Mariah Carey contractions | Mariah Carey due date | Gossip Cop Mariah Carey went to the hospital after experiencing contractions two weeks before she’s due to deliver twins. kasiabrwn says: Mariah Carey Home From Hospital After Contractions: Mariah Carey nearly received an incredible surprise birthday… http://bit.ly/f3SBLD
Continue reading …Katja Kipping über Hartz IV Sanktionen AntiAtom Demo “Fukushima mahnt” Berlin, 26.03.2011, vor CDU-Parteizentrale Die Welt hält dem Atem an: Wartezeiten vor Wahllokalen in Baden-Württemberg CDU suffers historic loss in Baden-Württemberg – The Local Chancellor Angela Merkel’s conservatives suffered a historic loss in Baden-Württemberg on Sunday, ending nearly six decades in power. According to exit polls, the Greens will lead a German state for the first time. AMERICAblog News: Angela Merkel's CDU may lose in regional … News and opinion about US politics from a liberal/Democratic/progressive perspective. Baden-Württemberg | News On Twitter If the CDU loses it will be a massive blow for Merkel said the Social Democrat candidate Nils Schmidt 37 whose party may end up ruling BadenWrttemberg in a coalition with the Greens. Helen Pidd in Stuttgart. But remember she is Teflon … Strahlenwerte by Schwarwel | Nature Cartoon | TOONPOOL TOONPOOL Cartoons – Strahlenwerte by Schwarwel, tagged cdu , atom, anti, partei, japan, strahlung, reaktur, explosion, tsunami, katastrofe, umwelt, natur, zerstörung, strom, fukushima, radioaktiv, pazifik, seuche, verseucht, grenzwert, … Football Fail: NFL Action Figures Without Cheerleaders Just More … Em Baden-Württemberg, na Alemanha, onde o CDU governa desde 1953, paira a ameaca da DERROTA. A eleicao tem sinais muito alem do Estado. A Kanzlerin (“Presidenta”) colocou todo o seu cacife no projeto Bahn21, e agora ve afundar seu barco … jfassbender says: Green Party clear winner in regional election in German state of Baden-Württemberg. Heavy defeat for coalitiln parties CDU and FDP
Continue reading …Damn Nature R U Kidding Me With This of the Day: In one of the most harrowing pieces of footage to emerge in the aftermath of the 2011 Sendai Earthquake, the resultant tsunami overruns the city of Kesennuma, leaving very little in its wake. [ japanprobe .] Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Daily What Discovery Date : 27/03/2011 19:11 Number of articles : 3
Continue reading …• Schoolgirl shot dead by paratrooper in 1976 • Letter to mother formally apologises for killing Majella O’Hare was 12 years old. It was a bright summer’s day in 1976 and the schoolgirl had just walked past an army checkpoint on the way to church. Moments later, she lay dying on a country road in County Armagh, shot in the back by a paratrooper. Now, almost 35 years after the infamous killing, an unprecedented apology from the Ministry of Defence will be handed over to her elderly mother at a ceremony in Belfast. The letter, signed by the defence secretary, Liam Fox, belatedly corrects the army’s account of the incident and acknowledges that the soldier’s subsequent courtroom explanation was “unlikely”. British Irish Rights Watch , a civil liberties group that has campaigned for decades for a formal apology, welcomed the statement and hoped that it would open the way for a more conciliatory approach by military officials. The only other occasion an apology has been offered for the army’s behaviour during Northern Ireland’s Troubles – albeit in more general terms – was after publication of the Bloody Sunday Inquiry last summer. Then, David Cameron described the Parachute Regiment’s actions in Derry as “unjustified and unjustifiable”. The death of Majella O’Hare followed a spate of sectarian murders in south Armagh. It was 14 August 1976 and she had set off for confession with some school friends. “They came upon an army patrol,” her brother Michael, now 62, told the Guardian. “She had walked on about 20 or 30 yards when [shots] rang out from a general purpose machine gun. Three shells were found on the ground. Two bullets hit her in the back. “The soldier [Private Michael Williams] was carrying the weapon cocked and ready but he would have had to exert between 10 and 12lb of pressure to fire it. “My father was the school caretaker and he had been outside cutting the grass and tidying up. He heard shots. There was panic; he know something terrible had happened and ran to the scene. “The soldiers were giving him abuse, shouting: ‘What do you think you are doing? You’re only the fucking grass-cutter.’ Even after he found her on the road and cradled her in his arms, they were abusive.” Majella was airlifted to Daisy Hill hospital but died in the military helicopter. Williams, of the 3rd Battalion Parachute Regiment, claimed he had fired in response to an IRA sniper attack. The RUC investigated and the paratrooper was charged with murder. By the time of the trial, the charge had been reduced to manslaughter. Lord Justice Maurice Gibson, sitting alone without a jury, accepted there probably had been a gunman who fired simultaneously even though there was no independent evidence of anyone hearing other shots. Gibson, who was killed with his wife by an IRA roadside bomb in 1987, acquitted Williams. At the end of the trial Mary O’Hare, Majella’s mother, approached Williams. “She asked him ‘why did you do it?’ He looked at her and shrugged his shoulders,” Michael O’Hare recalled. “Majella was a lovely child, going about her life in childlike ways and not feeling threatened at all. My father was so affected afterwards; he never really recovered from the shock and died in 1992.” An inquiry by the Police Service of Northern Ireland’s Historical Enquiries Team (HET), which re-investigated the case, found there was no evidence to suggest there had ever been an IRA gunman. The HET’s director, Dave Cox, last summer called on the army to apologise for killing Majella. The letter says: “I apologise for Majella’s death and offer you my heartfelt sympathy. Although many years have passed, I have no doubt that your grief and that of your family has not diminished … both the initial investigation by the RUC and the more recent review have concluded that it was unlikely that there was a gunman in the area when the soldier involved opened fire and struck Majella, as he claimed. “The soldier’s actions resulted in the loss of a young and innocent life, causing sorrow and anguish for those who knew and loved Majella. “On behalf of the army and the government, I am profoundly sorry that this tragic incident should have happened.” Mary O’Hare is now 88. She will be handed the letter by the Northern Ireland secretary, Owen Paterson, in Belfast. “It’s good to get this apology,” Michael O’Hare said. “It’s not going to bring Majella back but at least it will set the record straight for history. When you send trained killers out to use firearms in a warzone, you can never feel safe. “I would like to meet Michael Williams and see if there’s genuine regret about what happened. Closure will never be there but [there is] compassion and a sense of comfort that we have been denied for 35 years.” Jane Winter, director of British Irish Rights Watch who has followed the case for many years, said: “This is a full-blown apology from the MoD and on behalf of the nation. “It’s incredible that it’s taken so long. HET investigators tried to talk to Private Williams but got no further than his lawyers. They said he was contrite about what happened but would never [be able to give evidence] in the state he was now in. “I have never seen a letter like this. We have tried to get apologies before. I hope this sets a precedent for other families.” The Historical Enquiries Team, whose re-investigation led to the apology, has so far examined 1,400 deaths that occurred during the Troubles. It has provided fresh insights for many of the families of the bereaved, including those of soldiers who were killed on tours of duty in Northern Ireland Military Defence policy Northern Ireland Liam Fox Owen Bowcott guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Many countries still executing people for crimes and hundreds remain on death row, Amnesty International report reveals China, Iran, North Korea, Yemen and the US carried out the most executions last year, bucking a global trends towards abolition of the death penalty, a report has said . China again was by far the world’s most prolific executioner in putting to death thousands, said Amnesty International in its report on the death penalty worldwide. Amnesty does not provide a precise figure of executions in China as Beijing keeps such figures secret. Instead, it has challenged the Chinese authorities to publish figures for the number of people sentenced to death and executed each year to confirm claims of a reduction in the use of the death penalty. China, however, last year did move to cut down the number of offences that carry the death penalty, which applies to no less than 68 crimes. If the changes go through, the death penalty would be removed for such crimes as tax fraud, and for smuggling valuables and cultural relics. Amendments to the criminal code may also remove it as a punishment for those over 75. In all, the changes would affect 13 death penalty offences. Setting China aside, Amnesty said at least 527 executions were carried out last year. Almost half of those took place in Iran (252). North Korea executed 60, Yemen 53 and the US 46. The minimum number of executions was down from at least 714 in 2009. Methods of execution included beheading, electrocution, hanging, lethal injection and various kinds of shooting (by firing squad, and at close range to the heart or the head). No stonings were recorded in 2010, but stoning sentences were reported in Nigeria, Pakistan and Iran, where at least 10 women and four men remain under stoning sentences . At least 2,024 new death sentences were imposed during 2010 in 67 countries, including 365 in Pakistan alone, meaning it has some 8,000 people currently on death row. Amnesty expressed particular alarm that a significant proportion of executions or death sentences recorded in 2010 were for drug-related offences. They accounted for more than half of 114 sentences in Malaysia. Meanwhile, Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Sudan and the United Arab Emirates ignored international prohibitions and imposed death sentences on child offenders -people aged 17 or less when alleged crimes were committed, with Iran executing one such offender named as Mohammad A. The underlying trend on the death penalty, however, is strongly toward abolition, Amnesty said, with 31 countries removing the punishment in law or in practice in the last 10 years. Last year, Gabon became the 139th country to either abolish the penalty outright or to cease to use it in practice. “In spite of some setbacks, developments in 2010 brought us closer to global abolition,” said Salil Shetty, Amnesty’s secretary general. “The President of Mongolia announced a moratorium on the death penalty, an important first step as capital punishment is still classified as state secret. For the third time and with more support than ever before, the UN general assembly called for a global moratorium on executions. Any country that continues to execute is flying in the face of the fact that both human rights law and UN human rights bodies consistently hold that abolition should be the objective.” Capital punishment Amnesty International Human rights United States China Yemen North Korea Iran Mark Tran guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …So the cover story for bombing Libya without congressional approval? According to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who appeared with Defense Secretary Robert Gates on This Week, it’s an “internationally authorized intervention where we are one of a number of countries participating to enforce a humanitarian mission” and wasn’t anything like going to war in Iraq. (So far.) I’ll give Jake Tapper props for actually asking, but I would have probed that position a little more thoroughly. JAKE TAPPER, ABC NEWS: And joining me now in their first interview since the attacks on Libya began, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defense Secretary Robert Gates. Madam and Mr. Secretary, thanks so much for joining us. I’ll start with you, Secretary Gates. The mission is a no-fly zone and civilian protection but does not include removing Gadhafi from power, even though regimen change is stated U.S. policy. So why not have, as part of the mission, regime change, removing Gadhafi from power? ROBERT GATES, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE: Well, first of all, I think you don’t want ever to set a set of goals or a mission — military mission where you can’t be confident of accomplishing your objectives. And as we have seen in the past, regime change is a very complicated business. It sometimes takes a long time. Sometimes it can happen very fast, but it was never part of the military mission. TAPPER: NATO has assumed control and command for the no-fly zone or is this weekend but not yet for the civilian protection. When do we anticipate that happening? GATES: Hillary’s been more engaged with that diplomacy than I have. HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, SECRETARY OF STATE: Well, we hope, Jake, that NATO, which is making the military planning for the civilian protection mission, will meet in the next few days, make a decision which we expect to be positive to include that mission, and then just as the arms embargo and the no-fly zone has been transitioned to NATO command and control, the civilian protection mission will as well. TAPPER: what do you say to the people in Ivory Coast or Syria who say where’s our no-fly zone? We’re being killed by our government too. CLINTON: Well, there’s not an aircraft — there’s not an air force being used. There is not the same level of force. The situation is significantly different enough that the world has not come together. However, in Ivory Coast we have a U.N. peacekeeping force which we are supporting. We are beginning to see the world coalesce around the very obvious fact that Mr. Gbagbo no longer is president. Mr. Ouattara is the president. So you know, each of these situations is different but in Libya when a leader says spare nothing, show no mercy and calls out air — air force attacks on his own people, that crosses a line that people in the world had decided they could not tolerate. TAPPER: When do we know that the mission is done? The no-fly zone has succeeded, civilian protection has stopped, when — when do you — GATES: I would say, for all practical purposes, the implementation of a no-fly zone is complete. Now it will need to be sustained, but it can be sustained with a lot less effort than what it took to set it up. As I indicated in my testimony on the Hill, you don’t establishment a no-fly zone by just declaring it. You go in and suppress the air defenses and that mission is largely complete. I think we have made a lot of progress on the humanitarian side and his ability to move armor, to move toward a Benghazi or a place like that has — has pretty well been eliminated. Now we’ll have to keep our eye on it because he still has ground forces at his beck and call. But the reality is they’re under a lot of pressure. Their logistics — there are some signs that they’re moving back to the east — back to the west away from Ajdabiya and other places. So I think that we have prevented the large scale slaughter that was beginning to take place, has taken place in some places. And so I think that we are at a point where — where the establishment of the no-fly zone and the protection of cities from the kind of wholesale military assault that we have seen certainly in the East has been accomplished and now we can move to sustainment. CLINTON: You know, Jake, I would just add two points to what Secretary Gates said. The United States Senate called for a no-fly zone in the resolution that it passed I think on March 1th. And that mission is on the brink of having been accomplished. And there was a lot of congressional support to do something. There is no perfect option when one is looking at a situation like this. I think that the president ordered the best available option. The United States worked with the international community to make sure that there was authorization to do what we have helped to accomplish. But what is quite remarkable here is that NATO assuming the responsibility for the entire mission means that the United States will move to a supporting role. Just as our allies are helping us in Afghanistan where we bear the disproportionate amount of sacrifice and the cost, we are supporting a mission through NATO that was very much initiated by European requests joined by Arab requests. I think this is a watershed moment in international decision making. We learned a lot in the 1990s. We saw what happened in Rwanda. It took a long time in the Balkans, in Kosovo to deal with a tyrant. But I think in — what has happened since March 1st and we’re not even done with the month demonstrates really remarkable leadership. GATES: I would just add one other thing in sort of a concrete manifestation where we are in this and that is we and the Department of Defense are already beginning to do our planning in terms of beginning to draw down resources. First from support of the no-fly zone and then from the humanitarian mission. Now that may not start in the next day or two, but I certainly expect it to in the very near future. TAPPER: Well, I wanted to follow on that. How long are we going to be there in this support role? GATES: Well, I think that, as I say, we — we will begin diminishing the level of our engagement, the level of resources we have involved in this, but as long as there is a no-fly zone and we have some unique capabilities to bring to bear, for example, intelligence, surveillance and recognizance, some tanking ability, we will continue to have a presence. But a lot of these — a lot of the forces that we will have available other than the ISR are forces that are already assigned to Europe or have been assigned to Italy or at sea in the Mediterranean. TAPPER: I’ve heard NATO say that this — they anticipate — some NATO officials say this could be three months, but people in the Pentagon think it could be far longer than that. Do you think we’ll be gone by the end of the year? Will the mission be over by the end of the year? GATES: I don’t think anybody knows the answer to that. TAPPER: Do you think Libya posed an actual or imminent threat to the United States? GATES: No, no. It was not — it was not a vital national interest to the United States, but it was an interest and it was an interest for all of the reasons Secretary Clinton talked about. The engagement of the Arabs, the engagement of the Europeans, the general humanitarian question that was at stake. There was another piece of this though that certainly was a consideration. You’ve had revolutions on both the East and the West of Libya. TAPPER: Egypt and Tunisia. GATES: Egypt and Tunisia. So you had a potentially significantly destabilizing event taking place in Libya that put at risk potentially the revolutions in both Tunisia and Egypt. And that was another consideration I think we took into account. TAPPER: Secretary Clinton, how does — CLINTON: Jake, I just want to add too because, you know, I know that there’s been a lot of questions and those questions deserve to be asked and answered. The president is going to address the nation on Monday night. Imagine we were sitting here and Benghazi had been overrun, a city of 700,000 people, and tens of thousands of people had been slaughtered, hundreds of thousands had fled and, as Bob said, either with nowhere to go or overwhelming Egypt while it’s in its own difficult transition. And we were sitting here, the cries would be, why did the United States not do anything? Why — how could you stand by when, you know, France and the United Kingdom and other Europeans and the Arab League and your Arab partners were saying you’ve got to do something. So every decision that we make is going to have plusses and minuses. TAPPER: You heard the Secretary of Defense say that Libya did not pose an actual or imminent threat to the nation and bearing in mind what you just said, I’m still wondering how the administration reconciles the attack without congressional approval with then candidate Obama saying in 2007 the president does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation and, as a senator, you, yourself in 2007 said this about President Bush. (BEGIN AUDIO CLIP) CLINTON: If the administration believes that any — any use of force against Iran is necessary, the president must come to Congress to seek that authority. (END AUDIO CLIP) TAPPER: Why not go to Congress? CLINTON: Well, we would welcome congressional support, but I don’t think that this kind of internationally authorized intervention where we are one of a number of countries participating to enforce a humanitarian mission is the kind of unilateral action that either I or President Obama were — was speaking of several years ago. I think that this had a limited timeframe, a very clearly defined mission which we are in the process of fulfilling. TAPPER: I want to get to a couple other topics before you guys go and one of them is in Yemen President Saleh a crucial ally in counterterrorism seems quite on his way out. Secretary Gates, you said this week we have not done any post-Saleh planning. How dangerous is a post-Saleh world — a post-Saleh Yemen to the United States? GATES: Well, I think — I think it is a real concern because the most active and, at this point, perhaps the most aggressive branch of al Qaeda — al Qaeda and the Arabian Peninsula operates out of Yemen. And we have had a lot of counterterrorism cooperation from President