I would like to shove my foot directly up this asshole’s giant loophole. The Teabilly assholes in Indiana are trying to pass HB 1210. It’s an abortion bill because of course it is. And concerned Rep. Turner is concerned—that women are going to lie about rape and incest to get… oh, go read the title Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Balloon Juice Discovery Date : 31/03/2011 06:50 Number of articles : 5
Continue reading …Prince William has shown he can be a new kind of king. It is time to put away the cynicism and pledge our full-throated support A few short weeks from now, with the world looking on, William Arthur Philip Louis Windsor will exchange rings with Catherine Elizabeth Middleton, and much of Britain will rejoice. Yet, at such moments, certain voices – this newspaper’s included – have long expressed dissent. All this mawkish celebration, they maintain, merely bolsters an anti-democratic institution based on privilege and patronage, a costly anachronism that ought to be abolished. That view is understandable. But it is time for them – for us – to reconsider. A decade ago, the Guardian prominently announced its commitment to republicanism . But Prince William has shown that he can be a new kind of king. That is why, in a significant change of course, we today pledge our full-throated support for the British monarchy. Let’s face it: the current crop of world leaders is far from inspiring. Across the Arab world, dictators battle their own people; at home, attitudes towards Cameron and Clegg alternate between apathy and outrage. In America, the hope that greeted Barack Obama has long since faded. As The King’s Speech so vividly reminded us, there are times when only the calming leadership of a hereditary monarch will do; and as the MPs’ expenses scandal illustrates, it can be dangerous to trust power-hungry elected officials, who lack the security provided by land ownership and immense wealth. Amid all this, William in particular stands out as something unique: a bastion of tradition with a deeply modern sensibility – not to mention a helicopter pilot’s licence. When the time comes, we urge Prince Charles to redouble his focus on his important work in the field of alternative medicine, and to pass the mantle of head of state to his son. For too long, a hair-shirt tendency on the left
Continue reading …‘Bar Karma’ cast mates Cassie Howarth and Matthew Humphreys on the mysterious bar the Current TV show is set in and having fans help determine what happens on the show. (March 31)
Continue reading …St. Louis Cardinals – “Berkman’s Number” Commercial St. Louis Cardinals – “Rosin” Commercial St. Louis Cardinals – “Hotdog Gun” Commercial The St. Louis Cardinals and Playing a Hard 78 – Viva El Birdos A St. Louis Cardinals season preview about other St. Louis Cardinals season previews. Watch San Diego Padres vs St. Louis Cardinals Live Stream March 31 … Watch San Diego Padres vs St. Louis Cardinals Live Stream March 31 2011. Watching San Diego Padres vs St. Louis Cardinals match up is very easy, you can easily watch the game live here, don’t waste your time watch and enjoy live Major … Yigly Articles » Watch San Diego Padres vs St. Louis Cardinals … Watch San Diego Padres vs St. Louis Cardinals Live Stream March 31 2011. Watching San Diego Padres vs St. Louis Cardinals match up is very easy, you can easily watch the game live here, don’t waste your time watch and enjoy live Major … San Diego Padres vs St. Louis Cardinals Live Streaming, San Diego … San Diego Padres vs St. Louis Cardinals Live Streaming, San Diego Padres vs St. Louis Cardinals Online Streaming, San Diego Padres vs St. Louis Cardinals Live Online Streaming, San Diego Padres vs St. Louis Cardinals Free Online … Watch San Diego Padres vs St. Louis Cardinals Live Stream March 31 … CLICK HERE TO WATCH LIVE STREAM! Match Up: San Diego Padres vs St. Louis Cardinals Live Stream Time: 4:15 PM. NicoleCollins7 says: Attendance Watch 2011: The St. Louis Cardinals http://bit.ly/hB5Fma
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Ed Schultz talked to former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich about the potential impasse we’re looking at now and whether our government might be shut down if we can’t get both sides to come to some agreement on our budget. Reich laid out pretty plainly just how dangerous it is to be talking about cuts at all while our economy is still so fragile. I’m glad to see someone like Reich out there attempting to change the political dialog on these budget cuts and Ed Schultz having him on because for the most part our media is just accepting the Villager common wisdom that the poor and working class must suffer because our country “is broke” and we can’t ever in a million years ask the ones holding more wealth in our country that has not been seen since the Gilded Age to ever have to suffer the horrible fate of paying more in taxes. The fact that political games are being played in order to demand more from the working class while we have the largest income disparity since the Gilded Age is just disgusting, but it’s not surprising given the fact that our political class for the most part has been bought and sold by their campaign contributors. Ed did a nice job of laying out pretty plainly just how many people it’s going to do harm to if the government is shut down. You want a passport, forget about it. Want to take a vacation at a national monument, they’ll be closed. You’re a veteran who relies on the VA for assistance, don’t count on it. You work for a government contractor or one of their suppliers, your orders might not be coming in any time soon. You were expecting your Social Security or Medicare checks, well maybe not. Want to be warned by the National Institute of Health on disease control, never mind that. Reich went on to explain how cutting the deficit right now is just insane and rightfully slammed President Obama for not leading on this issue and calling out Republicans for just how harmful their demands are going to be to our economy. I agree with Reich and instead of using the bully pulpit when he’s the one person in this country who’s got it, he’s instead giving them credibility that somehow slashing spending is going to cure our economic woes and our budget battles have turned into an argument over who’s going to cut more instead of whether cutting at all instead of raising taxes is what we ought to be doing. Here’s more from Reich on where we’re headed and it’s not a pretty picture. Until our politicians decide that the American voters they’re supposed to represent matter more than their campaign donors, we’re in a world of hurt and it’s not going to change until more of us start demanding that they start representing their constituents instead of those donors. It would be nice to see campaign finance reform as a theme at more of these protests around the country since that really is the heart of the problem with the corruption in our politics. It’s not just greed. It’s that greed being allowed to buy off our politicians to perpetuate it at the expense of the rest of us. The Truth About the Economy that Nobody In Washington Or On Wall Street Will Admit: We’re Heading Back Toward a Double Dip : Why aren’t Americans being told the truth about the economy? We’re heading in the direction of a double dip – but you’d never know it if you listened to the upbeat messages coming out of Wall Street and Washington. Consumers are 70 percent of the American economy, and consumer confidence is plummeting. It’s weaker today on average than at the lowest point of the Great Recession. The Reuters/University of Michigan survey shows a 10 point decline in March – the tenth largest drop on record. Part of that drop is attributable to rising fuel and food prices. A separate Conference Board’s index of consumer confidence, just released, shows consumer confidence at a five-month low — and a large part is due to expectations of fewer jobs and lower wages in the months ahead. Pessimistic consumers buy less. And fewer sales spells economic trouble ahead. What about the 192,000 jobs added in February? (We’ll know more Friday about how many jobs were added in March.) It’s peanuts compared to what’s needed. Remember, 125,000 new jobs are necessary just to keep up with a growing number of Americans eligible for employment. And the nation has lost so many jobs over the last three years that even at a rate of 200,000 a month we wouldn’t get back to 6 percent unemployment until 2016. Read on…
Continue reading …On Wednesday's All Things Considered, NPR's Ari Shapiro acted as a stenographer for the Obama administration's energy proposals. Shapiro played four clips from the President's recent speech on the issue, and another from a sympathetic environmentalist. Even the lone clip from an oil industry representative came from someone who ” supports the move to invest in biofuels and clean energy .” At the beginning of his report , the correspondent noted that “the White House described this event as a pivot away from speeches about Libya and Japan. But President Obama acknowledged that those crises make it important to talk about energy now.” After playing his first clip from the chief executive, who stated that “the situation in the Middle East implicates our energy security,” Shapiro stayed within the perspective set by the Democrat: ” America's past is strewn with moments when a global crisis has driven up the price of gas or scared people about the risks of nuclear energy .” The NPR reporter continued by playing up Mr. Obama's past speeches during trips to green energy industrial site: ” This president often travels the country, speaking at electric car battery plants, wind turbine manufacturers, or solar panel factories. Today's speech at Georgetown University tied together many of the proposals from those events. It's not an either/or approach to energy. It's both/and .” Later, Shapiro barely touched on the critiques of the White House's energy policy before playing a clip of the President giving his talking point about his reluctance to encourage domestic oil production: SHAPIRO: Oil industry executives say President Obama has limited domestic energy production by imposing new regulations on drilling. Mr. Obama called that a useful political sound bite that doesn't track with reality, and he also suggested that it's beside the point . OBAMA: Even if we drilled every drop of oil out of every single one of the reserves that we possess, offshore and onshore, it still wouldn't be enough to meet our long-term needs. We consume about 25 percent of the world's oil. We only have 2 percent of the reserves. Near the end of his report, the correspondent finally turned to his two non-Obama sound bites, one from Erik Milito of the American Petroleum Institute, the “biofuels and clean energy” backer who also touched on the reality of the country's continuing need for oil and natural gas, and Dale Bryk of the Natural Resources Defense Council. He ended by touting the administration's point that their proposals would help create jobs. The full transcript of Ari Shapiro's report from Wednesday's All Things Considered: MELISSA BLOCK: President Obama took the long view today. With gas prices going up and trouble with the nuclear plant in Japan, the President said in a speech that the U.S. must become less dependent on foreign sources of energy. He wants to cut American oil imports by a third over the next decade. NPR's Ari Shapiro reports on how the President plans to get there. ARI SHAPIRO: The White House described this event as a pivot away from speeches about Libya and Japan. But President Obama acknowledged that those crises make it important to talk about energy now. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA (from speech at Georgetown University): Obviously, the situation in the Middle East implicates our energy security. The situation in Japan leaves us to ask questions about our energy sources. SHAPIRO: America's past is strewn with moments when a global crisis has driven up the price of gas or scared people about the risks of nuclear energy. President Obama said every one of his predecessors, going back to Richard Nixon, has talked about energy independence, and nobody ever manages to do anything about it. OBAMA: We cannot keep going from shock, when gas prices go up, to trance, when they go back down. SHAPIRO: This president often travels the country, speaking at electric car battery plants, wind turbine manufacturers, or solar panel factories. Today's speech at Georgetown University tied together many of the proposals from those events. It's not an either/or approach to energy. It's both/and. OBAMA: Meeting the goal of cutting our oil dependence depends largely on two things. First, finding and producing more oil at home. Second, reducing our overall dependence on oil with cleaner alternative fuels and greater efficiency. SHAPIRO: Oil industry executives say President Obama has limited domestic energy production by imposing new regulations on drilling. Mr. Obama called that a useful political sound bite that doesn't track with reality, and he also suggested that it's beside the point. OBAMA: Even if we drilled every drop of oil out of every single one of the reserves that we possess, offshore and onshore, it still wouldn't be enough to meet our long-term needs. We consume about 25 percent of the world's oil. We only have 2 percent of the reserves. SHAPIRO: Erik Milito of the American Petroleum Institute supports the move to invest in biofuels and clean energy. ERIK MILITO: But, you know, we have to remember there's 250 million cars on the road. We can convert a lot of them, but, at the same time, we're going to need oil and natural gas for many decades to come. SHAPIRO: Dale Bryk of the Natural Resources Defense Council is optimistic that this time around, the promise of reducing foreign oil consumption for clean energy could actually come true. DALE BRYK: This is an area of global competition, and the Chinese and the Germans and the Danes are eating our lunch, and I don't think the American people or American businesses are going to stand for that. SHAPIRO: And the White House hopes that investing in domestic energy production will have another positive side effect: by creating energy at home, companies create jobs at home, too. Ari Shapiro, NPR News, Washington. — Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. You can follow him on Twitter here .
Continue reading …Mercedes-Benz’s new A-Class E-Cell may be a limited production vehicle , but it is a production vehicle, which likely means that some folks will be interested in how it actually drives. Thankfully, the folks from PluginCars have now managed to take one for a quick spin, and have delivered a few first impressions. The short of it is that while it’s a “nice ride,” it’s apparently not a very powerful one — in fact, the site says that the car felt “significantly slower” than the Nissan Leaf , which also of course has the advantage of being cheaper and more widely available. The Mercedes does apparently handle much better, though, and while the floor is a bit higher than a normal car, the interior otherwise seems to be top notch. Unfortunately, the test drive wasn’t exactly long enough to truly test the car’s Tesla -provided batteries, but the site was at least pleased to see the current state of charge conveniently placed right in the middle of the dashboard. Mercedes’ A-Class E-Cell gets taken for a test drive originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:41:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …