Mark Zuckerberg in Indianapolis shares the same name as Facebook’s founder. That has caused all sorts of problems for one of the Zuckerbergs on the social networking site. (May 12)
Continue reading …Good morning everyone. It looks like the House Republican leadership is planning on a new round of hostage taking stunts for next year’s budget fight. Not happy with the crushing cuts they enacted through the last budget “deal,” the House GOP is looking to ram through a new round of crazy cuts aiming straight at health, labor and education programs. The New York Times reports this morning on the. The New York Times reports GOP’s latest plans to hold our government hostage (emphasis added): While the net reduction in spending is $30 billion, the impact on many domestic programs would be much more pronounced because the Pentagon received a $17 billion increase in its budget. Committee officials said spending that was not related to security would decrease by about $46 billion. The overall proposal is $121.5 billion less than what President Obama sought in his original budget this year. Labor, health and education programs, a priority of the president and Congressional Democrats, would be cut by $18.2 billion, coming in at $41 billion less than the amount recommended by the White House . Representative Norm Dicks of Washington State, the top Democrat on the spending panel, assailed the Republican proposal as irresponsible, saying it would necessitate “draconian” cuts to college aid, early childhood education, food safety, law enforcement, public health and national infrastructure. “It’s clear from what we’re seeing in the economy that if these cuts were enacted, they would lead to a severe setback for economic growth by shedding more government jobs and further depressing state and local government spending,” Mr. Dicks said. At a time when the pace of our country’s ongoing economic recovery is fragile, the relentless drive towards cutting and slashing our budget is nothing short of crazy and delusional . The increase in defense spending is also a classic touch of House Republican brand of crazy. I mean even Defense Secretary Robert Gates – Bush II appointed Republican – supports strategic cuts in Pentagon’s budget . One would think with the huge majority of Americans looking for US to end the war Afghanistan following the death of bin Laden , this would be the perfect time to look for strategic cuts in our defense budget. But the extreme, tone deaf House GOP leadership will apparently have none of that. They have no desire to represent the wishes of the majority of Americans and instead they want to go alone with the dogmatic, extreme right wing ideology of killing the government with no concern whatsoever with regards to how to serve our communities. As for the Democrats, this morning we are reading report of the President urging the Democratic Senate leadership to be “flexible” in the upcoming debt-ceiling “debate” with the House Republicans. The President does not want our party leaders to draw the proverbial lines in the sand. I agree with the President on this. I think drawing lines in the sand are essentially meaningless. Anyone can draw lines in the sand. The question always becomes where exactly is that line being drawn. We do not need our President and the Congressional Democratic Leadership to push out press releases and sound bites boldly drawing lines in the sand. We don’t need them blustering in public. Yet at the same time we there is no need for them to send hapless signals of flexibility and “bipartisanship” to make the villagers blush. What we need from them is to ensure they do not compromise on our core Democratic principles. We also need them to not operate under the illusion that they are dealing with a set of Republican leadership who can be trusted. As Karoli and Digby pointed out yesterday that is just a pipe dream.
Continue reading …Good morning everyone. It looks like the House Republican leadership is planning on a new round of hostage taking stunts for next year’s budget fight. Not happy with the crushing cuts they enacted through the last budget “deal,” the House GOP is looking to ram through a new round of crazy cuts aiming straight at health, labor and education programs. The New York Times reports this morning on the. The New York Times reports GOP’s latest plans to hold our government hostage (emphasis added): While the net reduction in spending is $30 billion, the impact on many domestic programs would be much more pronounced because the Pentagon received a $17 billion increase in its budget. Committee officials said spending that was not related to security would decrease by about $46 billion. The overall proposal is $121.5 billion less than what President Obama sought in his original budget this year. Labor, health and education programs, a priority of the president and Congressional Democrats, would be cut by $18.2 billion, coming in at $41 billion less than the amount recommended by the White House . Representative Norm Dicks of Washington State, the top Democrat on the spending panel, assailed the Republican proposal as irresponsible, saying it would necessitate “draconian” cuts to college aid, early childhood education, food safety, law enforcement, public health and national infrastructure. “It’s clear from what we’re seeing in the economy that if these cuts were enacted, they would lead to a severe setback for economic growth by shedding more government jobs and further depressing state and local government spending,” Mr. Dicks said. At a time when the pace of our country’s ongoing economic recovery is fragile, the relentless drive