Interaction between mother and child seen as significant factor in research based on Millennium Cohort Study Babies who are breastfed are less likely to have behavioural problems by the age of five than those given formula milk, according to new research. The question of whether breastfeeding has a long-term impact on behaviour has been investigated before, but the studies have usually been small-scale and inconsistent in their findings. But a large research project carried out by the universities of Oxford, Essex and York, together with University College London, has come to a more robust conclusion. They used data from the ongoing Millennium Cohort Study, a survey of babies born in the UK during a 12-month period between 2000 and 2001. More than 10,000 mother and baby pairs of white ethnic background took part. They were interviewed when the baby was nine months old and again at two-yearly intervals. The researchers asked parents to fill in questionnaires to assess their children’s potential behavioural difficulties. These included emotional issues such as clinginess and anxiety, hyperactivity such as restlessness, and conduct problems such as lying and stealing. Fewer than a third of the babies born at full-term (29%) and a fifth (21%) of those born prematurely were breastfed for at least four months. But only 4% of the breastfed babies showed a tendency to behavioural problems compared with 16% of those fed formula milk. The difference in the full-term babies was still significant even when other influences were taken into account, such as socioeconomic status and the mother’s education, age and smoking habits. However, the association was not clear among the 512 children who were born prematurely. The researchers, writing in the journal Archives of Disease in Childhood , say they are not concerned with ordinary childhood misbehaviour. “Children learn appropriate behaviour from people around them and, during the learning process, all children sometimes behave inappropriately – for example, have temper tantrums or are aggressive,” they write. “Behavioural problems, however, are inappropriate behaviours that occur repeatedly over a period of time, have a negative impact on the child’s development and interfere with the child’s or their family’s everyday life.” They offer two possible explanations for their findings. One is that breast milk contains large amounts of essential fatty acids, which are known to have an important role in the development and function of the brain and central nervous system. But in the past decade, they note, formula manufacturers have been supplementing their products with essential fatty acids and it is likely that the children in the study were given supplemented formula milk. The other possible answer, they write, is that “breastfeeding leads to more interaction between the mother and the child, better learning of acceptable behaviours and fewer behavioural problems”. Peter Kinderman, professor of clinical psychology at Liverpool University, called it “a very good piece of research published in an important journal”. He said he suspected the mother-child bonding that takes place during breastfeeding might be the most important factor. “Positive bonding between parent and child is known to be fantastically helpful for development,” he said, noting that the authors specifically took into account factors such as childcare arrangements because they are so well-established as important influences in development. “This is more evidence of the importance of breastfeeding and mother-baby attachment, not just for physical health but also for the psychological development of the child,” he said. The authors said that more work needed to be done to see if their findings would contrast with other ethnic groups. Breastfeeding Children Parents and parenting Medical research Health & wellbeing Health Sarah Boseley guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Press Complaints Commission condemns Daily Telegraph for undercover recording of Cable and other Lib Dem ministers The Daily Telegraph is criticised by the Press Complaints Commission today for secretly recording conversations between Liberal Democrat ministers and having reporters pose as constituents. It upholds a complaint lodged last year by the party’s president, Tim Farron MP, over the paper’s use of subterfuge, ruling that the stories the Telegraph published as a result did not justify the methods it employed. “On this occasion, the commission was not convinced that the public interest was such as to justify proportionately this level of subterfuge,” the PCC says. The undercover reporters taped Vince Cable boasting he had “declared war” on Rupert Murdoch when, as business secretary, he was due to rule on whether News Corporation should be allowed to take full control of BSkyB. The story was leaked to the BBC, which reported it the day before it appeared in the Daily Telegraph on 21 December. Cable came close to being sacked and was stripped of his power to rule on media mergers by David Cameron, who handed them to the culture secretary Jeremy Hunt. The paper also recorded separate conversations with other Lib Dems, including employment minister Ed Davey, who privately said he was opposed to housing and child benefit cuts despite defending coalition savings in October 2010. The PCC, an industry body paid for and run by newspaper and magazine publishers, says clandestine use of recording devices breaches the editors’ code of conduct, which it enforces. This states that papers “must not seek to obtain or publish material acquired by using hidden cameras or clandestine listening devices or hidden devices including tape recorders and cameras”. Subterfuge is also outlawed unless there is a strong public interest. The PCC acknowledges in its ruling: “there was a fine balance to be struck”. But it said it “did not believe that the Telegraph – although acting no doubt with legitimate intent – had sufficient grounds, on a prima facie basis, to justify their decision to send the reporters in”. It added it had consistently advised newspapers not to go on “fishing expeditions” in the hope of finding stories and said it would be issuing futher guidance on the subject. The Daily Telegraph editor, Tony Gallagher, says the paper accepts the ruling but adds in a statement that the PCC adjudication “has alarming implications for the future of investigative journalism”. The paper told the Commission it had received information from numerous anonymous sources, including voters as well as senior political figures, that Liberal Democrat ministers were contradicting their publicly-stated views in private. Its owner Telegraph Media Group told the PCC it had sought to expose this contradiction by sending in reporters and that it had been in the public interest to do so. It denied it had been on a “fishing expedition” because it had acted on tip off from politicians and the public. Gallagher said: “We had a duty to investigate their conduct and…..to be effective the use of subterfuge was necessary. Our revelations led to the demotion of a member of the Cabinet, apologies from a string of junior ministers and condemnation from their party leader.” He added that the decision: “Increases the obstacles facing newspapers wishing to carry out legitimate inquiries based on material which is often by its nature incomplete – and it limits their ability to expose matters of legitimate public interest which those in positions of power would rather shield from public view.” Daily Telegraph Newspapers & magazines Vince Cable Liberal Democrats News Corporation Press freedom James Robinson guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Over the years there’s been a battle between the feminists and the neo-traditionalists. The former will tell you that staying at home causes depression; the latter will tell you that working causes moms too much stress. (via Healthland) But there’s no black or white answer, according to a new report Working Mothers, Stay-At-Home Mothers, and
Continue reading …Jury selection started Monday in the trial of Casey Anthony, the Orlando woman charged with killing her 2-year-old daughter in 2008. (May 9)
Continue reading …Our rheumatology expert explains how chronic disease can affect family relations and how one reader can get the help she needs.
Continue reading …enlarge Credit: CNN USA NEXT smears AARP with anti-Gay ad Remember the above ad? As the American public turns its back on Paul Ryan’s Medicare-killing budget, part of his similarly popular Roadmap to the Poorhouse, the GOP is doubling down by attacking the AARP: Rep. Paul Ryan’s (R-Wis.) political group went on the attack Monday against AARP, calling one of the most powerful lobbies a “left-leaning pressure group.” Ryan’s Prosperity PAC sought to push back on attacks by AARP against the House Budget Committee chairman’s 2012 budget, specifically its proposed changes to Medicare. “Last week, the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP), a left-leaning pressure group with significant business interests in the insurance industry, launched a national ad campaign that intentionally misleads seniors about the Medicare debate,” wrote Pat Shortridge, a senior adviser to Ryan’s PAC, in an email to supporters. Ryan’s Medicare proposal has been a particular point of criticism by Democrats and groups on the left, which say that the Medicare plan would significantly revamp the entitlement program to the detriment of seniors. Democrats have homed in their attacks against that part of the Ryan budget, which has sparked some degree of heartburn among Republicans. AARP launched ads last week warning against “harmful cuts” to Medicare and Social Security it said Republicans favored. Fox News pushed a phony seniors’ group led by Art Linkletter called USA Next in 2005 when they tried to privatize Social Security, and they too attacked AARP — which failed miserably . Now some people on the right want you to think of gay marriage and Sunni insurgency. The New York Times this morning reported that the lobbyists who brought you the “Swift Boat Veterans for Truth” have been contracted to promote the agenda of USA Next, a conservative lobbying group. To build support, USA Next is portraying AARP – which opposes the White House’s pseudo-plan for privatizing Social Security – as some kind of liberal extremist group. They even produced a smear ad attacking gay marriage to try and rile up some old folks against AARP. Click here to view this media So now Ryan’s PAC is doing the same thing and attacking AARP. Good luck with that. Second up was John Boehner, who told Wall Streeters that he is indeed for going after Medicare: Speaker John Boehner is more blatant even than most politicians about telegraphing which constituency matters to him most: Wall Street. While his caucus leadership can’t run away from abolishing Medicare fast enough, Boehner is assuring Wall Street that it’s still on the agenda . In a speech to the Economic Club of New York in Midtown Manhattan, the Ohio Republican is set to reiterate to leading financial executives that he believes that reforming Medicare should be part of negotiations in raising the debt ceiling, saying that there needs to be “an honest conversation,” because the program is on an “unsustainable path if changes are not made,” according to sources familiar with the speech. Boehner also is expected to advocate for immediate cuts rather than deficit and debt targets preferred by some Democrats. After his talk, Boehner will take questions from two prominent Wall Street players at the intersection of Washington power: Peter G. Peterson, the private-equity giant who worked for President Richard Nixon, and Observatory Group CEO Jane Hartley, who worked for President Jimmy Carter…. Boehner’s public insistence that reforming Medicare stay a part of debt ceiling negotiations could reaffirm a concern among Wall Street types that Republicans are driving a hard bargain on the limit and will take the negotiations up to the last minute. Boehner said last week Congress must now cut trillions, not billions…. Friday evening, in a sign of unity after a disjointed week, GOP leadership, along with Ryan and Camp, released a statement saying “everything must be on the table except increasing taxes.” Freshmen, who voted en masse for the Ryan budget, largely want entitlement reform dealt with. It’ll keep Pete Peterson and his crowd happy, no matter how disastrous the plan is with actual voters. But more than anything, this is reflecting the very thin ice Boehner is skating. He’s got to try to convince the powers that be that really, his caucus isn’t a bunch of nihilists perfectly willing to blow up the economy over the debt ceiling vote. Lesse: the Speaker of the House is going to use the debt ceiling vote to “reform” Medicare, and Paul Ryan’s PAC is attacking the AARP. Let’s see how that all works out, but attacking AARP failed once and it will fail again. Millions of seniors have been members of AARP and they have tangible proof of how good an organization they are because they’ve used their services and love them. Using the debt to scare seniors is something that’s not tangible or even felt on a material level, so pragmatically speaking, which side would you choose if you’re fifty-five and older?
Continue reading …Late last Sunday night, President Obama interrupted The Celebrity Apprentice to announce that Osama bin Laden had finally been brought to justice. The news inspired far too much Obama/Osama “confusion” by TV anchors and just enough unexpected praise from conservative leaders. And of course, it was left to the late night hosts to find the comedy. More comedy videos at: GotchaMediaBlog.com.
Continue reading …U.S Secretary Hilary Clinton has proven to the entire world that a woman can outshadow men in their own turf and shown what women are capable of. Since the beginning of time,double standards treating women as inferior gender has been the battle cry for all women who are clamoring for equality. Over the centuries ,women Hilary Clinton Photoshopped Out Of A White House Picture is a post from: Daily World Buzz
Continue reading …On Sunday's 60 Minutes, CBS's Steve Kroft failed to bring up key issues related to the killing of Osama bin Laden during an interview of President Obama, such as the enhanced interrogation of captured al Qaeda leaders which provided the first intelligence that ultimately lead to the Navy SEAL raid in Pakistan. Kroft set the overall tone of his interview, which he conducted on Wednesday , by tossing a softball in his lead question to Obama: ” Mr. President, was this the most satisfying week of your presidency? ” After the chief executive gave his initial answer, the journalist followed up by asking, “Was the decision to launch this attack the most difficult decision that you've made as commander-in-chief? Later, the correspondent waxed ecstatic about the President's full schedule as final preparations were being made for the assault on the al Qaeda leader's compound:
Continue reading …The University of Pennsylvania’s GRASP Lab has already recklessly taught its autonomous quadrocopters to move in packs , fly through hoops and build things on their own, and it’s now for some reason decided to teach them yet another trick they’ll surely use against us one day. As you can see in the video above, the quadrocopters are now able to take cues from a leader and fly in formation . What’s more, they can even continue with the formation if one loses communication and falls out of the pack, which the researchers note is key to the success of any swarm. Isn’t that reassuring? GRASP Lab quadrocopters learn to follow the leader and fly in formation originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 09 May 2011 18:51:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …