The Education Department predicts that 59 percent of all higher education students in 2020 will be women. Women already outnumber men in higher education programs overall, and this imbalance is expected to grow. The share of women will grow by nearly 16 percent between 2009 and 2020, while male enrollment will only grow by 8
Continue reading …Does sex predict marital disruption? Now I know what you must be thinking. Surely scientists do not need to study this question. We all know the answer without even bothering with some lame scientific study. Or surely this was settled scientifically a long time ago, right? Well it is always a bit more interesting and complicated. That’s what make behavioral and social science fun. We can put our common sense to the test. Kristina Dzara at Southern Illinois University starts by telling us that scientists “know little about the sex that people have while married with their spouse and how it may influence marital disruption,” she writes in her article, Assessing the Effect of Marital Sexuality on Marital Disruption. To examine role of sex in marriage, Dzara used the Marriage Matters Panel Survey of Newly Wed Couples that followed over 1000 couples in Louisiana from 1998 to 2004. The average age of the wives in this study was 28 and the average age for men was 30 years. The author used three measures of sexuality in the first three to six months of marriage — frequency of sexual intercourse, sexual satisfaction, and agreement between spouses about their sex life. Dzara used these measures to predict divorce by the 5th year of marriage. As we know, there are a lot of factors can contribute to divorce — marital quality, early marriage, cohabitation and many more. In order to get a better understanding of the effects of sexuality in marriage, the author controlled for many of these other factors. So, first, does frequency of sexual intercourse matter in terms of couples staying together? No, say these findings. On average these young couples had intercourse between one and several times a week, but frequency didn’t seem to matter. What about satisfaction with sex and physical intimacy? The author tests this effect for both husbands and wives. For wives, satisfaction with physical intimacy decreased the likelihood of divorce, but overall marital quality and satisfaction with intimacy appeared to have the same effect. In other words, marital quality and satisfaction with sex could not be teased apart for wives. So what about the effect of husband’s sexual satisfaction and the prospects of divorce? The probability of divorce is dramatically reduced when husband’s report being sexually satisfied. Dzara writes, “a couple with a husband who has the highest self-rated satisfaction with physical intimacy, compared to a husband with the lowest self-rated satisfaction with physical intimacy, decreases their odds of experiencing a marital disruption by around 83.7%.” Overall, husbands’ satisfaction with physical intimacy is a stronger influence on divorce than any other measure in this study. Somewhat surprisingly, agreement between husbands and wives about their sex life did not seem to have much influence on their likelihood of divorce. “Agreement about one’s sex life” may be bound up with many other factors of agreement. In short, sex seems to matter to healthy marriages — not too big of a surprise. For wives, satisfaction with physical intimacy and marital satisfaction seem to be rolled into one overall factor. Not so for men. When men report being satisfied with their marriage, this reduces their likelihood for divorce, and if they also report being sexually satisfied, then divorce is even more unlikely. The author of this study notes the limitations of this study — the couples in the study were generally younger and from only one state, so they may not be representative of the United States as a whole. Nevertheless, these seems like important findings to consider.
Continue reading …The state of California has snipped San Francisco’s uppity bid to erect a ban on circumcision. Any such ban is now banned in a law signed by Gov. Jerry Brown. Ban backers had collected nearly 8,000 signatures to put the measure to a vote in November’s election, arguing that…
Continue reading …• Anti-Gaddafi forces prepare for assault on Sirte • Syrian dissidents unite to form opposition • Cameron emerges as “biggest hawk” on Libya • Read the latest summary 2.08pm: More than 3,000 people have been detained in the rebellious Syrian town of Rastan since government forces took back control of it at the weekend, according to AP. After five days of intense fighting between troops loyal to the al-Assad regime and soldiers who have defected to the protesters’ side, the regime appears to have hit back with force. An activist who said he was in hiding and gave his name as Hassan said those arrested were being held at a cement factory, as well as some schools and a large four-story compound called the Sports Club. He said: Ten of my relatives have been detained…The situation in the town is miserable The reports could not be independently confirmed. 1.52pm: An ominous update on the story reported earlier (see 9.52am) of David Gerbi, the Jewish Libyan who is seeking to reopen Tripoli’s main synagogue. He returned to the country after the fall of Gaddafi’s vehemently anti-Semitic regime in the hope that the new era would bring harmony and inclusiveness. However he has hit upon an early stumbling block: he is now being prevented from entering the synagogue. AP reports: A visibly angry David Gerbi says he went to clean garbage from the synagogue on Monday only to be told by men at the scene that they had warnings he would be targeted by violence. He says they told him to stop his efforts. Gerbi, who fled with his family to Italy in 1967, says he was surprised because he had permission from the local sheik. Gerbi’s colleague Richard Peters says several men armed with assault rifles later appeared to guard the building. Breaking down in tears, Gerbi says Libya needs to decide if it’s going to be a racist country or a democratic one. 1.51pm: Libya’s new rulers have named a new Cabinet, AP reports. 12.41pm: Reuters and Al Jazeera are reporting that a Red Cross convoy hoping to bring urgently needed medical supplies to the centre of Sirte was forced to turn back this morning after coming under fire. Al Jazeera’s Zeina Khodr tweeted that the aid trucks had turned back “after heavy exchange of fire”, with forces in the city, and an NTC commander told Reuters: The rebels secured the way for the International Red Cross to go but as soon as they entered the city they returned because of the (pro-Gaddafi) militias firing. We did not start the firing. The militias started the firing. But a Reuters team who witnessed the incident said they saw no incoming fire from the Gaddafi loyalists inside Sirte. 12.27pm: Here’s a lunchtime summary: Libya • Residents are continuing to flee the Gaddafi stronghold of Sirte as rebels prepare to launch a last big offensive to take control of the city. Those fleeing speak of a worsening humanitarian situation. Many are unafraid to make clear their support for the deposed dictator. (See 10.31am.) • The evacuation of some 1,200 migrant workers from the southern town of Sabha has begun, according to the International Organisation for Migration. The workers and their families were said to be “extremely relieved” that their long wait to leave the country was finally over. They will be taken to Chad, the IOM said. (See 11.29am.) • Gaddafi’s playboy son Al-Saadi has “strenously” denied charges of corruption and “armed intimidation” brought against him by Interpol. Al-Saadi, who is under house arrest in the neighbouring country of Niger, was issued with a red notice from the global policing body last week. Bahrain Thirty-six people have been sentenced by a court to prison sentences of between 15 and 25 years, according to Al Jazeera. Those sentenced are believed to include 14 people convicted of involvement in the killing of a Pakistani man during the anti-government unrest. Seven university students found guilty of taking part in the protests are also thought to have been among those sentenced. (See 10.21am.) Syria The formation of the Syrian National Council by the country’s chief opposition groups has been dismissed by a member of parliament. Khaled Abboud told AP that those who announced the SNC were “deluding themselves.” He added: “It’s a dream that will never come true.” 12.02pm: Al Jazeera are reporting that 36 protesters have been sentenced to up to 25 years in Bahraini jail. This could not be independently confirmed for now. Update: It appears that that figure of 36 includes the 14 people earlier reported to have been sentenced over the killing of a Pakistani man, and seven university students sentenced over the unrest. More when we have it. 11.29am: The nightmare may be over for some 1,200 migrant workers and their families who had been stuck in Sabha waiting to be able to leave Libya. According to AP, the International Organisation for Migration has said the workers are being evacuated to Chad. IOM chief of mission in Chad, Qasim Sufi, said Monday the group of people from 11 different nations are “extremely relieved” after enduring weeks of hardship and anxiety while trapped at a transit center in the embattled city. Gunfire and fighting had prevented IOM from getting the group out of the center or bringing supplies to them in Sebha, which also lacks running water and electricity. The group, including women and children, began leaving Sunday in a convoy of 15 trucks. The journey to Chad is expected to take about a week. Earlier reports suggested that around 3,000 migrants and their relatives had been contained in the southern town, which until late last month was controlled by pro-Gaddafi forces. A spokesman for the IOM said last month that the evacuation had been delayed because the NTC wanted to “make sure of the migrants, to register them and to identify who is a real migrant and who is not.” Sub-Saharan Africans have been a target of suspicion by the interim authorities ever since Gaddafi hired mercenaries to help him fight the rebels. 