Ayman al-Zawahri, al-Qaida deputy leader under Osama bin Laden, will lead the militant network in the wake of bin Laden’s death. The announcement about his appointment appeared on the Internet Thursday. (16 June 2011)
Continue reading …Fire swept through a family’s home early Thursday that appeared to have no smoke detectors, killing six people, including four children, fire officials said. (June 16)
Continue reading …Fire swept through a family’s home early Thursday that appeared to have no smoke detectors, killing six people, including four children, fire officials said. (June 16)
Continue reading …Fire swept through a family’s home early Thursday that appeared to have no smoke detectors, killing six people, including four children, fire officials said. (June 16)
Continue reading …Fire swept through a family’s home early Thursday that appeared to have no smoke detectors, killing six people, including four children, fire officials said. (June 16)
Continue reading …Republicans in Congress make fools of themselves yet again on a hearing that they are leading. Can’t they take any issue seriously except for trying to undermine the rights of women or cut off funds to Planned Parenthood? When you’re a hack, you’re a hack. Rep. Daryl Issa made a mockery out of his own hearing on Capitol Hill when he tried to shut up his own frakkin’ witness who tried to testify about an ATF program that went bad: The head of the House Oversight committee muted one of his invited witnesses on Wednesday for testifying in favor of tougher gun laws. Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said an ATF official’s promotion of gun reform fell “outside the scope” of the hearing and “would not be considered valid testimony.” Appearing before the panel, Peter Forcelli, a special agent for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), told lawmakers that straw purchasers – those who buy guns on behalf of others – should be hit with stiffer penalties to discourage gun trafficking. “I think perhaps a mandatory minimum one-year sentence might deter an individual from buying a gun,” Forcelli said. He was responding to a question from Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.), who said the current penalties are so weak that they discourage state prosecutors from pursuing straw-purchase cases. Forcelli agreed the current penalties do little to intimidate straw purchasers. That brief exchange prompted Issa to intervene. “We’re not here to talk about proposed gun legislation,” Issa said. Political Correction: We’re repeatedly asked whether Rep. Darrell Issa’s (R-CA) hearings into a controversial ATF operation that allowed certain shipments of firearms to cross the border into Mexico would also address the weak statutory authority that law enforcement are forced to rely on to prevent trafficking to Mexican drug cartels. Today, we learned that law enforcement witnesses called by Issa are eager to discuss the issue, but the Oversight Committee chairman is willing to do everything in his power to stop that problem from coming to the forefront. During this morning’s hearing, Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) asked ATF Special Agent Peter Forcelli whether he has heard that district judges criticize the prosecutions of straw purchasers as “paper violations” because they are based on statutes that carry such low penalties. Forcelli replied, “I have, and I agree with it,” and called for a one-year mandatory minimum sentence for such offenses to better deter purchasers. Issa immediately broke in to cut off this line of discussion, saying that the witness was testifying outside of the scope of the hearing. After an extended exchange between Issa and Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) in which Cummings said that Issa couldn’t tell the witness what to testify to, Maloney explained why this line of questioning is crucial. ISSA: I’d only caution we’re not here to talk about proposed gun legislation. That would be outside the scope of this hearing. MALONEY: I wasn’t discussing that. I was trying to figure out why the Justice Department and the [Inspector General] found that prosecutors often decline these gun cases. I want to know why they’re declining them. And to quote from the testimony, one of you said because they believe it is difficult to obtain convictions in these violations. Aren’t Republicans supposed to be tough on crime? We’re talking about guns being brought into Satan’s backyard; or if you’re not talking to Pat Buchanan—Mexico. Here’s what this hearing is about: Issa had called the hearing to examine a controversial ATF operation – dubbed “Fast and Furious” – that put firearms into the hands of known drug smugglers in order to track them to Mexican cartel leaders. Hundreds of those firearms have gone missing and several have been linked indirectly to the murder of border patrol agent Brian Terry, who was killed in a December firefight in Arizona. Terry’s family submitted a statement to Wednesday’s oversight hearing, calling for the prosecution of everyone – even government agents – involved in the tragedy. Why aren’t the penalties for bring guns into Mexico relevant to the investigation? I guess his NRA buddies wouldn’t approve.
Continue reading …Republicans in Congress make fools of themselves yet again on a hearing that they are leading. Can’t they take any issue seriously except for trying to undermine the rights of women or cut off funds to Planned Parenthood? When you’re a hack, you’re a hack. Rep. Daryl Issa made a mockery out of his own hearing on Capitol Hill when he tried to shut up his own frakkin’ witness who tried to testify about an ATF program that went bad: The head of the House Oversight committee muted one of his invited witnesses on Wednesday for testifying in favor of tougher gun laws. Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said an ATF official’s promotion of gun reform fell “outside the scope” of the hearing and “would not be considered valid testimony.” Appearing before the panel, Peter Forcelli, a special agent for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), told lawmakers that straw purchasers – those who buy guns on behalf of others – should be hit with stiffer penalties to discourage gun trafficking. “I think perhaps a mandatory minimum one-year sentence might deter an individual from buying a gun,” Forcelli said. He was responding to a question from Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.), who said the current penalties are so weak that they discourage state prosecutors from pursuing straw-purchase cases. Forcelli agreed the current penalties do little to intimidate straw purchasers. That brief exchange prompted Issa to intervene. “We’re not here to talk about proposed gun legislation,” Issa said. Political Correction: We’re repeatedly asked whether Rep. Darrell Issa’s (R-CA) hearings into a controversial ATF operation that allowed certain shipments of firearms to cross the border into Mexico would also address the weak statutory authority that law enforcement are forced to rely on to prevent trafficking to Mexican drug cartels. Today, we learned that law enforcement witnesses called by Issa are eager to discuss the issue, but the Oversight Committee chairman is willing to do everything in his power to stop that problem from coming to the forefront. During this morning’s hearing, Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) asked ATF Special Agent Peter Forcelli whether he has heard that district judges criticize the prosecutions of straw purchasers as “paper violations” because they are based on statutes that carry such low penalties. Forcelli replied, “I have, and I agree with it,” and called for a one-year mandatory minimum sentence for such offenses to better deter purchasers. Issa immediately broke in to cut off this line of discussion, saying that the witness was testifying outside of the scope of the hearing. After an extended exchange between Issa and Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) in which Cummings said that Issa couldn’t tell the witness what to testify to, Maloney explained why this line of questioning is crucial. ISSA: I’d only caution we’re not here to talk about proposed gun legislation. That would be outside the scope of this hearing. MALONEY: I wasn’t discussing that. I was trying to figure out why the Justice Department and the [Inspector General] found that prosecutors often decline these gun cases. I want to know why they’re declining them. And to quote from the testimony, one of you said because they believe it is difficult to obtain convictions in these violations. Aren’t Republicans supposed to be tough on crime? We’re talking about guns being brought into Satan’s backyard; or if you’re not talking to Pat Buchanan—Mexico. Here’s what this hearing is about: Issa had called the hearing to examine a controversial ATF operation – dubbed “Fast and Furious” – that put firearms into the hands of known drug smugglers in order to track them to Mexican cartel leaders. Hundreds of those firearms have gone missing and several have been linked indirectly to the murder of border patrol agent Brian Terry, who was killed in a December firefight in Arizona. Terry’s family submitted a statement to Wednesday’s oversight hearing, calling for the prosecution of everyone – even government agents – involved in the tragedy. Why aren’t the penalties for bring guns into Mexico relevant to the investigation? I guess his NRA buddies wouldn’t approve.
Continue reading …Republicans in Congress make fools of themselves yet again on a hearing that they are leading. Can’t they take any issue seriously except for trying to undermine the rights of women or cut off funds to Planned Parenthood? When you’re a hack, you’re a hack. Rep. Daryl Issa made a mockery out of his own hearing on Capitol Hill when he tried to shut up his own frakkin’ witness who tried to testify about an ATF program that went bad: The head of the House Oversight committee muted one of his invited witnesses on Wednesday for testifying in favor of tougher gun laws. Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said an ATF official’s promotion of gun reform fell “outside the scope” of the hearing and “would not be considered valid testimony.” Appearing before the panel, Peter Forcelli, a special agent for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), told lawmakers that straw purchasers – those who buy guns on behalf of others – should be hit with stiffer penalties to discourage gun trafficking. “I think perhaps a mandatory minimum one-year sentence might deter an individual from buying a gun,” Forcelli said. He was responding to a question from Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.), who said the current penalties are so weak that they discourage state prosecutors from pursuing straw-purchase cases. Forcelli agreed the current penalties do little to intimidate straw purchasers. That brief exchange prompted Issa to intervene. “We’re not here to talk about proposed gun legislation,” Issa said. Political Correction: We’re repeatedly asked whether Rep. Darrell Issa’s (R-CA) hearings into a controversial ATF operation that allowed certain shipments of firearms to cross the border into Mexico would also address the weak statutory authority that law enforcement are forced to rely on to prevent trafficking to Mexican drug cartels. Today, we learned that law enforcement witnesses called by Issa are eager to discuss the issue, but the Oversight Committee chairman is willing to do everything in his power to stop that problem from coming to the forefront. During this morning’s hearing, Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) asked ATF Special Agent Peter Forcelli whether he has heard that district judges criticize the prosecutions of straw purchasers as “paper violations” because they are based on statutes that carry such low penalties. Forcelli replied, “I have, and I agree with it,” and called for a one-year mandatory minimum sentence for such offenses to better deter purchasers. Issa immediately broke in to cut off this line of discussion, saying that the witness was testifying outside of the scope of the hearing. After an extended exchange between Issa and Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) in which Cummings said that Issa couldn’t tell the witness what to testify to, Maloney explained why this line of questioning is crucial. ISSA: I’d only caution we’re not here to talk about proposed gun legislation. That would be outside the scope of this hearing. MALONEY: I wasn’t discussing that. I was trying to figure out why the Justice Department and the [Inspector General] found that prosecutors often decline these gun cases. I want to know why they’re declining them. And to quote from the testimony, one of you said because they believe it is difficult to obtain convictions in these violations. Aren’t Republicans supposed to be tough on crime? We’re talking about guns being brought into Satan’s backyard; or if you’re not talking to Pat Buchanan—Mexico. Here’s what this hearing is about: Issa had called the hearing to examine a controversial ATF operation – dubbed “Fast and Furious” – that put firearms into the hands of known drug smugglers in order to track them to Mexican cartel leaders. Hundreds of those firearms have gone missing and several have been linked indirectly to the murder of border patrol agent Brian Terry, who was killed in a December firefight in Arizona. Terry’s family submitted a statement to Wednesday’s oversight hearing, calling for the prosecution of everyone – even government agents – involved in the tragedy. Why aren’t the penalties for bring guns into Mexico relevant to the investigation? I guess his NRA buddies wouldn’t approve.
Continue reading …Republicans in Congress make fools of themselves yet again on a hearing that they are leading. Can’t they take any issue seriously except for trying to undermine the rights of women or cut off funds to Planned Parenthood? When you’re a hack, you’re a hack. Rep. Daryl Issa made a mockery out of his own hearing on Capitol Hill when he tried to shut up his own frakkin’ witness who tried to testify about an ATF program that went bad: The head of the House Oversight committee muted one of his invited witnesses on Wednesday for testifying in favor of tougher gun laws. Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said an ATF official’s promotion of gun reform fell “outside the scope” of the hearing and “would not be considered valid testimony.” Appearing before the panel, Peter Forcelli, a special agent for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), told lawmakers that straw purchasers – those who buy guns on behalf of others – should be hit with stiffer penalties to discourage gun trafficking. “I think perhaps a mandatory minimum one-year sentence might deter an individual from buying a gun,” Forcelli said. He was responding to a question from Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.), who said the current penalties are so weak that they discourage state prosecutors from pursuing straw-purchase cases. Forcelli agreed the current penalties do little to intimidate straw purchasers. That brief exchange prompted Issa to intervene. “We’re not here to talk about proposed gun legislation,” Issa said. Political Correction: We’re repeatedly asked whether Rep. Darrell Issa’s (R-CA) hearings into a controversial ATF operation that allowed certain shipments of firearms to cross the border into Mexico would also address the weak statutory authority that law enforcement are forced to rely on to prevent trafficking to Mexican drug cartels. Today, we learned that law enforcement witnesses called by Issa are eager to discuss the issue, but the Oversight Committee chairman is willing to do everything in his power to stop that problem from coming to the forefront. During this morning’s hearing, Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) asked ATF Special Agent Peter Forcelli whether he has heard that district judges criticize the prosecutions of straw purchasers as “paper violations” because they are based on statutes that carry such low penalties. Forcelli replied, “I have, and I agree with it,” and called for a one-year mandatory minimum sentence for such offenses to better deter purchasers. Issa immediately broke in to cut off this line of discussion, saying that the witness was testifying outside of the scope of the hearing. After an extended exchange between Issa and Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) in which Cummings said that Issa couldn’t tell the witness what to testify to, Maloney explained why this line of questioning is crucial. ISSA: I’d only caution we’re not here to talk about proposed gun legislation. That would be outside the scope of this hearing. MALONEY: I wasn’t discussing that. I was trying to figure out why the Justice Department and the [Inspector General] found that prosecutors often decline these gun cases. I want to know why they’re declining them. And to quote from the testimony, one of you said because they believe it is difficult to obtain convictions in these violations. Aren’t Republicans supposed to be tough on crime? We’re talking about guns being brought into Satan’s backyard; or if you’re not talking to Pat Buchanan—Mexico. Here’s what this hearing is about: Issa had called the hearing to examine a controversial ATF operation – dubbed “Fast and Furious” – that put firearms into the hands of known drug smugglers in order to track them to Mexican cartel leaders. Hundreds of those firearms have gone missing and several have been linked indirectly to the murder of border patrol agent Brian Terry, who was killed in a December firefight in Arizona. Terry’s family submitted a statement to Wednesday’s oversight hearing, calling for the prosecution of everyone – even government agents – involved in the tragedy. Why aren’t the penalties for bring guns into Mexico relevant to the investigation? I guess his NRA buddies wouldn’t approve.
Continue reading …When we first read about Deep Shot, we were admittedly dumbfounded, but equally impressed. The “technology” allows you to “capture” the current state of a website on your desktop and transfer it to a mobile device — taking a picture of a Google Map on your desktop with your smartphone camera will open the site in the same state on your phone, for example. Sounds like a pretty neat magic trick, huh? Well, it’s not. In order to use Deep Shot, you need to install an app on your mobile, computer, and any other device you plan to use it with — thus making it even less practical than Chrome to Phone . It currently works with Google Maps and Yelp , but could theoretically be used with any site that uses URIs, or those lengthy URLs that contain search details, such as the origin and destination addresses you sent to Google Maps. You could also “transfer” a site in its “current state” by emailing the URI, or by using an app to seamlessly share it over WiFi or Bluetooth with a “send to mobile” button — which is likely what Deep Shot is doing here anyway, just with an extra step thrown into the mix. Care to visit a land where you can swim with the Loch Ness Monster and ride a pink unicorn? Head past the break for Deep Shot’s coming out video, which curiously makes no mention of the required desktop software. Continue reading Deep Shot transfers open websites from desktop to mobile, sans wizardry Deep Shot transfers open websites from desktop to mobile, sans wizardry originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:03:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …