Google+ ditched its invite-only policy last week and was rewarded with a massive surge in traffic—a 1,269% rise, according to Experian Hitwise. The Internet metrics company believes that on the day after the policy changed, Google overtook Twitter to become the third-most popular social media site in the…
Continue reading …Even that girl. Her knee will never be the same again! We kid, we kid … maybe. Ladies, if you ever wondered what kind of moves Chris Brown pulled to get down with Rihanna, we might have the answer for you here. Check out this video (above) from Chris’ recent concert in Detroit. He brought one lucky (?) Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : PerezHilton.com Discovery Date : 28/09/2011 00:19 Number of articles : 3
Continue reading …Investigation raises questions over safety at Queen’s hospital in Romford, Essex after deaths of Violet Stephens and Sareena Ali The deaths of two women shortly after giving birth have raised questions about the safety of care at an NHS hospital which boasts the largest maternity unit in the country. Violet Stephens died at Queen’s hospital in Romford, Essex, in April, just one month after a review by the care watchdog said Queen’s was failing to meet essential maternity standards. An independent investigation into Stephens’s death, seen by the Guardian, reveals that she saw at least 30 different healthcare staff in the last three days of her life, including five consultant obstetricians, 11 junior doctors and 12 midwives. She was known to be at risk – two previous babies had been delivered by caesarean section because of complications linked to high-blood pressure – but she did not get the standard of care to which she was entitled, says the report. “The number and extent of service provision weaknesses revealed by this investigation casts doubt on the organisational integrity of the maternity services,” it says. Stephens’s death followed that of Sareena Ali in January. Ali, who was having her first baby, died of a heart attack brought on by a ruptured womb. She had been left without midwife support for two hours. While the Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspectors were in the maternity unit – failing it on six different safety standards – Ali was lying on a life support machine in another part of the hospital. The CQC officers were not told. Queen’s, which is part of Barking, Havering and Redbridge NHS Foundation Trust, says it is doing all it can to improve maternity care. But Sarah Harman, the solicitor representing the families of the two women, as well as around 20 less serious complaints, said: “On the basis of all the cases coming forward to me, this is a maternity department that is not providing safe care.” The CQC report in March demanded “immediate improvements” to ensure the safety of women giving birth at Queen’s, warning that it was short-staffed, midwives were under-skilled and some equipment did not work. Queen’s responded that it was hiring 49 more midwives, half of whom had already been recruited. But the independent inquiry into Stephens’s death, dated July, suggested there were still fundamental problems in the maternity unit when she died. The independent “serious untoward incident” inquiry into her death, carried out by a professor of complex obstetrics and a senior midwife, found that Stephens had suffered severe pre-eclampsia in her fourth pregnancy, as she had in her earlier ones. Pre-eclampsia is one of the most common conditions that kill women in childbirth. In Stephens’s case it became particularly serious because her liver was affected. The report found her case was not well managed and there were delays in giving her a caesarean and blood transfusions. In the antenatal clinic, she saw six different doctors and midwives. In the last three days at Queen’s, no less than 30 different healthcare staff were involved. It is well-documented, said the report, that the more handovers of information and responsibility there are, the greater the risks for the patient. “The severity and deterioration of VS’s condition was not recognised or managed in a co-ordinated way,” it said. “The tragedy at the centre of this investigation is the death of a mother, which most profoundly affects her family, friends and the three motherless children left behind.” The report found evidence of good care, kind staff and effective working but “significant factors were identified which prevented VS from receiving the standard of care she was entitled to expect and to which the trust aspires”. Ali was 27 when she died at Queen’s hospital in January. Her husband Usman Javed has said she was in agony in the labour ward, but midwives did not respond to his requests for help. She suffered a ruptured womb, which brought on a heart attack. Her baby was delivered by caesarean section but born dead. At one point a team tried to resuscitate Ali with a mask that was not attached to the oxygen cylinder. “When I first took on Usman’s case, I thought it was a tragic and isolated incident,” Harman said. “In the best hospitals that run good maternity services, a tragedy can arise which is not in line with the care they provide.” Other complaints Harman is pursuing against the hospital include two allegations of caesareans carried out without enough anaesthetic and women having to be re-admitted with serious illnesses because they were discharged too soon. Queen’s sees nearly 7,000 births a year. The CQC inspection was a “compliance review” – designed to ensure the hospital had met all the necessary standards in maternity and midwifery care. It had not. The CQC said improvements were needed in six essential areas, including the safety of equipment, staffing numbers and safe and appropriate care for women. Inspectors said they had “major concerns” over delays in going to theatre when a caesarean was needed, pain relief and women being left alone in labour. Staff spoke of being “very stretched” at busy times when it was “like working on a conveyor belt”. Averil Dongworth, chief executive of the trust, said of the report she commissioned into Stephens’ death: “I was very concerned to hear that we had failed to give this seriously ill woman the high standards of care that she should have been able to expect from us and would like to apologise for this on behalf of the trust. I’m determined these issues are addressed so every woman can be confident about our maternity service.” Following the death, staff held a special conference to learn lessons and new guidelines were put in place. The hospital now has one of the highest levels of specialist doctor coverage in the country and enough midwives for one-to-one care, Dongworth said. “These changes are part of a comprehensive action plan to improve our maternity service across the board and make sure every woman can have a good experience of childbirth in the safest possible environment.” A further review of services by the CQC is underway and will report in a few weeks’ time. Health NHS Childbirth Health & wellbeing Sarah Boseley guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Resounding ‘yes’ vote will help accelerate plans to establish a permanent European monetary fund The German parliament is expected to approve enhanced powers for the eurozone’s bailout fund on Thursday as plans to set up a fully fledged European monetary fund (EMF) gather pace. Senior European officials believe Berlin will revisit proposals for an EMF – first raised by German finance minister Wolfgang Schäuble in spring last year and revived by French president Nicolas Sarkozy in July this year – once the Bundestag vote is secured. The only question is the scale of the majority Chancellor Angela Merkel will win for expanding the financial guarantees available to temporary precursor of an EMF, the European financial stability facility (EFSF), with markets hoping for a reassuringly large margin of victory. On Wednesday the Finnish parliament approved the enhanced EFSF, the ninth out of the 17 eurozone states to do so. Separately, the European parliament voted overwhelmingly in favour of the so-called “six-pack” series of laws to impose tougher budgetary discipline on the eurozone’s 17 members and help to prevent the flare-up of future sovereign debt crises. It also emerged that the “troika” of experts from the EU, International Monetary Fund and European Central Bank will be in Athens on Thursday to test whether Greece is complying with the terms of its rescue through savage budget cuts and can therefore be awarded the sixth and latest tranche of its initial €110bn (£95bn) bailout, worth €8bn. Merkel told Greek television that the second rescue package, worth €109bn, might have to be renegotiated amid suggestions this would entail bondholders accepting “haircuts” – write-offs on the debts they are owed – of up to 50% rather than the 21% agreed in July. Sources have indicated that Greece has enough cash to meet its bills, including the salaries of public servants, until the end of next month but that eurozone finance ministers will approve the release of the €8bn as early as 15 October, when they will hold an unscheduled meeting on the issue. Slovakia will not be voting on the enhanced EFSF until 25 October. None the less, this flurry of activity is viewed within the European commission as evidence that the eurozone, and the EU as a whole, can respond to demands – above all from the US – for greater urgency in tackling the debt crisis and thereby restore investor confidence. Some very senior figures even welcome the outspoken and unprecedented intervention last weekend by Tim Geithner, US treasury secretary, in favour of increasing the EFSF’s financial firepower from €440bn to closer to €2 trillion as providing a salutary spur to action. Schäuble has denounced his American counterpart in the run-up to Thursday’s key Bundestag vote. But he and his colleagues are said to be keen to relaunch the notion of an EMF armed with powers to analyse, prevent and help solve debt crises. On Wednesday, José Manuel Barroso, the commission’s president, gave his backing to bring in the eurozone’s permanent crisis resolution facility – the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) – earlier than planned. The ESM is due to replace the EFSF in July 2013. He told MEPs in his annual state of the union address that the EFSF should be made both stronger and more flexible. When ratified by all 17 eurozone parliaments, it would be able to deploy precautionary intervention measures, initiate the recapitalisation of banks, and intervene in secondary markets (via bond purchases) to help avoid contagion. “Once the EFSF is ratified, we should make the most efficient use of its financial envelope. The commission is working on options to this end,” he said. “Moreover, we should do everything possible to accelerate the entry into force of the ESM.” The ESM could, senior sources indicated, be set up a year early in mid-2012 and serve as a transition to the EMF. That is the wish of Guy Verhofstadt, the ex-Belgian premier and pro-federalist leader of the liberal (ALDE) group of MEPs. He told Barroso in a letter that an EMF should be swiftly set up with sufficient funds and designed to operate under majority voting to speed decision-making. Barroso admitted that the EU was facing “the biggest challenge in all its history” and that the sovereign debt crisis was really a “crisis of political confidence” and a “baptism of fire for our whole generation”. He insisted that Greece would remain a member of the eurozone but that the answer to the crisis was to deepen economic co-ordination and integration. He reiterated his call for the creation of eurobonds and indicated that this might require changes to the EU treaties – a red rag to a bull in the UK. The commission president went further by hinting at further treaty changes to limit the use of unanimous voting, which allowed the slowest EU member states to dictate the speed of progress of all the others. “This is not credible also from the markets’ point of view; this is why we need to solve this problem of decision-making,” he said. European debt crisis Germany Euro Greece European Union Economics Europe David Gow guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …New York authorities arrested seven former and current students at a top-ranked Long Island high school after charging that one of them, 19-year-old Sam Eshaghoff, collected up to $2,500 a pop to impersonate the others while taking the SAT. Eshagoff, who attends Emory University, is even accused of impersonating a female student in one case,
Continue reading …Only 6 percent of all school districts in the country significantly outperform students in the developed world on math tests, according to “When the Best Is Mediocre,” a new report from the journal Education Next. Even students who attend ritzy school districts that are considered high-performing wouldn’t hold muster in a global mathalon, the report
Continue reading …A New York prosecutor says she’s investigating whether students at other schools were participating in an SAT cheating ring. This follows the arrest of seven current or former students at Long Island’s Great Neck North High School. (Sept. 28)
Continue reading …The American Job Act also carries a provision that would protect the unemployed from being discriminated against when they apply for a new job. It seems like a logical step because Obama is trying to get American workers back to work. The many people who lost their jobs by no fault of their own, but as a repercussion of the financial collapse created by the banksters. Apparently Republicans and their mouthpieces are objecting to this protection even though they know workers are being discriminated against for being out of work for an extended period of time. Robert Pear: President Obama is backing legislation that would prohibit employers from discriminating against job applicants because they are unemployed. Under the proposal, it would be “an unlawful employment practice” if a business with 15 or more employees refused to hire a person “because of the individual’s status as unemployed.” Unsuccessful job applicants could sue and recover damages for violations, just as when an employer discriminates on the basis of a person’s race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Obama’s proposal would also prohibit employment agencies and websites from carrying advertisements for job openings that exclude people who are unemployed. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has received reports of such advertisements but does not have data to show how common they are. You want data? How about some examples via Marketplace : After I spoke to Anderson, I poked around at CareerBuilder.com and I found this job: Medical-equipment sales, St. Petersburg, Fla. Only, it says in bold caps, “MUST BE CURRENTLY EMPLOYED” or you won’t get an interview and your resume will be deleted. I found similar ads that exclude the unemployed — for restaurant managers in Atlanta, Houston and Iowa City; a service manager in New Jersey; an executive assistant at a New York hedge fund. Those listings would be illegal under legislation proposed by Democrats in Congress. Enter Stephen Moore from the Wall Street Journal . He’s a big business gasbag who always gets airtime to prop up what’s best for Wall Street. This legislation actually ties him up in knots in this interview with Matthews. Chris exposes him as an idiot for siding with discrimination against workers out of work. The babbling Moore says it’s wrong to say the Irish need not apply and being out of work shouldn’t be held against you, but it’s your problem for not having a job so the company use your unemployment record against you because you should already have a job when you start looking for a new one. The only time workers had any real power looking for work was when the economy was humming and companies were expanding back in the Clinton days so people did actually look for more perks and better pay while they had a job, but with over 9 percent unemployment across this country, not having a job is only an indicator of a bad economy. Hardball: I have to ask you, to start off at the bat — let`s go with Steve — what is the case for employers being allowed to say, don`t waste my time if you`re unemployed looking for a job; you`re not going to even get an interview here? STEPHEN MOORE, SENIOR ECONOMIC WRITER, “THE WALL STREET JOURNAL”: Well, I don`t think it`s — I don`t think it`s right to say, like, you know, like Irish need not apply, unemployed need not apply. But I do think, Chris, that it is important for employers to be able to look at the worker job history, and if somebody`s been out of work for a long time, for better or for worse, that`s usually a negative on their resume. It doesn`t look — I always tell people, you know, the best way to find a job is to have a job. And so — (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: But, Steve, you`re being redundant. If you tell a person they can`t apply for a job because they have been out of work, then the next time they apply for a job, they will say, you have been out of work longer; therefore, you can`t apply for this job. It seems like it`s a redundant, vicious cycle you`re creating here. MOORE: Well — MATTHEWS: Don`t hire the unemployed, so they can be unemployed next week and not get hired by someone who won`t hire the unemployed. Isn`t that a problem you have just created right here on this show? MOORE: Well, this is why I think these — (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: You have just done it. You have stepped in it. MOORE: No, I think that — (LAUGHTER) MOORE: I think the — I think problem is — one of the big problems with the — half of the people who are unemployed now have been unemployed for more than six months. I think one of the reasons for that, and the statistics show this, is we keep extending unemployment insurance. That`s kept people unemployed longer than they would otherwise be, and it`s hurt their job market prospects. MATTHEWS: So, as they go out there to apply for a job, they`re told they can`t apply because they have been unemployed. But you say they don`t go looking for jobs because they have been getting benefits. Which is it? Are they looking for jobs and being rejected? MOORE: Right. MATTHEWS: Why would they put those signs up if they weren`t having people come in and looking for jobs or unemployed? They wouldn`t need to sign. MOORE: Look — (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: It`s a good question. You don`t know the answer, do you? Why would you tell a person not to apply for unemployment when they unemployed aren`t looking for jobs? You wouldn`t need the sign, would you? MOORE: Look, Chris, you`re taking out of context my words. I don`t think it`s fair for employers to say, if you don`t have a job, you can`t apply. But I do think it`s certainly legitimate for businesses to look at the work history. If somebody`s been out of work for two years, you`re less likely to want to hire that person than somebody who actually has been working. MATTHEWS: OK. Dana, let me ask you this about this. I didn`t know this was going on. And I`ll tell you one thing — I`m into politics, not hiring people. I think it sounds like hell. This is the worst I’ve heard. You don’t help a guy or a woman who`s out of work, say a plant closed. It`s not their fault, they`re living in some small town, all there is is the plant. There`s not another plant opening up. It`s not their fault.
Continue reading …And golly, don’t they look proud. On the left, the new $99 Kindle Touch . On the right, the new $79 Kindle . And, in the middle, the $199 Kindle Fire tablet. So, which would you rather? If you need more help deciding, check out the gallery, which features the third-generation Kindle thrown into the mix. Gallery: Amazon Kindle family portrait Amazon Kindle family portrait originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:39:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …That nipple slip on Dancing With the Stars Monday night didn’t actually happen and people who think they saw otherwise must have been seeing, uh, things, Nancy Grace tells E! Online . “They have taken all sorts of major league industrial-type precautions for nothing to happen, and you know what, thank…
Continue reading …