When I first moved in with my soon-to-be husband and his two daughters, I was committed to being the nice, easygoing stepmother. I assumed there would be mutual respect and consideration between us since they were already ten- and sixteen-years-old. They weren’t little kids who didn’t know any better. But it didn’t take long to see that my assumptions would be tested. I exercised patience and bit my tongue when my protein bars were returned to the pantry unwrapped and half-eaten. I pretended not to care when my stepdaughters would just reach for my glass of water because it was apparently too much trouble for them to pour their own. I turned off the neglected lights at night and picked up the socks and shoes left in the hallway. I even let it slide off my back when my clothes, makeup or jewelry went missing. But after the first few weeks of feeling a loss of control over what I considered mine, I found myself becoming more and more resentful. Taking a sip from my water glass is a small intrusion, and I do believe in not sweating the small stuff. But the more it happened, the more my anger built up inside of me. I had no sense of privacy in what was now my own home. I had lived alone for a long time, so I was used to having my things left alone. I was slowly letting go of personal boundaries in favor of keeping the peace, whatever that meant. I wasn’t so sure anymore, since I felt anything but peaceful. I kept telling myself to get over it. I liked and wanted to bond with his girls. I didn’t want to risk having them be angry with me or think I was uptight, especially over a small thing like sharing a glass of water. But it wasn’t about the water, it was about privacy and respect. My frustrations continued to grow. I told my husband what was irritating me so much, hoping he would speak with his daughters and handle things for me. I wasn’t their mother. I felt such criticism was unwelcome, especially with a teenager who was used to doing things her way. But it was also my house! I’d hoped my husband would have figured things out and said something sooner. But he seemed oblivious to the problem and my growing frustrations, which made me even more frustrated. Who borrows clothes without asking? Who puts half-eaten food back in the cupboard? Who steals someone else’s water when they can pour their own? These kinds of manners and consideration were all common sense to me. It was a big part of my upbringing. At the heart of my grievance was a simple truth: I was hurt. I had been ignoring my own needs for the sake of being the nice stepmother. Saying “yes” instead of “no,” or just telling myself to “get over it” was not working. It was like admitting to myself that I didn’t matter, that my feelings were not important. I needed boundaries in my own home, and I’d given them up, along with my self-respect. But how could I change things now? The big challenge with being a new stepmother is you are walking into a situation already in progress. Family dynamics are in place. Rules and expectations have been communicated to the children, but they aren’t your rules. You can’t make any assumptions. What seems common sense to you is not to your new family. It’s up to you to figure out what’s going on, what’s wrong, and where you fit in to the whole picture. My tactic of laying low and letting my husband do the disciplining backfired entirely. One day my husband took his ten-year-old daughter aside to correct her on my behalf. She came over to me later and asked rather astutely, “Kelly, why don’t you just tell me yourself if you’re upset about something I do? Why does Dad tell me?” I was taken aback by her candor. The idea of confronting her directly seemed so simple. But for me it was so much easier said than done. I’m no pushover. In my career I’ve had several highly stressful jobs working for very difficult people. I was skillful at handling a wide variety of sticky situations. When someone was upset, I could always talk them down from the roof. When there was a tricky political situation, I was the one to bring both sides together. I was the calm, rational co-worker who could deal with problems and crises on a daily basis. Why couldn’t I deal with them in my own home? But I found stepmothering to be completely different. I’m helping raise children who aren’t mine. I wanted to make the transition for them easier by being as accommodating as possible. But what I really needed was to establish boundaries and enforce them consistently. I needed control over my own space, in my own home. I realized the best way to teach my stepchildren about respect is to have some for myself. It’s still an ongoing struggle for me and I have to choose my battles. But things are getting much better. I’m handling the occasional petulant silences, the angry glares and disrespectful arguing from my stepchildren. But setting clear boundaries has helped me enjoy being with them so much more. More importantly it has made me more comfortable in my home, which helps our relationship. The other day, my older stepdaughter walked over to me after her run, hoping to drink the glass of water I’d poured for myself. Instead of just taking it as she used to, she asked, “Can I have some of your water?” “No,” I responded. “This is for me.” Maybe it’s just a glass of water. But I’m making progress.
Continue reading …Many years ago, at a mutual friend’s wedding, I was chatting with John Von Kannon, fundraiser extraordinaire for the Heritage Foundation. We were discussing the importance of his work since I was performing a similar (but far less successful) task for another political group. “Robert E. Lee deserves all the credit he’s gotten,” Von Kannon explained, “but without his supply wagons he’d have accomplished nothing.” The point is salient: in the world of politics it is the generals who make the headlines, but it is the organizers, naturally overshadowed, who make it all possible. It is commonly accepted that without the National Review magazine and Bill Buckley there would have been no Ronald Reagan. Let the history books be amended to state that without the functional organization of its publisher,
Continue reading …Be the first to know when there is breaking financial news with timely alerts delivered straight to your inbox. Send to: Apple 2.0. Fortune’s Philip Elmer-DeWitt brings you Mac news from outside the reality distortion field. Send to: …
Continue reading …Last year, the Discovery Channel used a non-Discovery star to host Shark Week for the first time—and it worked out well for them, with the largest audience ever (31 million) tuning in to the Craig Ferguson-hosted event. So this year, the network is following the same formula: Saturday Night…
Continue reading …“This Just In” is CNN’s news blog. This is where you will find the latest news and information from CNN’s correspondents and sources around the world. We’ll cover fresh stories big and small – stories that are breaking , developing or …
Continue reading …Vibrators used to be confined to seedy stores or websites, but nowadays you can find them right next to the tampons at your local Walgreens, and women are increasingly open about purchasing the sex toys—and sharing them with partners. Consumers “kept telling us vibrators, vibrators. And we just laughed….
Continue reading …Innovative and unique ideas take center stage in today’s links. USS Lego: Legos serve as this artist’s medium. He created a 22 foot model of the USS Intrepid using 250,000 pieces. (Telegraph) Seeing Symmetry: Need a little beauty in your life? Watch this mesmerizing video. (GOOD) Horse Decor: Actress Amanda Seyfried has an unusual taste
Continue reading …When you think of sentences that Gwyneth Paltrow’s friends often say to her, here’s one that probably does not come to mind: “I want your chili recipe!” But yes, they do in fact exclaim that all the time, Paltrow revealed at a recent dinner party attended by New Yorker scribe…
Continue reading …UN report reveals war crimes on both sides of civil conflict, but Sri Lankans fear it would harm ethnic reconciliation Sri Lanka has warned the UN that publicly releasing a report on alleged war crimes committed as its civil war was ending could harm efforts at post-war ethnic reconciliation. Gamini Peiris, the foreign minister, told reporters that the UN panel had overstepped its mandate and become an investigative rather than an advisory body to the secretary general, Ban Ki-moon. The report handed to Ban last week criticised the Sri Lankan government and Tamil Tiger rebels on their conduct and said there were credible war crimes allegations against both sides. The UN has not released the report officially, but media reports have been describing sections of it. “It’s wrong to publish the report. It’s equally wrong and unacceptable to take any steps at all on the basis of any findings or recommendations contained in the report,” Peiris said. “We are very conscious of the fact that the need of the hour is reconciliation. Does [the report] further that objective, or does it make the accomplishment of that objective more difficult than it needs to be?” Ban’s deputy spokesman, Farhan Haq, told media in New York on Wednesday that the report is expected to be released this week and that the secretary general’s senior advisers have “completed their review of the report”. Many Sri Lankans are bemused at the push to investigate war crimes, now that the country is enjoying its first peace in almost 30 years. “We live in peace and harmony and now the UN wants to disturb the peace we achieved by defeating terrorism,” M A V Upul Kumara, a 40-year-old farmer, told Reuters after signing a petition against the report sponsored by the nationalist Jathika Hela Urumaya political party. The UN panel’s report says the conduct of the war was a “grave assault” on international law, alleging that the government and the Tamil Tigers had committed serious violations, including some that could amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity. Tens of thousands of people died in the last five months of the quarter-century war that ended in May 2009. The report accuses the government of large-scale shelling of no-fire zones where it had encouraged the civilians to concentrate, such as hospitals, a UN hub, food distribution lines and near Red Cross ships that came to pick up wounded civilians. It says Tamil Tigers recruited children to its fighting forces, held civilians as human shields, used them as forced labour, and exposed them to danger by firing heavy weapons from nearby positions. The panel also criticises UN bodies and international officials for not acting to protect civilian lives and not publicising casualty figures to show the human toll of the war. The Tamil Tigers fought for 26 years to create an independent state for Sri Lanka’s ethnic minority Tamils. The Sinhalese majority controls the government and armed forces. The UN says that between 80,000 and 100,000 people died during fighting. Sri Lanka also experienced Marxist uprisings in 1971 and 1988-89, which the government crushed violently at the cost of more than 100,000 lives, primarily young, rural members of the Sinhalese community. Sri Lanka United Nations Tamil Tigers War crimes guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Time has just released its annual list of the 100 most influential people in the world, and there are some perennial favorites (Barack Obama, Oprah), some recent newsmakers (Julian Assange, Mark Zuckerberg), some villains (Anwar al-Awlaki, Saif al-Islam Gadhafi, Kim Jong Un, all of whom get very brief write-ups), some…
Continue reading …