towards cutting and slashing our budget is nothing short of crazy and delusional . The increase in defense spending is also a classic touch of House Republican brand of crazy. I mean even Defense Secretary Robert Gates – Bush II appointed Republican – supports strategic cuts in Pentagon’s budget . One would think with the huge majority of Americans looking for US to end the war Afghanistan following the death of bin Laden , this would be the perfect time to look for strategic cuts in our defense budget. But the extreme, tone deaf House GOP leadership will apparently have none of that. They have no desire to represent the wishes of the majority of Americans and instead they want to go alone with the dogmatic, extreme right wing ideology of killing the government with no concern whatsoever with regards to how to serve our communities. As for the Democrats, this morning we are reading report of the President urging the Democratic Senate leadership to be “flexible” in the upcoming debt-ceiling “debate” with the House Republicans. The President does not want our party leaders to draw the proverbial lines in the sand. I agree with the President on this. I think drawing lines in the sand are essentially meaningless. Anyone can draw lines in the sand. The question always becomes where exactly is that line being drawn. We do not need our President and the Congressional Democratic Leadership to push out press releases and sound bites boldly drawing lines in the sand. We don’t need them blustering in public. Yet at the same time we there is no need for them to send hapless signals of flexibility and “bipartisanship” to make the villagers blush. What we need from them is to ensure they do not compromise on our core Democratic principles. We also need them to not operate under the illusion that they are dealing with a set of Republican leadership who can be trusted. As Karoli and Digby pointed out yesterday that is just a pipe dream.
Continue reading …Good morning everyone. It looks like the House Republican leadership is planning on a new round of hostage taking stunts for next year’s budget fight. Not happy with the crushing cuts they enacted through the last budget “deal,” the House GOP is looking to ram through a new round of crazy cuts aiming straight at health, labor and education programs. The New York Times reports this morning on the. The New York Times reports GOP’s latest plans to hold our government hostage (emphasis added): While the net reduction in spending is $30 billion, the impact on many domestic programs would be much more pronounced because the Pentagon received a $17 billion increase in its budget. Committee officials said spending that was not related to security would decrease by about $46 billion. The overall proposal is $121.5 billion less than what President Obama sought in his original budget this year. Labor, health and education programs, a priority of the president and Congressional Democrats, would be cut by $18.2 billion, coming in at $41 billion less than the amount recommended by the White House . Representative Norm Dicks of Washington State, the top Democrat on the spending panel, assailed the Republican proposal as irresponsible, saying it would necessitate “draconian” cuts to college aid, early childhood education, food safety, law enforcement, public health and national infrastructure. “It’s clear from what we’re seeing in the economy that if these cuts were enacted, they would lead to a severe setback for economic growth by shedding more government jobs and further depressing state and local government spending,” Mr. Dicks said. At a time when the pace of our country’s ongoing economic recovery is fragile, the relentless drive towards cutting and slashing our budget is nothing short of crazy and delusional . The increase in defense spending is also a classic touch of House Republican brand of crazy. I mean even Defense Secretary Robert Gates – Bush II appointed Republican – supports strategic cuts in Pentagon’s budget . One would think with the huge majority of Americans looking for US to end the war Afghanistan following the death of bin Laden , this would be the perfect time to look for strategic cuts in our defense budget. But the extreme, tone deaf House GOP leadership will apparently have none of that. They have no desire to represent the wishes of the majority of Americans and instead they want to go alone with the dogmatic, extreme right wing ideology of killing the government with no concern whatsoever with regards to how to serve our communities. As for the Democrats, this morning we are reading report of the President urging the Democratic Senate leadership to be “flexible” in the upcoming debt-ceiling “debate” with the House Republicans. The President does not want our party leaders to draw the proverbial lines in the sand. I agree with the President on this. I think drawing lines in the sand are essentially meaningless. Anyone can draw lines in the sand. The question always becomes where exactly is that line being drawn. We do not need our President and the Congressional Democratic Leadership to push out press releases and sound bites boldly drawing lines in the sand. We don’t need them blustering in public. Yet at the same time we there is no need for them to send hapless signals of flexibility and “bipartisanship” to make the villagers blush. What we need from them is to ensure they do not compromise on our core Democratic principles. We also need them to not operate under the illusion that they are dealing with a set of Republican leadership who can be trusted. As Karoli and Digby pointed out yesterday that is just a pipe dream.
Continue reading …And that, as they say, it a wrap. We’ve departed a shockingly sunny San Francisco, but not without a huge helping of Google news to mull over on the long ride home. In typical Goog fashion, the outfit served up a double-dose of keynotes this year, both of which seemed to delight both developers and media alike. Sure, no new superphones used the show as a launching pad, but plenty of other nuggets were unearthed. From the reveal of Music Beta to the official introduction of the world’s first commercial Chromebooks, the 2011 edition of Google I/O packed plenty of punch. If you missed even a second of our continuous coverage, we’ve got you covered — the best of the best is recapped below. We’ll see you next year, I/O… you bring the tiramisu, we’ll bring the Ice Cream Sandwich. Keynotes / liveblogs: Day 1: Music Beta, Android 3.1, Ice Cream Sandwich, Open Accessory, ADK Day 2: Chrome, Angry Birds, Chrome OS, Chromebooks Editorials / previews: Google Music Beta walkthrough: what it is and how it works (video) Editorial: Engadget on Google Music and Movies for Android Google Music Beta versus the titans of the streaming music space: a chart Editorial: Google clarifies Chromebook subscriptions, might have just changed the industry Hands-ons: Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 Limited Edition (white) hands-on from Google I/O! Samsung Series 5 Chrome OS laptop hands-on at Google I/O Fossil Meta Watch wrists-on at Google I/O (video) Hasbro’s experimental Nexus-powered robot toy hands-on at Google I/O (video) Lighting Science demos Android @ Home bulbs, promises dead-simple home automation (hands-on) Google’s Arduino-based ADK powers robots, home gardens and giant Labyrinth (video) LifeFitness exercise bike interfaces with Nexus S, makes fitness marginally enjoyable (video) iRobot Ava mobile robotics platform hands-on at Google I/O (video) Groupme’s group messaging app demoed at Google I/O, complete with data / location (video) Head on past the break for more! Continue reading Google I/O 2011 recap: Chromebooks, Music Beta, Movies and more Google I/O 2011 recap: Chromebooks, Music Beta, Movies and more originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 12 May 2011 12:01:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …Two men believed to have been planning a terrorist attack on New York City were arrested Wednesday night. Law enforcement sources describe the men as homegrown radicals of North African descent, the New York Times reports. The arrests were made by the NYPD’s Intelligence Division after the FBI-NYPD Joint Terrorism…
Continue reading …Rapper Common has sparked controversy since it was announced he was set to perform his poetry and rap at the White House on Wednesday. His pro cop-killing lyrics, as well as his song supporting a cop-killer, were chief among the critics’ arguments against his appearance. But despite drawing ire, Common ended up performing. And while there was no mention of cops, that performance wasn’t without at least… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Blaze Discovery Date : 12/05/2011 04:25 Number of articles : 5
Continue reading …Al-Qaida leader had major head wounds, says James Inhofe, who says less ‘gruesome’ pictures of corpse should be released A US senator permitted to view secret photographs of Osama bin Laden’s corpse has described “pretty grotesque” images of a badly mutilated body that leave no doubt that the al-Qaida leader is dead. Senator James Inhofe said he saw 15 pictures at the CIA headquarters in Virginia, some of which were taken immediately after Bin Laden was shot. They show the al-Qaida leader with large head wounds around the eye and ear. Inhofe described some of the pictures as “gruesome”. “One of the shots went through the ear and out through an eye socket, or through the eye socket and out through the ear and exploded, that was the kind of ordinance it was. That caused the brains to be hanging out of the eye socket,” he told CNN. Inhofe said that he had no doubt that the pictures were of Bin Laden. “Absolutely no question about it. A lot of people out there say, ‘I want to see the pictures,’ but I’ve already seen them. That was him. He’s gone. He’s history,” he said. Inhofe, a member of the Senate’s armed services committee, has pressed the Obama administration to make public pictures of Bin Laden’s body to challenge any claims that he is still alive. However, after viewing the photographs Inhofe hesitated to say they should all be released. Instead he said that three pictures taken aboard a ship after Bin Laden’s body was cleaned for burial at sea are more acceptable for distribution. “I still believe they should release these pictures, some of these pictures to the public,” he said. “At least the ones during the cleanup period on the USS Vincent, that’s just a personal opinion.” The administration agreed to permit members of congressional armed services and intelligence committees to view the pictures amid the debate over their release. However, concerns that Bin Laden’s supporters may not believe he was killed have diminished with al-Qaida’s acknowledgement that its leader is dead. Osama bin Laden al-Qaida Obama administration US foreign policy US military US politics Chris McGreal guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …PM and deputy say two parties have distinct identities but insist coalition will endure as they make joint appearance David Cameron and Nick Clegg have marked the coalition government’s first anniversary with a show of unity and a pledge to see out a full five-year term in power. At an event in east London, the prime minister and his deputy took turns to portray the coalition as two parties with distinct identities, prone to arguments behind the scenes, but intent on coming up with unified policy conclusions that would best serve the country. Cameron and Clegg appeared together in Stratford as the coalition government sought to draw a line under the events of last week, when the Lib Dems fared very badly in local and devolved parliament elections and failed to win the alternative vote referendum. Speaking in the wake of the disastrous results for his party, Clegg said the Liberal Democrats had gone into coalition with its eyes “wide open”. He said that he had always known that the elections would be a “tough period” but insisted that the party would be judged by what it had achieved at the end of five years in power. Cameron said the voters would not be swayed by unspecified “fripperies” but by whether the government delivered “good results about the things that British people care about”. “That’s what we’re focused on, that’s why it’s a five-year government and that’s why I believe it will endure.” Clegg insisted that “whoever was in government” would have to do difficult, controversial and, in some respects, downright unpopular things. “I went into this with my eyes open, my party went into this collectively with our eyes open, that it wouldn’t be easy– you shouldn’t go into government because it is easy – but because we genuinely believe that what we are doing together, two parties coming together, yes retaining our differences, to clear up a lot of the problems we have inherited of the past that is the long-term interest of the country.” Clegg added: “Polls go up and down. People’s popularity goes up and down, parties’ popularity goes up and down. At the end of the day, how will we be judged? We will be judged about whether we have sorted out the mess we have inherited and restored a sense of optimism, of prosperity, of jobs for this country. It is a job we have started and we are going to see it through. This was always going to be the really, really tough part for the coalition and the tough part for the country economically.” The reason for coalition was “as strong today as it was a year ago”, said Cameron, as he highlighted long-term “structural problems” facing the country, the nation’s debt and youth unemployment. “We have different traditions and views and beliefs and we have robust discussions, even arguments in private, and then we come out with agreed policies that we think are good for the country,” said Cameron. “If people could see what actually happens in private, where both parties stand up for their views but we come to a good, collective decision, I think they’d see it is a strong coalition government and that’s what I’m absolutely committed to delivering.” The prime minister and his deputy PM made a joint appearance to outline plans to “reverse the trend of rising youth unemployment” through apprenticeships and work placements in private firms later down the line. But a brief question-and-answer session with the media was dominated by the relations between the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrat party in the aftermath of last week’s local and devolved elections and the referendum. The two men were also grilled on the Commons standard watchdog’s decision to suspend David Laws , a former Lib Dem minister and MP for Yeovil, for “serious breaches” of the expenses system. Clegg was caught out when he began to speak about David as being “a close friend of mine” only to be stopped by Cameron who joked he might want to make it clear that he was referring to Laws, in an answer to a two-part question that involved the seven-day suspension of Laws. Both men laughed as Clegg clarified he was referring to Laws. Earlier in the day, Clegg aired his unhappiness at the political point-scoring of both sides of the alternative vote referendum campaign as he appealed for unity over House of Lords reform . Giving evidence to the Commons political and constitutional reform committee on Thursday morning, Clegg said he was determined to press ahead with moves towards electing the upper chamber despite the resounding public rejection of a change to the voting system. Clegg said he hoped for less argument over the Lords than those witnessed by both camps in the referendum. “The referendum campaign was characterised, some would say disfigured, by party politics and point-scoring. It was not a particularly uplifting argument by either side of the debate. “What lessons does one learn? It reinforces my view that where we can develop ideas together rather than everyone shouting at each other across the barricades, clearly it is best.” He said he had gone to “very considerable effort” to find agreement by talking to all parties in the committee drawing up the proposals for the reforms. “I hope that desire to try to move forward as consensually as possible on something as constitutionally significant as that will be reflected and recognised in the draft bill we will be publishing shortly,” he told the Commons political and constitutional reform committee. Asked about criticisms from within his own party that he should not concentrate on issues that were more important to the party than the public, he said: “Things that are important are not always resonant. The fact that we as a country, as a national community, have been talking about this one way or another for a century or more suggests that it is not a preoccupation or an obsession for one party or one politician. “I do not think that as a government we should apologise, not only in this area, for proceeding with things that are important but might not be things that your constituents and mine will raise in our weekly surgeries.” David Cameron Nick Clegg Liberal-Conservative coalition Conservatives Liberal Democrats Hélène Mulholland guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Dramatic amateur video emerged on Thursday showing several men in the city of Daraa struggling to drag an injured man to safety while avoiding shooting from alleged snipers (May 12)
Continue reading …