Click here to view this media Republicans inside the Beltway were all bent out of shape this week over the fact that President Obama, in his speech on immigration earlier this week, called them out over their absurd gamesmanship on the issue: PRESIDENT OBAMA: So, here’s the point. I want everybody to listen carefully to this. We have gone above and beyond what was requested by the very Republicans who said they supported broader reform as long as we got serious about enforcement. All the stuff they asked for, we’ve done. But even though we’ve answered these concerns, I’ve got to say I suspect there are still going to be some who are trying to move the goal posts on us one more time. You know, they said we needed to triple the Border Patrol. Or now they’re going to say we need to quadruple the Border Patrol. Or they’ll want a higher fence. Maybe they’ll need a moat. (Laughter.) Maybe they want alligators in the moat. (Laughter.) They’ll never be satisfied. And I understand that. That’s politics. This caused quite the huff among Republicans, who have been nothing if not crassly and openly partisan in their handling of immigration issues during Obama’s tenure, abandoning all the pretense of bipartisanship they had adopted during the Bush years (see especially John McCain in this regard ). And it gave an excuse for the last of the “bipartisan” crowd, Sen. Richard Lugar, to join the Tea Party element in opposing the DREAM Act : In a statement, Lugar spokesman Mark Helmke blamed Democrats for turning immigration into a partisan issue. “President Obama’s appearance in Texas framed immigration as a divisive election issue instead of attempting a legitimate debate on comprehensive reform,” wrote Helmke. “Ridiculing Republicans was clearly a partisan push that effectively stops a productive discussion about comprehensive immigration reform and the DREAM Act before the 2012 election.” Actually, the shoe is on the other foot: As long as Lugar’s fellow Republicans insist on calling the DREAM Act “amnesty for illegals” and denouncing any effort to do something that is so clearly a no-brainer in the Right Thing To Do Department, then it’s clear Obama can count on having a productive discussion about these issues from Republicans for the foreseeable future — that is, until at least sometime after the 2012 elections. Even more noteworthy is that Obama wasn’t really saying anything controversial — he was pointing out the cold reality on the ground. There was a remarkable exchange in this regard the other morning on Fox News, when Alisyn Camerota — filling in Megyn Kelly on America Live — had a following conversation with reliable RightWingabot Monica Crowley on the subject. And Camerota (uncharacteristically for most Fox hosts) wanted to know exactly how Republicans could respond to Obama’s salient points here. And Crowley sputtered. At first she tried to deflect the answer into the familiar ground of “he’s talking up immigration to help his re-election chances,” but Camerota kept pushing — and Crowley pretty much came up blank, sputtering an incoherent garble of whatever fake “facts” she could grasp out of the thin air: CAMEROTA: OK, so to his point: More deportations, more boots on the ground, reinforcing the fence, and they’re never satisfied. What do Republicans want? CROWLEY: Well, I’m sure that that bit of sarcasm there with that bit about the moat with the alligators will go a long way to getting Republican support for whatever he wants to do. He’s looking at his poll numbers, first and foremost, because, as I said, there’s no way the the DREAM Act or any comprehensive immigration reform is gonna make it through, certainly before 2012. And what’s happening, when he’s looking at his core constituency, he’s seeing a pretty significant dropoff among Hispanic voters. He won the Hispanic vote by two thirds in 2008. It is now down among Hispanics, his support is down to low to mid-50s, Ali, so what he’s seeing is a need to shore up that core constituency, because he cannot win re-election without it. CAMEROTA: OK, but to his point — what more do Republicans want than what he has done? CROWLEY: The … [sigh] … He deserves credit for what he has done so far. However, that does not solve the problem. The chaos on the border has actually gotten worse over the last many years than better. And so if you look and you talk to law-enforcement officials, where they’re on the front lines, you talk to folks who are living on the front lines in Arizona and New Mexico and Texas — they will tell you that the violence spillover — 35,000 people have been killed in recent years over the border — that violence spillover — illegals coming across the border still at an unprecedented rate — a lot needs to be done. In reality, of course, there has been a sharp decline in border crossings in recent years, particularly as the U.S. economy his spiraled downward in a recession and unemployment has skyrocketed. But then, reality has never stopped people like Crowley from misreporting fake “facts” on Fox. It’s a feature, not a bug. Look, we’ll never, NEVER be able to have an honest conversation with right-wingers about immigration, because they refuse to argue it honestly. Their recent tactic has been to demand that “first we secure the border, then we can talk reform.” And then when all their demands are met, they just keep changing the goalposts. And then when they get called out on that, they claim we’re just being unfair and uncivil. Screw that. It’s time to figure out how to move on without them.
Continue reading …On the May 13 “Fox & Friends,” NewsBusters publisher Brent Bozell to recap the 2011 Media Research Center Gala and DisHonors Awards dinner held on May 7 in Washington, D.C. Anchor Brian Kilmeade started off by showing the quote of the year, MSNBC's Ed Schultz ranting that Republicans “want to see you dead” and “make money off your dead corpse.” [For the full "Fox & Friends" segment, watch the video embedded after the page break or listen to MP3 audio here ]
Continue reading …Screen Grabs chronicles the uses (and misuses) of real-world gadgets in today’s movies and TV. Send in your sightings (with screen grab!) to screengrabs at engadget dot com. In the futuristic world of the would-be summer blockbuster Real Steel , Rock ‘em Sock ‘em -esque robots have become participants in a very real sport and, it seems, Nokia is still going strong — although you probably knew that if you’ve seen the latest Star Trek movie . In fact, this device bears more than a small resemblance to the one used by a young James T. Kirk, with it boasting the same translucent shell that encases what’s still unmistakably a Nokia design. Head on past the break for the full trailer, and look for the phone to make an appearance around the 16 second mark — although we wouldn’t recommend taking this as a hint of what’s to come for Windows Phone . Continue reading Screen Grabs: futuristic Nokia smartphone answers the product placement call in Real Steel Screen Grabs: futuristic Nokia smartphone answers the product placement call in Real Steel originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 13 May 2011 18:57:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …Though today’s links celebrate the superstition, we promise they won’t bring you bad luck. (Knock on wood.) Friggatriskaidekaphobia: That’s just a fancy word for Friday the 13th. Take a look at the five strangest fears you never knew existed. (Washington Post) We’re Scared Because: See a brief history of Friday the 13th. (TIME) We Hope
Continue reading …George W. Bush was reading My Pet Goat to schoolchildren when he got word of the 9/11 attacks, and now we know his whereabouts when the Osama bin Laden story finally ended: “I was eating souffle at Rise Restaurant with Laura and two buddies.” Informed that President Obama wanted to…
Continue reading …Departure underlines impasse of Israelis and Palestinians; Obama praises his role and earlier success in Northern Ireland The US Middle East peace envoy, George Mitchell, has resigned after failing to make any headway in resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. He is to be replaced by his deputy, David Hale, the White House said on Friday. Mitchell, age 77, was a central figure in securing peace in Northern Ireland, but has been unable to replicate that success in the Middle East. His departure underlines the lack of any immediate prospects for a resumption of serious negotiations between the Israelis and Palestinians. Such is the lack of any diplomatic movement that the envoy has not bothered visiting the region since December. In his letter of resignation to Barack Obama, he said his original intention had been to serve two years and he had done longer than that. Obama appointed him special envoy in January 2009, two days after his own inauguration, a time of widespread optimism that some of the world’s most intractable problems might be solved. “I strongly support your vision of comprehensive peace in the Middle East and thank you for giving me the opportunity to be part of your administration. It has been an honour for me to again serve our country,” Mitchell said. His resignation is effective from next Friday. Obama described Mitchell’s mission as “the toughest job imaginable” and praised him for leaving “a proud legacy of dedicated public service” both in Northern Ireland and in the Middle East. The White House insisted that his departure did not mean an end to Obama’s efforts to find a solution. Obama is scheduled to make a major speech on the Middle East next Thursday, but it is to be directed broadly, reaching out again to the Islamic world and the post-Osama bin Laden landscape, rather than focusing on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Secretary of state Hillary Clinton, joining in praise for Mitchell, said the state department would miss his “steady leadership and wise counsel”. She added: “We will carry forward his commitment to pursue a comprehensive peace in the Middle East.” The former senator established a reputation for skilful negotiation, patience and resilience when he successfully helped broker the Northern Ireland peace deal. Former president Bill Clinton sent him to the Middle East in 2000; he produced a report a year later calling on Israel to stop Jewish settler expansion in the West Bank and the Palestinians to end violence. Israel is at present refusing to negotiate with the new Palestinian unity government, citing the presence of Hamas. But even before that, there was almost no sign of any progress, with the Palestinians objecting in particular to Israel continuing to authorise settler expansion in the West Bank. The Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, is due to visit the US at the end of next week but no movement on peace negotiations is expected. As well as the politics of the Middle East, Mitchell had to contend with the internal politics of Washington, seeing much of his portfolio disappear when Obama appointed the veteran Middle East negotiator, Dennis Ross, to his national security team last year. Marina Ottaway, director of the Middle East programme at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, blamed a complex set of circumstances rather than anything Mitchell did or did not do, and accused Israel of inflexibility. “What is surprising is that he did not resign earlier … I do not think he ever had anything to work with. He did not have any cards to play.” Daniel Levy, co-director of the Middle East task force at the New America Foundation, said of Mitchell’s resignation: “Either he has advanced a certain approach that has not been taken up or, basically, that the chances of negotiation are diminishing by the day and he is not hanging about.” US foreign policy George Mitchell Middle East peace talks Israel Palestinian territories Middle East Northern Ireland Obama administration US politics United States Ewen MacAskill guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Largest rally in recent weeks comes on day ousted president’s wife detained on suspicion of illegally acquiring wealth Tens of thousands of Egyptians returned to Tahrir Square in Cairo on Friday in a show of national unity against sectarian tension, and to demonstrate their solidarity with the Palestinian people. The largest rally to be held in the Egyptian capital in recent weeks took place as Suzanne Mubarak, wife of ousted president Hosni Mubarak, was detained by investigators for 15 days on suspicion of illegally acquiring wealth. Cheers erupted in the square as news broke of Mrs Mubarak’s incarceration. The 70-year-old former first lady now joins her husband, two sons and more than 20 other ministers and business figures from the Mubarak regime on the list of those being investigated for crimes against the state. Last week former interior minister Habib Al-Adly was sentenced to 12 years in prison for financial fraud. He also stands accused of having ordered the killing of peaceful protesters, a charge that can carry the death penalty. In a sign of how vibrant and fragmented Egypt’s political landscape has become since the toppling of Mubarak in February, protesters came together on Friday to support a multitude of causes from local anti-corruption campaigns to unity with Arab uprisings elsewhere in the region. Following a week of sectarian violence in Cairo in which at least 15 people were killed in clashes at a church in the poor neighbourhood of Imbaba, many demonstrators held aloft placards depicting the Christian cross and Muslim crescent, and chanted: “We are all Egyptians.” On Wednesday the UN secretary general, Ban Ki-moon, said he was disturbed by the religious fighting, warning that it could threaten progress towards a “more free, just and harmonious Egypt”. Egypt’s Coptic Christian community comprises about 10% of the population, and claims it has long been the target of severe discrimination in the Muslim-majority country. “I think there are two themes playing out in Tahrir today,” said Hossam Bahgat, a human rights campaigner and director of the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights. “One is the search for a lost moment: in every speech on the stage and on every leaflet handed out there are words to the effect of ‘do you remember [the anti-Mubarak protests in] January and February when we stood here together? What happened to that moment?’ “The second is the realisation that even if we succeed in re-creating that moment, we need to build a bridge between on the one hand that sentiment of unity which once overwhelmed Tahrir, and on the other the poorer rural and urban neighbourhoods, where it takes only the slightest thing or most absurd rumour to unleash large-scale communal violence.” Egypt’s interim government has arrested almost 200 suspects in the aftermath of the Imbaba violence, charging 23 of them with terrorism and premeditated murder. The clashes began when Salafist Muslims marched on a church where they claimed a female Copt who had converted to Islam was being held hostage, prompting a street battle in which shots were fired and Molotov cocktails thrown. An inquiry blamed hardline Salafists for the attacks, but hinted that elements of the old regime seeking to sow discord may also have played a part in the violence. “The policies of the Mubarak regime did actively contribute to a rise in sectarian tension,” argued Bahgat. “But at the same time we need to acknowledge that whoever has been involved in incidents of sectarian violence over the past few weeks are the same people that have been engaging in such violence for years. They are not hired thugs, they are not organised Islamic entities, and they are not elements of the previous regime – they are us. And until we recognise that they are us, the solution will remain elusive.” Protesters in Tahrir also hoisted aloft Palestinian flags to demonstrate their support for a recent Fatah-Hamas reconciliation agreement signed in Cairo, just two days before a planned march to the Gaza border to mark the 63rd anniversary of the “nakba” – an Arabic word meaning “catastrophe” which is used to describe the founding of Israel. As part of a region-wide set of demonstrations in favour of Palestinian refugees being allowed to return home, protest leaders in Egypt have called for a “third intifada” to be launched on Sunday, with a mass march from Cairo to the Rafah border post. Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal has discouraged the event, arguing that in its present state of transition Egypt cannot carry the “burden” of a “direct clash with the Zionist entity”. The Egyptian government has put all entry points to the Sinai Peninsula on high alert in an effort to stop the march. “Our chants against sectarian tension and in support of the Palestinians are not side-issues,” said Ibrahim Houdaiby, 27, a political activist who was formerly a member of the Muslim Brotherhood. “Without solidarity between Christians and Muslims, without justice for Palestine, our revolution will die. Today you’re witnessing an attempt to keep it alive.” Egypt Hosni Mubarak Middle East Arab and Middle East unrest Protest Africa Jack Shenker guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …A collection of purses and makeup cases from the early 20th Century disappear from a museum in China’s famed Forbidden City. Police have arrested a man they say confessed to the robbery. (May 13)
Continue reading …A Coast Guard unit is back in Fla. after months of protecting the US base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. After hugging family members, two unit members described their reactions to learning that Osama bin Laden had been killed in a US raid. (May 11)
Continue reading …US officials say the Obama administration’s special Mideast peace envoy, George Mitchell, is resigning after more than two largely fruitless years of trying to press Israel and the Palestinians into negotiations. The officials tell the AP that the White House is expected to announce today that the former senator and…
Continue reading …