Saleh and Yemeni Security Services. So if that government collapses or is replaced by one that is dramatically more weak, then I think we’ll face some additional challenges out of Yemen. There’s no question about it. It’s a real problem. TAPPER: Secretary Clinton, on Pakistan. Pakistan has been trying to block U.S. counterterrorism efforts in the FATA region, it continues to work with terrorists to attack India, it held a U.S. diplomat in its presence for several weeks, as I don’t need to tell you. Has this relationship gotten worse in the last six months, U.S. Pakistan? CLINTON: Well, Jake, it’s a very challenging relationship because there have been some — some problems. We were very appreciative of getting our diplomat out of Pakistan and that took cooperation by the government of Pakistan. We have cooperated very closely together in going after terrorists who pose a threat to both us and the Pakistanis themselves. But it’s a — it’s a very difficult relationship because Pakistan is in a hard position trying to figure out how it’s going to contend with its own internal extremist threat. But I think on the other hand, we’ve also developed good lines of communication, good opportunities for cooperation, but it’s something we have to work on every day. TAPPER: And finally, we’ve talked a bit about the end of this operation, how it ends. I’m wondering if you can envision the United States supporting a plan where Gadhafi is exiled. Would the U.S. be willing to support Safe Haven and Unity from prosecution and access to funds as a way to end this conflict? CLINTON: Well, Jake, we are nowhere near that kind of negotiation. I’ll be going to London on Tuesday for a conference that the British government is hosting. There will be a number of countries, not only those participating in the — the enforcement of the resolution, but also those who are pursuing political and other interventions. And the United Nations has a special envoy who will also be actively working with Gadhafi and those around him. We have sent a clear message that it is time for him to transition out of power. The African Union has now called for a democratic transition. We think that there will be developments along that line in the weeks and months ahead, but I can’t sitting here today predict to you exactly how it’s going to play out. But we believe that Libya will have a better shot in the future if he departs and leaves power. TAPPER: All right. Secretaries Clinton, Secretary Gates, thank you so much for joining us. CLINTON: Thank you.
Continue reading …Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defense Secretary Robert Gates were featured guests on all the broadcast network Sunday morning shows with the exception of the one on Fox. Host Chris Wallace was clearly unhappy about this, and let his viewers know (video follows with transcript and commentary): CHRIS WALLACE: Of course we wanted to get the White House view on Libya. However, they chose to offer Secretary of State Clinton and Defense Secretary Gates to ABC, CBS and NBC, but not to Fox. Despite the fact that we routinely have more viewers than two of those Sunday shows, the Obama team felt no need to explain to the millions of you who watch this program and Fox News why they have sent U.S. servicemen and women into combat. We thought you’d like to know. As Jeff Poor accurately noted at the Daily Caller, Clinton and Gates appeared on ABC's “This Week,” CBS's “Face the Nation,” and NBC's “Meet the Press.” However, I was a little confused by Wallace's claim “we routinely have more viewers than two of those Sunday shows.” According to “TV by the Numbers,” “Fox News Sunday” got slaughtered last week by its three broadcast rivals: (Sunday, March 20, 2011) TOTAL VIEWERS A25-54 MM/Rtg ABC “THIS WEEK”
Continue reading …Sprint may not be the only US carrier spreading its wings with an HTC tablet this summer, oh no — promotional materials obtained by PocketNow point to the HTC Flyer launching with T-Mobile as well. Though the marketing mockups don’t prove that Madam Magenta will actually be offering the 7-inch Gingerbread tablet with Scribe stylus (or distinguish between T-Mobile USA and its European counterparts, for that matter), the carrier’s clearly given it a lot of thought, and HTC’s spec sheet for the Flyer has indeed listed the AWS bands necessary to carry T-Mobile USA’s 3G data since day one . Sneak a peek at what T-Mobile’s in-store tablet kiosks might look like at our source link below. HTC Flyer headed to T-Mobile, according to marketing scrapbook? originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:03:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …As the bloody stain of drug violence seeps into Mexico’s border towns and resort areas alike, Mexicans are taking refuge in a place that would have been unthinkable even five short years ago: Mexico City. The capital city, long known as a place where cops could be bought and petty…
Continue reading …At the 11th Annual GLAAD Media Awards during the 2000 Los Angeles ceremony, Elizabeth Taylor was presented the Vanguard Award by her stepdaughter Carrie Fisher. For her tireless work in HIV/AIDS advocacy, it was truly well deserved. Premiering tonight in Marc Malkin’s column at E! Online, Taylor’s moving acceptance speech recalls her frustration at government inaction in the Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : glaadBLOG.org Discovery Date : 26/03/2011 02:22 Number of articles : 3
Continue reading …