Well, the Pentagon is finally fed up with hackers picking on its buddies and foreign intelligence taking shots at its computer systems , and has decided that such cyber attacks can constitute an act of war. Of course, the powers that be won’t be bombing you for simply sending them some spyware, but attempts to sabotage US infrastructure (power grids, public transit, and the like) may be met with heavy artillery. It’s unclear how our government will identify the origin of an attack or decide when it’s serious enough to start shooting, but Uncle Sam is looking to its allies to help create a consensus answer for those questions. The retaliatory revelation is a part of the Pentagon’s new cyber strategy that’ll be made public in June — so saboteurs beware, your next internet incursion might get you an ICBM in your backyard. Pentagon says cyber attacks are acts of war: send us a worm, get a missle in return? originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 31 May 2011 14:43:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …The short truce in Yemen that never quite managed to be a truce is over, the government declared today. The development means that Yemen is that much closer to civil war and financial ruin, reports Reuters . President Ali Abdullah Saleh’s troops and tribal groups engaged in fierce fighting in the…
Continue reading …Hamid Karzai has called on NATO to cease all airstrikes on civilian homes, warning that Afghanistan could unilaterally intervene to stop any continued attacks. The Afghan president spoke at a televised press conference following a US airstrike that killed some 12 women and children . “The Afghan people can no longer…
Continue reading …راتكو مْلاديتش قد يُرحَّل إلى… I did not buy Oscar: AR Rehman Esporte Bahia no Ar 31 05 2011 _maosdeprincesa says: NO AR : Techno da AH – http://migre.me/4Gu09 por @_greee
Continue reading …Pakistani intelligence officers continue to offer to support to terrorist groups threatening regional security, according to a diplomatic cable circulated by Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state. The revelations will further undermine relations between Pakistan and America Photo: AFP/GETTY IMAGES By Rob Crilly, Islamabad 2:26PM BST 31 May 2011 Follow Rob Crilly on Twitter The cable, released by WikiLeaks, which was sent to American embassies, dated December 2009, ambassadors and charge d’affaires are given a series of “talking points” to raise with host governments. In Pakistan, they are told to ask the Islamabad government to take action against the Haqqani network, which is fighting…
Continue reading …Lost hikers and outdoorsmen will soon have yet another arrow to add to their navigational quivers, now that Garmin has decided to upgrade its eTrex line of GPS handhelds. The refresh, announced this morning, will bring three new models to the eTrex family during the third quarter of this year. First up is the eTrex 10 — a basic, $120 little guy that carries a global database of locations, as well as a monochrome display that can be read under the sun. The $200 eTrex 20, on the other hand, displays images in 65k color on a 2.2-inch screen and can support topographic, roadway and marine maps. At the high end of the spectrum is the eTrex 30 ($300), which offers all the features you’ll find on the eTrex 20, plus a tilt-compensated electronic compass, barometric altimeter and wireless data transfer capabilities. All three models allow users to download geocached information directly to their devices and boast a lengthy 25-hour battery life — giving you plenty of time to find your bearings before calling in the rescue squad. Full PR after the break. Continue reading Garmin announces redesigned line of eTrex GPS handhelds with enhanced geocaching Garmin announces redesigned line of eTrex GPS handhelds with enhanced geocaching originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 31 May 2011 12:59:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …The cost of food staples is set to more than double over the next two decades, Oxfam says, as we enter a “permanent food crisis.” World hunger had steadily decreased for decades, the Guardian reports, but with demand exceeding production, the numbers of hungry people are once again on the…
Continue reading …Shahzad’s body was discovered less than two days after he was allegedly abducted by ISI, Pakistan’s intelligence service A prominent Pakistani journalist has been found dead on the roadside outside Islamabad, less than two days after he was allegedly abducted by the country’s powerful military intelligence service. Saleem Shahzad disappeared on his way to a television interview on Sunday evening. Human Rights Watch said it learned he been abducted by the Inter-Services Intelligence directorate (ISI). Shahzad’s body was found six miles from his car in a small hamlet on the edge of Islamabad. Local media reported that he had torture marks on his face and a gunshot wound to the stomach. “This killing bears all the hallmarks of previous killings perpetrated by Pakistani intelligence agencies,” said Ali Dayan Hasan of Human Rights Watch, noting that Shahzad had previously warned that his life was in danger from the ISI. Hasan called for a “transparent investigation and court proceedings”. Other journalists reacted angrily, directly accusing the ISI of responsibility. “Any journalist here who doesn’t believe that it’s our intelligence agencies?” tweeted Mohammed Hanif, a bestselling author and BBC correspondent. Shahzad, the Pakistan correspondent for the Hong Kong-based news service Asia Times Online, vanished two days after publishing a story alleging negotiations between Pakistan military officials and al-Qaida . The story claimed that al-Qaida attacked the Mehran naval base in Karachi on 22 May in retaliation for the arrest of two naval officials with militant links. Al-Qaida had been secretly pressing the military to release the men, Shahzad said. Pakistani security forces battled for 17 hours to contain the assault, during which at least four heavily armed men slipped into the base, blew up two American-built surveillance planes and killed 10 soldiers. On Tuesday Pakistani media reported that military intelligence had picked up a retired navy commando and his brother in Lahore in connection with the raid. The detained men, who allegedly have militant links, were previously questioned in connection to an earlier militant assault. Shahzad was abducted from central Islamabad on Sunday evening as he travelled to the studios of Dunya television to discuss his report on the naval base attack. The following day, after being alerted by Shahzad’s wife, Hasan said he had been informed through “reliable interlocutors” that Shahzad was being held by the ISI. Last October Shahzad sent Human Rights Watch an email saying he was afraid he would be killed by the ISI, Hasan claimed. In the email, intended to be released in the event of his death, Shahzad said he had been summoned to ISI headquarters in Islamabad to discuss an article about Mullah Brader, a Taliban commander captured in Pakistan with American help months earlier. The two ISI officials Shahzad said were present at the meeting, Rear Admiral Adnan Nawaz and Commodore Khalid Pervaiz, were both naval officers. Last week Pervaiz was made commander of the Karachi naval base that was attacked. “We believed [Shahzad's] claim that he was being threatened by the ISI is credible, and any investigation into his murder has to factor this in,” Hasan said. Cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan called for a government inquiry into the “heinous crime”, but avoided mention of the ISI, focusing blame on the “servile policies [of] a corrupt and inept government”. As a reporter, Shahzad was known for delving deep into the murky underworld of Islamist militancy. He had interviewed some of the most notorious leaders including Sirajuddin Haqqani, a major player in the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan, and Ilyas Kashmiri, a Pakistani militant who works for al-Qaida. His new book, Inside Al-Qaeda and the Taliban: Beyond Bin Laden and 9/11, had just been published. Pakistan is the world’s most dangerous country for journalists, according to Reporters without Borders, which says that 16 journalists have been killed in the past 14 months. Last September Umar Cheema, another investigative reporter, was abducted from Islamabad for six hours and tortured before being released. He said he suspected that his kidnappers belonged to the ISI. Pakistan Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) Press freedom Declan Walsh guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Ex-SAS soldiers and private security firm employees passing information to Nato attack helicopters, sources tell Guardian Former SAS soldiers and other western employees of private security companies are helping Nato identify targets in the Libyan port city of Misrata, the scene of heavy fighting between Gaddafi’s forces and rebels, well-placed sources have told the Guardian. Special forces veterans are passing details of the locations and movements of Muammar Gaddafi’s forces to the Naples headquarters of Lieutenant-General Charles Bouchard, Canadian commander of Nato forces involved in the military operations, sources said. The targets are then verified by spy planes and US Predator drones. “One piece of human intelligence is not enough”, a source said. The former soldiers are there with the blessing of Britain, France and other Nato countries, which have supplied them with communications equipment. They are likely to be providing information for the pilots of British and French attack helicopters who are expected to start firing at targets in and around Misrata later this week. Four Apache helicopters are on board HMS Ocean, which is now approaching Libyan waters. Twelve French Tiger helicopters are on board the amphibious assault ship Tonnere, which is understood to be already within striking distance of the Libyan coast. The revelations about the role of the rebels’ advisers follow the filming of armed westerners on the Misrata frontline with rebel fighters. A group of six westerners were visible in a report by al-Jazeera from Dafniya, described as the westernmost point of the rebel lines in the city. Five of the men were armed, wearing sand-coloured clothes, baseball caps and cotton Arab scarves. The sixth, who seemed to be in charge, carried no visible weapon and wore a pink short-sleeved shirt. The group was seen talking to rebels and quickly leaving after they realised they were being filmed. The Ministry of Defence insisted it had no combat forces on the ground in Libya. The only MoD personnel were in Benghazi, it added, referring to the team of about 10 military advisers and mentors the UK has sent there. William Hague, the foreign secretary, described the advisers as “experienced military officers”, and said they would advise the rebels on intelligence-gathering, logistics and communications. Senior British defence sources revealed in April that they were urging Arab countries to train the Libyan rebels in order to strengthen their position on the battlefield. The sources said they were looking at hiring private security companies, many of which employ former SAS soldiers, to help the rebels. These private soldiers are reported to be paid by Arab countries, notably Qatar. British officials said they were not being paid by the UK government. Those countries in favour of the initial decision to impose a no-fly-zone over Libya and hostile to Gaddafi would be strongly opposed to any direct – or official – link between western advisers and Nato commanders. They are being kept at arm’s length while their role is privately welcomed. A Reuters photographer in Misrata said there was heavy fighting in the suburb of Dafniyah, in the west of the city, where the front line is now located. Speaking from a field hospital near the front line, she said 14 rebel fighters had been injured on Tuesday, one of them seriously. “Gaddafi’s forces are firing Grad rockets,” she said. “The rebels tried to advance, but Gaddafi’s forces pushed them back.” Rebel fighters, out of their familiar urban battleground and now in open ground, were being outgunned, one of their spokesmen said. “The situation is getting more difficult for the revolutionaries because fighting is going on in open places. They do not have the same heavy weapons as the [pro-Gaddafi] brigades,” their spokesman, Abdelsalam, said from Misrata. Major-General John Lorimer, the MoD’s chief military spokesman, said RAF Tornado and Typhoon aircraft over the past few days destroyed a main battle tank near Jadu and attacked a multiple rocket launcher and support vehicles south of Zlitan. On Monday, further RAF patrols near Zlitan located five heavy transporters carrying main battle tanks; all were destroyed or severely damaged, he said. Libya Military Defence policy Middle East Africa Richard Norton-Taylor guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Paul Krugman, who’s been pushing for government intervention all along (this video is from 2009) points out that our so-called “leadership” on both sides of the aisle is missing in action on policies that might actually help the unemployed : So there are policies we could be pursuing to bring unemployment down. These policies would be unorthodox — but so are the economic problems we face. And those who warn about the risks of action must explain why these risks should worry us more than the certainty of continued mass suffering if we do nothing. In pointing out that we could be doing much more about unemployment, I recognize, of course, the political obstacles to actually pursuing any of the policies that might work. In the United States, in particular, any effort to tackle unemployment will run into a stone wall of Republican opposition. Yet that’s not a reason to stop talking about the issue. In fact, looking back at my own writings over the past year or so, it’s clear that I too have sinned: political realism is all very well, but I have said far too little about what we really should be doing to deal with our most important problem. As I see it, policy makers are sinking into a condition of learned helplessness on the jobs issue: the more they fail to do anything about the problem, the more they convince themselves that there’s nothing they could do. And those of us who know better should be doing all we can to break that vicious circle. Dave Dayen has some thoughts on the response to Krugman’s column by Jared Bernstein, the liberal economist who recently left Joe Biden’s policy team. Bernstein says it was the White House, not the Republicans, who would not consider any kind of direct jobs program. He also says the White House was concerned about the political drawbacks of the “wrong” type of people getting a mortgage modification: Now, the most interesting thing about this is that the Obama Administration, through federal regulators, are RIGHT NOW attempting to negotiate a program of mortgage modification with the country’s major banks, as part of the foreclosure fraud settlement. This raises very troubling issues about what the eligibility would look like on that deal. Clearly, the White House is preoccupied with the “right” type of person getting help; Obama has mentioned this on several occasions. Yet who is that “right” type of person when the banks have engaged in systematic fraud? They didn’t just defraud those deserving of aid, whatever “deserving” means; they defrauded everyone, with their fake documents and breaking of the chain of title and fee pyramiding and the like. There’s no way to slice the salami at this point, and divy up the “deserving” from the “undeserving” of a mortgage modification. That simply doesn’t make sense in this case. However, it is driving the thinking inside Washington, and will almost certainly be a preoccupation with any settlement (if there even is one at this point). That makes a settlement even less valuable. Bernstein adds that “there are ways outside of federal legislation to encourage principal write-downs” and that he will write about them later. Maybe he’s talking about federal and state enforcement actions. But the same artificial constraints of Tea Party rhetoric about deadbeat borrowers applies there as well. And instead of attacking that ludicrous constraint, Bernstein accepts it. Or rather, he reports that his former bosses in Washington and policymakers on the Hill have accepted it. Good to know.
Continue reading …