – to get the singer to sleep every night, even though it has no known application as a sleeping aid, and routinely administered it without monitoring equipment to check Jackson’s response. The prosecutor described how Murray realised he had lost his patient – apparently while he was on the phone to a cocktail waitress he regarded as his girlfriend – on the morning of 25 June 2009. This was just moments after he emailed an insurance agent for Jackson’s upcoming tour and said that press reports of health problems were entirely “fallacious”. Walgren said Murray did not ask his girlfriend, Sade Anding, to call the emergency services. Nor did he ask Jackson’s personal assistant, Michael Williams, when they spoke about 20 minutes later. Instead, according to the prosecutor, Murray said “Mr Jackson had a bad reaction” and urged Williams to come over to the star’s plush hillside mansion right away. When the paramedics who eventually arrived asked Murray what he had given Jackson, he made no mention of propofol. Nor did he mention it to the emergency room team at UCLA Medical Center where Jackson was pronounced dead shortly after. Only two days after Jackson’s death, according to Walgren, did he acknowledge to the police that he had administered the drug – and then said he had injected just 25 mg, diluted with another drug called lidocaine. “The evidence will reveal that much more than 25mg was given to put Michael Jackson to sleep,” Walgren told the jury. Murray himself, crisply dressed in a pale shirt and blue tie, showed no reaction as Walgren painted him as a man willing to abandon his medical responsibilities to earn a lucrative $150,000 per month paycheck. He was equally impassive as Walgren described his activities in the minutes after realising Jackson was dead. The prosecutor characterised him as a man frantic not to be caught. Walgren described how Alberto Alvarez, who also worked for Jackson, came into the upstairs bedroom where Jackson’s lifeless body was laid out on the all-white bed covers and saw Murray administering CPR with one hand. Murray, according to Alvarez’s testimony, told him to grab a bag and started filling it with medicine vials and a saline bag which he told Alvarez to get rid of. Alvarez was also struck by the sight of a catheter running out of Jackson’s penis – a urine-collecting device usually used on patients knocked unconscious for major surgery. A jug of urine sat on a chair, and the jacket and trousers Jackson had worn to a rehearsal the night before lay strewn on the floor. For the defence, Ed Chernoff – from Murray’s home of Houston, Texas – took issue with almost every assertion from Walgren. He alleged that, just before he died, Jackson swallowed eight bottles of a drug called lorazepam, enough to knock out six adults. Chernoff also asserted that Jackson gave himself a dose of propofol on top of that, while Murray was out of the room, creating a “perfect storm in his body that killed him instantly”. “There was no CPR, no doctor, no paramedic, no machine that was going to revive Michael Jackson,” Chernoff said. “He died so rapidly, so instantly, he didn’t have time to close his eyes.” In contrast to the prosecution’s presentation, with its reliance on documents and charts, Chernoff appeared to be in the realm of plausible scenarios rather than verifiable fact. He offered just one low-tech card on an easel, with two questions written on it: “How did Michael Jackson get to the point?” and “What happened when Dr Murray was out of the room?” Unfortunately for him, the “Michael” in Michael Jackson was spelled wrong. United States Michael Jackson Michael Jackson trial Andrew Gumbel guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Austin Butler : Vanessa Hudgens House Visit! LIL KIM – WINTERBEATZ Perth 2011 – dancing to Michael Jackson July Favourites! greatresumeguru says: The Bling Ring – Chris Christie – Patti Stranger ( The things you think are precious)I … http://t.co/i0EbcB8o /via @ wordpressdotcom
Continue reading …Rachel Maddow should never be put in charge of crowd control. Not until she learns to count. Maddow is clearly flummoxed by what actually constitutes a crowd, as can be seen in her commentary on audiences at Republican presidential debates. (video after page break) On her show Friday, for example, Maddow gamely tried to make the case that audience reactions at GOP debates have been unintentionally damning, starting with the response that followed Chris Wallace of Fox News putting a question to Ron Paul about drug legalization — WALLACE: You say marijuana, cocaine, even heroin should be legal if states want to permit it. PAUL: What you're inferring (sic) is, you know what, if we legalize heroin tomorrow, everybody's going to use heroin. How many people here would use heroin if it were legal? I put nobody would put the, oh yeah (sarcastically) I need the government to take care of me! I don't want to use heroin so I need these laws … (enthusiastic applause and cheering from audience) WALLACE:
Continue reading …Massachusetts put a stop to most lifetime alimony payments yesterday, in what some are telling the Boston Globe are “the most dramatic change to family law in decades.” The measure, which ends most support either when the alimony recipient moves in with another romantic partner or when the payor hits…
Continue reading …