(YouTube link) Walt Disney Imagineering is updating the features of the Haunted Mansion. Here’s a look at how they are changing the beloved “hitchhiking ghosts.” -via Boing Boing Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Neatorama Discovery Date : 25/04/2011 03:34 Number of articles : 3
Continue reading …Electoral body says it would not publish results of 19 seats in legislature after widespread claims of counting irregularities Haiti is facing further political disarray after fraud allegations forced authorities to delay certifying results from last month’s legislative election. The provisional electoral council said it would not publish 19 seats’ results following criticism from the UN, US, and the incoming president, Michel Martelly. Some Haitian politicians demanded a recount, others a fresh election. There were also calls for a travel ban on members of the electoral council, some of whom resigned over the row. The complaints centred on irregularities in the counting of votes in the runoff which seemed to favour the Unity party of the outgoing president, René Préval. The party was awarded 46 of 99 seats in the chamber of deputies and 17 of the senate’s 30 seats. “We have found no explanation for the reversals of 18 legislative races in the final results, which in all except two cases benefited the incumbent party,” the US embassy in Port-au-Prince said in a statement. “Without a public explanation and review … the legitimacy of seating these candidates is in question.” The embassy cited one case in which votes for one Unity candidate jumped from 90,000 in preliminary results to more than 145,000 in final results. Gaillot Dorsinvil, head of the electoral council, said the results of 19 seats in total would not be certified out of “transparency” but he did not mention a recount nor details of what may happen next. The row could delay Martelly’s scheduled inauguration on 14 May and planned constitutional reforms, which are supposed to be voted on by 9 May. Martelly, who won March’s presidential runoff, said he expected the problem would be resolved within weeks but called for an independent Haitian-led investigation into electoral processes. The carnival singer-turned politician, fresh from US secretary of state Hillary Clinton’s backing on a trip to Washington, went to Miami to lobby Haiti’s diaspora for help in rebuilding the earthquake-shattered Caribbean country. “We need you to bring your skills and expertise back to Haiti,” he said. He proposed diverting 1% of wire transfers to Haiti, and a 5 cent a minute levy on phone calls, to an education fund to give 860,000 impoverished children free schooling. Even before the January 2010 quake, which destroyed many schools and killed numerous teachers, Haiti struggled to educate all its children. “Education is the future of Haiti,” said Martelly. Haiti United States Rory Carroll guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Information commissioner says legislation outlawing phone hacking should be clarified The information commissioner has told a powerful group of MPs that legislation outlawing phone hacking is “very uneven” and “very unclear” and the law should be clarified. Christopher Graham told the home affairs select committee that existing legislation outlawing the practice “was drawn up for another age and other circumstances”. The committee is investigating the legal framework surrounding phone hacking following revelations that the News of the World commissioned a private investigator to illegally intercept voicemail messages belonging to dozens of public figures. Since the committee began its inquiry the paper has apologised to eight victims who are suing its owner, News Group Newspapers, in the high court and offered to pay them compensation. The total bill is likely to run to many millions of pounds. The information commissioner pointed out he is not responsible for enforcing the legislation which outlaws phone hacking, including the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, but told MPs it needs to be updated. He said he was monitoring the dispute between the director of public prosecutions Keir Starmer and John Yates, the assistant commissioner of the Metropolitan police. Starmer has contradicted Yates’s claim that Starmer originally advised the Met that no offence was committed unless a voicemail message is intercepted before it has been listened to by its intended recipient. Yates told the home affairs committee earlier this month that advice “permeated the entire investigation”. Graham said on Tuesday: “We are a very interested bystander because there is a lack of clarity about where the law stands.” The information commissioner added: “At the moment you’ve got a regulatory vacuum because there’s no equivalent of the information commissioner acting as a regulator giving advice and guidance.” Graham also said stiffer sentences should be imposed for illegally “blagging” information and revealed the Ministry of Justice is considering introducing measures that would allow judges to impose prison sentences of up to two years for the offence. The maximum sentence for obtaining confidential information such as medical records or phone numbers by calling a company or public body posing as someone else is currently a £5,000 fine. Graham told MPs that blagging was a multimillion pound industry and that custodial sentences are needed to clamp down on “a very profitable business”. Graham said “tens” of public figures who are suing the News of the World for invasion of privacy have written to his office to discover if they were the victims of “blagging”. He added that “less than a dozen” have obtained court orders requiring the commissioner to make available any information it has on whether they were victims of the practice. The Information Commissioner’s Office conducted an investigation called Operation Motorman in 2003 looking at Steve Whittamore, a private investigator who specialised in obtaining information from mobile phone companies, tax authorities and other public bodies, which resulted in his arrest and conviction. Some of the public figures suing the News of the World have asked it to provide relevant information from that inquiry. Graham also criticised mobile phone operators for failing to advise their customers on the measures they should take to ensure their phones and other devices are secure. He said he did not know whether mobile phone operators had written to their customers informing them they had been targeted by Glenn Mulcaire, the private investigator who was on the News of the World’s books until August 2006, when he was arrested for illegally intercepting voicemail messages. He said it was not his job to advise them on whether they should hand over that information and he hasn’t given them guidance about whether to do so. Yates claimed during evidence to MPs on the culture, media and sport select committee that the Met had asked mobile phone companies to warn customers who may have been targeted by Mulcaire. All four leading mobile phone companies have since denied they received such a request. • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”. • To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook . James Robinson guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Chanel’s Tribeca Film Festival Artists dinner brought out stars like Naomi Watts, Zach Braff, Adrien Brody and Rose Byrne, who professed their admiration for the New York festival and its founder, Robert De Niro. (April 26)
Continue reading …The family of a Maine mother who disappeared over the weekend is offering a $3000 reward for her safe return. (April 26)
Continue reading …Click here to view this media There was another massive release of more Wikileaks documents and cries rang out by Village elitists and the Obama administration condemning them . The Obama administration is condemning the latest release of classified documents by WikiLeaks that provide new details about detainees held at Guantánamo Bay. More than 700 documents were made public Monday that detail sensitive information about the status of, evidence against and treatment of some of the 172 prisoners still housed at the detention facility in Cuba. The government said that the leak, published by news outlets like The Washington Post and The New York Times , could impede its anti-terrorism efforts. It defended its conduct in handling the prisoners… read on Any person that believes in the basic concept of journalism should be supporting the legality of these releases. Don’t look for that from the Beltway elites, though. Greg Mitchell has been doing an excellent job of covering WikiLeaks and is the go-to place for anything related to them: As I’ve done for five months, I will be updating news and views on all things WikiLeaks all day, with new items added at the top. — 10:50 Strong NYT editorial tonight: “The internal documents from the prison in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, published in The Times on Monday were a chilling reminder of the legal and moral disaster that President George W. Bush created there. They describe the chaos, lawlessness and incompetence in his administration’s system for deciding detainees’ guilt or innocence and assessing whether they would be a threat if released….The disaster at Guantánamo Bay is now Mr. Obama’s problem. He should not compound Mr. Bush’s mistakes in his efforts to correct them.” 7:45 The Gitmo Files: Center for Constitional Rights analysis, video. 5:05 Amazing: The Atlantic does the counting and finds that the NYT (tho often critical of Assange) has cited WikiLeaks docs in more than half of daily editions this year — and that’s not counting brief references to Assange or Manning but only actual use of documents. Would probably be even higher percentage going back to last Thanksgiving when Cable gate broke. 4:25 Bombshell from the Guardian : Al-qaeda terrorist / bomber also worked for Brit spy service M-16 . ” Adil Hadi al Jazairi Bin Hamlili , an Algerian citizen described as a “facilitator, courier, kidnapper, and assassin for al-Qaida”, was detained in Pakistan in 2003 and later sent to Guantánamo Bay. “But according to Hamlili’s Guantánamo “assessment” file, one of 759 individual dossiers obtained by the Guardian , US interrogators were convinced that he was simultaneously acting as an informer for British and Canadian intelligence.”… read on Which leads me to Bernie Goldberg , who’s book has had a very negative impact on right wing extremists. He’s a useful tool for Fox News because he’s their resident expert on “librul bias” in the media, but since he did work for CBS in the news department, he does understand how vital it is for journalists to use leaked information so that they can do their jobs when it comes to the government. Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers is a lesson from history on why they are so important. Anyway, Bill O’Reilly wants Wikileaks tried for treason (as you’d expect), but Goldberg sets him straight about their value and echoes what progressives have been saying about WikiLeaks. As long as they received them without participating in their retrieval if it was done illegally, then they are obligated to release them to the public. O’Reilly: This is an ongoing situation. Some of the press is seizing upon it. If I got leaked Wikileaks documents I wouldn’t put them on the air. I’m gonna tell everyone I wouldn’t flat out do it. Especially if it put the ISA in any kind of a dangerous situation, which the Guantanamo Bay thing can whip up people easily around the world Goldberg: I think we disagree . Certainly I’m against it if it put lives in jeopardy or jeopardizes an ongoing operation to capture terrorists then I’m against it, but I think you have to distinguish between the person who actually downloaded and in effect stole the documents. That person is clearly guilty of some crime and Wikileaks, if WIkileaks was not in collusion with that person who downloaded the documents. Wikileaks didn’t give them software to do it or didn’t tell them how to do it in any way, then Wikileaks is pretty much a news organization. Granted it’s an anti-American, anti war organization, but they got the information from whoever stole the documents and then made a decision as to whether or not to publish. I think they have a right to do that. I don’t think they should be prosecuted Bernie called Wikileaks a news organization and rightly so. O’Reilly tries to say the government can make some sort of Rico case against Wikileaks and says this. O’Reilly: You can get them on that Rico thing. Now, is Sweden going to expedite over here? I don’t know whether they will or they’re not. I think you can make a strong case that these people are practicing espionage against this country . Bernie actually lends the voice of reason to The Factor and explains the Pentagon Papers to Bill. O’Reilly, unsurprisingly, refuses to listen.