11.18am: Libya’s revolutionary army is an army that starts fighting at 10am and downs tools at 6pm — whether the battle is over or not , reports the Times this morning. Tom Coghlan writes that, what with their “courageous, chaotic, charming, inventive and incompetent” approach to battle, “it is hard not to like them immensely”. They even, he writes, have free cake and coffee on the frontline. But the amateurish tactics can often go wrong: Revolutionary commanders were somewhat embarrassed by the latest attack, which occurred during what was supposed to be a ceasefire for the Red Cross to visit the city. “There are many, many revolutionaries fighters, teenagers actually, who want to enter Sirte by themselves,” said Commander Omran al-Awaib yesterday. There is, he insisted, a high-level plan for taking the city. But the fighters often go out of their way to stress their lack of military training or indeed interest in military matters. “I got one lesson for 30 minutes,” smiled Ismael al-Zoubi, a 23-year-old graduate who now operates a multi-barrelled rocket launcher. High numbers of accidents are one result of an astonishingly relaxed attitude to weapons safety, particularly resulting from a relentless enthusiasm for shooting into the air. Recent accidents included a jerry-built rocket launcher bursting into flames, scattering its crew and filling the air with burning ammunition. On the same day another rocket launcher was accidentally fired inside a revolutionary camp killing two fighters. 10.31am: It is perhaps an indication of how bad the situation inside Sirte has got that many of the residents now fleeing the city are supporters of Gaddafi who say they simply cannot continue to live there. In this report from Al Jazeera English, the correspondent reports that “even the [NTC] fighters acknowledge that”. One woman, fleeing in her car, says: I am from Sirte. I am loyal to Gaddafi. I’m not with the rebels and NATO. I was living in my house. The bombardment forced us to leave everything. Inside the city, resistance to the NTC also remains strong, according to this report from the LA Times which contains interviews with residents . One man, a father, is quoted as saying: The rebels are worse than rats. NATO is the same as Osama bin Laden. The paper’s Ruth Sherlock continues: Revolutionary leaders say they are supported by a mandate to oust a brutal dictator. But many inhabitants of Sirte said they longed for Libya to be “just as it was” before the uprising began in February. “We lived in democracy under Moammar Kadafi; he was not a dictator,” said another Surt resident, Susan Farjan, who said she had been an on-screen journalist for Libyan state television. “I lived in freedom; Libyan women had full human rights. It isn’t that we need Moammar Kadafi again, but we want to live just as we did before.” Despite the living conditions and her dust-ridden clothes, Farjan’s makeup, Chanel perfume, diamante earrings and gold necklace told of a better life in times past. “Everyone loves Kadafi. My father loves him so much, the blood is green in his veins,” Farjan said as tears welled in her eyes, alluding to Kadafi’s use of green as the national color. Women and children gathered around Farjan suddenly burst into a raucous, tearful chorus: “God, Moammar, Libya. This is all we need!” 10.21am: A Bahraini court has sentenced 14 people to life imprisonment for the killing of a Pakistani man during anti-government unrest, according to AP. Seven university students charged with causing violence amid the protests were also sentenced, the news agency added. We will report more detail when we have it. 10.04am: US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta has blunt words for Israel today on the impact of the Arab Spring . Speaking to journalists on his way to Jerusalem, he said: There’s not much question in my mind that they maintain that [military] edge. But the question you have to ask: is it enough to maintain a military edge if you’re isolating yourself in the diplomatic arena? Real security can only be achieved by both a strong diplomatic effort as well as a strong effort to project your military strength. 9.52am: There is a lovely tale in the Wall Street Journal today about the efforts of David Gerbi- the so-called ‘revolutionary Jew’ of Tripoli- to promote his faith in the new Libya . Gerbi, who fled the country as a 12-year-old boy in 1967 when anger was mounting throughout the region over Israel’s Six Day War, returned to the country this summer to help with the uprising against Gaddafi. Two years after Gerbi and his family left, the former dictator expelled the rest of the country’s Jewish community , the AP reports. But, yesterday, Gerbi took the first step towards what he hopes will be a brighter, more inclusive future in the post-Gaddafi era, reopening Tripoli’s lone synagogue for the first time in 44 years. 9.36am: Al-Saadi Gaddafi, the ousted Libyan dictator’s playboy son, “strenuously denies” charges of corruption and armed intimidation made against him by Interpol. According to an email forwarded to the Associated Press , the former head of the country’s Football Federation insisted he had “worked tirelessly” to promote Libyan soccer, and accused Interpol of taking a “political decision” to recognise the NTC. In the email, al-Saadi called the Interpol notice a “clear political decision to recognize the de jure authority of the National Transitional Council taken without appropriate regard to the current absence of a functioning, effective and fair system of justice in Libya.” It said al-Saadi “worked tirelessly to promote football in Libya, priding himself on the fact that Libya was formerly selected to host the 2013 Africa Cup of Nations.” It added that Gadhafi’s son “continues to call on all sides to seek a negotiated and peaceful resolution to the present conflict.” 38-year-old Al-Saadi, Gaddafi’s third son, is under house arrest in Niger, where he sought refuge last month . 8.49am: Welcome to Middle East live. Here’s a summary of developments across the region. Libya • A ceasefire declared by the NTC to allow residents to flee the Gaddafi stronghold of Sirte has ended, and forces loyal to the interim authorities are preparing for an all-out assault. The humanitarian situation inside the city, meanwhile, is grim. A doctor told the Guardian that residents have run out of basic medical supplies and are drinking contaminated water to survive. • A Guardian investigation has revealed David Cameron’s determination to push for military action on Colonel Gaddafi , and how he overrode scepticism from both his cabinet and MI6 to enter his first non-inherited war as prime minister. One minister who attended meetings of the National Security Council (on Libya) is quoted as saying: The prime minister was always the biggest hawk in the NSC. He was always the person who was pushing and saying ‘how can we get things moving in this way?’ • Leading opposition groups have decided to form a national council to help topple Bashar al-Assad’s regime. Figures from the previously fragmented dissident movement said they hoped it would be a big step towards democratic change. • It was another bloody weekend for Syria. Mahmoud Merhi, head of the Arab Organization for Human Rights, has told Bloomberg that security forces killed at least 10 protesters yesterday in Homs, Idlib and Deraa . United Arab Emirates Five activists on trial for insulting the Royal Family and threatening national security have refused to appear in court. The men, who include blogger Ahmed Mansoor, have already been jailed since April and say they would not get a fair trial. Bahrain Some of the doctors facing years in prison for their role in the uprising have alleged that a princess working undercover as a police detective was involved in their torture. The Times reports that Sheika Noora bint Ibrahim Al-Khalifa “beat prisoners with sticks and a rubber hose, and gave electric shocks to the face with a cable”. Syria Libya Bashar Al-Assad Bahrain Lizzy Davies guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …High court judge rules 49 out of 54 caravans can go, along with most concrete pitches, but eviction must await judicial reviews Most of the caravans at the Dale Farm Traveller site can be removed, a judge has ruled. Basildon council took a further step towards evicting 86 families from the unauthorised site in Essex after a judge ruled it could remove caravans from 49 out of 54 plots. The council was also told it could remove most of the concrete pitches, but the walls, fences and gates should remain, quashing the council’s stated hope of “clearing” the site and returning it to greenbelt land. The eviction cannot begin for several days, as Travellers wait to hear about three separate judicial reviews about the legality of the eviction. A separate high court judge is expected to rule if the judicial reviews can be heard by noon on Tuesday. An injunction preventing any removal from the site is expected to remain in force until at least after that decision. The eviction at Dale Farm, which is now expected to cost Basildon council £22m, was halted at the 11th hour on Monday 19 September. The council had hoped to evict around 400 people, but an emergency injunction was put in place because of fears that the eviction would go further than eviction notices allowed. At the high court, Mr Justice Edwards-Stuart ordered Basildon council to pay one-third of the legal costs to Dale Farm residents. Some caravans can remain on site, along with fences, walls, some buildings and some concrete because they were in place before Traveller families bought the land at Dale Farm, or because they were not specified in the council’s eviction notices. Dale Farm resident Kathleen McCarthy said: “This will leave Dale Farm as a patchwork of concrete and fences, not the greenbelt the council are claiming it will be. Where are we supposed to go? They are separating families and ruining so many lives here, and for what? To turn Dale Farm into a scrapyard again. It’s ridiculous.” Dale Farm Roma, Gypsies and Travellers Court of appeal Local government Communities Alexandra Topping guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Michael Jackson trial enters its second week; ‘Dolphin’ deposes ‘Lion’ with $14.2 million grab at No.1; Gene Simmons and longtime girlfriend marry. (Oct. 3)
Continue reading …A tearful Amanda Knox has told an appeals court in Italy that accusations that she killed her British roommate are unfair and groundless. A verdict is expected later today. (Oct. 3)
Continue reading …This summer, a protest in Tel Aviv started with a few tents and grew to a huge tent city, culminating in a massive march of over 350,000 people who were angry over the lack of jobs, unaffordable housing and economic justice in Israel. It included Jews, Christians and Palestinians, and at its peak, was pulling huge support in public polls, with even 85 percent of Netanyahu’s Likud voters saying the protest was justified. And yet, there was almost no TV news coverage of this in America, which was spending so much time covering the Arab spring. From August 3rd: The Tent Protest has been dominating the news cycle in Israel for two weeks, and now there are also a couple of interesting polls regarding its possible political impact. While it would be unwise to try and predict what sort of effect these unprecedented demonstrations will have on Israeli politics, the polls do confirm some of the hunches we had in the last three weeks, and most notably, a potential for far-reaching changes in the political system in the years to come. – The support for the protest crosses sectors and party lines. According to Channel 10’s poll conducted on Monday, 88 percent of Israelis support the protest. The middle class parties lead the way: 98 percent of Kadima voters (!), 95 percent of Labor’s and even 85 percent of Netanyahu’s Likud voters find the protest just. Even if these figures dropped in the last couple of days—which had some fractions and public disputes in the protest movement—they are still exceptionally high. – The attempts to discredit the protest have mostly failed. Government spokesperson and rightwing organizations tried to tie the protest to left wing movements, claiming that it is a politically-motivated move aimed personally against PM Netanyahu. Still, 74 percent of the public think that the protest is a genuine one, and only 22 percent find it to be politically motivated. – The hard right is the only group not identifying with the protest. Half of Shas’ voters and most of those voting for the settlers’ parties think the protest is politically motivated. Voters of those parties are more inclined to oppose the protest than any other group. I believe that these groups sense that the protest might challenge the dominant political arrangements in Israel – ones [which] benefit the settlers and the religious parties. – The protesters reject the major opposition and the coalition parties alike. I wouldn’t take the headline of the Globes-Jerusalem Post’s poll—about a possible social party winning 20 seats in the coming elections—too seriously. There is a long time until the elections and it’s impossible to know which issues will dominate the campaign. Still, it’s very interesting to see where these 20 seats (roughly 16 percent of the votes) come from: 4-5 seats from Kadima, 2-3 seats from Likud, 2-3 seats from Labor, and some more votes from Meretz and undecided voters. The Arab parties and the extreme right are not hurt by the protest. To sum it up, all figures point to a unique phenomenon: the secular middle class – usually the backbone of society—is unsatisfied with the political and economical trends, and more important, with the entire political system (usually it’s the other way around – the more you move to the edges of the system, the less satisfied people there are). Under these circumstances, the potential for major political changes—though not necessarily immediate ones—is enormous. So what happened to this movement ? They were derailed by attacks officials claimed were from Gaza that killed seven Israelis : Organisers of the tent protests which have enthralled Israel for more than a month have called off demonstrations planned for this weekend following the attacks in the south of the country . A series of marches and rallies was due to be held around the country with the main focus in Jerusalem. This weekend will be the first for five weeks with no Saturday night demonstrations. In a statement, the National Union of Israeli Students said the protest movement was “lowering its head on this difficult day, joins the families in mourning, and wishes the wounded a speedy recovery”. NUIS leader Itzik Shmueli told Army Radio: “We decided given the events to cancel them.” He said the campaign for “social justice” and over the high cost of housing, childcare, fuel, electricity and food would continue. Some participants have said only a major security event would deflect attention away from the protests. So what can we learn from this? The Powers That Be don’t seem to want us to know that even in countries that aren’t run by dictators, citizens everywhere are unhappy with huge economic inequalities and lack of opportunity, nor are they willing to support the huge military expenditures that suck up money away from everything else. We also learn that whether by design or circumstances, if the people are too restless, the establishment will look for ways to divert us.
Continue reading …