Harmondsworth under spotlight for holding detainees as long as three years at a cost of £110 a night, says IMB report Ministers have been warned by an official immigration watchdog of the “excessively long” periods, including cases of more than three years, that detainees are being held at Europe’s largest removal centre. A “snapshot” taken last December showed that 35 detainees at Harmondsworth removal centre, near Heathrow airport, had been waiting more than 12 months to be deported, including seven who had been waiting more than two years. Harmondsworth’s officially appointed independent monitoring board (IMB) said one man had been held in detention for three years and seven months at a cost of £110 a night. The bill is already more than £144,000. “This is not only emotionally costly to detainees but expensive for the taxpayer,” says the IMB’s annual report to the immigration minister, Damian Green. It adds that the latest national figures show that as of 3 March, 170 detainees around the country have been held more than two years waiting for their removal. The watchdog raises the problem of “hidden children” being held in immigration detention centres despite the coalition’s pledge to end the practice. The IMB’s annual report reveals that six children who were held last year at Harmondsworth were removed by social services when it had been established they were children. The watchdog said they were part of the problem of young people being detained by the UK Border Agency as adults despite claiming to be under 18. “Arrangements should be made for the rapid assessment of those claiming to be under 18,” the IMB reported. Harmondsworth, which is run by a US private security company, GEO, became the largest immigration detention centre in Europe last year when four prison-style wings were opened, trebling the total capacity to 615 people. The report was published as a freedom of information request revealed a surge of complaints last year against the security company G4S over its running of four immigration removal centres. In 2010 the company received 773 complaints from detainees – 240 more than the previous year. Nearly 130 of the complaints were fully or partially substantiated. Most concerned lost property, poor quality food or poor communication but 25 of the complaints that were substantiated involved the conduct of individual members of staff. They included two complaints of serious assault by staff on detainees at Harmondsworth and at Tinsley House, near Gatwick. A third case of assault at Harmondsworth is still being investigated. G4S lost the contract to carry out immigration deportations last year. A police investigation continues into the case of Jimmy Mubenga, an Angolan who died after being restrained by three G4S guards on a flight . A spokesman for G4S said: “Anyone detained within our immigration facilities is given every opportunity to raise concerns about either the treatment they receive from our staff or the services we provide. “The level of substantiated complaints against our employees over the last three years, at 25, is extremely low and of a minor nature, albeit we take each one very seriously. “The vast majority of upheld complaints relate to issues at Brook House IRC, which houses some of the UK’s most challenging detainees, including a number of convicted criminals, prior to their deportation.” David Wood, head of criminality and detention at the UK Border Agency, said: “The way that complaints are processed and recorded has been made simpler in recent years, which has led to a rise in recording. “Complaints range from issues about the food served at mealtimes to more serious issues. Importantly these figures show a decrease in substantiated complaints and that the majority of complaints are minor and relate to availability of facilities at the centres.” Immigration and asylum Human rights Jimmy Mubenga Children Alan Travis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Harmondsworth under spotlight for holding detainees as long as three years at a cost of £110 a night, says IMB report Ministers have been warned by an official immigration watchdog of the “excessively long” periods, including cases of more than three years, that detainees are being held at Europe’s largest removal centre. A “snapshot” taken last December showed that 35 detainees at Harmondsworth removal centre, near Heathrow airport, had been waiting more than 12 months to be deported, including seven who had been waiting more than two years. Harmondsworth’s officially appointed independent monitoring board (IMB) said one man had been held in detention for three years and seven months at a cost of £110 a night. The bill is already more than £144,000. “This is not only emotionally costly to detainees but expensive for the taxpayer,” says the IMB’s annual report to the immigration minister, Damian Green. It adds that the latest national figures show that as of 3 March, 170 detainees around the country have been held more than two years waiting for their removal. The watchdog raises the problem of “hidden children” being held in immigration detention centres despite the coalition’s pledge to end the practice. The IMB’s annual report reveals that six children who were held last year at Harmondsworth were removed by social services when it had been established they were children. The watchdog said they were part of the problem of young people being detained by the UK Border Agency as adults despite claiming to be under 18. “Arrangements should be made for the rapid assessment of those claiming to be under 18,” the IMB reported. Harmondsworth, which is run by a US private security company, GEO, became the largest immigration detention centre in Europe last year when four prison-style wings were opened, trebling the total capacity to 615 people. The report was published as a freedom of information request revealed a surge of complaints last year against the security company G4S over its running of four immigration removal centres. In 2010 the company received 773 complaints from detainees – 240 more than the previous year. Nearly 130 of the complaints were fully or partially substantiated. Most concerned lost property, poor quality food or poor communication but 25 of the complaints that were substantiated involved the conduct of individual members of staff. They included two complaints of serious assault by staff on detainees at Harmondsworth and at Tinsley House, near Gatwick. A third case of assault at Harmondsworth is still being investigated. G4S lost the contract to carry out immigration deportations last year. A police investigation continues into the case of Jimmy Mubenga, an Angolan who died after being restrained by three G4S guards on a flight . A spokesman for G4S said: “Anyone detained within our immigration facilities is given every opportunity to raise concerns about either the treatment they receive from our staff or the services we provide. “The level of substantiated complaints against our employees over the last three years, at 25, is extremely low and of a minor nature, albeit we take each one very seriously. “The vast majority of upheld complaints relate to issues at Brook House IRC, which houses some of the UK’s most challenging detainees, including a number of convicted criminals, prior to their deportation.” David Wood, head of criminality and detention at the UK Border Agency, said: “The way that complaints are processed and recorded has been made simpler in recent years, which has led to a rise in recording. “Complaints range from issues about the food served at mealtimes to more serious issues. Importantly these figures show a decrease in substantiated complaints and that the majority of complaints are minor and relate to availability of facilities at the centres.” Immigration and asylum Human rights Jimmy Mubenga Children Alan Travis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …New York City police have begun an investigation into an online posting supposedly from a convicted felon who claims to have shot and robbed slain rapper Tupac Shakur. (June 16)
Continue reading …Tuesday night’s “Daily Show” focused on the second debate between the GOP’s potential Presidential candidates, this time taking place on CNN instead of Fox News. In this “Indecision 2012″ segment, Stewart is able to grade Santorum, Bachmann, Pawlenty, Gingrich, Romney, Cain, and Paul on their answers to the typical questions at every early debate. First there was the “comparing of the Christmas cards” as Stewart put it, where the candidates list all their children and describe their families in the noblest of lights (except Newt Gingrich). Stewart declared Michele Bachmann the “winner” with her five children and 23 foster kids. No argument here. Naturally all this baby talk led to the discussion of being pro-life, which of course pretty much all of them are. In fact, everyone was agreeing so much up until this point that Stewart wondered if anyone would get tripped up or just adhere to the same ideologies. Libertarian Ron Paul soon put that to rest by offering a long, rambling, political answer to the question of whether or not undocumented injured children should receive emergency care. “I’m sorry Congressman Paul, the correct answer is ‘Yes,’” Stewart said. Watch the full segment below to hear why Stewart calls Mitt Romney the debate’s “alpha candidate,” and how moderator John King decided the debate was a complete success due to how much attention it got on Twitter. WATCH: International users click here to watch on the “Daily Show” website
Continue reading …Tuesday night’s “Daily Show” focused on the second debate between the GOP’s potential Presidential candidates, this time taking place on CNN instead of Fox News. In this “Indecision 2012″ segment, Stewart is able to grade Santorum, Bachmann, Pawlenty, Gingrich, Romney, Cain, and Paul on their answers to the typical questions at every early debate. First there was the “comparing of the Christmas cards” as Stewart put it, where the candidates list all their children and describe their families in the noblest of lights (except Newt Gingrich). Stewart declared Michele Bachmann the “winner” with her five children and 23 foster kids. No argument here. Naturally all this baby talk led to the discussion of being pro-life, which of course pretty much all of them are. In fact, everyone was agreeing so much up until this point that Stewart wondered if anyone would get tripped up or just adhere to the same ideologies. Libertarian Ron Paul soon put that to rest by offering a long, rambling, political answer to the question of whether or not undocumented injured children should receive emergency care. “I’m sorry Congressman Paul, the correct answer is ‘Yes,’” Stewart said. Watch the full segment below to hear why Stewart calls Mitt Romney the debate’s “alpha candidate,” and how moderator John King decided the debate was a complete success due to how much attention it got on Twitter. WATCH: International users click here to watch on the “Daily Show” website
Continue reading …Looks like sharing videos over the cloud may be a risky task — if you’re using the box shown here on the left, that is. The Pogoplug Video hit the retail scene about two months ago , but Cloud Engines has already issued a recall after two devices nearly went up in flames. According to The Official Pogoplug Blog, the internal chip that handles video encoding can experience ” thermal runaways ” after long periods of use, which could cause the device to reach unsafe temperatures; this despite having a fan to keep things cool. The affected serial numbers include Pogo P-11 through 14, and the company asks that owners get in contact to setup a return and refund. In the meantime, it also suggests that the units be unplugged — a good idea if you want to avoid possibly burning the house down . Cloud Engines recalls potentially flammable Pogoplug Video originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:48:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …Tuesday night’s “Daily Show” focused on the second debate between the GOP’s potential Presidential candidates, this time taking place on CNN instead of Fox News. In this “Indecision 2012″ segment, Stewart is able to grade Santorum, Bachmann, Pawlenty, Gingrich, Romney, Cain, and Paul on their answers to the typical questions at every early debate. First there was the “comparing of the Christmas cards” as Stewart put it, where the candidates list all their children and describe their families in the noblest of lights (except Newt Gingrich). Stewart declared Michele Bachmann the “winner” with her five children and 23 foster kids. No argument here. Naturally all this baby talk led to the discussion of being pro-life, which of course pretty much all of them are. In fact, everyone was agreeing so much up until this point that Stewart wondered if anyone would get tripped up or just adhere to the same ideologies. Libertarian Ron Paul soon put that to rest by offering a long, rambling, political answer to the question of whether or not undocumented injured children should receive emergency care. “I’m sorry Congressman Paul, the correct answer is ‘Yes,’” Stewart said. Watch the full segment below to hear why Stewart calls Mitt Romney the debate’s “alpha candidate,” and how moderator John King decided the debate was a complete success due to how much attention it got on Twitter. WATCH: International users click here to watch on the “Daily Show” website
Continue reading …A marijuana grower who shot dead one burglar and critically injured another won’t be facing any charges at this time, say Colorado cops. Karen Cordova, 48, shot one burglar to death and stabbed another after they broke into her home, where she grows medical marijuana, the Longmont Times-Call reports. One…
Continue reading …Water levels on 40 rivers, including the Yangtze, above safety limits as authorities warn of dykes and dams under pressure China has evacuated more than 500,000 people from deadly floods that are devastating areas in the south of the country following the worst drought in 50 years. At least 105 people have been swept to their deaths or killed in landslides and another 65 are missing after rivers burst their banks. The authorities have issued the highest level of alarm about dykes and dams under dangerous pressure. Television channels that were only recently broadcasting images of dried-up lake beds are now carrying footage of flooded homes and boats plying their way through inundated streets. China Daily said 550,000 people have been forced to leave their homes. The dramatic shift is in line with weather trends identified by the Beijing Climate Centre, which says rain is coming in shorter, fiercer bursts , interspersed by protracted periods of drought. The worst affected province is Zhejiang, where some stretches of the Qiantang river have risen to their highest level since 1955, according to the Flood Control and Drought Relief Office. In the Zhuji district, which has had 40.5cm of rain since the start of the month, the Puyang river inundated 88 villages and 13,000 hectares of crops. In neighbouring Jiangxi province, troops have helped 122,400 residents evacuate from vulnerable lowlands, according to the China News Service. Roads have been closed and bridges have collapsed in the floods, which have also affected Hubei, Hunan, Sichuan and Guizhou provinces. Monitoring stations on 40 rivers have recorded water levels above the safety limit, including Asia’s biggest waterway – the Yangtze – which is simultaneously suffering a flood downstream and a drought closer to its source. Meteorologists warned that the torrential downpours are forecast to move southwards or inland. Li Xiaoquan was quoted on China’s weather news website as saying that the rains were expected to affect Sichuan, Chongqing and Guangdong provinces before easing on Sunday. Additional reporting by Cecily Huang Flooding Natural disasters and extreme weather China Jonathan Watts guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Boy’s family wins case in high court against Harrow college that bans ‘gang-related’ hairstyles A school’s anti-gang ban on unconventional hairstyles has resulted in “unlawful, indirect racial discrimination which is not justified”, the high court has ruled. The test case decision is a victory for the family of African-Caribbean teenager “G”, who wears his hair in cornrow braids as part of a family tradition. G, who cannot be named, and his mother challenged a refusal by St Gregory’s Catholic Science College in Kenton, Harrow, north London, to let G through the school gates with his braids in September 2009, when he was 11. Mr Justice Collins, sitting in London, ruled that the hair policy was not unlawful in itself, “but if it is applied without any possibility of exception, such as G, then it is unlawful”. He said in future the school authorities must consider allowing other boys to wear cornrows if it is “a genuine family tradition based on cultural and social reasons”. Even though the family’s application for judicial review was successful, G, now 13, does not wish to return to the school, which he left in tears on his first day. “This is an important decision,” said G’s solicitor, Angela Jackman, after the hearing. “It makes clear that non-religious cultural and family practices associated with a particular race fall within the protection of equalities legislation.” The judge emphasised that the school’s “short back and sides” hair policy was perfectly permissible and lawful, but exceptions had to be made on ethnic and cultural grounds. He stressed that the school was “not in any way racist” but had made “an honest mistake” in failing to allow for exceptions, adding: “The school has had glowing Ofsted reports and there is no question that it is an excellent school.” The judge said headteacher Andrew Prindiville had justified the policy as necessary to stop the gang culture prevalent in the area, in which haircuts were used as badges of membership, coming into the school. Cornrows were not necessarily gang-linked but other styles, like the skinhead haircut, might well have that connection, the judge said. The fear was that allowing exceptions to the “short back and sides” rule would undermine the anti-gang policy. But the judge pointed out that exceptions were already made for Rastafarians and Sikh boys who wore hair beyond the collar, and similar exceptions should be made for African Caribbeans. The judge said G’s family was not alone in regarding cornrows as part of their culture: “There are, on the evidence, other African Caribbeans who take the same view.” The judge refused the head teacher and governors permission to appeal to the court of appeal, but they can still go to the appeal judge directly to ask them to consider the case. The judge stressed that he was not ruling on whether the exclusion of G in 2009 was unlawful. It had been suggested that G’s family might bring a county court damages action over the case. That would be the time to decide whether or not the school had dealt with G’s desire to wear cornrows in an unlawful manner, said the judge. Jackman said the judge had found the school’s policy unlawful as it applied to African Caribbean boys with G’s beliefs because it indirectly discriminated on race grounds. She added: “For G, wearing his hair in cornrows is a fundamental cultural practice which would have had no adverse impact upon the school. His wishes, however, were dismissed by the school without any consideration. Whilst schools face the challenges of maintaining good discipline, a community environment and their particular ethos, this case is a reminder that they must do so within the boundaries of the law.” Schools London guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …