Home » Archives by category » News (Page 5113)
Mississippi River

Missouri Farmer: ‘A Decision Had to Be Made’ VID00021.MP4 VID00020.MP4 Mississippi River Floods 2011: Feds Consider Blasting More Levees … MEMPHIS, Tenn. — Flood worries that prompted the U.S. government to blast open a Missouri levee to ease pressure on some towns are rippling down the Mississippi River , leading to more evacuations and unease as the Army Corps of … Mississippi River Flood Water Keeps Rising in Memphis, Tennessee … 8 Responses to Mississippi River Flood Water Keeps Rising in Memphis, Tennessee Makes a Word-Filled Wednesday. jesadler says: 2011/05/04 at 1:56 am. I like this post..I’m doing a series myself on the memphis flood and storm damage. … Tritium Pumped From Nuclear Plant Into Mississippi River : The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is investigating after a radioactive element has been found in the Mississippi river . Authorities say it started at the Grand Gulf Nuclear Plant in Port Gibson. They say they went to check for standing … Mississippi River Threatens To Reach Record Heights | See ads Tags: relief valves, memphis tenn, mississippi river , kentucky arkansas. Mississippi River Water continued to rise along the Mississippi River and its tributaries on Wednesday, as residents in parts of Tennessee were advised to evacuate their homes and the Army Corp of Engineers considered blasting more levees to control … careyleigh26 says: RT @TWCBreaking : Mississippi River @ Caruthersville, MO in record #flood …surpassing 1937. It is forecast to rise ANOTHER 3+ feet! http://bit.ly/fkc7uA

Continue reading …

Jerry Seinfeld wants to give his stand up to the world—eventually. He’s gathered up more than 1,000 clips of his comedy for the new JerrySeinfeld.com site he’s launching Friday, but he only intends to release three of them a day. “I don’t want everything,” he explains to…

Continue reading …

Global sea levels are likely to raise two or three feet more than previously predicted this century, because the Arctic is melting significantly faster than expected, scientists conclude in a new report being presented to international officials today. The report, which examined the past six years’ worth of data, predicts…

Continue reading …
Nicole Scherzinger Likes The Way 50 Cent Talks Dirty In Her “Right There” Video

After all the teases for Nicole Scherzinger and 50 Cent’s “Right There” music video, the clip has finally premiered. The song serves as the maybe-X Factor judge’s first US single off forthcoming debut solo LP Killer Love. Head below to see if you think Pussycat Doll Nic and 50 are all killer or just filler … More » Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Idolator Discovery Date : 04/05/2011 09:37 Number of articles : 5

Continue reading …
Nicole Scherzinger Likes The Way 50 Cent Talks Dirty In Her “Right There” Video

After all the teases for Nicole Scherzinger and 50 Cent’s “Right There” music video, the clip has finally premiered. The song serves as the maybe-X Factor judge’s first US single off forthcoming debut solo LP Killer Love. Head below to see if you think Pussycat Doll Nic and 50 are all killer or just filler … More » Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Idolator Discovery Date : 04/05/2011 09:37 Number of articles : 5

Continue reading …
Nicole Scherzinger Likes The Way 50 Cent Talks Dirty In Her “Right There” Video

After all the teases for Nicole Scherzinger and 50 Cent’s “Right There” music video, the clip has finally premiered. The song serves as the maybe-X Factor judge’s first US single off forthcoming debut solo LP Killer Love. Head below to see if you think Pussycat Doll Nic and 50 are all killer or just filler … More » Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Idolator Discovery Date : 04/05/2011 09:37 Number of articles : 5

Continue reading …
Call for new rules for EU borders

Frontier controls proposed in passport-free Schengen zone for emergencies after demands from France and Italy France and Italy appeared to have won the right to reintroduce border controls in emergency situations, after the European commission called for new rules to govern EU frontiers. Countries in Europe’s passport-free Schengen zone will be able to temporarily impose controls at their frontiers in the event of a sudden influx of migrants, according to proposals unveiled by the commission on Wednesday, after a surge in migrant numbers from north Africa across the Mediterranean. “To safeguard the stability of the Schengen area, it may also be necessary to foresee the temporary reintroduction of limited internal border controls under very exceptional circumstances,” the EU home affairs commissioner, Cecilia Malmstrom, told reporters. The EU would also look to create a border patrol, intensify surveillance of Europe’s frontiers and re-establish pacts with north African governments to control the flow of immigrants across the Mediterranean. The commission announced the migration strategy after demands last week from France and Italy for a review of the Schengen agreement, which covers 25 European countries. The government in Rome says Italy is being swamped with refugees from north Africa and is demanding other European countries take in some of those arriving on its shores. Under the proposals, which will be discussed by EU home affairs ministers on 12 May, the commission itself would assess whether there was an emergency situation. Were a state within the Schengen zone to fail in its “obligation to patrol its part of the external border”, the mechanism would permit a limited re-introduction of border controls to isolate that state. Such moves would be “very limited” and done under “strict rules”, Malmstrom said. A number of northern states have called the commissioner to express their alarm at calls by France and Italy for a watering down of free movement within the EU. Malmstrom, a liberal on immigration issues, warned against the attempted exploitation of the situation by anti-immigrant groups. “We do not need to give in to short-term approaches to border control and populist and simplistic solutions,” she said. The European Council on Refugees and Exiles, a network of NGOs, said it was less concerned about proposed changes inside the Schengen zone than the beefing up of the EU’s external border and agreements with north African countries to restrict the flow of migrants, known as “mobility partnerships”. “This in effect is a return to the sort of pact Italy made with Libya before the Arab spring,” said the council’s secretary general, Bjarte Vandvik. In recent years, southern EU governments had signed a series of agreements with north African regimes under which the states would prevent migrants, particularly from sub-Saharan Africa, from arriving in European waters. Such accords were in tatters after the uprisings in the region. Vandvik added that the influx of migrants – an estimated 25,000, according to the commission in Brussels – has been blown out of proportion. “People see black people in boats landing on a small island in Italy and it seems unmanageable, but this year has seen a 20-year low in the number of asylum seekers,” Vandvik said. “The largest number of migrants that have fled the fighting in Libya in fact headed to Tunisia. “But Tunisia is keeping its borders open, has welcomed some 300,000 people and tried to treat them in the best manner. It is Tunisia that needs help handling its refugees, not Italy.” He compared the situation to the Balkan crisis in the 1990s, when western European states took in half a million refugees, with 350,000 in Germany alone. “The EU is being hypocritical at best and racist at worst. How can Europe say they applaud the new democracy coming to north Africa and then, when people flee, we turn our backs to them?” European Union Europe France Italy Arab and Middle East unrest Leigh Phillips guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Call for new rules for EU borders

Frontier controls proposed in passport-free Schengen zone for emergencies after demands from France and Italy France and Italy appeared to have won the right to reintroduce border controls in emergency situations, after the European commission called for new rules to govern EU frontiers. Countries in Europe’s passport-free Schengen zone will be able to temporarily impose controls at their frontiers in the event of a sudden influx of migrants, according to proposals unveiled by the commission on Wednesday, after a surge in migrant numbers from north Africa across the Mediterranean. “To safeguard the stability of the Schengen area, it may also be necessary to foresee the temporary reintroduction of limited internal border controls under very exceptional circumstances,” the EU home affairs commissioner, Cecilia Malmstrom, told reporters. The EU would also look to create a border patrol, intensify surveillance of Europe’s frontiers and re-establish pacts with north African governments to control the flow of immigrants across the Mediterranean. The commission announced the migration strategy after demands last week from France and Italy for a review of the Schengen agreement, which covers 25 European countries. The government in Rome says Italy is being swamped with refugees from north Africa and is demanding other European countries take in some of those arriving on its shores. Under the proposals, which will be discussed by EU home affairs ministers on 12 May, the commission itself would assess whether there was an emergency situation. Were a state within the Schengen zone to fail in its “obligation to patrol its part of the external border”, the mechanism would permit a limited re-introduction of border controls to isolate that state. Such moves would be “very limited” and done under “strict rules”, Malmstrom said. A number of northern states have called the commissioner to express their alarm at calls by France and Italy for a watering down of free movement within the EU. Malmstrom, a liberal on immigration issues, warned against the attempted exploitation of the situation by anti-immigrant groups. “We do not need to give in to short-term approaches to border control and populist and simplistic solutions,” she said. The European Council on Refugees and Exiles, a network of NGOs, said it was less concerned about proposed changes inside the Schengen zone than the beefing up of the EU’s external border and agreements with north African countries to restrict the flow of migrants, known as “mobility partnerships”. “This in effect is a return to the sort of pact Italy made with Libya before the Arab spring,” said the council’s secretary general, Bjarte Vandvik. In recent years, southern EU governments had signed a series of agreements with north African regimes under which the states would prevent migrants, particularly from sub-Saharan Africa, from arriving in European waters. Such accords were in tatters after the uprisings in the region. Vandvik added that the influx of migrants – an estimated 25,000, according to the commission in Brussels – has been blown out of proportion. “People see black people in boats landing on a small island in Italy and it seems unmanageable, but this year has seen a 20-year low in the number of asylum seekers,” Vandvik said. “The largest number of migrants that have fled the fighting in Libya in fact headed to Tunisia. “But Tunisia is keeping its borders open, has welcomed some 300,000 people and tried to treat them in the best manner. It is Tunisia that needs help handling its refugees, not Italy.” He compared the situation to the Balkan crisis in the 1990s, when western European states took in half a million refugees, with 350,000 in Germany alone. “The EU is being hypocritical at best and racist at worst. How can Europe say they applaud the new democracy coming to north Africa and then, when people flee, we turn our backs to them?” European Union Europe France Italy Arab and Middle East unrest Leigh Phillips guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Call for new rules for EU borders

Frontier controls proposed in passport-free Schengen zone for emergencies after demands from France and Italy France and Italy appeared to have won the right to reintroduce border controls in emergency situations, after the European commission called for new rules to govern EU frontiers. Countries in Europe’s passport-free Schengen zone will be able to temporarily impose controls at their frontiers in the event of a sudden influx of migrants, according to proposals unveiled by the commission on Wednesday, after a surge in migrant numbers from north Africa across the Mediterranean. “To safeguard the stability of the Schengen area, it may also be necessary to foresee the temporary reintroduction of limited internal border controls under very exceptional circumstances,” the EU home affairs commissioner, Cecilia Malmstrom, told reporters. The EU would also look to create a border patrol, intensify surveillance of Europe’s frontiers and re-establish pacts with north African governments to control the flow of immigrants across the Mediterranean. The commission announced the migration strategy after demands last week from France and Italy for a review of the Schengen agreement, which covers 25 European countries. The government in Rome says Italy is being swamped with refugees from north Africa and is demanding other European countries take in some of those arriving on its shores. Under the proposals, which will be discussed by EU home affairs ministers on 12 May, the commission itself would assess whether there was an emergency situation. Were a state within the Schengen zone to fail in its “obligation to patrol its part of the external border”, the mechanism would permit a limited re-introduction of border controls to isolate that state. Such moves would be “very limited” and done under “strict rules”, Malmstrom said. A number of northern states have called the commissioner to express their alarm at calls by France and Italy for a watering down of free movement within the EU. Malmstrom, a liberal on immigration issues, warned against the attempted exploitation of the situation by anti-immigrant groups. “We do not need to give in to short-term approaches to border control and populist and simplistic solutions,” she said. The European Council on Refugees and Exiles, a network of NGOs, said it was less concerned about proposed changes inside the Schengen zone than the beefing up of the EU’s external border and agreements with north African countries to restrict the flow of migrants, known as “mobility partnerships”. “This in effect is a return to the sort of pact Italy made with Libya before the Arab spring,” said the council’s secretary general, Bjarte Vandvik. In recent years, southern EU governments had signed a series of agreements with north African regimes under which the states would prevent migrants, particularly from sub-Saharan Africa, from arriving in European waters. Such accords were in tatters after the uprisings in the region. Vandvik added that the influx of migrants – an estimated 25,000, according to the commission in Brussels – has been blown out of proportion. “People see black people in boats landing on a small island in Italy and it seems unmanageable, but this year has seen a 20-year low in the number of asylum seekers,” Vandvik said. “The largest number of migrants that have fled the fighting in Libya in fact headed to Tunisia. “But Tunisia is keeping its borders open, has welcomed some 300,000 people and tried to treat them in the best manner. It is Tunisia that needs help handling its refugees, not Italy.” He compared the situation to the Balkan crisis in the 1990s, when western European states took in half a million refugees, with 350,000 in Germany alone. “The EU is being hypocritical at best and racist at worst. How can Europe say they applaud the new democracy coming to north Africa and then, when people flee, we turn our backs to them?” European Union Europe France Italy Arab and Middle East unrest Leigh Phillips guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Did you know that Republicans loved the health-care mandate all the time they criticized it? I mean, I understand it’s a Republican concept, but Paul Ryan’s love for it apparently is twice as much as President Obama’s. Steve Benen: Now, any serious person listening to the hysteria has to realize Republicans don’t actually mean any of this. Indeed, many of those characterizing the individual mandate as the death of the American experiment were endorsing the idea as recently as 2009 — during the debate over reform. But in case anyone thought to take the faux-outrage seriously, Simon Lazarus raises an important observation : the highly-touted House GOP budget plan, as shaped by Paul Ryan, includes a health care mandate, too. In fact, it includes more than one. The Ryan budget would reshape Americans’ access to health insurance mainly through two provisions, both of which pressure people to purchase private health insurance to an extent and through mechanisms that are materially indistinguishable from the supposedly toxic Obamacare mandate. One of these Ryan budget proposals — as yet little noticed by pundits or politicians — is almost an exact copy of its equivalent in the Affordable Care Act. Under both provisions, the result is the same: People who choose to carry health insurance have a lower tax bill than they would if they chose not to. In terms of their respective potential impact on individuals’ bank accounts and tax liability, the manner in which they affect individuals’ financial incentives, and hence the constraining effect on individuals’ financial choices to either buy or forgo health insurance, the two “mandate” provisions are identical. (Indeed, in most cases, the financial difference for the individual taxpayer made by the Republican tax credit would be greater — i.e., more “coercive” — than the ACA tax penalty.) In addition to cloning the ACA’s framework for coverage of adults under 65, the Ryan budget would also apply a similar approach to Americans currently covered by Medicare. Beginning in 2021, former Medicare-eligibles would receive a voucher they can apply to the purchase of private insurance. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the vouchers would be worth approximately $6,000 for recipients age 65, and would be greater for older recipients, averaging $11,000 across the entire Medicare population. Of course, Americans would be required to continue to pay their annual Medicare tax throughout their working lives. Hence, the Republicans’ proposal to replace Medicare with partially subsidized private insurance also operates to “compel” people to pay for private health insurance policies. Moreover, this mandate is not even a pay-or-play option; Medicare taxes are mandatory, whether workers want to buy eligibility for old-age vouchers or not. Nearly every member of the House Republican caucus voted for this budget plan, and said nary a word about the freedom-crushing provision included by Paul Ryan. Howie Klein finds that Republican voters aren’t thrilled with Ryan’s budget proposal either: Even their own right-wing polling firm , that normally tells them whatever they want to hear, had bad news about Paul Ryan’s ultra-reactionary budget from hell, what he calls his “cause.” A plurality of voters still have no opinion about Republican Congressman Paul Ryan’s long-term budget-cutting plan, but opposition has increased over the past several weeks. By a near two-to-one margin, they don’t like his proposal for tackling spiraling Medicare costs. And Ryan’s plan is also linked to how badly Wisconsin voters are feeling about the GOP: Zerban himself seemed buoyed by the results in La Crosse. When we contacted him this morning he also saw the Ryan effect setting in on Wisconsin Republicans: “We are seeing an incredible amount of opposition to the Ryan budget plan and Gov. Walker’s unprecedented power grab. Representative-elect Steve Doyle’s election last night confirms that. People all across Wisconsin are seeing the true colors of the GOP, and rejecting their mantra of reducing taxes for the wealthiest and balancing the budget on the backs of the hard working families of Wisconsin. The more people hear and look at Ryan’s un-bold plan to destroy prosperity, the more they hate it and the more it infects the entire GOP. Remember, they all voted for it.

Continue reading …