Home » Archives by category » News (Page 4029)
Mad Catz brings Mac support to R.A.T. gaming mice

Mac users certainly have quite a few more gaming options these days than they once did, and they can now also add Mad Catz’s series of Cyborg R.A.T. gaming mice to that list. The company finally released some Mac drivers for the complete range of mice today, which will let you take advantage of all the advanced features Windows users are already accustomed to. Those still putting off that Snow Leopard update will have to take care of that first, however, as the drivers won’t accept anything less. Mad Catz brings Mac support to R.A.T. gaming mice originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 08 Jun 2011 12:06:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Continue reading …
Anti-Union Delta Charges $2800 In Baggage Fees To Returning Afghanistan Troops

Delta Airlines was caught this week charging troops returning from Afghanistan an extra $200 each to bring a fourth bag home, forcing one unit to pay more than $2800 in baggage fees. Evidently, Delta’s policy is to allow troops only three free checked bags, while the soldiers said that their military orders allow them to Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Think Progress Discovery Date : 08/06/2011 04:00 Number of articles : 4

Continue reading …
Bettencourt affair in new twist as L’Oréal heiress writes €170m cheque

Daughter reattempts to make France’s richest woman, 88, a ward of court after she invests in company run by TV mogul Only months after they kissed and made up, France’s richest woman, the L’Oréal heiress Liliane Bettencourt, and her daughter appear to have fallen out again. Françoise Bettencourt Meyers, the heiress’s only child, is reported again to be seeking to have her mother made a ward of court after Bettencourt, 88, invested €170m (£151m) in a company belonging to one of her lawyer’s clients. The two buried the hatchet in December after a three-year estrangement over Bettencourt’s decision to give a society photographer more than €1bn worth of art masterpieces, cash and life-insurance policies. But the second act of what French newspapers call the Bettencourt affair erupted on Tuesday, after Bettencourt Meyers, 57, alerted the authorities, claiming at least one member of her mother’s entourage appeared to be taking advantage of her deteriorating mental state. Her accusations were directed at Pascal Wilhelm, Bettencourt’s lawyer and the man appointed in January to manage her “interests”. The latest spat in France’s long running family feud saw a judge, police officers and five doctors turn up at Bettencourt’s home on Tuesday to check on her health. Their arrival at the house in the chic Paris suburb of Neuilly at 8am – at least two hours before the heiress reportedly makes her morning appearance – was prompted after Bettencourt failed to keep two medical appointments. Le Monde revealed that in March a judge had decided that it was “impossible” for Bettencourt to act in her own interests. It quoted a legal document stating her “cognitive faculties” had changed for the worse and that she suffered from profound deafness. Bettencourt Meyers decided to act again when she discovered her mother had written a cheque for €170m as an investment in a company run by television mogul Stéphane Courbit, who brought the Big Brother reality show to France, and is also a client of Wilhelm. Bettencourt legally named Wilhelm to manage her fortune in January as part of the agreement with her daughter reached last December. However, Wilhelm also remained her lawyer, which Bettencourt Meyers argues is a conflict of interest. The Bettencourt affair, as it became known, began in 2007 after Bettencourt Meyers accused the photographer François-Marie Banier, 63, of taking advantage of her mother’s frailty and sued him for “abuse of weakness”. Secret tape recordings suggested Bettencourt had made Banier her “sole heir”. In 2010, the affair turned from private squabble to political scandal amid allegations – vehemently denied – that Bettencourt had made illegal donations to President Nicolas Sarkozy’s election campaign . It was also revealed that the wife of Eric Woerth, then budget minister, was working for a company managing the heiress’s fortune while Bettencourt had hidden millions from the taxman in Swiss bank accounts. Bettencourt Meyers later dropped the case after her mother agreed to change her will and not see Banier and the photographer renounce the insurance policies. This week, she told lawyers she feared a “new security cordon” was being thrown up around her mother “to the detriment of her family”. France Nicolas Sarkozy Kim Willsher guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Oil price rises sharply after Opec meeting collapses in disarray

• Proposal to increase production rejected by 6 of 12 members • Analysts foresee Opec’s power base weakening Oil prices have jumped by more than $1 a barrel after a meeting of Opec collapsed in acrimony without a deal to aid the struggling world economy by pumping more crude. Saudi oil minister Ali al-Naimi called the gathering “one of the worst meetings we have ever had,” after the Saudis’ proposal to increase production quotas by about 1.5m barrels a day was blocked by six of the group’s 12 members, including Iraq and Venezuela. Several countries argued that they are using their tax revenues to cushion their populations against the rocketing cost of other commodities such as food and cannot afford for oil prices to fall. Opec is not due to meet again for another three months, and some analysts said the angry divergence of views could mark the beginning of the end for the cartel. “A new world order beckons, doubtless preceded by disorder,” said Marc Ostwald, strategist at Monument Securities. He predicted that non-Opec members such as Russia and Kazakhstan could be the main beneficiaries if the cartel’s power wanes. Production quotas have now remained unchanged since 2009. The International Energy Agency, the global energy watchdog, expressed its “disappointment” at Opec’s decision and urged producers to increase output anyway. “Ongoing supply disruptions, as well as the fragile state of the global economy, call for a prompt increase in supply on a competitive basis that will allow refiners to boost throughputs and meet rising seasonal demand,” it said, adding: “Otherwise, a further tightening in the market and potential increases in prices risk undermining economic recovery, which is in the interests neither of producers or consumers.” However, Julian Jessop, chief international economist at Capital Economics, said the weakening outlook for the global economy should bring oil prices down later this year: “We continue to expect the price of Brent crude to drop back below $90 per barrel by the end of the year, as global demand continues to disappoint, the Middle East risk premium fades, and the dollar rebounds.” Oil Commodities Heather Stewart guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Colin Farrell’s ‘Fright Night’ in Vegas

Colin Farrell talks about his love of horror while promoting a remake of the eighties classic ‘Fright Night’ at the CinemaCon convention in Las Vegas. (June 8)

Continue reading …
They made their bed, but they don’t want to lie in it.

enlarge Republican candidates for office are finding out the hard way that support for Privatizing Ryan’s Serfin’ USA Roadmap to Ruin is really, really unpopular. Take Mike Haridopolos, for instance. He is the president of the Florida State Senate and one of three would-be GOP candidates vying to challenge Democrat Bill Nelson for his U.S. Senate seat. During a call-in interview to a St. Augustine radio show, he was asked the question point-blank: Would you vote for or against a Republican plan to overhaul Medicare? He refused to give a straight answer , trying to play it both ways. He hemmed and hawed and called the question “hypothetical” — while simultaneously positing that Ryan’s plan was a “good start” and that it had “a lot of merit.” The host eventually became so frustrated with Haridopolos’ refusal to simply answer the damned question that he simply hung up on him. It’s an important question requiring an honest, straightforward answer. Especially in the state that has the highest per capita number of Medicare recipients in the country. In sheer numbers, Florida, with 3.2 million Medicare recipients is second only to California, with 4.4 million. It’s also a vivid reminder that Medicare has become as much a “third rail” in American politics as Social Security. While the entire republican caucus in the House held hands and jumped off the cliff together, voting as a bloc in favor of the Ryan budget plan, it has also provided a wedge that has been used with some success to split the republicans. Take for example hand-picked GOP candidate Jane Corwin in last month’s special election in the New York 26th. That is Jack Kemp’s old seat and one of my grandma’s lived in that district. No Democrat had held that seat in my conscious memory. It was as solidly Republican as the district I currently live in is Democratic. But Jane Corwin said she agreed with Paul Ryan’s scheme to destroy Medicare as we know it and it cost her the seat she should have won standing up. The NRCC and the GOP leadership in the House can spin until they generate a gravitational field, insisting that Corwin was a “bad candidate” until the cows come home. The establishment still hand-picked her, after grooming her for higher office for years. If she really were a bad candidate, it would say more about them than it would about her. Medicare decided that election and even those who spin it otherwise know that statement is true, whether they will admit it or not. The fact of the matter is, polling shows that over half of the American people hate the Ryan plan, with the highest level of opposition coming from senior citizens — the exact group of people who would be spared it’s ravages. The irony isn’t lost on me that the very people who would get hurt the worst is the demographic that registers the highest support for the plan — but when you’re still on your parents insurance and don’t have any pre-existing conditions and have never looked for insurance on the private market, it’s easy to think you can navigate the system. Remember how much smarter your parents got in the ten years it took you to get from 15 to 25? Same principle here. But it doesn’t really matter, because guess who votes? That’s right. The old people who oppose it the most. I also have to admit that my inner armchair-psychologist is bemused by Ryan. As we all know, he is a Randian , and Randians embrace an “ethic” of selfishness. I honestly believe that Paul Ryan thought that those 55 and older would be totally cool with throwing their kids and grandkids to the wolves, so long as they themselves didn’t have to pay the penalty. I think he was taken aback when people asked “but what about my kids?” because he lacks the capacity for empathy that is required before one can think to ask such a question. When it turned out that most people aren’t sociopaths, I truly believe that Ryan was genuinely shocked. Not only that, it was a possibility he failed to consider, because he lacked the empathy necessary for that sort of foresight. Fortunately, that flaw always proves to be the undoing of the Objectivist Libertarians like Ryan — not just because it energizes and mobilizes the left, but because it mobilizes people of faith as well , and as we well know, there are many people of faith in the ranks of the GOP. I have long said that the republicans were headed for a split, that the religious right was going to get sick of getting nothing and split from the libertarian wing of the party. I think that all the bring-back-DADT and anti-abortion nonsense that they know is going nowhere is an effort to keep them from splitting off sooner rather than later. But fat lot of good that pandering is doing when the most prominent piece of republican legislation out there, that has dominated the news for three months now, causes true Christians to recoil in horror. * * * * * This post originally appeared at Show Me Progress and is part of a series I am writing as a blogging fellow for the Strengthen Social Security Campaign , a coalition of more than 270 national and state organizations dedicated to preserving and strengthening Social Security.

Continue reading …
Time, Newsweek Offered Cover Stories, 15 Pages to Mark Foley in 2006; But About 160 Tiny Words on Weinergate

Brent Bozell reminded readers of his column that the networks piled on 152 stories about Rep. Mark Foley in the story's first 12 days in the fall of 2006, but they weren’t the only ones with a vast left-wing disparity. Time and Newsweek each devoted cover stories and multiple pages to the Foley scandal. Time put an elephant’s rear end on the cover with the words “What a Mess…Why a tawdry Washington sex scandal may spell the end of the Republican revolution”. Newsweek had a huge picture of Foley (with a small President Bush in front of his face) with the huge headline “Off Message” and the subhead “Foley’s Secret Life: How a Predator’s E-mail Sex Scandal Could Cost Bush Congress.” Obviously, there were no Anthony Weiner cover stories this week (dated June 13): Time had Dr. Oz, and Newsweek mocked Mitt Romney’s Mormonism as they promoted the vulgar South Park musical “The Book of Mormon.” How many Weinergate pages inside? Do you have to guess? There's not a “page” at all. Time magazine was funnier: try reading the whole issue for any mention of Weiner. There’s no news story, no funny quote from Weiner about “certitude” in the “Verbatim” feature. Then on page 83, in tiny six-point type in the “Pop Chart” feature, there are these tiny words: “A college student received a lewd picture from his allegedly hacked Twitter account.” Thirteen words and an tiny, upside-down picture. What a contrast: In 2006, Time’s table of contents page highlighted the cover story: “Whatever happened to the Republican revolution? The reformers who took Congress in 1994 are gone, replaced by pols who seem willing to do anything to hold power – even overlook a Congressman’s improprieties with teens.” Time devoted eight precious pages to the Foley scandal, including two hostile one-page columns from Time staffers answering the question “Mark Foley’s Real Sin Was…” TV columnist James Poniewozik compared Foley’s situation to Dateline NBC’s “To Catch a Predator” series. Gay activist/reporter John Cloud naturally insisted Foley’s sin was “Not Being True to Himself” as a gay man. Time also paid for a poll asking “Do you think Republican leaders in Congress handled the Foley situation properly or do you think they tried to cover it up?” It was 16 to 64 for a coverup. And: “Did the disclosure about Foley’s sexually explicit instant messages to teenage congressional pages and the h andling of this situation by the House Republican leadership make you less likely to vote for the Republican candidate in your district, more likely, or did it really have no effect on how you will vote?” (25 percent less likely, 4 for more, 68 no effect.) And: “Do you think Dennis Hastert should resign as Speaker because of his handling of the Foley case?” (39 yes, 38 no, 23 percent don’t know.) Perhaps these last two polling results convinced Time they'd succeeded at selling a coverup, but had to keep hammering away at Hastert on Foley before the voters went to the polls. In 2006, Foley was not only the Newsweek cover story – his story somehow required a team of eleven Newsweek staffers to handle this enormous scandal. Flood the zone! Newsweek added eight pages of coverage to Time’s seven. Editor Jon Meacham boasted up front: “As Michael Isikoff, Mark Hosenball, Holly Bailey, Debra Rosenberg, Richard Wolffe, Jonathan Darman, Arian Campo-Flores, Catharine Skipp and Catherine Gentile report in a story written by Evan Thomas, the revelation of Foley’s secret life – one that included instant messages to young House pages – sheds light on the larger culture of Washington and raises questions about the Republican leadership’s competence and accountability. And in the debut of his new reported column, Howard Fineman explores another GOP dilemma: unease within the party among politically conservative evangelicals.” Newsweek’s table of contents was blunt: “Fall of a Predator.” The Evan Thomas piece carried the subtitle “Mark Foley’s explicit e-mails could bring down the GOP. His story, and the fallout.” Next to that was a huge picture of Foley and President Bush. There were two items in the “Conventional Wisdom Watch” box: a down arrow for Bush (“Only good thing about Foley scandal is it keeps spotlight off Iraq fiasco. Gulp.”) and a down arrow for Hastert (“Won’t resign over page scandal – but will get fired as House speaker if Dems gake over in Nov.”) On the “Perspectives” quote page, they quoted Hastert saying “Ultimately…the buck stops here.” In 2011, Newsweek’s “coverage” of Weiner didn’t take eight pages or 11 reporters. It was only granted 148 words. There was no Democratic “fallout.” Newsweek was practicing “fallout containment.” There were eight tiny words in “Conventional Wisdom” on page 25, just “Junk shot puts House member in a pickle.” There was a dismissive 63-word paragraph in a Roger Ailes profile on page 10, and a few words on page 4 on “Perspectives.” They summarized: “The New York Congressman faced a PR nightmare after a lewd image was sent from his Twitter account, which Weiner clamed was hacked.

Continue reading …
Deadly Urban Dance of the Day: “By summer 2010, the…

Deadly Urban Dance of the Day: “By summer 2010, the expansion of bike lanes in NYC exposed a clash of long-standing bad habits — such as pedestrians jaywalking, cyclists running red lights, and motorists plowing through crosswalks.” In “ 3-Way Street ,” Ron Gabriel focuses on a single NYC intersection as part of a case study aimed at showing the responsibility we collective share “in improving the… Broadcasting platform : Vimeo Source : The Daily What Discovery Date : 08/06/2011 01:22 Number of articles : 5

Continue reading …

NATO continued to pound Moammar Gadhafi’s compound into the wee hours today, dropping a total of 80 bombs on it and other targets around Tripoli, reports the New York Times. The compound was largely decimated in the shelling, and Gadhafi’s whereabouts remain unknown, though he taunted NATO in a 10-minute…

Continue reading …
Emma Watson: Guys Are Intimidated By Me, I Wasn’t Bullied At Brown

About to take on evil wizard Voldemort for the very last time, Emma Watson stands ready, finally, to take on her next challenge. “I was in denial,” she told the Sunday Times Style Magazine about her brief retreat into the anonymity of college life. “I wanted to pretend I wasn’t as famous as I was. I was trying to seek out normality, but I kind of have to accept who I am, the position I’m in and what happened.” The position she’s in is beloved megastar of the most successful movie franchise in the world. And while her run in “Harry Potter,” is ending with next month’s eighth and final volume, “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2,” she has plenty more on her plate. Watson is the new face of Lancome, and is set to star in the big screen adaptation of the angst-teen novel “The Perks of Being a Wallflower.” As for that foray into college — she took a break this spring — she swears she’s not done with her education and will be returning to school in the fall. And while she won’t be going back to Brown, she swear it has nothing to do with alleged bullying. “It made me so sad when all this stuff came out that I left Brown because I was being bullied. It made no sense at all. Brown has been the opposite. I’ve never even been asked for an autograph on campus. I threw a party for nearly 100 students and not a single person put a photo on Facebook,” she told the paper. “Anyway, even if I was being given a hard time, I wasn’t going to wuss out of university because someone said ‘Wingardium leviosa’ to me in a corridor, or ‘Ten points for Gryffindor.’ I’ve been dealing with the media since I was nine. If I can’t stand up to a few people giving me a hard time, it’s a bit pathetic, really. I’ve had so much worse.” Watson does admit, however, that dating has been a bit of a problem for her as of late. “I say to my friends, ‘Why hasn’t X called me? Why doesn’t anyone ever pursue me?’ They’re like, ‘Probably because they’re intimidated.’ It must be the fame wall,” she said. “It must be the circus that goes around me. Me, as a person, I find it hard to believe I would be intimidating.” In fact, when she does hear from guys, it’s not always a positive experience. “Sometimes, maybe because they feel intimidated, they feel they have to knock me down. They know perfectly well who I am, but they’ll ask me, ‘How are the Narnia films going?’” she laments. “I’m single at the minute.” For much more, click over to the Times Sunday Style Magazine or the blog WatsonUncensored.

Continue reading …