Home » Archives by category » News (Page 5230)
PSA: AT&T DSL and U-Verse landline internet caps begin tomorrow, if you can see this website

Tomorrow is May 2nd, 2011, and you know what that means — tomorrow is the day that AT&T will impose data caps on DSL and U-Verse Internet, and begin tallying up overage fees. At least, that was the plan on March 18th — when the company formally announced 150GB DSL and 250GB U-Verse caps — but even if you’re a paying customer who chows down several hundred gigabytes in a month, you may not have to worry about paying extra right away. AT&T specified that folks like yourself will have access to an online tool to self-police your usage before the company even begins to calculate the cost of your formerly all-you-can-eat bandwidth buffet, and as you can see in the picture above, the tool isn’t quite ready for public consumption across the entire country. Scoot on over to our source link, enter your AT&T ID, and if you see the same, perhaps you won’t have to cancel your 700-hour Star Trek marathon quite yet. PSA: AT&T DSL and U-Verse landline internet caps begin tomorrow, if you can see this website originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 01 May 2011 13:16:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Continue reading …
Paul Walker Fast Five

Paul Walker – Fast Five Interview HD Paul Walker “Fast Five” Official Interview Footage Paul Walker & Cast of “Fast Five” Arrive to Premier in Rio Jordana Brewster and Paul Walker Fast Five – Just another … Jordana Brewster and Paul Walker Fast Five Jordana Brewster and Paul Walker returns to the “Fast and Furious,” “Fast Five” franchise, where he will reprise their roles as Brian O’Connor, and Mia Toretto. When the film Dwayne Johnson … Fast Five | movies Writers: Chris Morgan, Gary Scott Thompson. Staring: Vin Diesel, Paul Walker and Dwayne Johnson. Justin lin vin Diesel fast five. Justin Lin and Vin Diesel. Paul Walker fast five . Paul Walker. Dwayne Johnson The Rock Fast five … followmytweet says: Jordana Brewster and Paul Walker Fast Five – Just another … http://bit.ly/lqCaUH

Continue reading …
Centrica threatens to shut gas field

Row over windfall tax on offshore drilling provokes possible closure of field that produces 6% of nation’s gas The dispute between energy firms and the government over the level of tax paid by firms operating in the North Sea dramatically escalated on Sunday with British Gas threatening to shut down an important gas field on the Irish Sea. Centrica, which owns British Gas, closed the Morecambe Bay field for routine maintenance and warned it may not reopen it because of the 12% tax rise on North Sea profits announced by the chancellor, George Osborne, in the budget in March. The move provoked an immediate response from the Treasury, which said the rise was necessary and that the company would continue to make substantial profits on its operation. Morecambe Bay produces 6% of the UK’s gas, but Centrica said it may now be cheaper to buy supplies on the open market, shipping them in from abroad, rather than bear the expense of operating Morecambe where gas is subject to an “onerous” tax regime. Centrica said that UK oil and gas fields are now subject to the highest levels of tax in the world. A spokesman said: “At these higher tax rates, Morecambe’s profitability can be marginal. Accordingly, we may choose to buy gas for our customers in the wholesale markets in preference to restarting the field after planned maintenance [due to last four weeks].” The company added that following the increase in supplementary corporation tax, North Morecambe will be subject to a 62% tax rate and South Morecambe 81%. “This impacts the trigger levels at which point we shut in production and purchase gas from other sources such as LNG [liquefied natural gas].” A Treasury spokesman said the tax rise was essential to help motorists cope with the soaring cost of petrol: “The decision to increase the charge on oil and gas companies … has allowed the government to lower fuel duty, helping hard-pressed motorists at a difficult time. Even with this change, average post-tax oil profits per barrel are forecast to be higher in the next five years than the last five, meaning that profits are expected to stay high.” In February, Centrica reported record profits of £742m at British Gas – a 24% leap on a year earlier – provoking criticism from consumer groups. Centrica had pushed through a 7% increase in energy bills just two months earlier. Centrica argues that its gas production goes into power stations, not to fuel cars, and that it should not have to pay a tax being levied to help motorists. The row between business and government is potentially embarrassing for Centrica as its chief executive, Sam Laidlaw, has recently been appointed a non-executive director at the Department for Transport as part of the drive to import private-sector efficiency to Whitehall. The chancellor sparked uproar in the energy industry when he imposed the £2bn windfall tax on North Sea firms. The industry was furious that the levy was introduced without consultation and warned it could jeopardise investment, damage investor confidence and hit jobs. Last week, Shell and BP both reported big increases in profits but said the tax increases could cost them as much as $1bn (£600m) each. Some companies have threatened an investment boycott in response to the new tax, which follows increases introduced a few years ago when Gordon Brown was chancellor. Executives argue they need “fiscal certainty” if they are to continue to invest in the North Sea, where production is in decline but thousands of British workers are still employed. They have been lobbying hard to change the chancellor’s mind, but so far he has refused to reconsider. Critics have complained that the energy industry is trying to dodge its responsibilities and avoid paying a fair share of higher taxes at a time of national economic hardship. Unions and consumer groups point out that oil prices have been soaring, thanks to the boom in commodity prices generated by bigger demand from India and China. Last week, the AA said it planned to ask the European competition commission to investigate whether oil and petrol markets are being manipulated after Shell reported first-quarter profits up 40%, which means the company is making £2m an hour. In the past, Treasury ministers have dismissed fears that the hike in North Sea taxes would lead to a decline in production. But oil executives have threatened to bring forward the retirement of many big fields, shutting down infrastructure that could affect smaller developers struggling to bring new oil fields into production. Thousands of jobs in Scotland have been put at risk after Norway’s Statoil said it would “pause and reflect” before starting on a £3bn project near the Shetlands. Oil companies have complained that Osborne’s decision would scupper plans to explore the remaining North Sea fields, a move which was expected to create 15,000 jobs. Centrica Budget 2011 Budget Gas Commodities Energy industry Energy Gas Richard Wachman guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
David Cameron using AV to trash us, say Lib Dems

Prime minister accused of using referendum to ruin Nick Clegg’s leadership as new polls shows No lead cut to 10 points The deepening loss of personal trust at the top of the coalition government engendered by the bitter AV referendum campaign was exposed when David Cameron was accused of a systematic and shortsighted attempt to trash Nick Clegg’s leadership. The attack by the energy secretary, Chris Huhne, in the final week of the campaign further exposes the deep anger among Liberal Democrats that Cameron is using the referendum to shore up his position within the Conservative party at Clegg’s expense. Huhne expressed anger over widely circulated no campaign leaflets that focus on Clegg’s alleged broken pledges. He told the Guardian: “David Cameron has had the power to stop these no campaign leaflets saying Nick Clegg has broken promises and told lies. He has done nothing about it. “To attack your political colleagues in a coalition and Nick Clegg in particular for accepting the compromises necessary to allow the Conservatives to implement some of its policies is absurdly short-sighted and outrageous. “Our two parties came together in the national interest in order to deal with our country’s economic problems. The Conservative party is now completely trashing us and Nick Clegg’s leadership for doing something they asked us to do in the national interest.” Huhne’s remarks constitute the most personal attack on Cameron mounted by a Lib Dem during the referendum campaign. Huhne, who has taken more risks than any other Lib Dem cabinet member to take the fight to the Conservatives during the campaign, said the no camp was run and wholly funded by the Conservative party, and if Cameron wanted to stop the leaflets he could have done so. Cameron insisted he was only responsible for the Conservative no campaign, and not the wider all-party campaign. The latest row follows a Sunday Times/YouGov poll that showed some tightening in the race, with the no lead narrowing from 18 points to a still emphatic 10. There is some sign that Labour voters now believe it is in their better long-term interest to damage Cameron by voting yes than it is to vote no and punish Clegg. But the yes campaign is still only leading in Scotland, suggesting that despite the fluctuating polls it may have an insurmountable job to turn a tentative shift into a decisive victory by Thursday. Both Clegg and Cameron said the coalition would survive Thursday’s results, which could also see the loss of 600 Conservative councillors and as many as 400 Liberal Democrats. Speaking on the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show, Cameron said he would not be giving his coalition partners any consolation prizes if they were defeated in the referendum. “I don’t believe that a successful coalition is based around trying to endlessly sort of trade off each other’s policies.” But he signalled he wanted to revise his plans to introduce GP-led commissioning in the NHS so that the reform did not exclude hospital doctors. Meanwhile, Clegg accused the no campaign of trying to sow confusion over AV. But he acknowledged that “at a time of some anxiety … it’s sometimes quite a challenge to persuade people that we need to change things, move with the times”. He said the campaign had shown “this coalition government is composed of different parties with different values and different identities; maybe in the long run that’s not a bad thing”. The Labour leader, Ed Miliband, also waded into the dispute yesterday, saying: “I have always thought that this is likely to be a five-year government. I think it is less likely after the rows of the last month.” Alternative vote AV referendum Electoral reform David Cameron Nick Clegg Chris Huhne Conservatives Liberal Democrats Patrick Wintour guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

For fans of The Office , Michael Scott’s leaving was a hard but enjoyable climax—and that’s what she said, of course. And for fans of “that’s what she said” joke, two scientists at the University of Washington have created a computer program for identifying the popular double entendre, the Double…

Continue reading …
Mayor Orders Ill. City Evacuated on Flood Threat

Police are going door to door throughout Cairo, Ill., to clear out any remaining residents after the mayor issued a mandatory evacuation over flood concerns. (May 1)

Continue reading …

Tea Partiers and Conservatives live in their own reality, especially when it comes to numbers. They find an easily digestible sound-byte line and they repeat it into the ground. Florida’s Marco Rubio, or Mr. Tea Party, refused to back Paul Ryan’s budget mess when asked if he supported it on MTP and then made up his own numbers pertaining to Medicare and what the Ryan budget actually does. David Gregory asked Rubio questions and instead of answering him outright, he deflected the question and said he’s for anything that will fix the budget. Oh, where’s the love? Here’s the CBO on RyanCare: Under the proposal, most elderly people would pay more for their health care than they would pay under the current Medicare system . For a typical 65-year-old with average health spending enrolled in a plan with benefits similar to those currently provided by Medicare, CBO estimated the beneficiary’s spending on premiums and out-of-pocket expenditures as a share of a benchmark: what total health care spending would be if a private insurer covered the beneficiary. By 2030, the beneficiary’s spending would be 68 percent of that benchmark under the proposal, 25 percent under the extended-baseline scenario, and 30 percent under the alternative fiscal scenario. … CBO estimates that average spending in traditional Medicare will be 89 percent of (that is, 11 percent less than) the spending that would occur if that same package of benefits was purchased from a private insurer. Rubio makes up magical numbers to defend cuts to Medicare and said that Ryan’s budget actually increased funding to Medicare while sticking to the previously debunked notion that HCR will cut 500 billion out of Medicare. Rubio: The Ryan plan doesn’t cut Medicare, it actually increases funding in it and the only people in this town that have voted to cut medicare that are the people who supported Obamacare, that cut half a trillion dollars for the next ten years from medicare. Political Correction has all the details of that lie : FactCheck.org: Cost Saving Provisions “Not A Slashing Of The Current Medicare Budget Or Benefits.” According to FactCheck.org: “Whatever you want to call them, it’s a $500 billion reduction in the growth of future spending over 10 years, not a slashing of the current Medicare budget or benefits. It’s true that those who get their coverage through Medicare Advantage’s private plans (about 22 percent of Medicare enrollees) would see fewer add-on benefits; the bill aims to reduce the heftier payments made by the government to Medicare Advantage plans, compared with regular fee-for-service Medicare. The Democrats’ bill also boosts certain benefits: It makes preventive care free and closes the ‘doughnut hole,’ a current gap in prescription drug coverage for seniors.” [FactCheck.org, 3/19/10 ] Screaming that Medicare is going broke must be Frank Luntz’ instructions to Conservative since that’s all Rubio kept coming back to. But that ignores the second half of the sentence: “…under current revenue structures.” How does privatizing this system (which then builds in corporate profits rather than the pay for service system now) make things better? What happens to seniors who can’t afford the additional costs imposed upon them by the Ryan plan? Proposing ludicrous ideas are not brave. Jonathan Chait debunks Paul Ryan in an interview he conducted with the Wisconsin Congressman in a post called: Debunking Paul Ryan’s Latest Spin John Cohn takes apart the idea that Ryan’s plan would even decrease the federal deficit one iota. “Only” is a slightly misleading term here, since $4.5 trillion dollars would still represent a large spending cut. But wait! The House Republican budget also calls for tax cuts—$4.2 trillion of them. In other words, the tax cuts in the House Republican budget would very nearly offset the spending cuts, leaving just $380 billion in additional savings over ten years. It would be nice if our beltway media would arm themselves with enough facts about this entire debate so that when Conservatives lie about the numbers they could actually correct them on the spot and not at a later date or if ever. I know it’s a bit complicated, but letting lies go unchallenged is not an option either.

Continue reading …
Amanpour Accuses Paul Ryan of ‘Reverse Robin Hoodism,’ Freeland Urges ‘Courage’ to Raise Taxes

“This week — budget blowback,” Christiane Amanpour trumpeted in framing her Sunday look, at reaction to Republican Congressman Paul Ryan’s proposed budget plan, through those hostile to it, asserting: “As town halls across America erupt in anger over a plan to slash spending, Republicans find themselves under fire.” Amanpour maintained: “Congressman Ryan is at the center of the storm. It's his plan, of course, that has sparked the outcry. Across the country, the anger is palpable.” Instead of adding some light, however, Amanpour fueled the fire by legitimizing left-wing talking points, confronting Ryan: “People who have been studying your numbers very carefully have been saying that the numbers don't add up,” since: It also says two-thirds of the savings that you want to make in spending cuts come at the expense of programs designed for the poor, for the disadvantaged. And this is reverse Robin Hoodism, if you like – take from the poor, give back to the rich again. With “Ryan’s Plan Under Fire” as her on screen heading during most of the segment, Amanpour showed scenes from a day she spent with Ryan at town meeting in his Wisconsin district, illustrated mostly by liberal complaints to him with a few bits of praise mixed in. In the subsequent roundtable, Chrystia Freeland, global editor-at-large for Thomson-Reuters, made a plea to increase taxes, fretting: What I think is really missing – in both the Republican and the Democratic approach right now and is really an example of political cowardess – is taxes. We heard in your interview, Christiane, Ryan saying, “well, you know, this is about cutting spending.” It's partly going to be about cutting spending, but it is also going to be about raising taxes. And that's the thing that I think no one has the courage to talk about. It's partly going to be, I think there should be more taxes on the very rich. They’re doing incredibly well in this economy, but it is going to be about more taxes on the middle class, including consumption taxes. From the Sunday, May 1 This Week with Christiane Amanpour , her segment with Ryan joined in progress: CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR: At the end of the day, Congressman Ryan and I sit down to talk about the bottom line. AMANPOUR TO RYAN: People who have been studying your numbers very carefully have been saying that the numbers don't add up. CONGRESSMAN PAUL RYAN: Well the Congressional Budget Office say they do. AMANPOUR: It also says two-thirds of the savings that you want to make in spending cuts come at the expense of programs designed for the poor, for the disadvantaged. And this is reverse Robin Hoodism, if you like – take from the poor, give back to the rich again. RYAN: I would disagree with that. First of all, spending increases in this budget, spending on the safety net increases but it increases at a more sustainable rate. Here's the problem, Christiane, the safety net we have right now is going bankrupt. It's tearing apart at the seams. AMANPOUR: What you're proposing, seems like it's going to put a lot of the burden on the seniors. They’re worried they’re not going to be able to afford the cost of health insurance. RYAN: So, we’re saying give them more money to cover their expenses, don't give wealthy people as much to cover their expenses because they're wealthy and can afford more. But we're also saying, you have to get at the root of the cause of inflation. Even President Obama is saying slow the growth rate of Medicare.

Continue reading …

Four years ago, Mitt Romney was everywhere. But as the former Massachusetts governor again guns for the White House, he’s one of the quietest frontrunners ever—and that’s a good thing, writes Dan Balz in the Washington Post .. “This year, he runs as if he couldn’t care less what others…

Continue reading …
JUKI HZL-27Z Sewing Machine

Type: Art and Craft Supply Title: JUKI HZL-27Z Sewing Machine See all customer reviews Product Description: Juki Industrial sewing machine technology in every stitch. High quality, light weight sewing machine with 22 stitch patterns and 4-step buttonhole. This little workhorse comes with LED lights for a brighter sewing area and automatic needle threader. The free arm and stitch variety give you lots of flexibility. Great starter machine. Large and easy to use stitch selection dial and reverse lever right in front of the machine. Easy drop in bobbin and 7 point feed dog just like the bigger machines. Features: Light weight portable with 22 stitches and buttonhole Automatic needle threader Easy stitch change dial Free arm and drop in bobbin LED light bright work area See the details

Continue reading …