Missouri police have launched a massive manhunt for a baby girl who vanished from her crib in the middle of the night. “We’ve exhausted everything we can at the original scene,” said a police spokesman. “We’ve opened up the crime scene and are doing everything we can.” A neighbor reported…
Continue reading …Sure, we may not see flying cars in our lifetime, but a mainstream digital dash is a definite possibility. The all-glass vehicle dashboard has been conceptualized by other manufacturers in the past, but this year it’s Panasonic’s turn to try its hand at building a multi-display system. The electronics maker brought its Cockpit prototype to the CEATEC floor, causing quite a stir among passersby. The dash itself was little more than a semi-functional mockup, presenting recorded rendered video on the main 20-inch LCD and dual 10.4-inch secondary displays. The main display’s current objective appears to be improving safety, using a series of cameras to eliminate blind spots and alert drivers to other road hazards. Real-time driving stats are displayed atop a video feed, either from the rear camera (when in reverse), or one up front. We spent a few minutes behind the wheel of Panasonic’s mockup, which consisted only of a pair of (rather comfortable) leather seats, along with a trio of LCDs, which the company claims are currently based on panels used in other Panasonic products, but may eventually utilize custom displays. This wasn’t an actual vehicle prototype — only the “cockpit” was on hand. The main display will (hopefully) focus the driver’s attention away from distractions on those two smaller screens — the one in the center can be used to control standard vehicle settings like climate and entertainment, while a second display positioned directly in front of the passenger seat can play movies and other content. Are we there yet? No, so you better get comfortable for the long drive ahead. Overall the setup looked like it could have potential, though Panasonic warned us not to expect anything final until the end of the decade (2018 at the earliest). Jump past the break for a Cockpit drive-by. Gallery: Panasonic Cockpit LCD Dash hands-on Continue reading Panasonic Cockpit digital dash prototype hands-on (video) Panasonic Cockpit digital dash prototype hands-on (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 05 Oct 2011 09:52:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …Tia and Tamera Mowry on Wendy Williams Show 9/27/2011 (Full) Tia Mowry Receiving Kt Steppers on Tia & Tamera (on The Style Network) Jackée’s surprise call to Tia & Tamera t_animated says: Oooh I jus Love Tia Mowry avi wit her sister Tamera!!!..i friggin wish I had a sissy
Continue reading …FUTURISTIC SCI-FI ALIEN SPACE BATTLE HELMET Prop,FALL OUT, HALO, INDI FILM, FOR SALE ON EBAY Давайте поиграем в Starship Troopers часть 2 Давайте поиграем в Starship Troopers часть 1 thefunshit says: A quick look at the movie Starship troopers and if it’s a movie one should watch. Think… http://t.co/emN6EWYc
Continue reading …Hank Williams Jr. has apologized—again—for comparing President Obama to Hitler during an appearance on Fox and Friends . The country singer, who was pulled from ESPN’s Monday Night Football broadcast after saying Obama playing golf with John Boehner “would be like Hitler playing golf with Netanyahu,” admitted that his…
Continue reading …The Rum Diary Part 1/15 HD Online Full Free Movie Trailer. The Rum Diary – part 1 of 9 full movie. The Rum Diary – Nothing in Moderation Milagromtrdv says: RT @ Hlynnj3 : @ DesieLuvDdub Happy Early Birthday Will you celebrate by watching the Rum Diary
Continue reading …Twenty years after she spent Thanksgiving weekend dining on her husband’s ribs cooked barbecue-style, Omaima Nelson is seeking release from a California prison. The Egyptian-born former model—who had been married to her husband for under a month when she killed him, dismembered him and ate parts of his body—…
