myview921 says: @ lyndsayfarlow here’s your story http://t.co/IKrJLnVT it reads that Jobs acknowledgd Lias at 2. Great story> much frm Lisa @ Scruffbucket
Continue reading …“I’m self-destructive,” I told my psychiatrist weeks after my brother’s funeral. “That’s what I like about you,” he said. “You’re honest.” Awkward pause. Did he really just say that? I wondered. “What I mean is, I don’t think my meds are working,” I said, although what I really wanted to say was shut.the.hell.up. It had been almost a month since my eldest brother, Donnie, died and still grief was difficult to reach. Twenty years my senior, Donnie was in and out of my family’s life based on his needs — money, a job, a place to crash, someone to keep his kids for the afternoon. He spent the rest of his time, as far as I understood, in pursuit of the next high. So it wasn’t a shock when his flirtation with death proved fatal. Showing up to his funeral was like showing up to a surprise party you already knew about. I couldn’t adequately feign the proper emotions. I was impatient watching everyone kneel by his body in tears. I was angry that his children were without their dad. I figured I’d probably never feel any sadness and explained away my lack of tears with the fact that our relationship, what there was of it, was complicated. And then one night, a month after his passing, I found myself drunk and full of rage, punching my pillows senseless until I passed out. The well was no longer dry. At a dinner earlier that night, I had been seated between two people who spent the meal talking about what happens to the body as it dies. They talked about it like two people would talk about a movie one has seen and the other must see. “It sounds like a train rumbling.” “Air comes out of every orifice.” “The body fights to live, just in case there’s a chance it can be saved.” I stared across the empty table off into the distance, twirling my hair nervously. This is what happens when grief is late, I told myself — no one knows it’s there. * * * The Donnie I knew tortured my father. He lied. Stole. Cheated. He scared me. There were times when I feared Donnie would finally snap and kill my parents — his behavior got that outrageous. Donnie was the sibling I rarely mentioned to people I was trying to impress. To people I felt safe with, I described him as the black sheep. Off the tracks. Embarrassing. Pathetic. Selfish. When I was a child, Donnie would talk to me about inappropriate things — sex, drugs, ex-girlfriends. At the time that’s just what I thought brothers did, and then I grew up and realized that’s what sick people do. Drunks. Druggies. So when I read through the comments on his online obituary days after his death, I wondered, Who are they talking about? “His experience and strength, which he shared passionately, provided hope to many who had none.” “I remember all the times we prayed together wondering about heaven and God. I believe in my heart that is where you are and all your questions are answered.” “Donnie I will miss u very much, you were like the brother I never had.” Donnie’s only influence on me was to instill a strong sense of what I should never become. He started drinking at nine, so I didn’t taste my first beer until 15. Donnie started doing drugs in middle school, I didn’t try them until college. Donnie never went to college, never had a career. I did both, with ambition. But no matter how far I tried to run away from any connection to him, the comparisons were still made. Family does that, I guess. Despite all the ways in which we weren’t alike, my parents would point out all our similarities — the sense of humor, the obsessive compulsiveness, the hypochondria, the paranoia. I’d rather have been compared to the youngest of my brothers, Damon. He’s the Ivy-league educated, mother’s dream come true — athletic, popular, attractive, a doctor. I tried to follow Damon’s lead, but it never quite panned out. Instead, no matter how hard I tried to draw a firm line in the sand, I’ve always felt on the edge of that line, one misstep away from becoming him. Donnie. It wasn’t until after Donnie died that I could admit how much of him I saw in myself. There are times when I’ve been afraid to die because I’m so afraid to live. I’ve called my mom at 2AM warning her that this was the last stop on my ride, that I just can’t take it anymore. Friends have seen cuts on my wrists and scars on my legs. Dieticians know about the binging and purging. Self-loathing has leaked out of the most secure vaults, perhaps on purpose. But I also realized that by spending his life slowly killing himself, Donnie had given me room to create my own smaller crises — and pull myself out of them. Compared to Donnie’s faults, my own seemed insignificant. After all, there was always someone I most definitely was not, and I was safe there, the low voltage version of insanity. Once my brother died, that all changed. Looking at Donnie in his coffin, all the desperate moments of my own self-destruction rushed through my mind like an old VHS on fast forward. * * * The day of the funeral was also my nephew’s 16th birthday. “How could you?” I’ve asked Donnie throughout the years, in my mind, and I asked him one more time that day. “Why? For what?” The only thing we know about Donnie’s death is that he had been in the hospital the night before and sometime during his stay removed his I.V. and walked out. In the morning, his neighbor stopped by to visit him and discovered his lifeless body in a chair. Because toxicology reports are not required for people who die from “natural causes” (no matter their age), we’ll never know what exactly happened — his heart stopped, but why? What time? Did he rumble like a train? Did his body fight to live? But I don’t really need a toxicology report to explain my brother’s passing. At this point, it’s just a formality. I’m not sure I’ll ever come to terms with the fact that Donnie is gone or how he went. I always thought I didn’t care whether he was alive or not. Then he died, and I saw that a series of self-destructive acts could actually lead to complete self-destruction. This was what he had kept me safe from knowing all these years. And the resentment I felt after he died was, I think, about distancing myself from that truth just a little longer. But now that I see it, that it is a very real option to end up in a coffin at 49, I can choose the alternative — to live through my lows, to not let them take over. Somehow realizing that made it easier to finally mourn my brother. I could even feel something close to love for him — not because he was some great guy in my life, but because if I can love him, just love him, then we are not the same. Then I am still here, making the choices he didn’t. Need help? In the U.S., call 1-800-273-8255 for the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline.
Continue reading …“It’s an outrage that federal money has been an enabler for NPR and PBS since 1967 in their efforts to undermine conservatives and Christians,” NewsBusters publisher Brent Bozell complained in a statement released this morning that accompanies the release of a new Media Research Center (MRC) study detailing a comprehensive compilation of the 20 most memorable leftist excesses of National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting System. “In this current era of huge deficits, surely this is the most non-essential spending. The pattern of bias from PBS hosts and contributors is more than severe. Now is the time for Congress to finally put an end to it,” the MRC founder argued. Some of the 20 instances in the MRC’s report on NPR & PBS include: PBS host Tavis Smiley insists America has a terrible Christian terrorist problem. In 2010, he told an author that Christians blow up people “every day” in the United States. NPR reporter Nina Totenberg wishes Jesse Helms death from AIDS. When Helms insisted in 1995 that AIDS drew a disproportionate amount of federal funding, Totenberg was disproportionately mean-spirited. PBS regular Julianne Malveaux hopes Clarence Thomas dies young of heart disease. On the talk show To the Contrary in 1994, panelist Malveaux proclaimed, “I hope his wife feeds him lots of eggs and butter and he dies early like many black men do, of heart disease.” Longtime PBS host Bill Moyers proclaims GOP officials wearing flag pins after 9/11 remind him of communist China. On his weekly show Now in 2003, Moyers ranted, “When I see flags sprouting on official lapels, I think of the time in China when I saw Mao's Little Red Book.” To see the full list from the MRC, visit here for the PDF version or here for the HTML version .
Continue reading …Guy Kawasaki and Chris Brogan at IMS 2011 Bill Reichert – Lessons from the Valley (Meetup PREI São Paulo) Colleges, Employers, Young People, Facebook alphalim says: + Guy Kawasaki interrupts his Facebook marketing webinar to talk about Steve Jobs. #ripstevejobs http://t.co/2b7YlMwt
Continue reading …Mac fans everywhere gathered online and at Apple stores offline last night, mourning the loss of Steve Jobs, reports the LA Times . There were flowers, memorabilia, and even a bagpipe player at the company headquarters in Cupertino, Calif., where the company flags flew at half-staff. At an Apple store in…
Continue reading …Ballad of Sacco & Vanzetti, Part 3 Joan Baez – Mary Hamilton (1965) Best Live Joan Baez – The River In The Pines (1965) Lyrics Beejicgr says: RT @ nagarajkeshav : once HH Jobs dated Joan Baez
Continue reading …Forget Favre!! (Forget YOU! Parody) Aaron Rodgers: Brett Favre and His Packers Legacy on SiriusXM HD LeSean McCoy & DeSean Jackson Highlight Video 2010-2011 SedaGirl says: Aaron Rodgers , Brett Favre “Feud”: Much Ado About Nothing http://t.co/U0YgMnZ8
Continue reading …CHARLES NAPIER RIP (1936 – 2011) Charles Napier 1936 – 2011 FELONY (1995, clip) Lance Henriksen 5MinsToMidnight says: RT @ bearmccreary : Charles Napier also passed away today. RIP Tucker McElroy and the booming voice of Duke Phillips. What a day. Can we start over tomorrow?
Continue reading …The industry will be forced to pay for their carbon emissions on all flights to and from, as well as within, Europe Airlines can be charged for their greenhouse gas emissions on flights to and from Europe, according to a landmark court ruling on Thursday. The indicative ruling, by the advocate general of the European court of justice , is a blow to airlines and non-European governments that had hoped to escape from the extension of the European Union’s emissions trading scheme to cover air transport from next year. It was greeted with jubilation by environmental campaigners, who want to ensure that emissions from aviation are subject to the same controls as those of other industries. If the ruling is followed, airlines will be forced from next year to pay for their carbon emissions on all flights to and from, as well as within, Europe. Sarah Burt, staff attorney at the campaigning organisation Earthjustice , said: “In the absence of an effective global measure for reining in greenhouse gases from aviation, the EU law is a necessary step to address this significant and rapidly expanding source of pollution. We are pleased that the advocate general’s opinion confirms the legality of this important action.” The UK’s climate change minister, Greg Barker, said: “We welcome today’s legal opinion. The UK and EU will continue to robustly defend our policy to bring aviation into the EU’s emissions trading system and believe it is consistent with international law. The aviation industry, in the same way as other industries, needs to play its part in reducing emissions.” If successful, Europe’s move to include international flights in its emissions trading system will be the first time that emissions from flights – which make up about 2 to 3% of global greenhouse gases – have been regulated. Aviation and maritime transport were explicitly excluded from the 1997 Kyoto protocol , the only international binding treaty on emissions reduction. Air industry bodies that helped bring the case to court vowed to fight on. The Air Transport Association said: “[We are] disappointed that Advocate General Kokott does not believe that the European Union is bound by the Chicago Convention , the treaty governing aviation, and that the unilateral application of the EU [emissions trading sytem] to international aviation otherwise does not violate law. ATA’s view that the extension of this unilateral, regional scheme to aviation violates international law is supported by more than 20 countries, including Brazil, Russia, India, China, Japan, the United States and many others, which recently reconfirmed their opposition to the EU.” Under the EU’s plans, all flights to, from and within Europe will be subject to emissions trading, a system whereby companies must have permits to cover the carbon dioxide they produce. A small number of permits are allocated to companies for free, while the rest must be paid for, and the proportion of free permits is reduced over time. At present, the permits are changing hands for about €14 per tonne on the open market. The trading system will add to airlines’ costs, at a level of as much as €5-10 per passenger, according to some estimates. All of the costs are likely to be passed on to passengers, raising ticket prices. Airlines based outside Europe have bitterly opposed the plans , arguing that the trading system amounts to a tax, which is illegal under international rules on aviation. The US, China and other non-EU governments have taken up the cause , vowing to fight the plans in all legal forums available. Thursday’s ruling – an indicative and preliminary finding by one senior judge – was a severe setback to their legal challenges, but is not the end. The governments, and airlines, will continue to fight against the EU in the courts and explore other options. The ATA said: “Today’s action is an important step in the court process, but as it is a non-binding preliminary opinion it does not mark the end of this case. The opinion will provide a basis on which the judges assigned to the case can further deliberate and come to a full and unanimous decision. In complex cases such as this one, it would not be unusual for the full court’s final opinion to vary from the preliminary opinion.” Outside the international legal system, however, the opportunities for airlines are limited, as mooted alternatives such as stopping or refuelling outside the EU in order to avoid the charge are likely to cost more than paying it. Analysts also regard it as extremely unlikely that the cost of trading permits will diminish the number of flights into and out of Europe. Governments such as the US have argued that the International Civil Aviation Organisation should be in charge of reducing emissions from international aviation. ICAO has discussed ways of cutting emissions from aviation for most of the last decade. It has yet to come forward with binding plans that would reduce emissions. In his legal opinion, the advocate general said: “The EU institutions could not reasonably be required to give the ICAO bodies unlimited time in which to develop a multilateral solution.” Annie Petsonk, international counsel at the US-based Environmental Defense Fund , said: “Airlines operate in a global market, and the reality is that those markets will be increasingly carbon-constrained. It’s time for the US airlines to provide leadership and demonstrate that we can compete in the carbon-limited markets of the 21st century. No lawsuit will stop climate change or its effects, so it’s time to move forward and implement the solutions already available: Europe’s aviation directive.” Richard Dyer, transport campaigner at Friends of the Earth , urged governments to spend more time considering lower carbon forms of transport. He said: “The aviation industry has consistently opposed measures to protect our economy and our environment from global warming – the EU must stand firm and force the sector to play its part. Governments must also take action to make alternatives to short-haul flights, such as making long-distance rail travel cheaper and easier to use.” Carbon offsetting Air transport Airline industry Carbon emissions Climate change European Union Fiona Harvey guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Fan and toaster rule 34 – search on RAGE – Austin Jimithebum – Rule 34 hostreviewerorg says: http://t.co/d583SraO ;P rule 34 E-Discovery Emergence in Civil Litigation
Continue reading …