Home » Archives by category » News (Page 4331)
Why did CQ let Mitch McConnell get away with a subtle, but nefarious, lie?

Click here to view this media You know the time-tested-and-proven adage — a gaffe is when a politician opens his mouth and what he or she really believes comes out. Sometimes it’s the revelation that the politician is barking mad and doesn’t have the foggiest notion what they are talking about. We only have to look back a week for a perfect example of this phenomenon, when Mitch McConnell said this in an interview with Congressional Quarterly : “Last week, the Social Security trustees issued a report saying Social Security and Medicare are not sustainable under their current structure.” Back in the day, when we had a functioning press corps instead of a cocktail-weenie-wagging press corpse; back when we had real reporters doing actual journalism instead of the steno-pool full of faithful scribes who can be counted on to regurgitate right-wing talking points unchallenged; back then, that sort of nonsense would have been a bit in the teeth of the reporter, who would have done his or her homework ahead of time, and McConnell would have been hammered mercilessly with the fact that the trustees said no such thing . “Projected long-run program costs for both Medicare and Social Security are not sustainable under currently scheduled financing.” There is a world of difference between what McConnell said the trustees reported and what the McConnell said they reported. McConnell’s implication is that there is a hair-on-fire emergency and Social Security has to be fundamentally changed because it’s doomed to bankruptcy otherwise; when in fact what the trustees presented was an either/or — either revenues will have to be raised, or benefits will have to be cut decades down the road. The essential Dean Baker had the best analogy I have seen on McConnell’s misrepresentation: This would be like driving from Chicago to Detroit and determining that at some point you will need more gas to complete the trip. That would mean stopping at a gas station and refilling your tank. By contrast, McConnell’s comment implies that the car is about to breakdown and will not make the trip. Congressional Quarterly failed their readers when they didn’t follow up and press the Senator to clarify whether A.) he didn’t understand what the trustees actually said or B.) was being deliberately dishonest in pursuit of political gain. There is no option C. The reality is there is no Social Security crisis , no matter how loudly the greed-mongers and deficit scolds insist there is. They can wail and gnash their teeth and rend the cloth from their breast all day long and into the night. That still won’t change the fact that Social Security is not only not responsible for our deficit woes, it is independent of the deficit /and/ it is solvent for decades . Period. Full stop. The trustees report that McConnell misrepresented actually presents the same findings as the CBO report in that last link. Both report that the Social Security trustfund, without changing a thing, will be able to make full payouts through 2030-something — it should also be noted that the full payout projections have been pushed downward not by flaws in the system, but by the economic downturn of the last couple of years. Both note that those numbers should start ticking back up as the economy recovers, and if that isn’t the case, we have a lot bigger problems than Social Security heading our way. In reality, any projected shortfalls in future Social Security benefits could be easily remedied with either of a couple of easy fixes would not only fill that hole, it would put the program on a sound footing indefinitely. The first option would be to raise the cap. Currently, a person making more than $106,800 pays no Social Security tax on any monies earned over that amount. Removing the cap and taxing all monies equally would put the program on solid footing indefinitely. So would a very modest increase — 1% or less — in the amount of payroll tax withheld from the wages of those of us who earn less than $106,800. I don’t know about you, but I would be willing to give up three designer coffees a pay-period now to assure that Social Security will be there when I reach retirement age. Elected leaders who embrace the “fundamental change is necessary” mantra are either stupid, or lying. In neither instance should they be making decisions that affect millions of Americans. And that goes double for those who parrot the BS knowing full well it’s just that…BS. I’m looking at you, CQ. [ This post originally appeared at Show Me Progress and is part of a series I am writing as a blogging fellow for the Strengthen Social Security Campaign , a coalition of more than 270 national and state organizations dedicated to preserving and strengthening Social Security. ]

Continue reading …
Andrew Sullivan Shocks Chris Matthews: Palin Can Beat Obama as the ‘Principled’ Tea Party Candidate

Andrew Sullivan this weekend seemed to shock Chris Matthews when he said that former Alaska governor Sarah Palin could actually beat President Obama in next year's elections running as the “principled candidate” representing “this grassroots movement of cutting government down to size.” Maybe even more surprising, Time's Joe Klein seemed to agree telling the host of “The Chris Matthews Show,” “You were around in ’79 and ’80 as I was. Did you see many people in the Carter administration think that Ronald Reagan could beat Jimmy Carter?” (video follows with transcript and commentary): CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: Does anybody here really, does anybody imagine Sarah Palin being elected President of the United States? ANDREW SULLIVAN, DAILY BEAST: Yes. MATTHEWS: You can. SULLIVAN: Yes, because… [LAUGHTER] GLORIA BORGER, CNN: Uh oh, here it comes. SULLIVAN: …not because of her apparent virtues, not because of Obama’s weakness, but because of unforeseen events. I do think that if for example we have a collapse in the markets because of a debt ceiling crisis, if we have a second recession… MATTHEWS: You’re talking Armageddon. SULLIVAN: If we have another terrorist attack… BORGER: Sorry. SULLIVAN: No, I’m just saying we shouldn’t rule out things. MATTHEWS: Okay, okay, let’s go… JOE KLEIN, TIME MAGAZINE: You were around, you were around in ’79 and ’80 as I was. Did you see many people in the Carter administration think that Ronald Reagan could beat Jimmy Carter? MATTHEWS: Okay, let’s imagine that short of an Armageddon moment like the capture of 80 hostages and the humiliation of the United States for year-long and inflation and unemployment like Carter had. Well, we’ve got the soaring gas and food prices as well as the unemployment. Apparently Obama gives Matthews too much of a thrill up his leg to notice. Regardless, a few minutes later, the discussion came back to Palin: MATTHEWS: Okay, let’s go to Palin. Lot of fun here. Palin, you love Palin. In some strange way you’re fascinated by her, Andrew. SULLIVAN: As I said on the show many times, she started running the day after the 2008 election ended, and there’s no reason to believe she isn’t running. MATTHEWS: Did she take a smart break the last three or four months so that the Newts and the Trumps make fools of themselves more or less? SULLIVAN: Her position has been formerly if no one else will represent this grassroots movement of cutting government down to size and standing up for America abroad, then I will have to go in. MATTHEWS. Anger. She’ll be the anger candidate. SULLIVAN: Not just the angry candidate. She’ll be the principled candidate against what she will describe as the free… MATTHEWS: Are you getting her into this race? Are you escorting her into this race? SULLIVAN: No, no, no, no, no. I’m too terrified for the country to do such a thing. But I don’t, I do think Washington has misread her, underestimated her, and doesn’t see the… MATTHEWS: Okay, can Palin and Bachmann run both on the right? KLEIN: Sure they can both run, but I don’t know that either of them can win. But one thing you have to say about Palin: she doesn’t know anything about policy, but she’s got skills. She knows how to be a standup politician. MATTHEWS: I agree. Great on the stage. KLEIN: Yeah. BORGER: But I believe in the end she’s so relentlessly negative that the, the American people don’t like relentlessly negative politicians. Look at Ronald Reagan. Ronald Reagan was optimistic, positive… SULLIVAN: But “Sarah Palin’s Alaska” is the most – I know it’s completely phony – but it’s very optimistic. This whole “Triumph of the Will” movie she’s putting out there, two hours of total upbeat, optimistic stuff. She, she knows this, and she’s going to work around it. It is indeed fascinating that any media discussion of Republican presidential candidates always goes back to Palin. Is it because the press really want her to run to make the race more interesting, or much like Sullivan they secretly fear she could be the one to beat the president they love so much?

Continue reading …
North Sudan forces commit war crimes, group says

JUBA, Sudan — An advocacy group on Sunday said new satellite images provide evidence that northern Sudanese troops have committed war crimes, including ethnic cleansing, in the contested border town of Abyei where the forces took over more than a week ago. The Satellite Sentinel Project said in a statement that satellite images by DigitalGlobe show that the Sudanese army burned about one third of all civilian buildings in the north-south border town, used disproportionate force and indiscriminately targeted civilians. “The totality of evidence from satellites and ground…

Continue reading …
Stann Vs Santiago

CageReligion says: @ksmitty_ Agreed. All in all, the Stann vs. Santiago fight saved that card.

Continue reading …
Malta votes yes to legalising divorce

Largely Catholic nation was last EU member to not allow divorce but country votes for change in law through referendum Malta has voted yes in a non-binding referendum on legalising divorce , the country’s prime minister, Lawrence Gonzi, has confirmed. Almost three-quarters of the electorate voted on Saturday on whether divorce should be introduced in Malta. A majority Catholic country, Malta is the only EU country not to allow divorce. Figures from the electoral commission late on Saturday out the turnout at 72%, according to The Times of Malta . “Even though the result is not what I wished for, now it is our duty to see that the will of the majority is respected,” Gonzi said in a televised speech on Sunday. Gonzi, who campaigned against the introduction of divorce, said it was now up to parliament to enact a law legalising the dissolution of marriage on the island. The influential Catholic church supported a no vote during the campaign. The leader of the yes movement, Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando, of the governing Nationalist party, said the result was significant. “It brings Malta into a new era where the state and the church are separate,” he told the EFE news agency. Chile was the last country to legalise divorce in 2004 after overwhelming public pressure. Maltese voters were asked whether parliament should introduce a new law that would allow couples to obtain a divorce after four years of separation. Previously, couples could apply for a legal separation through the courts, or seek a church annulment – a complex process that can take up to nine years. A third option was to get divorced abroad, which would be recognised as valid in Malta. Malta Divorce David Sharrock guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Today in History: May 29

Mount Everest was conquered as Edmund Hillary and Tensing Norgay became the first to reach the summit. John F. Kennedy born in Brookline, Mass. Patrick Henry denounced the Stamp Act before Virginia’s House of Burgesses. (May 29)

Continue reading …
Today in History: May 29

Mount Everest was conquered as Edmund Hillary and Tensing Norgay became the first to reach the summit. John F. Kennedy born in Brookline, Mass. Patrick Henry denounced the Stamp Act before Virginia’s House of Burgesses. (May 29)

Continue reading …
Dr. Drew Discusses Jeff Conaway’s Death (VIDEO)

Dr. Drew Pinsky spoke Friday on his HLN show ‘Dr. Drew’ about the death of ‘Grease’ star Jeff Conaway. Pinsky treated Conaway on the VH1 show ‘Celebrity Rehab with Dr. Drew.’ “Jeff was a severe, severe opiate addict with chronic pain, one of the most serious and dangerous combination of problems you could possibly interact with, and one I see all the time,” said Pinsky. He continued, “and we live in a time when opioids and opiate pain medication is so available and so readily passed out that for somebody like Jeff, who was a severe drug addict, he never seemed to be able to get away from it. The pain seemed to keep motivating him back to the opiates and I told him for years that it was going to kill him.” Mike Catherwood, Pinsky’s ‘Loveline’ co-host, also appeared on the program and contributed his own thoughts on the subject of addiction. Catherwood described “pill-popping” as “an American plague.” Pinsky explained, “I just want people to remember opiate addiction is a deadly disease. It kills people all the time. We are dealing with a fatal illness, more likely to kill you than the vast, vast, vast majority of cancers. That is the fact, and I have lost a patient today. And frankly I’m sick of it, I’m tired of it, it makes me angry almost more than anything else.” WATCH (via CNN):

Continue reading …
Dr. Drew Discusses Jeff Conaway’s Death (VIDEO)

Dr. Drew Pinsky spoke Friday on his HLN show ‘Dr. Drew’ about the death of ‘Grease’ star Jeff Conaway. Pinsky treated Conaway on the VH1 show ‘Celebrity Rehab with Dr. Drew.’ “Jeff was a severe, severe opiate addict with chronic pain, one of the most serious and dangerous combination of problems you could possibly interact with, and one I see all the time,” said Pinsky. He continued, “and we live in a time when opioids and opiate pain medication is so available and so readily passed out that for somebody like Jeff, who was a severe drug addict, he never seemed to be able to get away from it. The pain seemed to keep motivating him back to the opiates and I told him for years that it was going to kill him.” Mike Catherwood, Pinsky’s ‘Loveline’ co-host, also appeared on the program and contributed his own thoughts on the subject of addiction. Catherwood described “pill-popping” as “an American plague.” Pinsky explained, “I just want people to remember opiate addiction is a deadly disease. It kills people all the time. We are dealing with a fatal illness, more likely to kill you than the vast, vast, vast majority of cancers. That is the fact, and I have lost a patient today. And frankly I’m sick of it, I’m tired of it, it makes me angry almost more than anything else.” WATCH (via CNN):

Continue reading …
The NPR/PBS 2012 Campaign Wisdom: It’s Down to Romney, Pawlenty, or Huntsman; Gingrich Is a ‘Joke’ and a ‘Travesty’

The conventional wisdom manufacturers on NPR and PBS this week have announced that the actual Republican presidential field has only three serious candidates: Mitt Romney, Tim Pawlenty, and the new media favorite, Jon Huntsmann. On Friday night’s All Things Considered, “conservative” NPR analyst David Brooks said the week belonged to Huntsman, and Texas Gov. Rick Perry is too conservative to have appeal. Liberal analyst E.J. Dionne suggested Perry was “very, very conservative.” On Monday night’s Charlie Rose show on PBS, the assembled journalists came up with the same trio, but former Wall Street Journal Washington Bureau Chief Al Hunt strongly insisted Newt Gingrich was just a “joke” and a “travesty” as a candidate: First, Friday night on NPR: MICHELE NORRIS, anchor: Fellows, I think it's time for our weekly check-in on the ever-growing, shifting, evolving, shrinking, expanding GOP field. This week, Governor Romney is in Iowa. Michele Bachmann says she'll have a big announcement soon – no exact date. And today, Governor Rick Perry of Texas says he's now considering a run in 2012. Perry is one candidate we really haven't spent much time talking about. Should we assume that a governor from a big state will automatically shake up the candidate pool? DAVID BROOKS: Well, he is from a big state, but that state happens to be Texas. And I think there was a general view among Republicans that governors of Texas have been tried and maybe they shouldn't go back to that well again so soon. He's also quite a conservative fellow on education, some of those things which will hurt him. He's also – the reputation is not the greatest campaigner on earth. So, I'm not sure Perry is flirting because there's a vacuum there. I would say this week sort of belongs to Jon Huntsman. Among those who talk about those things, the former governor of Utah, his stock has suddenly risen and I would say he seems to have entered the big three of Huntsman, Pawlenty and Romney. NORRIS: E.J.? E.J. DIONNE: I agree with David that Huntsman is going to become the next darling of the Washington conventional wisdom, at least for a while. You know, Governor Perry spoke loosely about Texas secession a couple of years ago. Maybe he could run on a program to let all the states secede – and Massachusetts and Vermont might actually want to if he got elected. He's a very, very conservative governor. But the Republican race now is like the Publisher's Clearinghouse Sweepstakes. Anybody can enter, anybody can win. And I think that the field is so cut up, Republican opinion is so divided that it's hard to rule out anybody as having a possibility of winning… NORRIS: That's an amazing statement you made – anybody can win. Is that true? DIONNE: Well, I don't mean the general election, I do mean the nomination. BROOKS: It's not true, by the way. Only Pawlenty, Romney and Huntsman can win. All the rest are in there for fun. Then there’s the PBS chatter on Gingrich from Monday: MARK HALPERIN: I still think under a certain scenario he could be a nominee. I`m in a pretty small group who thinks that still. AL HUNT: You and Callista. (Laughter) HALPERIN: He`s in

Continue reading …