While autonomous quadrocopters are quietly evolving into Hunter-Killers , there’s still one who just wants to be your friend and playmate. Meet CrazyFlie, a tiny (so tiny!) chopper you can hold in the palm of your fleshy, human hand. Built by the trio of hackers at Daedalus Projects, on a printed circuit board that weighs just 20 grams and spans eight centimeters, it’s piloted using a Bluetooth Playstation controller; the onboard Cortex-M3 CPU keeps it flying stable by monitoring gyroscopes and accelerometers and adjusting rotor speed accordingly. Enjoy its adorable, gnat-like whirring in the video after the break, and the source link includes a detailed build diary for the truly ambitious. Continue reading Tiny CrazyFlie quadrocopter piloted by Playstation controller, does not run Doom (video) Tiny CrazyFlie quadrocopter piloted by Playstation controller, does not run Doom (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 03 May 2011 05:19:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …CBC News Toronto – Syrian Revolution Election coverage blackout (May 2, 2011) CBC NEWS MONTREAL- Bin Laden death CBC News broke election broadcast news? | Canada Votes 2011 CBC News broke election broadcast news? Monday May 02, 2011, 06:34 PM. Global News is reporting that the CBC News broke the election results broadcasting ban this evening by displaying results for around five minutes at 9:05 p.m. EST. … Yolkobsens go to Hot Docs | Canada News HOT DOCS Ardayo review … Yolkobsens go to Hot Docs. Yolkobsens embark today on the Toronto cultural adventure known as Hot Docs, touted as North America’s largest documentary film festival. For years, Mrs. Y has been a huge fan of the event. … Alpine White F30 3-series Sedan Spotted. Third F30 Sighting Today … The F30 3-series FEP (final evaluation phase) stage sedans were out testing in force today! This is the third sighting we are bringing you photos from, and this time the F30 was spotted in Alpine White. Enjoy the photos! … 5 election predictions by Canada News Report May 2, 2011 … Stephen Harper out, resigns on Tuesday as Party Leader. Jack Layton cuts deal with Michael Ignatieff to save party. Michael Ignatieff takes speech training for next years election. The Bloc, Blocked. Elizabeth May wins a seat. … Tories retain power, NDP to form opposition, CBC projects | Canadian voters have delivered Conservative Leader Stephen Harper another election night victory, but it is still too close to call whether he will head a minority or majority government, CBC News projects. Meanwhile NDP Leader Jack … AlexHunnings says: A somber Bob Rae talking to Peter Mansbridge on CBC News Network #exln41
Continue reading …Pix n Pix: Stevie Nicks dedicates album to fan Stevie Nicks dedicates album to fan . Stevie Nicks – Stevie Nicks Dedicates New Album To Tragic Fan Singer/songwriter Stevie Nicks has dedicated her latest album to a fan who lost her battle with cancer in 2008. … Kohannahlala says: Stevie Nicks dedicates album to fan http://goo.gl/S5yOL
Continue reading …Details are spotty but Apple special forces have apparently swept into its data center, temporarily disrupting the company’s ability to sell anything online. We’re expecting official word of the operation from company CEO Steve Jobs, at about 08.30 Eastern Time. With any luck, a new iMac will emerge unscathed by the Nehalem menace , sporting a shiny new Sandy Bridge microarchitecture all its own. [Thanks to everyone who sent this in] Apple store goes down, iMac refresh on high alert originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 03 May 2011 05:42:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …If you’re not in the trade, they can be confusing occasions. These are some useful pointers for novice buyers Just recently home after five days displaying our stock at the New York Antiquarian Book Fair , and I’m resting. You need to: it’s a peculiarly exhausting business, exacerbated by the fact that I had flown in from Sydney via London, and kept waking at 2am longing for bacon and eggs. For the first three mornings I eventually got up at 6am and went out to dinner. Worked for me. Great steaks in New York. We do three fairs a year – California, New York, and London – and none of them are much fun. In the olden days (I feel an old fart moment coming on) fairs had a real buzz about them. During set-up (when dealers unpack their trunks and shelve the books) other dealers would crowd round, checking out each book as it emerged, picking up the occasional bargain. Set-up was why you were there, to see if you could buy something before the public got a look-in, and sell enough in that hectic first few hours to cover your costs. No more. Things are tighter and tougher, we’ve seen each other’s books in catalogues and online, and there is no excitement during the two-day (too long!) set-up period. We sold one book for $5,000 (£3,000), which is better than five for $4,000, and pretty much in line with what I would have expected. The key to surviving a fair emotionally is to keep expectations realistic, which means low. I set our bottom line hope at sales of $40,000, though whether such a sum is profitable depends on what you have sold. Sometimes we have books on consignment at 20% to us, at others we may be selling something we own – better yet, have owned for ages – and get an entirely positive cashflow boost. I need one. I have, alas, taken my eye off the ball this last year, with reading for the Man Booker International prize , and the effect on the business has been predictable. Even my bank manager is starting to twitch an eyelid. So it was essential both to get some money in from New York, and to generate a project or two with clients or other dealers: find a collection to buy, an archive to sell, a line to pursue. But I’m getting ahead of myself, and it may be hard for you to envisage what I’m talking about. People in specialist trades often do this, and lose their audience in a welter of trade jargon and inappropriate assumption that one will be understood. So: What is an antiquarian book fair, anyway? It is an arena for members of the rare book trade publicly to offer their stock, and for collectors to peruse it. That sounds a little dull, doesn’t it? OK, then. Dealers sit in their little, lit booths, displaying their wares like girls in Amsterdam windows. A few potential customers drift by. Sometimes money is exchanged. Some pleasure is had. Usually nobody gets hurt, but many wives are not told of the transaction. Or husbands. What sort of things might one see at the fair? Enticing ones, naturally. Hand-coloured antique maps, letters by Freud or Dickens, leatherbound sets of Jane Austen, rare books on travel, nature or military history, books illustrated by Arthur Rackham or Beatrix Potter, first editions by most of the greatest writers. Why are first editions valuable? They’re not. Most first editions are worthless, because most books are first editions – that is, not worth reprinting. A tiny number of these first editions are desirable because they are by collected authors, and were printed in small numbers. How can you tell if a book is a first edition? Generally, it can be assumed unless there is any evidence to the contrary. Why are some authors collected? Most, because they deserve to be: John Milton, Jonathan Swift, John Keats, Charles Dickens, Mark Twain, James Joyce, Graham Greene. Some, because whatever their deserts, people love them: Agatha Christie, Ian Fleming, JK Rowling. Does the condition of the book matter very much? Hugely, as with all collectibles. If a book looks fresh and near-as-damn-it new, it will fetch many times more than a tired and worn copy. With 20th-century books, the presence of the original dust wrapper is crucial. A first edition of Brighton Rock (1938) without the dust wrapper is worth, say, £2,000. With it? I just paid £80,000 for one, on behalf of a customer. Isn’t that silly? Very. But the argument is that a book without its dust wrapper is as incomplete as a Chippendale chair without its legs. Do you think that’s a fair argument? No. How does one know if the asking price is right? There is no “right” price for a rare book, though there are certainly wrong ones. If you buy from a reputable member of the trade, and you are happy with your purchase, then the price is probably right enough. But isn’t a book worth whatever it fetches? Certainly not. If I convince a muddle-headed plutocrat to pay me £1m for a common book, it doesn’t mean it is worth it. It means I am a crook, and he is an idiot. Books can be under- or over-priced. That’s part of the fun: trying to locate the former and avoid the latter. When I find what I want, should I ask for a discount? Yes. Will I get one? These days, for sure. What advice could you give to a new collector? Only buy what you like. Always buy the best copy you can afford. Buy fewer books, at a higher level. Buy from someone you have reason to trust. Spend 30% more than you can afford. What about buying and selling at auction? Auctioneers claim that (1) you get the best bargains if you buy at auction, and (2) you can get the best prices if you sell at auction. Both can’t be true, though it is amazing how many people believe it. But about 90% of the books at auction are sold to members of the book trade. It’s best to know what you are doing. Can’t you get a better deal on ebay, and cut out the middleman? Every now and again you might. You are more likely to end up roasted with an apple in your mouth. How do you explain the allure of rare books? You either feel it or you don’t. It’s a matter of taste, and inclination, and, like love, doesn’t need to be justified. I think holding a copy of the first edition of Ulysses, or Great Expectations, is thrilling, especially with a presentation inscription by the author. If you don’t feel similarly, you haven’t got the makings of a book collector. In fact, I don’t even think I would like you. Final note: we ended up with takings of $60,000, which was not bad, and buying three or four things at reasonable prices, that will make one or two of our collectors very happy. I am now eating breakfast in the morning, and dinner in the evening. Maybe I will sleep through the night one day soon. Booksellers Rick Gekoski guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Met Gala 2011 – Kristen Stewart on Red Carpet Kristen Stewart – MET GALA 2011 Kristen Stewart: Met Gala 2011 *NEW PICS* Rihanna Glams Up the 2011 MET Gala | Celebrity-gossip.net Rihanna was among the many stars attending the ‘Alexander McQueen: Savage Beauty’ Costume Institute Gala. Colin Firth at 2011 Met Gala Colin Firth and his gorgeous wife, Livia Giuggioli, were two of the first stars to hit the red carpet at this evening’s Met Gala in NYC. This year’s Costume Institute event has the theme of Alexander McQueen: Savage Beauty, though Colin … Lea Michele News – Lea Michele Makes Her Way to Met Gala (PHOTOS … Glee darling Lea Michele has been a busy girl filming the season two finale, so we’re glad to see her get a break Monday evening! Ms. Michele is photographed. Kristen Stewart 2011 Met Gala Pictures Kristen Stewart looked stunning in a sultry crimson Proenza Schouler gown, which managed to stand out even on the red carpet, at tonight’s Met Gala in NYC. She pulled back her hair to expose her back in the gown, which kept her pretty … Pictures of Isla Fisher at Met Gala Isla Fisher donned a strapless blue gown by Tory Burch at the Met Gala in NYC tonight. She was out and about looking casual with her family in the Big Apple just yesterday, but the busy mom got glamorous for fashion’s biggest night. MsMegBee says: RT @hmusa : Beyonce and @jayz go high fashion for #MetGala , but seriously, can she walk? http://t.co/Pu53vvx via @popsugar
Continue reading …Leo Hickman: Does living in an urban centre have a smaller environmental impact than living in a rural area? Having resided in both, I have often wondered whether living in a city has a smaller environmental impact than living in the countryside. I suspect it does, but it would be nice to have a definitive view, one way or the other. R Lassiter, by email At first glance, it would certainly seem logical that city-living is the greener option – if it is, indeed, an option. Surrounded by public transport, you don’t need to own a car. And by living in dense, compact housing, you should need less in the way of resources and energy. The economies of scale and superior efficiencies available in a city should, in theory, always trump those in a rural environment. There certainly seems to have been a slew of books and reports arguing much this point in recent years. I once interviewed the New Yorker’s David Owen about his book Green Metropolis: Why Living Smaller, Living Closer, and Driving Less are the Keys to Sustainability and he made a very compelling case. But he also admitted – like myself – that he doesn’t now live in the Big Smoke, which suggests there is still some way to go to convince people to remain in these hubs of eco-efficiency once they have the opportunity to leave. I have also visited Donnachadh McCarthy ‘s home in south London which displays what can be achieved when you take urban eco-living to the absolute extreme. (In the context of a westernised lifestyle, of course.) It’s hard to imagine Donnachadh achieving quite the same results in a rural setting. But there must be some environmental positives to country-living, surely? You can grow your own food, should you desire. And better source renewable solid fuels, such as timber. But, as David Owen points out, if everyone moved from cities to the countryside, it would likely trigger an environmental crisis as there just wouldn’t be enough land to go round for everyone to live the “good life”. So this question must also raise wider issues of equity about the ownership and availability of land and other natural resources. So, as urban populations swell, as is the current global trend , what future role will the countryside hold? Will our green expanses beyond the ‘burbs exist solely to supply cities with food and energy? Perhaps, in a way, they already do? Or is this issue a little more complex and nuanced that we might otherwise imagine? This column is an experiment in crowd-sourcing a reader’s question, so please let us know your views and experiences below (as opposed to emailing them) and I will join in with some of my own thoughts and reactions as the debate progresses. I will also be inviting various interested parties to join the debate too. • Please send your own environment question to ask.leo.and.lucy@guardian.co.uk. Or, alternatively, message me on Twitter @LeoHickman Ethical and green living Carbon emissions Waste Travel and transport Leo Hickman guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Adventure Time Mortal Recoil- Adventure Time Adventure Time Mix Video Preview: Adventure Time Episodes 'This Mortal Folly' and … Can’t wait for the 2-part Adventure Time episodes “This Mortal Folly” and “Mortal Recoil” when they air tonight starting at 8 p.m. ET/PT on Cartoon Network? Take a look at these sweet clips below, and read on for more info! … Adventure Time with Kat and Kam: The Ten-Mile Walk Around … Months ago, my best friend, Tracey and her husband, Dan, introduced me to “ Adventure Time ”, the most imaginative little 15-minute program on the Cartoon Network. Kam and I started watching it together, and while we were out walking and … Episode Mortal Recoil, Adventure Time with Finn and Jake 2 May, 2011 Watch Adventure Time with Finn and Jake – Mortal Recoil Air date: 08:15 pm, 02 May 2011 TV channel: Cartoon Network Watch Adventure Time with Finn and Jake… Words from Steven Daily | Color Ink Book I would have to say GI JOE, if you asked me about cartoons today… it would be Adventure Time , Cartoon is so relevant and fresh. Where can you be found when not painting? Hiking, flea markets, and trying new food places cole chillin with … Sell ??”on the side” jobs? | register.org.in The Professor would be fantastic on a hip kid’s show like Yo Gabba Gabba or Adventure Time . Reply. Frosttty says: May 2, 2011 at 2:30 pm. @iammoog Sure, I don’t mind sending you a scan! Send me your email addy and I’ll get it over … Tonio_Jay says: I wish Regular Show and Adventure Time had a mash-up episode
Continue reading …President Obama Announces Osama Bin Landen’s Death White House Correspondents’ Dinner (VIDEO. Preview At White House Correspondents’ Dinner (VIDEO) 2011 Obama's speech at White House Correspondents' dinner (video ) [ALCO … Topic: Obama’s speech at White House Correspondents’ dinner (video ) Forums: Uncategorized Topic is Closed! RSS Feed for this Topic Tags: Correspondents’, Dinner, house, Obama’s, Speech, Video, White, … VIDEO: Obama Roasts Trump @ White House Correspondents Dinner … One day before announcing the death of Osama Bin Laden, the President name dropped Tupac Shakur and The Notorious B.I.G. during his speech at the White House Correspondents Dinner…details inside! VIDEO: Seth Meyers Blasts Donald Trump at White House … … Obama’s speech at White House Correspondents’ dinner (video ) · Rick Springfield arrested on suspicion of DUI · Seth Meyers blasts Donald Trump at White House Correspondents Dinner · Rick Springfield Arrested on Suspicion of Driving … Obama Name Drops Biggie, Tupac & References ODB @ White House … Obama Name Drops Biggie & Tupac & References ODB @ White House Correspondents Dinner [VIDEO ] · Why Jumping The Broom Is A Must-See! Luther Campbell Responds To Low Fundrasing Efforts · Jaden Smith Is Already A Millionaire … Obama Name Drops Biggie, Tupac & References ODB @ White House … Obama Name Drops Biggie & Tupac & References ODB @ White House Correspondents Dinner [VIDEO ]. Previous. Post by Devi Dev in National > News & Gossip on May 2, 2011 at 9:45 am. Tweet · President Barack Obama at the 2011 White House … RicardoMorgan3 says: Obama's speech at White House Correspondents' dinner (video) http://bit.ly/jOUbfJ
Continue reading …Some leaders can become so demonised that it’s impossible to assess their achievements and failures in a balanced way It happened again in Madrid a few weeks ago. I was at a meeting of development officials and researchers and Venezuela came up in conversation. Cue mayhem. Is it possible to mention Hugo Chávez without becoming embroiled in name-calling, exaggerations and, not infrequently, brazen lies? While it is fairly normal that politics can become partisan very quickly (just look at the US at the moment), the point of being a development professional is meant to be that you step outside the partisan for a minute to examine, wait for it, the evidence. I don’t claim that this is easy, because evidence can be skewed by its provider (often, in international development, the government of the country in question). But that is the objective. So I am constantly surprised how many development professionals find it hard to do this when Venezuela gets mentioned, or Cuba, or Bolivia. It is as if evidence and balanced analysis are appropriate for some governments but not for others. If you say, “inequality appears to have gone down considerably in Venezuela”, you risk being accused of being a Chavista. But if you say, “inequality appears to have gone down in Ethiopia”, no one would start accusing you of being a zealous supporter of Meles Zenawi. The same problem exists on the other side too. When I was in Colombia, some in the human rights community were incapable of saying anything positive about the administration of President Alvaro Uribe , because they accused his government of making shady deals with paramilitaries. I would call this the “pitchfork effect” (technically known as the “e-halo effect”), whereby a leader can become so demonised in certain countries or populations that it is no longer possible to assess their achievements and failures in a balanced way. The more a leader is demonised, the more his or her supporters will exaggerate how wonderful they are. It is the converse of the more well-known “halo effect”, whose most famous beneficiary in recent times was Nelson Mandela, a politician to his fingertips, embroiled in many of the things politicians get embroiled in, and responsible for as many bad decisions as good ones on economic policy in South Africa. But criticise him and you are criticising the freedom that he personifies. It is a handy effect to have. There are some leaders who are so vile that applying a balanced assessment to them seems tasteless. The murderous juntas of Argentina and Chile in the 70s and 80s spring to mind. But even Augusto Pinochet, a man who oversaw barbaric murders and torture , appears to be granted by many a balanced assessment of the time he was in power. And that is probably right. It is not condoning his actions to assess how his period in power affected Chile’s economic conditions. So why not Chávez? One word often used to describe him is “dangerous”, and this may be the key to understanding the rage he engenders. It is hard to consider him a military threat, the odd phoney war with neighbouring Colombia notwithstanding. No, it is the danger he poses to normality that people who oppose his policies find so worrying. His rhetorical attack on modern capitalism is so strong, that were he to demonstrate any improvements in Venezuela with his rather vague “21st-century socialism”, the conventional wisdom favouring free markets and a limited state would be challenged. It is the same reason that the US is so obsessed with Cuba – the danger to capitalism is allowing another model to succeed. I am saying all this because the first step we need to take when analysing the achievements and failures of the new left in Latin America is to do our best to be balanced, taking the evidence as we find it, and trying to incorporate new evidence into our analysis, even if it does not fit our assumptions. Hugo Chávez Jonathan Glennie guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …