Home » Archives by category » News (Page 4884)
‘War is a bummer,’ chief of defence staff tells MPs

Failure of intelligence in Afghanistan, notably about tribal loyalties and aggressive US operations, exacerbated already dangerous situation, says General Sir David Richards Serious intelligence failures meant British commanders were unprepared for the Taliban-led insurgency in Afghanistan as soldiers “turned up a hornets’ nest”, three of the country’s most senior military officers have said. General Sir David Richards, the chief of the defence staff, told MPs the British had got involved in a very serious situation, adding: “War is a bummer.” A failure of intelligence, notably about tribal loyalties and aggressive US operations, and ill-thought out attempts to eradicate the opium poppy harvest, combined to exacerbate an already dangerous situation facing the 3,000 British troops sent to Helmand by the Blair government in 2006, the officers said. The huge problems then confronting British soldiers – the situation is much better now that about 11,000 are deployed in operations in a smaller area – were described by Richards, his deputy, General Sir Nick Houghton, and General Sir Peter Wall, the head of the army, in evidence to the Commons defence committee on Wednesday. “It was very clear the British were going to get involved in a very difficult situation,” Richards, then Nato’s commander in Kabul, told the cross-party committee of MPs. He said: “War is a bummer. Politics and the enemy have a vote.” Richards, who had asked Britain and other countries to send more troops to southern Afghanistan, warned: “It is impossible just to chuck troops at the problem, because of the great duty of care”. Wall said: “I absolutely accept what we found when the forces arrived on the ground was starkly different from what we anticipated and had been hoping for.” He said British commanders did not expect the insurgency to be as “vehement” as it turned out to be, and told MPs it was clear there was a failure of intelligence. Houghton, a widely respected general who, along with Richards, was interviewed by Cameron for the top military post, listed a number of problems that came together. Britain’s military commitment to Iraq was higher than it was anticipated it would still be in 2006, and British troops arrived in May, “the natural start of the fighting season”. The Taliban, at the time, encouraged the belief that foreign troops were out to eradicate the poppy harvest, a valuable source of income for local farmers. Some 200,000 labourers migrated from Pakistan to help with the poppy harvest, and some were happy to stay as “guns for hire”. Houghton added that US troops had just engaged in “particularly kinetic” [aggressive] military operations at the time. Moreover, at the behest of President Hamid Karzai, British troops were deployed to forward “platoon houses” in northern Helmand areas such as Sangin and Musa Qala. The soldiers turned out to be dangerously exposed and too few in number. Asked about the effect of Osama bin Laden’s death on military operations in Afghanistan, Richards said it was too early to tell, but that it clearly had a psychological effect and possibly an effect on the ability of the insurgents to raise money. Military Afghanistan House of Commons Defence policy Foreign policy Richard Norton-Taylor guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Ugandan parliament drops bill that would jail gay people for life

Legislation first put forward in 2009 removed from MPs’ timetable amid worldwide outcry A bill calling for gay people to be imprisoned for life has been dropped by the Ugandan parliament after worldwide condemnation. The fiercely controversial legislation, first put forward in 2009 , was discussed in committee on Friday. It was due to be debated on Wednesday but was removed from the MPs’ timetable. With the current parliament about to be dissolved, the bill appears to have been put on hold indefinitely – but campaigners warned it could be reintroduced in the next session. John Alimadi, an MP, told the Associated Press the bill may have been dropped from the agenda because of the worldwide outcry against it. Campaigners welcomed the development. Christopher Seneno, a Ugandan bishop, said: “It’s good news. We wouldn’t like this bill even to be debated. That will be dangerous because there is a lot of misinformation and excitement. Just with the bill being debated, anything can happen to LGBT people.” Seneno admitted he did not know whether the bill was dead in the water or could be revived at a later date. Ricken Patel, the executive director of Avaaz, an online group that attracted more than 1 million signatories condemning the legislation, said: “The pressure on the Ugandan government has had a big impact today, with President Museveni keeping the bill off the table – as he has for months. “If not tabled this week the bill will die for good – a huge victory for human rights.” Gay activists say homophobia in Uganda has increased since the bill’s introduction. More gay people are being harassed because of media attention and because church leaders have been preaching in favour of the bill going through parliament. Authored by the MP David Bahati, the bill carries harsh provisions. Anyone convicted of a homosexual act would face life imprisonment. Anyone who “aids, abets, counsels or procures another to engage of acts of homosexuality” would face seven years in prison. Landlords renting rooms or homes to homosexual people could get seven years. Bahati’s original bill mandated a death sentence for active homosexual people living with HIV or in cases of same-sex rape, but he said last month this was “something we have moved away from”. Politicians and civil rights groups around the world have criticised the bill, with Barack Obama describing it as “odious”. Gay rights Uganda Africa David Smith guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Ugandan parliament drops bill that would jail gay people for life

Legislation first put forward in 2009 removed from MPs’ timetable amid worldwide outcry A bill calling for gay people to be imprisoned for life has been dropped by the Ugandan parliament after worldwide condemnation. The fiercely controversial legislation, first put forward in 2009 , was discussed in committee on Friday. It was due to be debated on Wednesday but was removed from the MPs’ timetable. With the current parliament about to be dissolved, the bill appears to have been put on hold indefinitely – but campaigners warned it could be reintroduced in the next session. John Alimadi, an MP, told the Associated Press the bill may have been dropped from the agenda because of the worldwide outcry against it. Campaigners welcomed the development. Christopher Seneno, a Ugandan bishop, said: “It’s good news. We wouldn’t like this bill even to be debated. That will be dangerous because there is a lot of misinformation and excitement. Just with the bill being debated, anything can happen to LGBT people.” Seneno admitted he did not know whether the bill was dead in the water or could be revived at a later date. Ricken Patel, the executive director of Avaaz, an online group that attracted more than 1 million signatories condemning the legislation, said: “The pressure on the Ugandan government has had a big impact today, with President Museveni keeping the bill off the table – as he has for months. “If not tabled this week the bill will die for good – a huge victory for human rights.” Gay activists say homophobia in Uganda has increased since the bill’s introduction. More gay people are being harassed because of media attention and because church leaders have been preaching in favour of the bill going through parliament. Authored by the MP David Bahati, the bill carries harsh provisions. Anyone convicted of a homosexual act would face life imprisonment. Anyone who “aids, abets, counsels or procures another to engage of acts of homosexuality” would face seven years in prison. Landlords renting rooms or homes to homosexual people could get seven years. Bahati’s original bill mandated a death sentence for active homosexual people living with HIV or in cases of same-sex rape, but he said last month this was “something we have moved away from”. Politicians and civil rights groups around the world have criticised the bill, with Barack Obama describing it as “odious”. Gay rights Uganda Africa David Smith guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Elephant Therapy for Children With Autism

In Thailand, children with autism are being offered therapy sessions with elephants, playing with them, scrubbing their bristly hides, and riding them bareback. It’s the first program of its type in the world using these charismatic animals. (May 11)

Continue reading …
Elephant Therapy for Children With Autism

In Thailand, children with autism are being offered therapy sessions with elephants, playing with them, scrubbing their bristly hides, and riding them bareback. It’s the first program of its type in the world using these charismatic animals. (May 11)

Continue reading …
‘Neverisms’: 11 Things You Should Never Do, Never Say, Never Forget (PHOTOS)

In a 1950s conversation with her dear friend Ernest Hemingway, Marlene Dietrich asked his advice about a problem. She had been invited to perform at a Miami nightclub but was not sure she wanted to accept it. It was a lucrative offer, she explained, but her heart was simply not in it. When she thought of turning it down, though, she wondered if she was just “pampering” herself. Her explanation was met with a moment of silence, after which Hemingway said, “Don’t do what you sincerely don’t want to do.” And then he added: Never confuse movement with action. Hemingway’s words immediately cleared up any doubts that Dietrich was having about the decision. But it was her comment about his advice that has been remembered to history: “In those five words he gave me a whole philosophy.” There are periods in life when we are especially receptive to the influence of others. During these times–often called teachable moments–a handful of words can dramatically impact our lives. And when it comes to words that command attention, nothing can beat those that are phrased according to the figure of speech known as dehortatio, which Willard R. Espy once crisply defined as “dissuasive advice given with authority.” Technically, Hemingway offered Dietrich a dehortation, a rarely used but quite proper English term (compared to an exhortation, which attempts to persuade people to do something, a dehortation is an attempt to dissuade people from a course of action). Here’s another example, this one written more than 2,500 years ago by the Greek writer Euripides: Never dare to to judge till you have heard the other side. For more than twenty-five years, I’ve had my own pet term for this kind of cautionary advice, and I have compiled nearly 2,000 examples in my new book Neverisms: A Quotation Lover’s Guide to Things You Should Never Do, Never Say, or Never Forget (HarperCollins, 2011). Here are a bunch more, along with a thought or two about each one.

Continue reading …
‘Neverisms’: 11 Things You Should Never Do, Never Say, Never Forget (PHOTOS)

In a 1950s conversation with her dear friend Ernest Hemingway, Marlene Dietrich asked his advice about a problem. She had been invited to perform at a Miami nightclub but was not sure she wanted to accept it. It was a lucrative offer, she explained, but her heart was simply not in it. When she thought of turning it down, though, she wondered if she was just “pampering” herself. Her explanation was met with a moment of silence, after which Hemingway said, “Don’t do what you sincerely don’t want to do.” And then he added: Never confuse movement with action. Hemingway’s words immediately cleared up any doubts that Dietrich was having about the decision. But it was her comment about his advice that has been remembered to history: “In those five words he gave me a whole philosophy.” There are periods in life when we are especially receptive to the influence of others. During these times–often called teachable moments–a handful of words can dramatically impact our lives. And when it comes to words that command attention, nothing can beat those that are phrased according to the figure of speech known as dehortatio, which Willard R. Espy once crisply defined as “dissuasive advice given with authority.” Technically, Hemingway offered Dietrich a dehortation, a rarely used but quite proper English term (compared to an exhortation, which attempts to persuade people to do something, a dehortation is an attempt to dissuade people from a course of action). Here’s another example, this one written more than 2,500 years ago by the Greek writer Euripides: Never dare to to judge till you have heard the other side. For more than twenty-five years, I’ve had my own pet term for this kind of cautionary advice, and I have compiled nearly 2,000 examples in my new book Neverisms: A Quotation Lover’s Guide to Things You Should Never Do, Never Say, or Never Forget (HarperCollins, 2011). Here are a bunch more, along with a thought or two about each one.

Continue reading …
Motorola Xoom WiFi to get Android 3.1 update within the ‘next several weeks’

Google said yesterday that the new limited edition Galaxy Tab 10.1 would be getting updated to Android 3.1 in the next couple of weeks, and it looks like it will be a similar situation with the WiFi-only Xoom. Motorola has just announced that it will receive the update “within the next several weeks.” It also reaffirmed that the Verizon 3G Xoom is rolling out over the air this week, so you should be receiving it soon if you haven’t already. Full press release is after the break. Continue reading Motorola Xoom WiFi to get Android 3.1 update within the ‘next several weeks’ Motorola Xoom WiFi to get Android 3.1 update within the ‘next several weeks’ originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 11 May 2011 10:58:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Continue reading …
NHS reforms: David Cameron rejects claim that ‘listening exercise’ is a sham

Cameron promises ‘significant and substantial changes’ to health and social care bill as Ed Miliband accuses him of ‘dumping on’ health secretary Andrew Lansley David Cameron has promised “significant and substantial changes” to the government’s plans to reform the health service amid accusations that ministers are conducting a “sham” consultation exercise. The prime minister became embroiled in a row with the Labour leader, Ed Miliband, at prime minister’s questions over treatment waiting times and plans by the health secretary, Andrew Lansley, to revamp the National Health Service, which have sparked widespread opposition from staff. The two leaders traded insults as Miliband ramped up the pressure on Cameron by linking him personally with the NHS reform plans. The Labour leader read out a quote from Cameron last month, in which he claimed he had been involved in designing the reforms “way back into opposition with Andrew Lansley”. “Can he therefore confirm that the NHS plans are not Andrew Lansley’s fault; they’re his?” asked Miliband, before accusing him of “dumping” on a minister rather than taking responsibility himself – a practice Miliband claimed was “becoming a pattern”. “This morning in the papers we see the universities minister [David Willetts] being dumped on for his tuition fees policy, we see the schools secretary [Michael Gove] being dumped on for his free schools policy and the poor deputy prime minister [Nick Clegg], he just gets dumped on every day of the week.” He said the decision to throw open a “listening exercise” last month, with the legislation for the reforms already making its passage through parliament, was proof that Cameron thought “something has gone wrong”. But he went on to claim that the exercise was “nothing more than a sham” in light of the fact that the NHS chief executive, Sir David Nicholson, had told health managers to carry on implementing the reforms after the “so called pause” in the legislation had begun. Cameron insisted the government was determined to get the reforms “right”. “I can absolutely guarantee there will be significant and substantial changes to the reforms because we want to get them right, because we want to guarantee an NHS, free at the point of use, available on need rather than ability to pay and unlike the party opposite, which is cutting the NHS in Wales, this government will put more money in the NHS.” The prime minister cited a letter signed by 42 GPs that hailed Lansley’s health reforms as “good for patients”. The letter, published today in the Daily Telegraph called on the government to press ahead with the health and social care bill. The 42 signatories, all family doctors, who together lead 1,100 practices across England and who are all heads of recently-formed GPs’ consortiums, said that ditching the reforms would be a mistake. They insisted the reforms would benefit the most elderly, infirm and vulnerable people in society. But it emerged almost three weeks ago that Jonathan Munday, a former Tory councillor who chairs the board of the Victoria Commissioning Consortium, had emailed GP colleagues urging them to back his reforms by signing the letter of support to the prime minister that went out today. Miliband told Cameron he should be “embarrassed” by the assessment by the Royal College of General Practitioners, which represented thousands of GPs, and has warned that the government’s plans would cause “irreparable damage to the core values of the NHS”. The prime minister challenged Miliband to deal “with the substance of the reform” since he agreed that “no change is not an option”. “He should be seriously engaging in how we make sure we have a strong NHS for all our people in the future. Instead we have an empty opposition, which got him nowhere last week.” Miliband used his first question to ask Cameron to rate his handling of the NHS after a year in office before pointing to figures published today which show waiting times for diagnosis have risen : “Over 10,000 people waiting to get their tests, that’s three times the number it was a year ago.” Cameron instead seized on a previous claim Miliband made two weeks ago about rising waiting times for inpatients and outpatients, which the prime minister said had turned out to be wrong, and told the Labour leader he should have the “guts” to admit he had been wrong. But the Labour leader insisted “waiting times are rising” and said Cameron had refused to take responsibility for the NHS reforms. The NHS surfaced again later in prime minister’s question as Cameron told MPs that the government would consider terminating its contract with a private firm to overhaul the NHS’s computer system. He faced calls from Richard Bacon, the Conservative MP for South Norfolk, to scrap the new system and save a further £4.7bn, which he said could be better spent directly on patients. The NHS computer programme would “never deliver its early promise”, he added. Cameron said the IT systems inherited from Labour were “poor value for money”, with the £12bn centralised records system for 50 million patients in England taking four years longer than planned to implement. He told the Commons: “Since coming into government we have reviewed the projects with the intention of making the best of what we have inherited. “In part, as a result of our work, the government has cut £1.3bn from the cost of the National Programme for IT in the NHS, including planned savings of at least £500m from Computer Sciences Corporation.” He added: “There are no plans to sign any new contract with Computer Sciences Corporation until the National Audit Office report has been reviewed and until the public accounts committee meetings and the Major Projects Authority reviews have taken place. “The Department of Health and Cabinet Office will examine all the available options under the current contract, including the option of terminating some or all of the contracts.” NHS Health PMQs House of Commons David Cameron Ed Miliband Health policy Public services policy Hélène Mulholland guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Barry George could be compensated after supreme court ruling

Britian’s top judges rule that Northern Irish pair who suffered miscarriage of justice are entitled to compensation Two men from Northern Ireland whose convictions for murder during the Troubles were quashed following the emergence of fresh evidence are entitled to compensation, the supreme court has ruled. In a new definition of what constitutes a miscarriage of justice Britain’s most senior judges said that Raymond McCartney and Eamonn MacDermott were entitled to compensation. The two men were convicted in January 1979 of murder and membership of the IRA but had their convictions quashed in February 2007. Millions of pounds could be paid to scores of other victims from Northern Ireland as a result of the decision. The court rejected a similar challenge by Andrew Adams, a former aircraft engineer, of Newcastle upon Tyne, who spent 14 years in jail before his murder conviction was ruled unsafe. Barry George, whose conviction for the murder of the TV presenter Jill Dando was quashed, has been fighting for years for compensation; he also joined the case. Nick Baird, solicitor for George, said after the judgment that he was encouraged and would be applying for the Ministry of Justice asking them to reconsider their refusal to give him compensation. The nine supreme court judges ruled that in George’s case where a ‘”new or newly discovered fact” had emerged which led to an acquittal at retrial “compensation should be paid to him under the scheme that had been set up by the statute”. By a narrow majority, the judges held that a miscarriage of justice had occurred “when a new or newly discovered fact shows conclusively that the evidence against a defendant has been so undermined that no conviction could possibly be based upon it”. The supreme court panel said: “A claimant for compensation will not need to prove that he was innocent of the crime but he will have to show that, on the basis of the facts as they are now known, he should not have been convicted or that conviction could not possibly be based on those facts.” Not all miscarriages of justice will lead to compensation. “Procedural deficiencies that led to irregularities in the trial or errors in the investigation of offences will not suffice to establish entitlement to compensation,” the judges ruled. McCartney, a Sinn Féin assembly member for Foyle, said his decision to pursue the case had been justified. “I feel totally vindicated,” he said. “This has been a long process and I want to pay due gratitude to my legal team who have been magnificent throughout this. The supreme court has allowed us to pursue compensation … [The] former lord chief justice (of Northern Ireland) Brian Kerr has stated in the course of the judgment that not only should we have been acquitted but shouldn’t have faced trial in the first place. ” This is damning indictment of the RUC’s (Royal Ulster Constabulary) interrogation techniques at the time and a damning indictment of the actions of the Public Prosecution Service at the time.” Adams said: “I welcome the fact that the majority of the supreme court has not agreed with the justice secretary’s proposal to solely compensate those people who he decides have been completely exonerated of the crime they were wrongly convicted of. “But I am bitterly disappointed that … [my case has not been] accepted for compensation within the new definition. I maintain my innocence of the murder of Jack Royal – as I have from day one.” Since 2006 the Ministry of Justice has awarded compensation to 59 applicants out of 228, according to figures given to the court. UK criminal justice UK supreme court Northern Ireland Jill Dando murder Crime IRA UK security and terrorism Owen Bowcott Sandra Laville guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …