Home » Archives by category » News (Page 6799)
Obama’s Budget Nominee Can’t Defend His Budget

Author: Andrew Stiles The Senate Budget Committee held a hearing Thursday to consider the nomination of Heather Higginbottom for deputy director of the Office of Management and Budget. Her qualifications? Well, she was policy director for Sen. John Kerry (D., Mass.) and an adviser on Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign. Any formal budget experience? You already know the answer. Higginbottom… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Corner Discovery Date : 17/03/2011 21:33 Number of articles : 5

Continue reading …
Barack Obama to visit City of God

US president expected to visit shantytown that inspired film as part of bridge-building tour of Latin America When the world’s most powerful man touches down in Rio this weekend he will receive a handwritten letter from a man called José. “To his excellency, the president of the republic of the United States of America,” it will read. “Felicitations for the happy idea of coming to see our great nation and above all the City of God. Signed, José Neves.” Neves is an 80-year-old community leader from the City of God, a shantytown in western Rio de Janeiro which gave its name to Fernando Meirelles’s 2002 blockbuster movie. And on Sunday he is expecting a visit from Barack Obama, who is tipped to visit the favela as part of a five-day bridge-building tour of Latin America intended to bolster the US’s shrinking regional influence against an economic and diplomatic offensive from China. After visiting the favela, Obama is scheduled to make a speech in central Rio, before continuing on to Chile and El Salvador. Obama will call for a rapprochement between Brasilia and Washington, a partnership that soured because of ties between Brazil’s former president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, and the Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. With Lula in power, western diplomats in Brasilia described an Obama visit as virtually inconceivable. Brazil’s new president, Dilma Rousseff, who took power in January, appears open to reconciliation. In a rare post-election interview with the Washington Post she vowed to “try to forge closer ties with the US” and spoke out against human rights abuses in Iran. Neves, a retired policeman and proud Afro-Brazilian, will need little convincing. In his ground-floor office in Bible Square, rumoured to be on Obama’s itinerary, he keeps a giant US flag. “I followed [Obama's] election on TV – for the first time a black man took a step up,” he beamed. “We’ll be glad to receive him. He is president of a great nation that is our friend.” The US is no longer the only great nation in town. Recent years have seen the Chinese make big strides into Latin America – China overtook the US as Brazil’s top trade partner in 2009 and is pouring billions into oil, mining, infrastructure and agriculture to secure access to its natural resources. In Washington, alarm bells are ringing. US officials deny the visit is directly intended to counter the Chinese advance but White House adviser Ben Rhodes admitted it was “imperative that the United States [did] not disengage from these regions”. “There’s a cost to disengagement,” he said. Daniel Restrepo, Obama’s leading adviser on Latin America, said the trip would highlight “the importance of the region” and “the restoration of American influence and appeal in the Americas”. For Rio’s governors the visit represents a marketing coup as they battle to revive the city’s international reputation as a safe, business-friendly metropolis. The City of God is one of more than 20 favelas that have been “pacified” in a security initiative aimed at driving heavily armed drug traffickers from the slums before the 2016 Rio Olympics. “It was terrible before,” Neves recalled. “The kids would come out of school and they would all be stood there with shotguns and revolvers. Obama wouldn’t have even considered coming to the City of God back then.” Even now, he is taking no chances. Obama will reportedly travel to the favela in a missile and gas-proof Cadillac, flanked by special forces operatives. A no-fly zone will be imposed by the Brazilian air force. Neves said he had even spotted “the FBI” inspecting his favela. “They are big,” he whispered. “And very strong.” Barack Obama Brazil US foreign policy Tom Phillips guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

New York Communities for Change on Vimeo . Humanity’s literature from the very earliest days has many stories of hubris and arrogance that ring true. Icarus got too close to the sun, and had his wings burned off. Goliath got a little too cocky with the kid with the slingshot. Lady Macbeth’s dreams of glory turned to ashes. Pride goeth before the fall indeed. It happens in literature so much because it happens to humans so much. In my career in politics, I have seen it happen over and over again, from the highest of levels to the ones you’ve never heard of, like the 26-year-old junior staffer at the Clinton White House I once heard yelling into the phone “Don’t you know who I am?” who was fired shortly after. There are plenty of arrogant politicians walking around D.C. today bragging about everything they are going to do that I suspect won’t be here very much longer. But there is no match at all for the hubris of Wall Street bankers. They are convinced they really are masters of the universe, but I think they will be heading for a fall. It may be soon, it might take a little while given the money they have and the politicians in their pocket, but you cannot be that arrogant and not be in for a serious fall. Just to recap: the financial industry talked politician after politician from both parties into one round of deregulation after another, all the while increasingly consolidating the industry while inventing more and more exotic kinds of financial speculation (derivatives, credit default swaps, CDOs, etc., etc., ad nauseam). There were warning signs aplenty- the S&L debacle, Long-Term Capital Management, an early version of a subprime derivative collapse, the Mexico currency collapse, the Thai currency collapse, the corporate accounting scandals of the early 2000s — and each time some combination of the Federal Reserve and/or American taxpayers directly had to step in and save the day. The warning signs were not only ignored, but more deregulation usually happened on top of the old kinds. When the big collapse happened in 2008, the American economy and entire world economy were sent into collapse and panic, only to be saved by the biggest corporate bailouts in history by far. Now you may find me biased, but this essential summary as far as I can tell seems to be pretty much accepted by just about every author on the financial collapse, financial blogger and reporter, the Angelides commission, the TARP oversight board: pretty much everyone who has looked into the collapse except those being paid by Wall Street bankers. And given all that, you would think the corporate PR guys for these big banks would be advising their clients to lay low for a while, make a show of how badly they felt, do at least some symbolic belt-tightening and some early retirements for the most visibly corrupt executives, maybe make some major donations to charities. On Capitol Hill, you would think the lobbyists they hire would advise them to show some amount of humility at congressional hearings, to make clear in their public statements that they totally understand the need for some “modernization” of regulations (even while fighting to soften the blow behind the scenes as much as possible), and to make sure their longtime allies on the Hill know they didn’t need to spend a lot of political capital right now defending them — that the best strategy was to quiet things down and delay or soften things, not to make a lot of noise. But the Wall Street guys are so arrogant, so completely used to running the world and having everyone bow down to them, that they just fundamentally don’t get it. They give themselves record setting bonuses the year after taxpayers bailed them out. They fought every minor restraint on their power in the battle over financial reform last year, and now their Capitol Hill allies are planning to re-open the whole battle again with new legislation rolling back key components of the bill like the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, derivative regulation, and swipe-fee regulation. They get their allies on the Hill to beat up on Elizabeth Warren because she is actually trying to help consumers. They bitterly and loudly complained to reporters and anyone who would listen about President Obama saying a few mildly populist about them during the financial reform fight last year, even though Obama’s Treasury Secretary and most of his other appointees have been fairly friendly to bankers throughout his term in office. They complain about the moral hazard of helping homeowners who are underwater on their mortgages despite taking the bailout money when their own bets went bad. But these remarkably arrogant folks are setting themselves up for a fall. Anger has been building against Wall Street bankers for years, and banks are consistently listed in polls as the most unpopular institutions in America. The movement against them is growing every day with demonstrations and move-our-money kind of actions by everyone from local governments to churches to foundations. A great new report just came out of a group of California organizations on the incredible cost of all the foreclosures the banks are doing right now. Bloggers are doing a remarkable job in documenting all the illegal actions banks have been taking in terms of foreclosures and fraud in general. Check out this powerful piece on crimes committed by bank executives by naked capitalism. Activists are demanding that they actually start paying taxes on their ill-gotten gains. Lawyers are filing case after case against banks for committing fraud in the foreclosure, and the banks have been losing a lot of those cases in court. Ministers are even doing exorcisms of the banks . The other key thing to note is that it is not just progressive activists who are getting upset with the bankers: a lot of small businesspeople are being gauged by swipe fees, or left out in the cold in terms of getting loans because bankers would rather hoard their money or use it to speculate on derivative markets. Investors who have gotten screwed by the big banks are increasingly looking to file lawsuits. State and local officials are pushing back more and more against abusive bankers. Wall Street bankers are looking around at all these activities and laughing, assuring themselves that no one can touch them because they are so rich and so powerful. But sooner or later, guys, what goes around will come around. Here’s just one example: if they want to bring up the financial reform issue again in Congress, just remember that the bill last year just got stronger every time it went to the floor because nobody wanted to vote against amendments that were tough on Wall Street banks. If you want to get into a floor fight, reformers will be happy to start offering amendments all over again, and we’ll see what we can get passed. You don’t like the derivatives regulations? Well, our side thinks they need to be tougher. You don’t like the CFPB? Well, we think they need more power. You don’t like debit card rules? Well, let’s expand them to credit cards as well. We can win a lot of these floor fights because it is pretty easy right now to argue against bankers; it’s what we call in my political consulting business a resonant message. But this isn’t just about the next legislative fight. Grassroots anger at the banks continues to build, and the more arrogant the Wall Street guys act, the more angry people will get. Their own hubris will bring them down quicker than Icarus fell from the sky. If I were a strategist for the Wall Street bankers right now, I’d sure be encouraging them to read some mythology and Shakespeare — and a few lessons from scripture probably would do them some good as well.

Continue reading …

The body of 4-year-old girl who had been shot in the chest was discovered yesterday, the fifth child killed in less than a week as drug violence rages on in Acapulco. The girl was found in a car next to a woman who’d been shot several times; police didn’t offer…

Continue reading …
Militant Segrecide

Article by WorldNews.com Correspondent Dallas Darling. The latest news and images of U.S. trained and armed Iraqi security forces using water cannons and batons to beat and disperse protesters and journalists, coupled with a new report from the Military Leadership Diversity Commission detailing how the United States military is too white and too male in its upper echelons; evoked another time and another place, namely, America’s Era of Segregation. All of these occurrences are intertwined and inseparable in the fabric of American history. Sadly, each of them reveal a shared militancy and deep-seated hatred that has yet to be acknowledged and exorcised. In 1955 when fourteen-year-old Emmett…

Continue reading …
Libya conflict sees Britain accused of launching ‘new war’ in Middle East

Stop the War Coalition say airstrikes by UK and US will strengthen, not weaken Muammar Gaddafi’s position Labour MP John McDonnell has ‘grave and serious’ concerns over the use of force by western powers in the region. Photograph: Fiona Hanson/PA The Stop the War Coalition has condemned Britain and its allies for launching a “new war” in the Middle East after the “bloody and failing” occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan. A spokesman for the campaign said: “Air attacks on Libya will not help end the civil war but will escalate it and could be the prelude to a much wider war. They will not help bring the downfall of Gaddafi. He is already portraying the United…

Continue reading …
Steve Martin Shoplifts A Ham On Letterman (VIDEO)

On Wednesday night’s “Late Show,” the great Steve Martin hammed it up in more ways than one — revealing to David Letterman’s audience that he recently got in some trouble for “stealing” a pork product. When Letterman first noticed what looked like a police ankle bracelet on Martin’s leg, he allowed him to come up with a pretty good excuse, that it was the latest Hollywood trend. But soon after, Letterman whipped out a security tape with some pretty convincing footage of Martin using his pants to smuggle a glazed ham out of a New York deli. Watch the full bit below, and click here to see Alec Baldwin walk out of Dave’s studio once he hears Martin is the guest. WATCH:

Continue reading …
The Gender Gap in Motherhood

“How can you leave your children?” It was the question leveled at me when I was away from my children for four months to interview the atomic bomb survivors in Japan. I heard it again, when I was facing divorce and my husband and I had to decide what was best for the children. We decided that he would keep primary physical custody and, as a joint legal custodian, I would move down the block and be a very involved, noncustodial mother. It worked for us. It was the best choice for the children in a time of heartbreak and loss. But the rest of the world, it seems, could not agree. An article about my choices that was published on Salon.com generated so much public conversation that it continued on television. Rage on behalf of my not-actually-abandoned children can be extreme. The responses directly to my website split along clear gender lines, and expose our great anxiety, not only about the perfect motherhood ideal that we can’t live up to, but also about our transforming family structures and our high divorce rate. Men — not all but many — tend to accuse, call names and threaten me. I am “evil,” “worse than Hitler,” “trailer trash and a perfect liberal,” and other things that don’t bear repeating. One told me I was only “created to create.” Another man in the Huffington Post comment section made up a whole story about how the Vermont family court stripped me of custody. His comment was eerily authoritative, and entirely impossible: I don’t live in Vermont! These angry men have missed the point. I have not, as one accused, “left my children in an orphanage.” On The View, Joy Behar pointed out that if I was a man, we would not be having this conversation, and it’s true. When I was separated from my children to do my work, people called my husband “a saint” for taking care of his children. If he had left, and I, as the mother, had stayed behind, people would have asked me how he was doing over there and said how exciting it must be for him to be pursuing the work he loved! As a noncustodial mother, I am exactly the opposite of a deadbeat dad. I give my children love, time and money. We cook together, do homework, play games and have an old-fashioned “how was your day?” conversation at dinner. Since I work from home, our days start after school, the minute they arrive, not after the traditional workday. They feel like they spend the same amount of time with me as with their dad, probably because our time together is focused, quality time when they are the center of my attention. And still, because I am a woman, people equate this with “leaving.” Women’s responses to me have been different. More women than men have written to me directly, and they tell me their stories. Most are supportive, but even those who are not have shared advice or a glimpse into their own lives. So many have offered encouragement and thanked me for telling my truth, and some report, unfortunately, that when they tried to express their support in the comments on an article, they too were attacked in turn. But ambivalence about motherhood and struggles with divorce mark many of these stories. Even women who have dedicated themselves to a more traditional motherhood are sometimes exhausted by the overwhelming demands of the myth of the perfect mother and their role as caretaker in their marriage. Why do we continue to cling to a dream that is increasingly impossible in a society where approximately half our children live with divorced parents, single moms, grandparents, LGBT parents and single dads? Partly, I think, because of our wish for unconditional, all encompassing love, much like the fairytale of the prince on the white horse coming to rescue the beautiful maiden. Love is essential, of course, and so is caretaking. The problem is that, in our society, we put the full responsibility for providing it on the woman. Our mothers are our knights in shining armor: our prince. It has become clear, in my conversations with women, that too many are functioning as sole caretaker: caring for children, spouses, clients or patients at work if they do work, and then elderly parents as time moves on. Their needs wait until everyone else’s are satisfied. Some women embrace this role and do it with love, but that doesn’t make them less exhausted and ambivalent. It is this “role” that I was rejecting when I said I didn’t want to be a “mother,” but many people have put different words into my mouth, claiming that I do not want my children. This is wrong. These two things are not at all the same. But the misunderstanding is very important to look at. If we let the all-encompassing role of “mother caregiver” be the equivalent to love, there is no way to make changes and improve the situation for women. My family is trying to recreate itself in love, honesty and support of every member in it– adults and children alike. I love my sons and they know it. Like many divorced parents, I don’t sleep in the same house with them, but that does not mean I am evil or human garbage. Roles and gender expectations, aside, the opinions that matter are the ones voiced by the people who see my family in action. Like the high school counselor at my sons’ middle school who told me last week that my former husband and I were the best co-parents she has ever seen. WATCH:

Continue reading …

In what is quite possibly the most amusing lawsuit ever filed, a top Elie Tahari manager is suing the design house for $2 million because, he says, he suffered a mental breakdown … after being exiled to New Jersey. His complaints: the smog, the “depressing” commute, “horrendous” traffic, “pretty bad…

Continue reading …

Ctic

No Comment
Ctic

Fundación CTIC First LEGO League Vídeo Fundación CTIC First LEGO League Vídeo noticia RTPA EE.NN. ASTURIAS – MESA REDONDA Cell Therapeutics, Inc. Traded with a volume of more than 50 … Cell Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: CTIC ) witnessed an unusual volume of 50.35 million shares during last trade however it holds an average trading capacity of 4.69 million shares. CTIC shares opened at $0.37 reached intraday low of $0.37 … 5 Active Stocks in Pre-Market Trading | Beacon Equity: Penny … Shares of Cell Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ: CTIC ) surged 23% at today’s opening day, kicking off another day in a week of gains for the company. In the last three trading sessions the penny stock of Cell Therapeutics gained 38.21%; … Biotech Stock Cell Therapeutics Roars to Finish a Solid Week in … Shares of Cell Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ: CTIC ) surged 23% at today’s opening day, kicking off another day in a week of gains for the company. In the last three trading sessions the penny stock of Cell Therapeutics gained 38.21%; … Stock Market Analysis: Stocks to Buy 3/18/11 March 18, 2011 CTIC will have resistance located at $0.46 and $0.55. Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) – Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) is popping after the company announced a dividend. CSCO will have resistance up at $18.75. Cisco Systems will now have support … Stock Market Analysis: Stocks to Buy 3/18/11 March 18, 2011 CTIC will also have resistance located at $0.46 and $0.55. Accelr8 Technology Corp. (AXK) – Accelr8 Technology Corp. (AXK) hit $4.49 on Thursday before pulling back. Cano Petroleum, Inc. (CFW) – Cano Petroleum, Inc. (CFW) hit $0.63 on … quotethegirl says: ctic http://bit.ly/hZ2kKh In definition, i made about 300% on the stock ctic , w just a small 200$ investment is it good to pull out now?

Continue reading …