The Justice Department is expected to indict former Senator John Edwards as early as Wednesday for violating federal campaign finance laws. On this weekend's “Chris Matthews Show,” the host along with Time magazine's Joe Klein and the Daily Beast's Andrew Sullivan said the DOJ should leave Edwards alone (video follows with transcript and commentary): CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: Welcome back. Our big question this week: Does it strike you as appropriate for the justice department to go after John Edwards with a criminal investigation of the use of donated money for Edwards’ mistress and their daughter? Joe Klein? JOE KLEIN, TIME MAGAZINE: Leave him alone. I mean, why waste our effort on that when we haven't indicted a single banker after the crash of 2008? MATTHEWS: Gloria. GLORIA BORGER, CNN: I don't know enough of the facts. I don't know whether Edwards personally directed that this money should go to some kind of cover-up of his mistress but millions of dollars. This? MATTHEWS: Was it campaign money though? BORGER: I don't know the answer. KLEIN: Billions. ELISABETH BUMILLER, NEW YORK TIMES: I don't know enough of the facts. MATTHEWS: Andrew, do you like the smell of this case? ANDREW SULLIVAN, DAILY BEAST: No I don’t, and I agree entirely with my esteemed colleague Joe that we should focus on the people who plunged this country… MATTHEWS: Yeah, we got enough real crime out there without worrying about this stuff. That’s my view. Who thinks Klein, Matthews and Sullivan would feel this way if Edwards was a Republican?
Continue reading …Ratko Mladic claims he had nothing to do with the massacre of 8,000 men and boys in the Bosnian town of Srebrenica when it fell during the 1992-1995 war, his son said today. Darko Mladic said his father denies ordering the massacre—the worst atrocity in Europe since the…
Continue reading …A charismatic Joplin teenager whose disappearance in Sunday’s tornado captured national attention has been found dead, reports CNN. Will Norton was driving home from his high school graduation with his father when the violent storm snapped his seat belt and pulled him through the sunroof of his Hummer H3. His…
Continue reading …Statement of support issued amid growing speculation over health secretary’s cabinet future Downing Street has moved to quash growing speculation that health secretary Andrew Lansley will quit if the government’s review of proposed health reforms ends in wholesale changes. It has been reported that David Cameron and Nick Clegg have been discussing how to handle Lansley’s cabinet future when the review by Professor Steve Field concludes in mid-June. Downing Street issued a statement of support for Lansley, saying: “The speculation in the papers is nonsense. Andrew Lansley is doing an excellent job.” Foreign secretary William Hague is said to be advising against pressing ahead with the reforms, while Nick Clegg has argued that the changes required to the health and social care bill are so widespread it will have to go back for a second line-by-line scrutiny by MPs. That would delay the bill by up to six months. Cameron was caught apparently telling Clegg the reforms no longer had anything to do with Lansley, as the two men exchanged angry words about the reforms while waiting to hear Barack Obama address parliament last week. In a sign Lansley has become fed up with horsetrading over his plans, he has said: “I’ve stopped being a politician – I just want to get the NHS to a place where it will deliver results. I don’t want to do any other cabinet job. I’m someone who cares about the NHS who happens to be a politician, not the other way around.” Cameron is caught between needing to show he has listened to the public and professional outcry over the changes, and his need to keep Lansley in the cabinet. Lansley and his fellow ministers believe much of the reassurance required can be provided without big changes, arguing that much of the opposition was based on a misunderstanding of the bill – in part created by the health secretary’s failure to sell the reforms effectively. Lansley is confident his key proposals for GP commissioning will survive, with membership extended to include nurses and possibly other health professionals, such as doctors in acute hospitals. His aides believe the Liberal Democrats will not press for local councillors to join GP commissioning bodies but will demand they are subject to greater scrutiny by health and wellbeing boards on which councillors will sit. Plans for Monitor, the health regulator, to be given a general duty to extend competition in the NHS will be shelved, something Lansley has been prepared to do. He is also likely to support Clegg’s call for no sudden, top-down opening up of all NHS services to any qualified provider. Lansley has been receiving support from the Tory right, as well as from Blairite health reformers including Lord Warner and Prof Julian le Grand of the LSE. In a sign of support from the right, the defence secretary, Liam Fox, gave strong backing to Lansley’s plans. “We have very clear common aims: that we want to get the outcomes of the NHS up, we have to get better health outcomes in this country for the money we spend. We also have to ensure that more decisions are taken by doctors and nurses and fewer by bureaucrats.” Fox is regarded as increasingly difficult to control by Downing Street. During Obama’s visit he chose to go to Washington to speak at an anniversary marking the relationship between Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher. His speech included an apparent snub to Cameron and Obama, saying Thatcher and Reagan never saw the special relationship as “a dewy-eyed Disneyesque emotional love-in”. Fox added: “They were giants of history when history needed giants. We may never see their likes again in our lifetime.” Fox also praised competition, the principle in dispute in the health bill, saying Reagan and Thatcher “believed that competition is to be welcomed not feared – that it is the means by which we judge our talents, one against the other, without recourse to conflict.” Andrew Lansley Health policy Public services policy David Cameron Nick Clegg William Hague Liam Fox Health NHS GPs Patrick Wintour guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Prime minister to promise more money for immunisation despite growing outcry over UK’s aid budget David Cameron will use a conference in London to promote plans to raise a further $3.7bn (£2.25bn) in global aid to increase immunisation programmes, further antagonising those in Britain who claim he is putting overseas aid before squeezed living standards in the UK. With his modernising credentials damaged by the row about NHS reforms, Cameron is determined to show that he is committed to a generous UK aid budget, and reassure those on the centre left he is a centrist Conservative. He also believes he can see off the aid sceptics in his own party, mainly from the right. In his most high-profile intervention on overseas aid since becoming prime minister, Cameron will host the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (Gavi) conference in London on 13 June. The conference, discussed by Barack Obama and Cameron last week, is regarded as vital to efforts to lower child mortality in Africa. In a sign of the scale of pledges being sought, the Obama administration is being asked to give $450m to the programme over three years. Britain will also announce a substantial extra contribution to help reach the $3.7bn required to scale up immunisation programmes between 2011 and 2015, and save an estimated 4 million children’s lives. The funding will specifically enable Gavi to distribute two vaccines, pneumococcal and rotavirus, tackling the two biggest killers of children in the developing world: pneumonia and diarrhoea. It is thought the vaccines will save more than 4 million lives by 2015. Pneumonia accounts for 20% of all deaths of children under five. Britain gave £150m to Gavi in March last year, and since 2005 has been the second most generous contributor to the alliance after the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Gavi was praised by the Department for International Development in a review on multilateral aid published three months ago. Officials at the department were reassured by steps Gavi is taking to be more transparent about the differing costs of vaccines from different producers. Two pharmaceutical industry representatives sit on the board of Gavi. Germany announced last week that it would give €30m (£26m) to GAVI in 2012, up from €20m in 2011. Cameron made passionate remarks at his press conference at the close of the G8 summit of industrialised nations in France last week, insisting he would not backtrack on a commitment to increase the amount of overseas aid given by DfID. It is the only UK department not facing budget cuts. Cameron added he would not solve the UK deficit on the backs of the world’s poor, and lambasted some other world leaders for forgetting their promises on aid. Some of this passion was driven by the knowledge of what the Gavi conference could achieve next month. He regards practical vaccines that are shown to have tangible results in terms of saving lives as one of the best ways of combating the aid fatigue currently gripping the UK. Gavi claims it has saved more than five million lives in its first decade of existence. Alan Duncan, the international development minister, sprung to Cameron’s defence telling Sky News that “aid-bashing does not actually get us anywhere. If we were to cancel the aid budget altogether it wouldn’t solve all the other problems, so this sort of balancing of the aid budget versus all other problems isn’t entirely logical. “The fact is, if you had a pound, would you give a halfpenny to stop someone dying in the street? The answer is you probably would, and what we are doing is stopping millions of people dying from disease, we are helping educate people and make them healthy.” Aid Vaccines and immunisation Health David Cameron Patrick Wintour guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …KABUL, Afghanistan — A car with the license plate of a high-ranking Afghan general approached the gates of the Defense Ministry in Kabul last month. A special “A” pass also was on its windshield, so guards quickly waved it through. Once inside, a man in an army uniform jumped from the car and stormed the ministry’s main office building, an Afghan government official said. He gunned down two Afghan soldiers before being killed. The gunman also wounded an Afghan army officer, who died later at a hospital. The April 18 attack – brazen and cleverly orchestrated by insurgents – is indicative of the high-profile yet small-scale attacks that are trademarks of the Taliban’s spring campaign. Unable to match the firepower of the U.S.-led coalition and Afghan forces, insurgents conduct suicide bombings and assaults on government buildings, figuring these types of attacks will prove their resilience. On Saturday, a suicide bomber wearing a police uniform detonated a vest laden with explosives at a provincial governor’s compound in northern Afghanistan, killing two top Afghan police commanders and wounding the German general who commands NATO forces in the north. Two Germans and two other Afghans died. It’s unclear how deep of a dent the U.S.-led military campaign made in the insurgency over the winter or if these attacks are preludes to more widespread fighting by the Taliban this summer. Insurgents need to take back part of the southern provinces of Kandahar and Helmand, their traditional strongholds, if they hope to retain their power base and the opium fields that fund their movement. “Certainly the types of attacks they are now doing is an indicator they don’t want to send a large number of fighters against coalition or Afghan National Security Forces because they know they will get the worse of that,” said Lt. Col. John Dorrian, a spokesman for the coalition. “The types of attacks they are doing are intended to create a propaganda flash and try to discredit the Afghan government.” Military and NATO officials, including the top commander in Afghanistan, Gen. David Petraeus, have predicted heavy fighting this summer. They have also predicted the Taliban will continue its campaign of terror and assassination. That campaign targets anyone who backs the Afghan security forces, peace talks with insurgents, or the Afghan government’s reintegration program designed to lure Taliban foot soldiers back into their communities with offers of economic development for their villages. “This is going to be a tough fighting season. The Talibs are not going to take these security gains laying down, and we have already seen them trying to come back. There are no certainties here,” said British Maj. Gen. Phil Jones, a veteran of four tours in Afghanistan and NATO’s point man on efforts to reintegrate Taliban fighters back into society. Nearly all the Taliban’s recent attacks have been on a small scale, with one or two notable exceptions in the mountainous northern province of Nuristan – a remote area where no permanent NATO or Afghan forces are deployed. Insurgents, however, have increased the tempo of assaults with attacks conducted by disgruntled Afghan soldiers and police or militants impersonating soldiers. “The enemy is making huge efforts to infiltrate Afghan security organizations,” Gen. Abdul Rahim Wardak, the Afghan defense minister, recently told parliament. The Taliban claim that indirect tactics, such as suicide attacks, assassinations and infiltration, are part of their new strategy against the government. “The mujahedeen are able to infiltrate into the ranks of the enemy and are using these opportunities to attack,” Taliban spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid said after the attack. Since September 2007, the coalition has recorded 21 incidents in which a member of the Afghan security forces – or someone in a uniform used by them – have killed coalition forces. Forty-nine coalition troops, including at least 35 Americans, have been killed. At least six members of the Afghan security forces also died in the incidents. Of the 21 incidents, eight were attributed to combat stress or personal disagreements; seven were due to unknown motives; four involved members of the Afghan security forces who were co-opted by insurgents or sympathetic to the insurgency, and two involved attackers who were impersonating Afghan police or soldiers. The sale of Afghan security force uniforms is banned in Afghanistan, but they are still easily obtained. While insurgents have claimed credit for nearly all the attacks, no evidence has been found suggesting they have successfully embedded individuals in the Afghan security forces with the intent to attack coalition forces, training mission officials said. In the two most recent attacks in Kabul, however, militants had inside help. In the attack on the Defense Ministry, the man who drove the car with heavily tinted windows into the facility was the nephew of the general, the government official told The Associated Press. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to disclose the information. The Afghan army would never stop or search a vehicle driving into the ministry with a special pass on its windshield, the official said, adding that the general had not yet been told about the car or the involvement of his nephew, who is believed to have fled to Pakistan where many insurgent groups have safe havens. The official said the investigation was still under way, and he would not elaborate as to why the general had not been questioned, or whether he even knew that a vehicle assigned to him by the ministry was used in the attack. A month later, on May 21, the Afghan intelligence service said a soldier serving with the security unit at the main military hospital in Kabul picked up a Pakistani national and drove him to a mosque in the capital. There, inside a restroom, the man slipped an Afghan army uniform over a suicide explosives vest and got back into the soldier’s official vehicle. He was then easily driven through the gates. The attacker blew himself up in a tent being used as a cafeteria. The explosion killed six Afghan students and wounded 23 others. No foreigners were injured. Police later arrested the driver – a soldier who had been in the army for eight months. NATO said the Taliban-affiliated Haqqani network was responsible.
Continue reading …Wow, so our theory and mockup turned out to be pretty much spot on: indeed, the oddly named ASUS PadFone does tuck itself into a shielded docking bay on the back of its companion tablet, and the latter’s hinged cover appears to pop up upon releasing the latch. You can also just about make out the two ports inside which are likely to be HDMI and micro-USB — one for driving the larger display, and the other for taking care of touch input while possibly sipping juice from an extra battery somewhere. Now, what we really like to know is which version of Android will be shipped (if ever) with this split-personality phone — our money’s on Ice Cream Sandwich , given that this flavor will happily cater both phone and tablet form factors later this year. That said, given the uniqueness of this product, ASUS could probably still get away with taking a step back and launch this as a Gingerbread tablet. Well, we shall dig up more answers for y’all tomorrow, and stay tuned for some sweet hands-on time. Continue reading This is the ASUS PadFone This is the ASUS PadFone originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 29 May 2011 14:55:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …Why bother with a baby name book when you can go straight to the Social Security Administration … via your iPhone? The SSA, of course, releases an annual list of the most popular baby names in the US, and its new (and free!) Baby Name Playroom app can suggest…
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Tea party favorite Rep. Allen West (R-FL) said Sunday that it was inappropriate to consider withdrawing from Afghanistan while Americans were still losing their lives there. Fox News’ Chris Wallace noted that Rep. Donna Edwards (D-MD) and other progressive Democrats wanted to pull out of Afghanistan. “I do,” Edwards said. “I think the responsible thing is you raise the debt limit and then we work on the plan that gets us out of Iraq, out of Afghanistan.” “I can see Congressman West shaking his head. He’s going to say no way,” Wallace noted. “Let me tell you something that just happened,” West began. “On my Blackberry, I get 12 alerts this week of soldiers that lost their lives in Afghanistan. It’s not over in Afghanistan.”
Continue reading …Lord of the Rings and Ringcon norafizabasri says: @PHEEEEEE RT @TVGuide : Orlando Bloom to return as Legolas in The Hobbit: http://bit.ly/iOizrA Are you excited?
Continue reading …