Continue reading …As a young woman like myself, there are precious beauty milestones that will forever remain a part of you, or so I’ve been told. One that will never, ever leave the bowels of my brain: the first time I saw the Facial-Flex informercial on late night television. The year was 2k6; I immediately called my mother into the room so she could witness the magical mouth-gear and myriad of exercises meant to firm the jawline in just weeks! I’m pretty sure she woke up my brother, father and our family dog and we all had a good laugh (while secretly assessing whether we could each shell out $38 plus shipping and handling for the glorified retainer). Apparently — and inexplicably — the Facial-Flex has only gained in popularity since then. Introducing this lady of The Looseleaf Beauty Report. She gets really, and I mean really, into using her Facial-Flex, hitting her stride when the background music swells, even losing count because she’s having such. A. Great. Time. The first minute of the video: mesmerizing. The remaining three: absolutely terrifying. But all worth watching! (Via BuzzFeed) WATCH:
Continue reading …An article in the U.K. Daily Mail stopped me in my tracks recently. New research, it reported, shows that more than 90 percent of women in their 40s and 50s are deeply unhappy with how they look and are suffering from what experts have dubbed “Midlife Mirror Angst Syndrome.” Curious and apprehensive, I read the article. Not surprisingly, the women who were interviewed for the story were quite down on themselves: “Ever since I turned 40, my reflection has upset me. I loathe what’s happening to my body, I am riddled with hang-ups — and I hate the fact I can’t control the changes I see.” “Before the ageing process kicked in, I used to take all those sideways glances from men for granted. I’ve had to accept that I simply don’t turn heads any more.” “I’m going through the menopause and it’s a shock every time I catch sight of myself in the mirror: I expect to see the woman I was in my 20s, but there’s a 50-something woman staring back at me.” I used to feel that way — but no more. A few years ago when I turned 50, this is what was staring back at me when I looked into the mirror: A woman who: was starting to feel invisible and ignored hadn’t exercised regularly in many years had very little energy had hair that looked like road kill because she had been blow-drying it to death for decades, trying to make it something it wasn’t (straight) assumed that the 15 pounds she packed on after going through menopause was normal and would never come off believed that she was no longer attractive focused on her wrinkles was feeling insecure about her place in the world Need I go on? I looked in the mirror and thought, “Okay, this is it. This is what being middle aged is all about, and I’d better just accept it.” Then, I mentally tucked myself under the proverbial blanket and was getting ready to stay there — until I pulled myself up by my bootstraps, declaring, “Giving up is not an option.” Deciding that drastic action was required, I took it upon myself to get the best information from the best experts on nutrition, fitness, style, hair, makeup, health, finances, careers after 50 and everything else you could possibly think of to feel good and look good so that I could stare at that person in the mirror with a renewed sense of pride and confidence. Armed with my new “look” and new attitude, I appeared on the Today Show to talk about how I learned to embrace my age instead of fighting it. During the interview with Ann Curry (see video below), I shared what I believe is the simple key to being fearless after 50: “Embrace your age, whatever it is. Love your life, get as healthy as you can, move your body every day, be informed, stay engaged, connect with others, use your mind, live with style, be bold, be brave and walk with confidence.” The message has resonated with men and women around the country because we’re tired of being told that we are invisible and no longer relevant. I meet people over 50 every day who are engaged with life in ways they never thought they could be. I can honestly say that turning 50 changed my life for the better. Instead of giving up and giving in, I did a bit of “tough love” on myself and took action. But more than that: I also realized that I didn’t want to just be alive; I wanted to have a life, a great, big, wonderful life after 50. Before sitting down to write this piece, I looked in the mirror, and this is what I saw: A woman who: just came back from running nine miles (with walk breaks and quite slowly) will run in the New York City Marathon this year to celebrate her 55th birthday and raise money for the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (see the “NYC Marathon Training Weekly Update” at the end of this article) can do 20 push-ups (just a few years ago she couldn’t even do one) is starting a new business and has outlines for two other books has come to truly understand and appreciate the power of connecting with other women who are, or have been, going through similar midlife experiences (take a look at a few of the comments from Facebook friends who were asked this question, “What do you see when you look in the mirror?” below) can see the pride in her daughters’ faces when they look at this confident, happy and unstoppable woman their mother has become smiles more often than not is the happiest she has ever been That is what I see. Oh, about those wrinkles. Yes, they are still there. I love them, and I hope you come to love yours, too. They are the most empowering things I possess. I put this question, “When you look in the mirror, what do you see?” on Facebook, and here are a few of the responses, reprinted with their permission. If you’re on Facebook, join me and these wonderful women so we can all learn from each other about living our best lives after 50: I see a different face every day. The face may change, but the reflection remains the same. There’s always a smart, loving, talented woman looking back at me. (Karen Hanley Taylor) I see wisdom in the lines around my eyes, happiness in the lines around my mouth and joy reflecting in my eyes. (Denise Taylor Tremaine) I see a youthful spirit with a new wisdom that can only come with life experience. I take care of myself and do the best that I can with my looks, and have accepted the physical change as part of growing older. I feel very blessed. (Marsha Silver-Kessler) I see a woman who believes that dreams can come true again and again! (Amy Wise) I see an older version of myself, but a much more serene and confident version. I see a woman who can handle just about anything with a little time to get used to whatever it is. I see a truly happy woman who has found contentment, has lost her judgementalism, has found her groove and who can find common ground with anyone and who can enjoy herself in any situation….take that you 20 year olds!
(Maureen Ardron) Tell us: what do you see? * * * * * 2011 New York City Marathon Weekly Training Update Saturday: 5 miles with a run/walk ratio of 3 minutes/30 seconds Monday: 5 miles with a run/walk ratio of 3 minutes/30 seconds Thursday: 9 miles with a run/walk ratio of 1 minute/1 minute Every other week I’ll be adding another mile or so to the long run (keeping the two short runs the same distance), and will be adding “speed work” to my training. For more information on the Jeff Galloway Run/Walk/Run Method, check out his website, jeffgalloway.com. * * * * * Staying connected is a powerful tool. “Friend” me on Facebook and follow me on Twitter. For more information on “The Best of Everything After 50: The Experts’ Guide to Style, Sex, Health, Money and More,” please visit my website, bestofeverythingafter50.com. Stay well, and stay in touch.
In his “Rewrite” segment last night, MSNBC's “Last Word” host Lawrence O'Donnell pounded out a 9-minute-long sermonette against conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh. O'Donnell slammed Limbaugh as biblically illiterate, reacting to a monologue from his April 25 program in which Limbaugh complained about liberals co-opting Jesus Christ for political purposes in the federal budget debate, posing questions such as “What Would Jesus Cut” from the budget. “What would Jesus take?” Limbaugh countered, answering “nothing.” O'Donnell vehemently disagreed, going on to cite Scripture references — divorcing them from context — in order to argue Jesus was a fan of “progressive taxation,” among other things. [Video posted after page break] “The New Testament does have an answer to Rush's question, 'What would Jesus take?' and it's not one Rush is going to like,” O'Donnell began, adding smugly, “And since he obviously has no working command of the Bible, it will surely shock him because he will be hearing it now for the first time.” “The answer is everything, not 35 percent, not 39.6 percent. One hundred percent,” O'Donnell continued, referring to marginal tax rates for top income-bracket earners, citing as his proof text a passage from Mark 10 in which a rich man comes up to Jesus and asks “What shall I do to inherit eternal life?” O'Donnell then selectively edited Jesus's answer: Go and sell all your possession and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven… But right after the ellipsis, verse 21 continues “and come, follow me.” O'Donnell also ignored the thrust of the story in context, which is the high personal cost in this age of following Jesus, but the eternal inheritance that awaits those who abandon all to follow Jesus, whose kingdom, Jesus himself repeatedly said, was “not of this world.”
Continue reading …Jon Stewart has some advice for anybody alarmed by Donald Trump’s apparently relentless rise in the polls: Relax. Polls this early don’t mean squat. The Daily Show host, in a segment on “Premature Ecalculation,” looked at some other front runners from the spring before other election yesteryears, including Joe Lieberman,…
Continue reading …