Continue reading …Sara Payne, 7/7 hero Paul Dadge and father of Josie Russell, who survived murder attempt, among 13 new writs this week News International is now facing more than 60 separate writs over phone hacking, with a raft of new claimants emerging including Sarah’s law campaigner Sara Payne, 7/7 hero Paul Dadge and Shaun Russell, father of Josie, the girl who survived a murder attempt. Thirteen new legal claims were issued against Rupert Murdoch’s company on Monday, which followed 24 the week before. One of the most recent claimants is Sara Payne, the woman who campaigned with the News of the World to change the law so that parents could obtain access to information about paedophiles following the murder of her eight-year-old daughter, Sarah. Another writ was in the name of Paul Dadge, the man whose image was published across the world after he was photographed helping victims of the 7/7 tube bombings. There were also writs from singer Dannii Minogue, Paul Burrell, Princess Diana’s former butler, and Shaun Russell, whose daughter Josie survived a hammer attack in which her mother and sister were killed in 1996. According to people familiar with the situation, the sudden flurry of writs occurred because of a judicial cut-off point for initial claims. It is thought the rash of suits has been triggered by a deadline set by Mr Justice Vos to consider claims ahead of a January trial of a few test cases to determine how much News International should pay in damages to five of the victims. Among the high-profile names in the 63 writs are the former Downing Street communications chief Alastair Campbell and politicians, including John Prescott, Simon Hughes, Denis MacShane, Chris Bryant, Mark Oaten, Tessa Jowell and George Galloway. There are several actors in the list, such as Jude Law and Sadie Frost, and TV personalities including Steve Coogan and Ulrika Jonsson. There are also writs in the names of George Best’s son, Calum, footballer Ashley Cole, rugby player Gavin Henson and jockey Kieren Fallon. Some of the writs involve more than one person. For example, Charlotte Church is joined in her lawsuit by her mother, Maria, and stepfather James. The overwhelming majority of the writs have been issued jointly against News Group Newspapers, the News International subsidiary that published the now defunct News of the World, and Glenn Mulcaire, the private investigator who worked under contract for the Sunday tabloid. However, one – by singer Cornelia Crisan – also names the former News of the World chief reporter, Neville Thurlbeck, and another of the paper’s former reporters as defendants in her claim. It is the first phone-hacking lawsuit to target Thurlbeck. He was arrested and bailed in April for alleged phone hacking but has not been charged. He is suing News International for unfair dismissal. Thurlbeck said: “As I said last week, the truth will out. But this will be in the law courts and at a public tribunal.” The number and range of the claims has taken some legal observers by surprise. One source said it suggests that News International’s £20m contingency fund to deal with legal claims will not be anywhere near enough to cover the final total. One of the lawyers acting for some of the hacking victims, Mark Lewis, told Bloomberg News : “So far, fewer than 5% of the victims of Glenn Mulcaire have been notified. “He was just one agent used by one paper. When the final tally takes place, we will see thousands of claims and more than one paper.” Lewis said that, as the number of claimants grows, estimates that Murdoch’s company would need at least £100m to settle such claims looks like “a serious underestimate”. His logic is based on the fact that only 200 people have been identified from the 4,000 names said to be on documents that were seized from Mulcaire’s house in 2006, when he was arrested with the News of the World’s former royal editor Clive Goodman. Both Mulcaire and Goodman were jailed for phone hacking in early 2007. About half of those initially identified have launched legal actions. So, if the same proportion of the full 4,000 were to sue, then News International’s liability, in terms of damages plus legal costs would be colossal. News International has already offered to pay one of Lewis’s clients, the family of murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler, £3m. Media lawyer Niri Shan, of Taylor Wessing, said that victims who file claims before next year’s trial could benefit because “there is a level of uncertainty about what the court will award” in January. He added: “[News International parent company] News Corp may overpay to get rid of claimants.” Phone hacking News of the World Newspapers & magazines National newspapers Newspapers Roy Greenslade guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …ThinkProgress points out how little the Koch-manufactured tea party has in common with the real thing, and how the Occupy Wall Street movement embodies the real spirit: 1.) The Original Boston Tea Party Was A Civil Disobedience Action Against A Private Corporation . In 1773, agitators blocked the importation of tea by East India Trading Company ships across the country. In Boston harbor, a band of protesters led by Samuel Adams boarded the corporation’s ships and dumped the tea into the harbor. No East India Trading Company employees were harmed, but the destruction of the company’s tea is estimated to be worth up to $2 million in today’s money. The Occupy Wall Street protests have targeted big banks like Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, as well as multinational corporations like GE with sit-ins and peaceful rallies. 2.) The Original Boston Tea Party Feared That Corporate Greed Would Destroy America . As Professor Benjamin Carp has argued , colonists perceived the East India Trading Company as a “fearsome monopolistic company that was going to rob them blind and pave the way maybe for their enslavement.” A popular pamphlet called The Alarm agitated for a revolt against the East India Trading Company by warning that the British corporation would devastate America just as it had devastated South Asian colonies: “Their Conduct in Asia, for some Years past, has given simple Proof, how little they regard the Laws of Nations, the Rights, Liberties, or Lives of Men. And these not being sufficient to glut their Avarice, they have, by the most unparalleled Barbarities, Extortions, and Monopolies, stripped the miserable Inhabitants of their Property, and reduced whole Provinces to Indigence and Ruin.” 3.) The Original Boston Tea Party Believed Government Necessary To Protect Against Corporate Excess . Smithsonian historian Barbara Smith has noted that Samuel Adams believed that oppression could occur when governments are too weak. As Adams explained in a Boston newspaper, government should exist “to protect the people and promote their prosperity.” Patriots behind the Tea Party revolt believed “rough economic equality was necessary to maintaining liberty,” says Smith. Occupy Wall Street protesters demand a country that invests in education, infrastructure, and jobs. 4.) The Original Boston Tea Party Was Sparked By A Corporate Tax Cut For A British Corporation . The Tea Act, a law by the British Parliament exempting tea imported by the East India Trading Company from taxes and allowing the corporation to directly ship its tea to the colonies for sale, is credited with setting off the Boston Tea Party. The law was perceived as an effort by the British to bailout the East India Trading Company by shutting off competition from American shippers. George R.T. Hewes, one of the patriots who boarded the East India Trading Company ships and dumped the tea, told a biographer that the East India Trading Company had twisted the laws so “it was no longer the small vessels of private merchants, who went to vend tea for their own account in the ports of the colonies, but, on the contrary, ships of an enormous burthen, that transported immense quantities of this commodity.” Occupy Wall Street demands the end of corporate tax loopholes as well as the enactment of higher taxes on billionaires and millionaires. 5.) The Original Boston Tea Party Wanted A Stronger Democracy . There is a common misconception that the Boston Tea Party was simply a revolt against taxation. The truth is much more nuanced, and there were many factors behind the opposition to the East India Company and the British government. Although the colonists resented taxes levied by a distant British Parliament, in the years preceding the Tea Party, the Massachusetts colony had levied taxes several times to pay for local services. The issue at hand was representation and government accountable to the needs of the American people. Patrick Henry and other patriots organized the revolutionary effort by claiming that legitimate laws and taxes could only be passed by legislatures elected by Americans. According to historian Benjamin Carp, the protesters in Boston perceived that the British government’s actions were set by the East India Trading Company. “As Americans learned more about the provisions of the new East India Company laws, they realized that Parliament would sooner lend a hand to the Company than the colonies,” wrote Carp.
Continue reading …The self-styled lord, whose home was used to film The King’s Speech, was the mastermind of an ‘advanced fee fraud’ scheme An entrepreneur whose lavish home was used in scenes from the Oscar-winning film The King’s Speech and for a less mainstream “porn disco” has been jailed for a multimillion-pound fraud. Self-styled “Lord” Edward Davenport, 45, was the mastermind of an “advanced fee fraud” scheme in which scores of businesses were ripped off. Davenport – who owns Sierra Leone’s former High Commission in west London – set up Gresham Ltd in 2005 and pretended it was a respectable business with 50 years’ experience of sourcing huge commercial loans. “To outward appearances it was long-established, wealthy and prestigious,” said Simon Mayo QC, for the prosecution at Southwark crown court. “It operated from expensive London premises and had a balance sheet showing significant assets. “It had a flattering corporate brochure and used headed notepaper that lent an image of corporate credibility. “That image, however, deliberately cultivated by these defendants, was entirely false. “In truth it was a company which had only been set up by Edward Davenport in late 2005. “It was essentially worthless. Its only business was fraud.” Davenport, of Portland Place, central London, was jailed last month for seven years and eight months along with his lieutenant, Peter Riley, 64, of The Old Bakery, Brentwood, Essex. They were convicted of a single count of conspiracy to defraud along with Borge Andersen, 66, of Roland Gardens, south Kensington, south-west London. Andersen was jailed for 39 months at the same court on 12 September. He was also disqualified from being a company director for seven years under Section 2 of the Directors Disqualification Act. Their convictions, following a three-month trial, can be reported for the first time after a judge lifted an order. Davenport hit the headlines last year when Westminster council banned him from using his historic home for activities including a “porn disco”, a sex party and pole dancing lessons. The five-storey, 110-room house was also used for film shoots, a fashion show, a wedding, a nightclub and a masquerade ball. His swimming pool was reportedly filled with Cognac so revellers could row through it. But the Serious Fraud Office arrested him in December 2009 after gathering evidence that Gresham had promised to fund loans worth £500m. From 2007 to 2009 Gresham Ltd had received more than £4.5m from unsuspecting clients. The fraudsters made their money by fooling clients into paying tens of thousands of pounds for due diligence and deposit fees. Across the world businesses were collapsing after entering into big deals on the false promise from Gresham that their money was only days away. In Austria, two victims had contractors waiting to start work with diggers after Gresham promised to find €32m (£27.4m) to fund a leisure resort. No money materialised. In India a businessman from Bellary Steels paid Gresham £285,000 to finance €183m. Nothing materialised and the victim “suffered crippling losses” of £825,000 and now owes €11m, the court heard. There were at least 51 victims. Davenport, known as “Fast Eddie” and pictured on his website with dozens of celebrities including Simon Cowell, the actor Hugh Grant, Sarah Ferguson and the justice secretary, Kenneth Clarke, kept his distance from the legwork and operated under a false name, James Stewart or Stuart. He launched the fraud, remained in overall charge and did not “leave many footprints in the snow for himself”, not wanting to risk his champagne lifestyle which included parties with the stars and a property in Monaco. Davenport, supported in court by his girlfriend and 78-year-old mother, was happy to give orders to Riley, the son of an alcoholic schoolteacher. Judge Peter Testar described Riley as “an accomplished conman” who could lie with incredible ease and skill to clients desperately waiting for their money. Riley blamed many of the delays on a lawyer in Monaco called Louis Martin. But Martin did not exist – it was Riley introducing one of many fictitious characters to aid the scam. Riley set up an email address for the non-existent Martin and to add credibility wrote emails from him in broken English. The judge said of the grandfather-of-one: “He strung along borrowers on a huge scale with bare-faced lies.” Of the victims, he added: “The stress and anxiety these people suffered were enormous and their lives have been grievously affected by this fraud. “Some of them will never recover from that … It was a professional and sophisticated fraud which had a great impact on the victims and each of these two defendants had a significant role to play.” Andersen, a Danish national, will be sentenced after his defence obtain medical reports for his various illnesses. He was “generally perceived as the most articulate and plausible of the fraudsters”, said Mayo. He made loan offers and provided bogus explanations for delays with money. According to internal Gresham accounts created by Riley, Andersen received £159,564 from the fraud, Riley £695,407, and Davenport £773,000. The court heard that £349,025 has vanished from the accounts and cannot be traced. Davenport and Riley were banned from being company directors for 10 years after their release and a confiscation hearing was listed for 2 May next year. Crime guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …