The mission to nail Osama bin Laden could have gone horribly wrong. That’s why the heart-stopping raid was the “longest 40 minutes of my life,” President Obama revealed in a 60 Minutes interview aired yesterday. Officials “had a sense of when gunfire and explosions took place,” but “we could not…
Continue reading …Egyptian officials warned yesterday that an “iron fist” will enforce national security in the wake of violent clashes between Muslims and Christians in Cairo that left 12 dead and nearly 200 wounded. Some 190 people arrested will face military trials in a special “deterrent” against further violence, and laws will…
Continue reading …Tonight BBC4 will begin repeating this 1976 Doctor Who story. It’s the perfect way to honour to Elisabeth Sladen The recent death of Elisabeth Sladen , best known for her role as Doctor Who’s time travelling companion Sarah Jane Smith, prompted an extraordinary outpouring of grief from her peers and fans young and old. And when it came to asking which story the BBC should repeat in her honour, the candidates seemed endless. Planet of the Spiders, when Sarah Jane first witnessed a regeneration, Pertwee bowing out with the seminal line, “a tear, Sarah Jane?” The bravehearted face-off against Davros in Genesis of the Daleks? Her eerie vulnerability in possession caper Pyramids of Mars? Instead BBC Four will repeat 1976 story The Hand of Fear tonight and tomorrow. The four-parter holds all of those qualities that made Sarah Jane, and the woman who played her, so loved: the heart, the courage and the fragility. But it is of course most notable as being her final appearance in the classic series. The Hand of Fear itself is a classic from the Hammer-inspired period, with the disembodied hand of ancient species Eldrad causing havoc in a nuclear power station, feeding off the radiation to grow back into its true form and attempting a standard enslavement attempt. But it’s also among the strongest examples of its type: given the chance to film in a real nuclear plant (in 1976!), the producers could deliver expensive-looking wideshots, a world away from the wobbly sets of legend. The adventure is notable for the ridiculous Andy Pandy outfit Sarah Jane had to wear, but when she is possessed (as happens rather often), the childish costume, coupled with a dead-eyed Sladen camping it up, declaring that “Eldrad must live!”, means her porcelain face is every bit the killer dolly. It’s vintage Sarah Jane. It seems crazy now, but the original plan had been to kill Sarah Jane off, perhaps as a marker of how iconic the character had become. It was testament to how much affection had developed for Sladen that her request for that not to happen was met. It wouldn’t be fair on the younger children, she reasoned. Neither did she want to be married off, as had happened to her predecessor, Katy Manning’s Jo Grant. This wouldn’t be true to the character, she figured, and her unspoken feelings for the Doctor. So Sarah Jane’s exit feels low-key, but no less powerful. It’s a common criticism of old Doctor Who that the female characters are underwritten tropes who come and go like carousel horses. The worst thing you could say about Sarah Jane’s exit is it maybe feels a little tacked on compared to the epic story arcs that greet companions nowadays. But Baker and Sladen rewrote the scripts themselves to deliver something fitting. Cold from the ice planet, grumpy at being possessed once too often, an exasperated Sarah declares that: “I’m going to pack up my goodies and go home!” Exasperated that the Doctor doesn’t appear to be listening, bungling under the console, she storms off and does just that, demanding to return to south Croydon. While she’s off packing her goodies, the Doctor receives a summons to Gallifrey from the Time Lords, and “realises” that he cannot take a human to his home planet and Sarah must indeed depart. In many ways he’s behaving appallingly. The audience didn’t know at this point whether he was telling the truth (he never cared much for Time Lord custom in the past), or whether he had realised that he’d denied this woman a normal life for too long, and was breaking his own heart to do the right thing. As the domestic turns serious, Sarah’s face cracks, she claims she was only joking to get a rise, but they both know it’s over. As ever with this extraordinary friendship, it’s about what isn’t said. They part with some platitudes about how “travel really does broaden the mind,” and she scuttles off whistling, not imagining for a minute that she won’t see him again for 30 years. A little sad, but striding off into the future whistling. This was Sarah Jane Smith. We discovered the true emotional cost of what happened to Sarah, of the Doctor’s alien misunderstanding of human emotion, when they were reunited in 2006, Sarah having been unable to ever truly move on. We also discovered that rather than south Croydon, he’d actually left her in Aberdeen. Sarah Jane’s story eventually got its happy ending. For Elisabeth Sladen’s rather mournful one, I can’t think of a more suitable tribute. • Doctor Who: Hand of Fear, will be on BBC4 at 7.40 and 8.05pm on Monday 9 May, and again on Tuesday 10 May Doctor Who Television Science fiction Fantasy BBC4 BBC Television industry Dan Martin guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Mother’s Day approaches, and with it the usual exhortations to care enough to send the very best. Sure, a handmade card or thoughtful phone call is always appropriate, but if you want to surprise the mother in your life this year, here are some books featuring mothers anyone would love to hate (and hate to love). As compared to the mommies dearest in these pages, almost any woman can feel like Mother of the Year. A frisson of schadenfreude might be preferable to a entire bouquet of roses. Amy Wilson is the author of When Did I Get Like This?
Continue reading …Steering wheels: sure, they’re fun and functional, but why do they have to be so opaque ? It’s like you can’t see through them at all! Our friends at CTA Digital — purveyors of such fine gaming peripherals as the Wii bowling ball and the Nintendo DS/DSi Puppet Pouch — are thinking outside that particular box with the aptly named Transparent Steering Wheel. Looking like something pulled from the wreckage of Wonder Woman’s invisible plane, the TSW is nothing more than a transparent (well, translucent if we’re being nitpicky) piece of plastic shaped like a steering wheel, which promises more precise driving on the Kinect racetrack. The company’s apparently still perfecting the clear-plastic technology, which will ship June 5th, setting you back $12.99. CTA’s translucent Kinect steering wheel, for when you absolutely, positively must see the road originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 09 May 2011 07:31:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …Dominique Strauss-Kahn pictured in €100,000 car, undermining socialist credentials ahead of expected bid for presidency In a country that has never forgiven Nicolas Sarkozy’s love of bling, it wasn’t the brightest idea for the French Socialists’ great presidential hope to be photographed climbing into a €100,000 Porsche car. Dominique Strauss-Kahn, head of the International Monetary Fund and long-hailed as the only man who can beat Sarkozy, now looks certain to return to France and run for president in 2012. Secret meetings in Paris in recent days have mobilised his future campaign team. But “Porschegate” has created a headache for the man whose greatest challenge is convincing voters that he is not a haughty champagne socialist. From Washington, Strauss-Kahn has spent months trying to convey to the French electorate that he is not the voice of globalised fat cats and highly-paid technocrats but a true leftwing intellectual who can save the French social model. Sliding into a sports car outside his €4m (£3.5m) Paris penthouse with his millionaire wife was a faux pas, even if the vehicle was not his, but belonged to an adviser who works for one of France’s richest men. Sarkozy’s entourage could not hide their glee. So many Porsche jokes flew around the Socialist party that Ségolène Royal, a rival of Strauss-Kahn, ordered her supporters not to crack sports-car gags online. Things were made worse for Strauss-Kahn, as France on Monday marked 30 years since François Mitterrand’s 1981 election victory. Mitterrand is modern France’s only Socialist president; his sphinx-like public self-restraint went under the slogan La force tranquile (calm strength). Strauss-Kahn was quickly dubbed La Porsche tranquile . Strauss-Kahn – or DSK has he is known in France – has remained silent over his presidential ambitions owing to the impartiality of his IMF job. But his lieutenants in Paris said over weekend that he will declare his intentions on 28 June, the start of the Socialists’ race to chose a candidate. Polls continue to show him far ahead of Sarkozy. The latest survey for LH2 found Strauss-Kahn would take 23% of the vote followed by the extreme right politician Marine Le Pen (17%) and Sarkozy (16%). Not only would DSK beat Sarkozy, the incumbent would be eliminated in the first round. “To walk away now looks weak,” said a diplomat who knows Strauss-Kahn but wanted to remain anonymous. Jean-Jacques Urvoas, one of DSK’s close supporters, said he was “convinced” his man would run. But even advisers acknowledge that a return to Paris would not be easy. A former finance minister and economics professor, Strauss-Kahn will land in the middle of a party fighting over a primary race to nominate its candidate. His attributes – a presidential demeanour, experience of global politics, understanding of finance – are also weaknesses. He has been criticised for being haughty and arrogant, and worst of all “free-market” and not truly leftwing. Despite being regarded as the architect of the 35-hour week, a cause celebre of the French left, Strauss-Kahn is seen as to the right of his party. “He’s not a socialist,” said Roland Dumas, a former foreign minister in the Mitterrand government. The Socialists chose Royal over Strauss-Kahn to run in the last presidential election in 2007. He now faces another rival, her former partner François Hollande. The former Socialist party leader has emerged as a surprise challenger by positioning himself as a man of the people against DSK’s man of the establishment. In a poll this week, Hollande was seen as the Socialist who most resembled Mitterrand. The primary race will begin in June and end in the autumn. Strauss-Kahn’s greatest weapon may proved to be his third wife, Anne Sinclair, France’s answer to the Newsnight presenter Jeremy Paxman. She has helped neutralise his moneyed image by preparing a book about her art-dealer grandfather, suggesting the couple’s wealth comes from her inheritance rather than her husband. Sinclair has also set out to neutralise Strauss-Kahn’s troubled image as, what the French press politely call, “the great seducer”. In 2006, when he was last preparing to run for president, she told L’Express she was “rather proud” of his reputation, saying: “It’s important for a politician to be able to seduce.” Sinclair has remained silent over his brief affair with a senior IMF colleague. In 2008, an IMF investigation cleared him of harassment and favouritism over the affair while deeming it a “serious error of judgment”. When Porschegate erupted and the right took advantage, the MP Pierre Moscovici, a DSK lieutenant, warned against a campaign of “stink bombs”. It was interpreted not only as a warning against jibes about Strauss-Kahn’s wealth but also to silence rumours that the Sarkozy camp could go rummaging through his private life to catch him out during an election campaign. Olivier Ferrand, who is head of the thinktank Terra Nova and is close to Strauss-Kahn, said the Socialist party primary would work in DSK’s favour, giving him a “legitimacy” as the left’s true candidate if he won. The Socialist party, which could be dented by anti-globalisation candidates on the hard left, wants to avoid a repeat of the “political aberration” of April 2002 when an array of leftwing candidates split the vote and the Socialists were knocked out of in the first round by Jean-Marie Le Pen’s Front National. France Nicolas Sarkozy Europe Angelique Chrisafis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Twitter claims of intimate photos of socialite and Top Gear host are untrue and upsetting, says Khan Jemima Khan described weekend rumours that she has taken out a gagging order preventing “intimate photos” of herself and Jeremy Clarkson being published as a “bloody nightmare”. The socialite was among a number of celebrities alleged to have taken out privacy injunctions to stop potentially embarrassing details being made public. A Twitter account claiming to expose the celebrities has attracted about 30,000 followers since its first message on Sunday afternoon. Khan said the rumours were ” untrue and upsetting “, and added on Monday: “I hope the people who made this story up realise that my sons will be bullied at school because of it. Plus I’m getting vile hate tweets.” Khan has consistently denied having obtained a gagging order. On Monday, Mark Stephens, a senior media lawyer at Finers Stephens Innocent, told the Guardian: “This is discriminatory justice: not one single woman has sought or obtained a superinjunction.” Stephens added that the Twitter user behind the allegations “should expect a knock on the door within the next 48 hours” from solicitors representing the stars. “If it is false, it is libellous; if it is true, it is contemptuous,” he said. The lawyer added that anybody acting for the celebrities could attempt to force Twitter to hand over information about the person behind the account. “Twitter can reveal the user who dialled up to the connection at that time,” he told the Guardian. “The technical trail is indelible – it has the fingerprints of the miscreant all over it. They should expect a knock at the door in the next 48 hours and they should take their toothbrush to court, because they can expect to spend a very long time in Pentonville [prison].” Privacy injunctions – and the high-profile figures alleged to have obtained them – have been thrown into the spotlight in recent weeks as MPs warn of a new privacy law created by judges, rather than parliament. The use of Twitter and other internet sites to publicise the alleged injunctions has made the high court gagging orders “increasingly untenable,” Stephens said on Monday. “We’re in Spycatcher territory here. Eventually, the House of Lords will be forced to accept that the purpose of an injunction has been removed so remove it – as I’m sure they will on this occasion.” Twitter had not returned a request to comment at the time of publication. On Sunday, a Twitter spokesman said the company “strive[s] not to remove tweets on the basis of their content,” but that it would remove “illegal tweets and spam”. Keith Arrowsmith, the head of intellectual property and media at Ralli solicitors, told the Guardian that superinjunctions – where even the existence of a gagging order cannot be reported – are rendered ineffective without an international “supercourt” to implement them. “Anything the government says about privacy law is now nonsense, because they can only tweak UK law.” More details soon … • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”. • To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook . Privacy & the media Media law Press freedom Newspapers & magazines Newspapers Superinjunctions Twitter Josh Halliday guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Syrian authorities were conducting fresh raids, detaining hundreds of people as part of a widening crackdown on protests, one activist said Monday. Video about the situation in Syria is coming from state television and activists. (May 9)
Continue reading …Musician John Walker dies of liver cancer; ‘Thor’ hammers competition at the box office; Paula Abdul and Simon Cowell reunite on `The X Factor’. (May 9)
Continue reading …Kate Middleton — she’s just like us! The now-Duchess Catherine of Cambridge was spotted doing a little shopping at her local Waitrose grocery in Anglesey on Thursday, the Daily Mail reports. Clad in a white sweater, olive green shrug, skinny jeans and flats, she went nearly unnoticed — although she was escorted by three bodyguards. A customer told the Mail that she stocked up on basics and a few special items, adding: “She loaded all the shopping into her car on her own, then skipped as she ran the trolley back to the park. She looked very happy and was smiling at people. Most people didn’t even spot who it was, despite her being probably the most famous person in the world at the moment.” She was last seen leaving Buckingham Palace the morning after her nuptials. Take a look at the duchess on Thursday.
Continue reading …