Tornadoes have torn through parts of the US midwest, killing at least 89 people in the Missouri city of Joplin and causing extensive property damage
Continue reading …In the Long Run: A Father, A Son, and Unintentional Lessons in Happiness By Jim Axelrod Farrar, Straus and Giroux 304 pp. Gotta check Twitter! Survey the last five minutes of chatter. Check for RTs, @mentions. Over to e-mail. Work e-mail first. Dash off responses to two e-mails. Now Gmail. Read through the daily news digest that hits that time of day, but only about halfway through. Just remembered that piece I need to read. Google. There it is. Open it. Check headline. Scour first graph. Need to check for Facebook messages. Nothing there. But look at what Melissa posted! Ok, I’m getting distracted. Close that … … repeat. How many hours of productivity and creativity have we lost to this maniacal routine? Has it left us more fulfilled, at peace, ready to give of ourselves to our loved ones? This pace — this urge to create and consume news and information faster and faster — has it enhanced our media culture and our national conversation? To those of you who do not feel at times like you are going nuts in the total information age: my congratulations, my condolences, and pass the Adderall. For the rest of you, there’s Jim Axelrod’s new book, In the Long Run, a raw, penetrating and deeply moving look at the impact of fathers on their sons, the price of ambition, and the pressures on those in the professional world that lead to a false definition of success — all told through Axelrod’s struggle to train for a marathon, to follow in the sneaker-steps of his late father. Axelrod, a top CBS News TV reporter, says that during his runs “a quieter mind descended on me… that’s what I was after.” A quieter mind. Axelrod touches most deeply when writing about the impact of his father on his own life, especially when he pulls up memories from his early childhood. His description of his father’s “strong hands” pulling him out of a ride at Disney World and “pulling me close to his chest, warm and safe” made me think of how I am perceived by my own young son. What mundane moment is my son going to remember years from now? I need to make them all count as much as possible. Now, ultimately, I’m a believer that the totality of moments is what matters. I don’t need to fear that if I lose my temper just once or don’t do my best every second then my children’s earliest memories will be tainted forever. But what was alarming was Axelrod’s portrayal of how his father “left” him early on: “Not physically. Nothing that clear. My dad steadily withdrew into his own confusion, overmatched by the responsibilities and implications of the life he’d assembled around him.” Now we’re talking. Axelrod relates that as a young boy he could tell when he was “wholly cherished” and could “hold the attention” of his father. He knew when his dad was “entirely present” and when he wasn’t. If that doesn’t strike home in the age of playgrounds filled with blackberry or iPhone-obsessed parents, then nothing will. Do my children know I am “entirely present” with them? Not if I can’t resist the urge to know if my existence on the face of this earth has been validated by an e-mail in the last 120 seconds. Validation. That’s at the root of another big lie exposed in Axelrod’s story. We are told, and believe, that professional achievement equals success. But what if you reach the end of your life a rich, famous or established professional, and yet your friends and loved ones say you were an asshole? Or a coward? What if your wife feels unloved and your children are unhappy? We can’t control those outcomes, but we certainly influence them, and it’s hard to argue that success can be achieved in a vacuum outside the realm of our interpersonal relationships. In fact, those relationships would seem to constitute the most important parts of our lives and so they should weigh heavily in determining whether our lives have been successful or not. But we want to be validated. And while we might get a smile or even some admiration for being a family man or woman, validation often comes primarily from the professional realm. Our priorities are screwed. But we’re going 150 miles per hour. We have no time to stop and think about whether the choices we are making are good ones or not. Axelrod knows this as well as anyone. He had been crushing it at CBS News for a decade when his life began to fall apart. That’s where his book begins. He’s with then-presidential candidate Barack Obama at a Houston campaign rally in February 2008. His confidence is sagging. So is his waistline. He and his wife are on the rocks. He hasn’t seen his three children in weeks. This is success? A friend’s e-mail stirs up memories of his father, who would undoubtedly have answered: ‘Yes.’ But he died a decade earlier. In an attempt to recapture some control of his chaotic life, Axelrod decides to start training for a marathon. The goal, at first, is to beat his father’s time. By the end, he realizes that a big reason he’s been suffering is his insistence on following his father’s path in life too closely. His father ran the 1982 New York City Marathon in 3:29:58 when he was 46-years-old. Axelrod sets out to beat his time, but is going about it all wrong. As he tells his younger brother about his debilitating injuries suffered while trying to gut out training runs, his brother dispenses some plain advice that addresses not only his running ills, but also our modern pace and the twisted psychological and metaphysical deformities driving it: “Slow down Jimmy. You’ll go farther.” I got to know Jim a little working alongside him in the White House press corps covering the last two years of George W. Bush’s presidency. The chatter at the time was all about how boring it was to cover a lame duck president. Not for me. I was drinking it all in. But for Jim, it was a death knell for his upward trajectory. I had wondered why he left Washington and went back to New York after Barack Obama was inaugurated. He tells the story of his professional humiliation with refreshing honesty and in vivid prose. His retelling of a brutal meeting with then CBS News President Sean McManus is particularly poignant. Axelrod goes into McManus’ New York office intent on earning consideration to replace Bob Schieffer behind the desk of “Face the Nation.” McManus cuts to the bone: “There’s no way I would consider you.” Axelrod is humble enough to recognize a blessing in disguise. “I’d come to Washington to become extraordinary. What a moron … But I was lucky. Before I did any irreparable harm, I failed,” he says. He’s able to say this because he has his family back. Over the years he had religiously followed his father’s mantra – “Never say no.” But this meant life-threatening trips to Afghanistan and Iraq despite his wife’s concerns and in spite of the risk that he might orphan their three children. It meant time away for weeks on end covering the 2008 campaign. All great assignments. “Assignments like the Clinton campaign didn’t come along very often in a reporter’s career,” Axelrod writes. But he came to a point where he realized that while “that had always been enough to counterbalance the consequences of taking them,” the reward had become far less valuable than what he was losing. In the end, it’s only either failure or some combination of continual awareness, grace and a little luck that keeps the ambitious — in this case those in power and close to it in Washington — from losing their minds and sacrificing what’s most important. As a husband and father who also happens to be a political reporter assigned to cover the 2012 presidential election, I read Axelrod’s book closely, hoping to learn from his mistakes so I don’t make them myself, and grateful to him for his honesty and courage to own up to his failures. It won’t be easy. I’m doing a final edit of this book review from a coffee shop in Concord, N.H., after racing around the state for the last 24 hours chasing Jon Huntsman. And the Granite State won’t even hold its primary for close to a year. But like each trip so far, I’m not wasting any time on the road. Huntsman will be here three more days, but I’ll be home tonight. If I miss anything, that is a price worth paying to be with my wife and kids this weekend.
Continue reading …In the Long Run: A Father, A Son, and Unintentional Lessons in Happiness By Jim Axelrod Farrar, Straus and Giroux 304 pp. Gotta check Twitter! Survey the last five minutes of chatter. Check for RTs, @mentions. Over to e-mail. Work e-mail first. Dash off responses to two e-mails. Now Gmail. Read through the daily news digest that hits that time of day, but only about halfway through. Just remembered that piece I need to read. Google. There it is. Open it. Check headline. Scour first graph. Need to check for Facebook messages. Nothing there. But look at what Melissa posted! Ok, I’m getting distracted. Close that … … repeat. How many hours of productivity and creativity have we lost to this maniacal routine? Has it left us more fulfilled, at peace, ready to give of ourselves to our loved ones? This pace — this urge to create and consume news and information faster and faster — has it enhanced our media culture and our national conversation? To those of you who do not feel at times like you are going nuts in the total information age: my congratulations, my condolences, and pass the Adderall. For the rest of you, there’s Jim Axelrod’s new book, In the Long Run, a raw, penetrating and deeply moving look at the impact of fathers on their sons, the price of ambition, and the pressures on those in the professional world that lead to a false definition of success — all told through Axelrod’s struggle to train for a marathon, to follow in the sneaker-steps of his late father. Axelrod, a top CBS News TV reporter, says that during his runs “a quieter mind descended on me… that’s what I was after.” A quieter mind. Axelrod touches most deeply when writing about the impact of his father on his own life, especially when he pulls up memories from his early childhood. His description of his father’s “strong hands” pulling him out of a ride at Disney World and “pulling me close to his chest, warm and safe” made me think of how I am perceived by my own young son. What mundane moment is my son going to remember years from now? I need to make them all count as much as possible. Now, ultimately, I’m a believer that the totality of moments is what matters. I don’t need to fear that if I lose my temper just once or don’t do my best every second then my children’s earliest memories will be tainted forever. But what was alarming was Axelrod’s portrayal of how his father “left” him early on: “Not physically. Nothing that clear. My dad steadily withdrew into his own confusion, overmatched by the responsibilities and implications of the life he’d assembled around him.” Now we’re talking. Axelrod relates that as a young boy he could tell when he was “wholly cherished” and could “hold the attention” of his father. He knew when his dad was “entirely present” and when he wasn’t. If that doesn’t strike home in the age of playgrounds filled with blackberry or iPhone-obsessed parents, then nothing will. Do my children know I am “entirely present” with them? Not if I can’t resist the urge to know if my existence on the face of this earth has been validated by an e-mail in the last 120 seconds. Validation. That’s at the root of another big lie exposed in Axelrod’s story. We are told, and believe, that professional achievement equals success. But what if you reach the end of your life a rich, famous or established professional, and yet your friends and loved ones say you were an asshole? Or a coward? What if your wife feels unloved and your children are unhappy? We can’t control those outcomes, but we certainly influence them, and it’s hard to argue that success can be achieved in a vacuum outside the realm of our interpersonal relationships. In fact, those relationships would seem to constitute the most important parts of our lives and so they should weigh heavily in determining whether our lives have been successful or not. But we want to be validated. And while we might get a smile or even some admiration for being a family man or woman, validation often comes primarily from the professional realm. Our priorities are screwed. But we’re going 150 miles per hour. We have no time to stop and think about whether the choices we are making are good ones or not. Axelrod knows this as well as anyone. He had been crushing it at CBS News for a decade when his life began to fall apart. That’s where his book begins. He’s with then-presidential candidate Barack Obama at a Houston campaign rally in February 2008. His confidence is sagging. So is his waistline. He and his wife are on the rocks. He hasn’t seen his three children in weeks. This is success? A friend’s e-mail stirs up memories of his father, who would undoubtedly have answered: ‘Yes.’ But he died a decade earlier. In an attempt to recapture some control of his chaotic life, Axelrod decides to start training for a marathon. The goal, at first, is to beat his father’s time. By the end, he realizes that a big reason he’s been suffering is his insistence on following his father’s path in life too closely. His father ran the 1982 New York City Marathon in 3:29:58 when he was 46-years-old. Axelrod sets out to beat his time, but is going about it all wrong. As he tells his younger brother about his debilitating injuries suffered while trying to gut out training runs, his brother dispenses some plain advice that addresses not only his running ills, but also our modern pace and the twisted psychological and metaphysical deformities driving it: “Slow down Jimmy. You’ll go farther.” I got to know Jim a little working alongside him in the White House press corps covering the last two years of George W. Bush’s presidency. The chatter at the time was all about how boring it was to cover a lame duck president. Not for me. I was drinking it all in. But for Jim, it was a death knell for his upward trajectory. I had wondered why he left Washington and went back to New York after Barack Obama was inaugurated. He tells the story of his professional humiliation with refreshing honesty and in vivid prose. His retelling of a brutal meeting with then CBS News President Sean McManus is particularly poignant. Axelrod goes into McManus’ New York office intent on earning consideration to replace Bob Schieffer behind the desk of “Face the Nation.” McManus cuts to the bone: “There’s no way I would consider you.” Axelrod is humble enough to recognize a blessing in disguise. “I’d come to Washington to become extraordinary. What a moron … But I was lucky. Before I did any irreparable harm, I failed,” he says. He’s able to say this because he has his family back. Over the years he had religiously followed his father’s mantra – “Never say no.” But this meant life-threatening trips to Afghanistan and Iraq despite his wife’s concerns and in spite of the risk that he might orphan their three children. It meant time away for weeks on end covering the 2008 campaign. All great assignments. “Assignments like the Clinton campaign didn’t come along very often in a reporter’s career,” Axelrod writes. But he came to a point where he realized that while “that had always been enough to counterbalance the consequences of taking them,” the reward had become far less valuable than what he was losing. In the end, it’s only either failure or some combination of continual awareness, grace and a little luck that keeps the ambitious — in this case those in power and close to it in Washington — from losing their minds and sacrificing what’s most important. As a husband and father who also happens to be a political reporter assigned to cover the 2012 presidential election, I read Axelrod’s book closely, hoping to learn from his mistakes so I don’t make them myself, and grateful to him for his honesty and courage to own up to his failures. It won’t be easy. I’m doing a final edit of this book review from a coffee shop in Concord, N.H., after racing around the state for the last 24 hours chasing Jon Huntsman. And the Granite State won’t even hold its primary for close to a year. But like each trip so far, I’m not wasting any time on the road. Huntsman will be here three more days, but I’ll be home tonight. If I miss anything, that is a price worth paying to be with my wife and kids this weekend.
Continue reading …It has not been a good year for Sony, which was affected both by the massive earthquake in March and the PSN outage that spanned from April into May. There couldn’t be any doubt that those things would have a drastic impact on the company’s bottom-line, and it’s now taking the time to give investors an idea of just how big an impact that could be — even though the financial issues lie largely elsewhere. Sony is set to announce its full financial report for its fiscal year this Thursday and, to soften the blow, estimates have been revised steeply downward. Previously Sony predicted a
Continue reading …Volcanic ash from a spewing Icelandic volcano is drifting toward British airspace, threatening a mini-repeat of last year’s travel debacle. Iceland grounded all flights at its main Keflavik airport yesterday after the Grimsvotn volcano shot steam and ash 12 miles into the air. The ash is expected to be over…
Continue reading …Green party beats CDU for first time in state elections after coming second to Social Democrats in Bremen Angela Merkel has been dealt another blow after support for her Christian Democratic Union party plunged once again – this time at regional elections in Bremen. For the first time in state elections, the Green party won more votes than the CDU, capturing almost 23% of the vote on Sunday, according to an exit poll from German state television ARD. The Green surge, if confirmed by final results, means the party will continue to rule in coalition with the Social Democrats (SPD), who have been in charge of the north German city for 66 years. While the Greens’ victory in the smallest of Germany’s 16 states will not directly affect the chancellor’s hold on the federal government, it is another symbolic black eye for Merkel and her party. In Baden-Württemberg’s state election in March, the Christian Democrats were voted out of power for the first time in five decades . The anti-nuclear Greens became the strongest party there amid concerns over Germany’s atomic future following the Fukushima plant accident in Japan. The win will mean that Germany will have its first Green governor. The success in Bremen has led some Greens to admit they are now on the hunt for a candidate for chancellor to go head-to-head with Merkel at national elections in 2013 should their trajectory continue upwards. Some are even tipping the popular former foreign minister Joschka Fischer for a comeback. According to German magazine Focus, a third of Germans would still vote for Fischer. Merkel’s junior partner in the federal government, the pro-business Free Democrats (FDP), look to have been kicked out of Bremen’s bürgerschaft , the state legislature, after failing to meet the minimum 5% threshold. Provisional results suggest the FDP won 2.5% of the vote – a headache for Merkel as well as its new national leader, Philipp Rösler. The Left party won 6.4% of the Bremen vote, down from just over 8% in 2007, the poll said. The Greens’ rise was also echoed in a new national poll that saw their support at 23%, closely trailing the SDP’s 26%. The poll commissioned by ARD television and released on Sunday showed the CDU at 33%, and the FDP at 4%. Merkel’s conservatives won Germany’s last general election in 2009 with 33.8% of the vote and joined forces with the FDP, which had then secured a 14.6% share. About 1,000 people were surveyed for the poll that had a margin of error of up to 3.1%. Sunday’s vote in Bremen marked the first time in German history that people between 16 and 18 were allowed to vote for their state legislature. Despite that effort to boost the vote, ARD estimated a turnout of 54%, down from 57% four years earlier. Germany Angela Merkel Europe Helen Pidd guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Penny Johnson says surgeon played God with her life after experimental facelift left her with nerve damage A woman who sued a plastic surgeon who “played God” with her life has been awarded more than £6m in damages. Penny Johnson, 49, claimed Le Roux Fourie carried out experimental surgery during a facelift in August 2003 that caused nerve damage to the right side of her face and led to her financial and IT consultancy business going into administration. At a trial in February at the high court in London she asked Justice Owen to award her a proportion of the £54m she says was her potential loss, as a 50% shareholder, when her company, Bishop Cavanagh, failed in 2009. During the hearing, Johnson, of Godstone, Surrey, said: “My face is constantly contracting, I don’t sleep and I have a permanent buzzing around my eye, which can be so intense that I can’t think about anything.” The judge gave his ruling in the case on Monday and awarded her £6,190,884.92. Alain Choo Choy QC, defending, accepted liability but put the potential business loss at £9m. He did not accept the surgery had been experimental. The claim that Bishop Cavanagh lost out on a series of lucrative contracts was unrealistic and deluded, he said. He accepted that her injuries restricted her ability to work but the business had failed for unrelated commercial and economic reasons. The court was told that during her absence the company was run by her husband, Peter, with whom she now owns another business, BC Direct. The bulk of the award relates to lost earnings, both past and future. In his ruling, the judge said Johnson had been a confident, happy and outstandingly successful woman with a full and rewarding family and social life. But the negligent surgery had serious consequences – both physical and psychological – and resulted in a prolonged adjustment disorder with features of anxiety and depression. As he observed during the trial, the facial twitching she suffered was “virtually constant”. He said it was clear her injuries from the facelift and the replacement of breast implants, which was carried out at the same time, had harmed her relationship with her husband. “Their marriage has survived, but the claimant said in evidence that she is no longer a wife to her husband. He says that she is now a completely different person and that their marriage is not what it used to be.” He awarded £80,000 for the facial disfigurement, the asymmetry and pain caused by the breast surgery and the psychological consequences of the injuries. Assessing Johnson’s claim for loss of earnings, the judge said her projections were the product of her intense disappointment at the “devastating” consequences to the business. “She has understandably become preoccupied by what might have been, which has affected her judgment as to what could and would in reality have been achieved,” he added. As to her residual earning capacity, the judge said Johnson functioned intellectually at a high level and continued to have the potential to deploy her outstanding abilities at work. But account had to be taken of the uncertain prognosis for her psychiatric symptoms. He said: “Unless she makes a full recovery … recovers some vestige of her former self-confidence, the prospect of engagement in business activities that involve face-to-face contact with others is limited.” Plastic surgery Health & wellbeing Health guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Pitt’s film wins Cannes Palm D’Or, Rihanna and Swift win Billboards, Pirates of the Caribbean storms box office (May 23)
Continue reading …Pakistani commandos have regained control of a naval base in Karachi around 18 hours after armed insurgents launched an attack there, dealing a humiliating blow to the military. At least 12 security officers were killed, officials said. (May 23)
Continue reading …enlarge Credit: David Brewster/Minneapolis StarTribune Tornados striking urban areas are even worse, because homes are packed more tightly together. This system caused some real damage yesterday in Minneapolis : A huge storm system spawned at least three tornado touchdowns as it moved northeast across the Twin Cities metro area Sunday afternoon, killing one person in particularly hard-hit north Minneapolis and critically injuring two others among 29 needing medical attention. Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak and Police Chief Tim Dolan said early Sunday night that a large section of north Minneapolis — roughy 4 square miles — was being put under a curfew to help emergency personnel move around and to combat potential looting of damaged homes and businesses. Rybak and City Council Member Barbara Johnson got an aerial view from a helicopter. The mayor described the damage as “widespread and significant.” City officials said at least 100 homes were damaged, some of them totaled . The same system hit a hospital in Joplin, Missouri: Damage was widespread across the south side of Joplin. John Campbell, operations director for the Missouri State Emergency Management Agency, confirmed fatalities have been reported, but he did not yet have an exact number or specifics. Phone communications in and out of the city of about 50,000 people about 160 miles south of Kansas City were largely cut off. Jasper County Emergency Management Director Keith Stammer said the St. John’s Regional Medical Center on the city’s south side took a “direct hit.” Witnesses said windows were blown out on the top floors of the hospital.
Continue reading …