Home » Archives by category » News (Page 6830)

A Madison district attorney has filed a lawsuit against Wisconsin’s Republican lawmakers, saying they violated the state’s open meetings law in their backdoor maneuver to pass a bill stripping public unions of most of their collective bargaining rights. The prosecutor, Democrat Ismael Ozanne, wants a judge to issue an emergency…

Continue reading …
Blood, gore, and silly wigs

The CBBC TV version of Horrible Histories has won yet another award. Now the kids’ show, which has become cult daytime viewing, is moving to a primetime slot The feedback from the BBC was unambiguous: “We really like it, but we feel the poo quotient needs to be higher.” Terry Deary , creator of the wildly successful Horrible Histories children’s publishing franchise, is recalling the two-year journey to bring his books to the screen. “At one time, it was going to be based on a ghost train at a deserted fairground carrying two children into the past. But the BBC, to its credit, was very adventurous and said that it wanted a comedy sketch-based format written by adult sketch-show writers.” It was the right call. Since Horrible Histories first aired in 2009 on CBBC , the BBC’s digital channel aimed at six- to 12-years-olds, it has been a huge hit with viewers and has won a slew of awards, including a Royal Television Society award for best children’s programme earlier this week . But it isn’t just children who have found themselves drawn to the show’s Pythonesque sketches, which skip jauntily through the books’ trademark themes such as the Rotten Romans and Groovy Greeks up to the Terrible Tudors and Vile Victorians. By the time the second series aired last summer, the programme had attracted a loyal audience of grown-ups, too; parents watching with their children at first, but soon followed by students and pensioners as it quickly developed into cult daytime viewing. Some of the most popular sketches and songs from the show have attracted more than half a million hits each on YouTube. But perhaps the show’s break-out moment came in January when it won best sketch at the Comedy Awards, the first children’s programme ever to do so. The crossover into a mainstream audience will be completed later this year when BBC1 airs a repackaged version of the show in primetime, fronted by Stephen Fry instead of the current host, a talking rat called Rattus Rattus . There are even ongoing discussions to create a stage show featuring all the actors, which would tour arenas in the autumn. And there are murmurs of a movie. “Children’s TV is, on the whole, appalling. Just shocking,” says Deary, whose books have sold 20m copies globally since the first one was published in 1993. “It’s all shouty, patronising voices. But what I love about the Horrible Histories show is that it’s not a literal translation of the books. I’ve written the odd song for the show and I make the odd cameo appearance, but I’m not a sketch writer. It’s best left to the likes of the excellent Steve Punt. Incorrectly, I get lots of credit for the TV show, but it’s the team behind it who are the massive talent.” Once the decision was taken by the BBC to use writers and actors from adult comedy shows, production company Lion Television corralled the best talent it could find. Writers such as Punt, Jon Holmes (Dead Ringers) and Giles Pilbrow (Have I Got News For You) wrote sketches for the first series, which featured comedy actors such as Meera Syal, Jim Howick (Peep Show), Simon Farnaby (The Mighty Boosh), Mathew Baynton (Gavin and Stacey) and Ben Ward (Dead Ringers). Dominic Brigstocke, the director of Green Wing and The Armstrong & Miller Show, also played a key role from the start. But by the second series, David Baddiel, Alexei Sayle and Dave Lamb (Come Dine With Me) were also making appearances. With the editing team behind The Office, Extras, and Outnumbered overseeing post-production, the show quickly stood out by some distance from its rivals on children’s TV. “The team is excellent,” says Deary. “The show’s actors were all targeted. They didn’t rely on auditioning unknowns. Yes, there is some ad-libbing at times, but it is rare because the actors are also involved in the writing. We sit around a table for about eight weeks with the director and a historical adviser and we read the books in a circle. Then someone might say, ‘That might work as a gameshow’ and they go off and write the sketch.” As a result, viewers have been treated to an Eminem-inspired pastiche about Charles II , a Victorian Dragons’ Den, “Spartan School Musical” and a Jackson 5-style explainer on hieroglyphics . The show’s unique comedy pedigree among children’s programming has long been acknowledged by those in the business. Jesse Armstrong, co-writer of the Bafta-winning Peep Show and Oscar-nominated In the Loop, admits the show has been his afternoon vice ever since it first aired. “Hit shows are very difficult to achieve. You need to have everything just right – that’s what’s so terrifying. But Horrible Histories has a great cast and brilliant writers. They’re also blessed with great source material. The tone is perfect and it is done in a non-patronising, engaging way. The key for me, though, is that the team has been given leeway to do the subjects that really interest kids – death, shit, blood and piss.” Armstrong says that it ranks alongside Pingu as his favourite children’s show: “You can just tell the creators of both shows have put more of themselves into them than is normal. I used to write for children’s TV [Tracy Beaker]; it’s certainly not easier than writing for adults. You have fewer tools at your disposal because you can’t draw on sexual content or obscenities. Kids are as discerning as adults, if anything they are quicker and clearer in knowing what they like. My daughter, who says Horrible Histories is her favourite programme, gets that the tone is sophisticated and that it takes children seriously. It doesn’t talk down to them. Just watch the Four Georges . It’s my favourite sketch – wonderfully written and beautifully performed. The programme could go on for years because the material is limitless.” The Four Georges sketch featured in the first series but is still among the most popular of the show’s trademark pastiche songs. Mocking the modern-day trend of boy bands perched on high stools sitting in a line, we see the four Georgian kings singing Born to Rule Over You under moody spotlights – “You had to do what we told you to do, just because our blood was blue” – before standing up in unison on the key change. Another much-loved repeat sketch is Stupid Deaths, which sees a comical grim reaper processing recently departed historical characters at the “Death Check-In” counter and then laughing mercilessly at the farcical manner in which they died. For example, King Edmund II, who was stabbed by a Viking hiding in his pit latrine, receives little sympathy from the reaper. No one seems to question that the show is entertaining, but is it good history? Dan Snow, the TV historian, says it doesn’t need to be both and we should celebrate it for what it is: “It’s wonderfully exciting to watch. It has such a great sense of the past. It’s fun, harmless stuff. But it isn’t a serious look at the past. It’s one step above Blackadder, but that’s fine: the Victorians fictionalised their history. We shouldn’t try to dress it up as brilliant history. For example, the Four Georges song is great, but George III was only mentally ill for a short period of his reign. It plays to stereotypes, but it’s fantastic as entry-level history.” While admitting he has not yet seen the programme, Tristram Hunt, the historian and Labour MP, expressed concerns in December about Horrible Histories being adapted for primetime BBC1, describing it as “cartoon content for adults”. “For children, Horrible Histories is an exciting aid to engage with the guts and gore of the past, but there are more sophisticated, populist ways of getting people involved in history than this.” Richard Bradley, the programme’s executive producer and managing director of Lion TV, rejects this perception: “Lion has done countless history programmes, but Horrible Histories is the best history we’ve ever done. It looks at the role of women, social history, attitudes to authority and class. We’ve done the foundation of the Anglican church and the American civil war. It’s incredibly dense and factual. My eight-year-old said to me after watching one sketch: ‘So, that’s what the Restoration was.’” Bradley says that his son must take some credit for the show ever being produced. “I had a chat with him about five years ago and he said he wanted me to make Horrible Histories for TV. But how could I get the rights? Even though the publisher Scholastic held the licence, the first thing was to get Deary on board. He had had a terrible experience with a little-known animated version of his books being produced about 10 years ago in the US. But he said there were three things that must happen if we were to do it: it must be horrible, funny and true.” Bradley says it took a while to find the “spirit of Blackadder, Monty Python and Carry On”, which he credits as the show’s key success. In addition to the time-travelling ghost-train format (“it was too similar to Doctor Who and Mr Benn”), Lion also tried to develop a Dumbledore-like master storyteller as narrator – “a sort of wizard historian” – but it felt too generic. “The click came when I met Dominic Brigstocke in the street one day and we immediately thought of doing a high-powered sketch show,” says Bradley. “We realised that when children go around stately homes all they ever want to know about is how the people went to the loo and how they died. Working with Anne Gilchrist, the then controller of CBBC, we finally struck on the live-action comedy route directed and acted by adult comedy talent.” Bradley says the programme has led the trend for adult comedy writers and directors working in kids TV. For example, Graham Norton’s company makes Sorry, I’ve Got No Head. But the most rewarding aspect of making the programme, he adds, was first showing it to children. “We took it to local schools and showed them the rough cuts. The reaction was fantastic. The recognition of the Horrible Histories brand is so strong that they even cheered the names Groovy Greeks and Rotten Romans.” There were a few sketches that missed the beat, admits Bradley – a riff on the Incas, for example. “But it made us realise that it had to be written 100% for children and not have knowing references aimed only at adults. We’re still learning what works best for children. At the moment, we have never gone further than the Blitz, but we are having discussions now about doing a sketch based during the fall of the Berlin Wall. “The Georgians with their big hair and makeup are very popular, but, from a pure comedy point of view, you really can’t beat the Romans.” Rewriting the past: What makes Horrible Histories so funny? Steve Punt At the first writers’ meeting we sat round with the producer watching clips of Blackadder and Life of Brian. The point, from the outset, was to stress that this was a comedy show based on history, not a history show with a bit of humour grafted on. It’s a fact of comedy writing that the tighter the brief, the better the result. Plucking comedy out of the air is what leads to cliches and well-worn themes. But knowing that you have to stick to the facts of what the Celts wore, or how the Tudors treated illness, concentrates the mind. It leads you into strange areas that you would never have thought of, and that’s always creatively a good thing. One underestimated element of the show is the sheer fun of all the costumes, wigs, silly beards and hats. Wigs, in my book, are funny, and so are hats. TV budgets have shrunk since the days of Blackadder and Python. My children have lived in a world where TV comedy mostly consists of people sitting behind desks on panel shows. There is a glorious, back-to-the-70s daftness about Horrible Histories’ parade of togas, wimples, ruffs and tights that makes it appealing – to a wide audience. David Baddiel People tend to go on about Horrible Histories being “not just a kid’s show, but a proper comedy show” but actually I don’t see the dichotomy there. It’s partly to do with the fact that kids are more sophisticated, especially linguistically, then they used to be, so to do a show that is clever and funny and uses arcane references but can play to adults and children is more possible now. It’s very modern in style – single camera, throwaway delivery etc – and it uses history brilliantly: they had a sketch once about how Henry VIII only found out about Catherine Howard’s adultery from his jester, since everyone else was too frightened to tell him, which was both poignant and funny – and, of course, told me something I didn’t know about the Tudors. When they asked me to play Vincenzo Larfoff (the reader of Scary Stories, which regularly turn out not to be that scary) I was really pleased, and he seems to have been a hit – I get kids shouting “scaaarry story” at me. Children’s TV Television Children and teenagers History Leo Hickman guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
UN security council air strikes vote – live

• UN security council expected to pass Libya resolution • US and Britain support air strikes to protect civilians • France ready to launch first missions within hours • Gaddafi declares: ‘There will be no mercy’ in Benghazi • Qatar and UAE governments may add forces Read the Guardian’s latest news coverage 5.59pm ET: Security council members are milling about in the chamber – with the big question being, how will the votes go? The Guardian’s Luke Harding spoke with Germany’s foreign minister Guido Westerwelle , and he sounded hostile: Westerwelle warned the results of western military intervention were “unpredictable” and could have consequences for freedom movements in the Arab world. “Your own instinct is to say ‘We have to do something.’ But military intervention is to take part in a civil war that could go on for a long time. “Germany has a strong friendship with our European partners. But we won’t take part in any military operation and I will not send German troops to Libya.” Westerwelle said other options could be used against Libya including “targeted sanctions, political pressure and international isolation”. “Considering alternatives to military engagement is not the same as doing nothing,” he said. He declined to say how Germany would vote this evening at the UN security council. From the sound of those comments, Germany is likely to abstain tonight – but will Angela Merkel want Germany to be out of step with the rest of Europe on this? 5.45pm ET / 10.45pm GMT: The UN security council will shortly start its proceedings for a vote on a resolution supporting military action against the Gaddafi regime in Libya. Here’s the Guardian’s latest coverage reporting today’s meeting : Britain, France and the US, along with several Arab countries, are to join forces to throw a protective ring around the Libyan rebel stronghold of Benghazi as soon as a UN security council vote on military action is authorised, according to security council sources. We’ll be following the UN security council debate, final vote and reactions here as it happens. With France’s air force said to be ready to fly missions over Libya within hours of a resolution, we’ll be watching what happens in the air and on the ground in Libya, as well as input from the Guardian’s correspondents and other international responses. A live webcast of the security council meeting can be watched here – and of course we welcome comments below. Libya United Nations Middle East Arab and Middle East protests US foreign policy France Nato Foreign policy Richard Adams guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
What No One Ever Told You About The Long-Term Effects Of Three Mile Island’s Nuclear Accident

Mary Osborn Ouassiai, Harrisburg resident, at the Health Effects of Three Mile Island Nuclear Policy Institute symposium, presented by Nuclear Information and Resource Service, Physicians for Social Responsibility-Chicago and Dr. Helen Caldicott. I’ve been listening for days now to TV talking heads explaining that potential radiation from a nuclear accident is not usually such a big deal, and they often bring up Three Mile Island as an example. (“If this is as bad as it gets, it’s all good!”) But nuclear energy lobbyists are working overtime to make sure no one looks too closely at what really happened there. If you want to know, go read this entire story from On The Issues magazine: Becky Mease, a nurse in her late twenties at the time, fled with her husband, eight-month-old daughter Pam, and two other adults two days after the accident, when then Pennsylvania Governor Dick Thornburgh suggested that pregnant women and preschool children within five miles of Three Mile Island evacuate . They drove more than 250 miles to Ocean City, Maryland, where they stayed for about three weeks. Recounting her experience to citizen researchers Katagiri Mitsuru and Aileen Smith in October 1982, Mease said Pam, who had been outside playing in the grass the day of the accident, had gotten violently ill with diarrhea and projectile vomiting about two days after they left. A full battery of tests at a local hospital failed to find any bacteria or foreign organism, which could cause such symptoms, so the hospital staff told them to go to a civil defense station. Mease knew radiation sickness can cause vomiting and diarrhea, so she asked the people at the civil defense office to check their car and belongings with a Geiger counter. “It just went completely crazy… It went like nuts when it went over my pocketbook, too,” she said. “They told us to go wash everything down.” enlarge Pam’s severe diarrhea lasted the entire three weeks they were away. “Her behind was so raw that we just left it lay on diapers. Didn’t even put them on after a couple of days,” said Mease. In the summer of 1981, when Pam was two years old, she was diagnosed with severe cataracts in both of her eyes, which her doctor attributed to juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. The Meases’ ordeal was one of thousands area residents suffered in the aftermath of the accident. But the radiation effects weren’t confined to humans. The evidence was visible across the landscape, too, with unprecedented numbers of sick and dying farm animals and strangely mutated plants. *** Three Mile Island plant owner Metropolitan Edison and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) maintained that ten million curies of radioactive gases were released into the atmosphere from the accident, resulting in an average dose to area residents equal to a chest X-ray. Lochbaum says that figure is grossly underestimated, because it is based on a measurement of radiation levels on the Three Mile Island site a year after the fact and does not account for shorter-lived radionuclides like iodine-131, which would not have been measurable by that time . Nor, he says, does the official figure include any leakage from the containment building, the concrete dome surrounding the core of the reactor, which is meant to prevent deadly radiation from escaping into the environment in the event of an accident. Lochbaum estimates that at least 40 million curies were released during the accident . Other more recent estimates by former nuclear industry executive Arnold Gundersen calculated the radiation releases at 100 to 1,000 times higher than NRC estimates. Health studies conducted by the Pennsylvania Department of Health, various federal government agencies, and Columbia University supported the nuclear industry claims. The affected citizens contend these studies were sloppy and included people who should not have been counted, excluded many who should have been, or the researchers did not do the necessary follow-up on people who left the area after the accident. The citizens also say study authors uncritically accepted the premise that not enough radiation was released to cause the illnesses people were experiencing, so that even when higher disease rates were found, they were attributed to other factors such as stress or “lifestyle factors” like smoking, drinking, poor diet, or taking too much anti-anxiety medication. Some scientists have attempted to find out what really happened to the community after the accident. Dr. Ernest J. Sternglass, a tenured professor of radiation physics at the University of Pittsburgh, immediately sought every relevant health statistic he could find. According to Sternglass, a student of Albert Einstein’s who holds several patents on X-ray technology, the health impacts from the accident were unquestionable, significant, and included a sharp spike in infant deaths and hypothyroidism. Dr. Gordon MacLeod, Pennsylvania’s Secretary of Health at the time, tried to ensure all health impacts from the accident were fully disclosed. He was fired by then Governor Dick Thornburgh for his efforts. More recently, University of North Carolina epidemiologist Steve Wing reanalyzed the data from the Columbia University study and concluded that people living closer to the path of the radiation cloud developed all types of cancers more frequently. In the areas of greatest fallout, lung cancer rates jumped 400 percent, and leukemia rates climbed 700 percent. These scientists — and others who question the nuclear orthodoxy — have all been either drowned out or viciously attacked as biased, unprofessional purveyors of panic with an anti-nuclear axe to grind. More than 2,000 people participated in a class-action lawsuit claiming injuries against Three Mile Island. Although an unknown number of cases settled out of court with terms that must be kept confidential, in June 1996 the class-action lawsuit was dismissed on the grounds that the plaintiffs failed to prove that the Three Mile Island accident had caused their health problems. Mary Osborne is deeply disillusioned by what she characterizes as a gross miscarriage of justice. “Not a day goes by that I don’t think about the accident.” Nearly 32 years later, the Three Mile Island disaster and its aftermath continue to shape the lives of many who were exposed to the radioactive fallout. Three Mile Island serves as a model of what American citizens can expect if another nuclear disaster were to occur. With 104 mostly aging nuclear reactors not only still running but virtually all being granted 20-year license extensions, and, in some cases, permits to generate more power than they were designed to do, David Lochbaum believes that sheer luck rather than good management or serious concern for safety has so far prevented another nuclear disaster. Considering that approximately 190 million citizens live within 100 miles of at least one nuclear reactor, let’s hope that luck holds.

Continue reading …
3D fog projection display brings purple bunnies to life, just in time to lay chocolate eggs (video)

Fog projectors have been around for ages, but projecting a 2D image onto a wavy field of 3D smoke doesn’t exactly result in the most immersive experience ever. This system from a team at Osaka University is different, relying on three pico projectors all focused on a single column of steam that, as far as we can tell, is dropped down through a slew of multicolored drinking straws. Each projector has a slightly different perspective of the violet hare in question and, as you move about, the fog acts like a parallax barrier, only showing one angle at a time. With a few more projectors and a whole lot more fog the could be even greater. The bunnies, they would be majestic . Continue reading 3D fog projection display brings purple bunnies to life, just in time to lay chocolate eggs (video) 3D fog projection display brings purple bunnies to life, just in time to lay chocolate eggs (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 17 Mar 2011 18:03:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Continue reading …

Guess who’s back on Twitter? That’s right, everyone’s favorite crazytweeter, Courtney Love. Or at least, someone who claims to be Courtney Love—and sounds a lot like her too, Gawker notes . Love ditched Twitter in January after she was sued for defamation by a fashion designer (she ended up having…

Continue reading …

The 165 banks that toppled like dominoes in the financial crisis have stuck the FDIC with a hefty tab to the tune of $9 billion, the Wall Street Journal reports. Regulators have helped shoulder the burden of bad assets and loans at the failed banks; the loss-sharing agreements encouraged healthier…

Continue reading …
Corned Beef Crock Pot

Chef Mama Crock Pot Corned Beef OFFICIAL MUSIC VIDEO – Travis + Julie – “Osmosis” The Bachelor – Travis’ Final Reaction Corned Beef Crock Pot – marybaker's posterous Corned Beef Crock Pot . Corned Beef and Cabbage Recipecorned beef and cabbage corned beef and cabbage crock pot crock pot corned beef and cabbage corned beef and cabbage slow cooker corned beef:Zap2it here we’re addicted to TV and when … Corned Beef Crock Pot Corned Beef Crock Pot . March 17th, 2011 by admin | Filed under Headline News. Crock Pot Corned Beef Brisket. Read More. Apple and Sugar Corned Beef This is not exactly your traditional Irish style corned beef and cabbage recipe but if … Corned Beef Crock Pot Corned Beef Crock Pot . Posted by salman. March 17, 2011. This is not exactly your traditional Irish style corned beef and cabbage recipe but if you don’t cook with beer, it’s a tasty alternative. What You Need: 1 corned beef brisket … slainte, shamrock, four leaf clover, … – World News Online News … slainte shamrock four leaf clover corned beef and cabbage recipe blarney stone ncaa tournament st.patrick s day corned beef crock pot cbs sportsline fabric aol. Mary Bakers News: Corned Beef Crock Pot Corned Beef Crock Pot . Corned Beef and Cabbage Recipecorned beef and cabbage corned beef and cabbage crock pot crock pot corned beef and cabbage corned beef and cabbage slow cooker corned beef:Zap2it here we’re addicted to TV and when … y_is_it_hot says: #corned #beef #crock #pot : Check out http://nh22.com?q=5161 for ' corned beef crock pot '

Continue reading …
No Potters Bar prosecution for Jarvis

Lawyer for relatives of victims condemns ‘farce’ as rail regulator looks set to drop criminal case against maintenance firm Jarvis will escape prosecution for the fatal Potters Bar train crash after the rail regulator is understood to have dropped criminal proceedings against the maintenance firm. A lawyer representing families bereaved in the accident slammed the nine-year quest for justice as a “farce”, particularly as the taxpayer is instead likely to underwrite a looming six-figure fine for Network Rail over its liability for the incident. The Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) is preparing to announce that it will not seek a prosecution over the derailment of a train outside Potters Bar station, Hertfordshire, on 10 May 2002 in which seven people died. Louise Christian, a solicitor who represented families at the inquest into the deaths, said: “There is a huge problem every time we have one of these health and safety disasters. There is no accountability and the prosecutions they bring are a bit of a farce.” A tragic bookend to the Railtrack era that ushered in rail privatisation, the circumstances of the Potters Bar crash highlighted severe strains in the rail industry. Jarvis was contracted by Railtrack to maintain the line but attempted to blame the crash on a saboteur with “informed” engineering knowledge. The company later withdrew the claim in a humiliating apology and admitted joint liability for the crash. Six passengers on the West Anglia Great Northern train – Austen Kark, Emma Knights, Jonael Schickler, Alexander Ogunwusi, Chia Hsin Lin and Chia Chin Wu – were killed in the accident. A passerby, Agnes Quinlivan, died after she was hit by falling debris. It is understood that Jarvis’s financial problems contributed to the ORR’s decision, which it reached after consultation with the victims’ families, who have already seen the prospects of criminal proceedings against former Jarvis or Railtrack executive disappear. Jarvis’s rail division is in administration and its administrators have not participated in proceedings, adding further complications to a prosecution under the Health and Safety At Work Act that could only result in a fine against the company. Perdita Kark, whose father Austen was killed and whose mother, the novelist Nina Bawden, was seriously injured in the derailment, urged the industry to tighten safety standards after a coroner at the Potters Bar inquest warned that passengers still faced safety risks. “The gut instinct is that one wanted Jarvis in the dock along with Railtrack but in the end you just want to make sure that this sort of thing does not happen again because they have learned something from it. It is disappointing but I don’t see how you can bring into court something that does not exist anymore.” Last month Network Rail told Watford magistrates court that it would plead guilty to track safety failings that caused the derailment. Network Rail admitted failings over the installation, maintenance and inspection of stretcher bars, which hold rails apart at the correct width for train wheels. The owner of Britain’s tracks and stations inherited the liability for Potters Bar after it replaced Railtrack months after the crash and it will be sentenced at St Albans crown court on 30 March. Sentencing guidelines state that a fatal breach of health and safety laws carries a fine of at least £100,000 but the punishment will be underwritten by the state, which put £3.7bn into Network Rail last year and is its main source of funding. After entering its guilty plea Network Rail said the rail system had improved considerably since the crash, with the last fatal accident due to infrastructure problems occurring in 2007 when a Virgin Trains Pendolino derailed at Graygrigg, claiming the life of one passenger. “The railway today is almost unrecognisable since the days of Railtrack and the Potters Bar tragedy of 2002,” said Network Rail. The government has ruled out a joint public inquiry into Potters Bar and the Graygrigg crash, saying public interest would be “best served” with separate independent inquests into the disasters. The ORR declined to comment. Potters Bar train crash Transport Rail transport Dan Milmo guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

What follows is a statement NewsBusters publisher and Media Research Center president Brent Bozell released moments ago: Republicans said today that the arrogant liberal sneers at taxpayers in Flyover Country deserve to be met by NPR raising its own money in its own fancy cafes. And an organization that admits catering to a “core audience that is predominately white, liberal, highly educated, elite” is among the last that should survive budget cuts if legislators are serious about cutting unnecessary spending. We applaud the 228 Representatives who stepped up to say so with their votes in the House today. If the Senate and President Obama really care about reckless spending, they’ll pony up and do the same. The time is now to stop wasting taxpayer dollars on funding NPR.

Continue reading …