At Netroots Nation , Felipe Matos of the Trail of Dreams caught White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer in two lies, yesterday: (1) Obama “hears from DREAM Act Students all the time,” and (2) Obama “does not have the executive authority [to stop the deportations of DREAMers].” The first lie is probably the greatest disrespect to the migrant youth movement. It is not widely known that Obama refuses to meet with undocumented people himself. Undocumented youth have certainly confronted him at public events , but Obama refuses to meet with undocumented people to talk with them about an immigration system that is doing violence to them. Felipe Matos would know that Obama refuses to meet with undocumented people because he himself walked 1,500 miles from Miami, FL, to Washington, D.C. only to be denied a meeting with Obama. Obama has met with currently documented former DREAMers, but not with undocumented youth themselves. Felipe himself makes this clear in the video, only to be dismissed by Pfeiffer: Felipe Matos : He has spoken to people who are not DREAM Act-eligible, people who are not undocumented, because he has made it very clear that he doesn’t want to talk to undocumented people . Dan Pfeiffer : I don’t think that’s accurate. Felipe Matos : I mean I was in meetings with Valerie Jarrett when she told me that so I know it’s accurate. Netroots Nation (17 June 2011) While the first lie is disrespectful to the migrant youth movement, it is probably the second lie that does the most violence to migrant communities. Obama does have the power to grant administrative relief to migrant communities. The Immigration Policy Center has made that very clear. As a former teacher of constitutional law, and as the signatory of nearly 80 Executive Orders, President Obama understands that the role of the Executive branch of the U.S. government has never been limited to blindly enforcing laws passed by the Legislative branch. In fact, the effective implementation of any law (criminal law, tax law, environmental law, securities law, etc.), requires the Executive branch to interpret that law and develop strategies to implement it. Every new administration brings its own set of values and priorities to this task. That is why federal regulations, policies, and procedures change from administration to administration. This fundamental fact has been repeatedly recognized by the Obama Administration outside of the immigration context. Speaking in 2008, President Obama’s transition chief, John Podesta, noted: “There’s a lot that the President can do using his executive authority without waiting for congressional action, and I think we’ll see the president do that.” Speaking in 2010, White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer observed: “The challenges we had to address in 2009 ensured that the center of action would be in Congress. In 2010, executive actions will also play a key role in advancing the agenda.” Dan Pfeiffer lied to Felipe Matos, pure and simple, just as Obama has been lying to Latino voters across the country . I’m struggling a little bit with categorizing these as lies so blatantly right now, primarily because I feel an unproductive narrative of liberal anger at Obama is emerging from Netroots Nation. Were I to craft my own productive narrative of why Obama needs to provide administrative relief to migrant communities, it would go something like this: We’re not asking Obama to ignore the laws that are already on the books, as broken, unjust, and violent as we feel those laws are. What we are saying is that the Obama administration has limited resources to enforce the law, and that his administration should use those resources wisely. At a time when the federal government is struggling with a growing deficit, it makes no sense to spend thousands upon thousands of dollars detaining and deporting young people who know no other country as their home, or any undocumented people with strong and productive ties to their communities in the U.S. for that matter. Even with the Obama administration deporting over 400,000 people a year, now, the undocumented population continues to hover at around 11 million people. There’s even research to suggest ( pdf ) that heavy enforcement actually increases the undocumented population in the U.S., not because more people are coming in, but because less people want or are able to leave. If Obama continues to force pro-migrant voters to choose between helping to elect him, and stopping the deportations of our family members, friends, and peers, guess where we’re going to put our energy? Dreamers have regularly shown the ability to mobilize tens of thousands of people to stop their deportations one-by-one. Wouldn’t Obama prefer that they direct their energy at convincing or electing lawmakers who can change the laws, rather than have us continue to direct our energy at his administration? As it gets closer and closer to election time, pressure is going to increase on the pro-migrant movement to shut our mouths lest we help elect a nativist Republican to the presidency. It’s difficult to say where different pro-migrant groups will fall as that pressure increases but I can say that I certainly won’t help elect someone that continues to decimate my community. With Obama deporting more people that George W. Bush ever did, and now implementing a program, [In]Secure Communities, which would turn every local police officer into a border patrol agent by 2013 , there might even be situations where a Republican president would be better for the pro-migrant community. In other words, does Obama want to continue wasting limited resources and grassroots energy by continuing to deport folks who don’t need to be deported, or does he want to save money and direct that energy towards lawmakers who should be taking responsibility for fixing this unjust immigration system? I hope the answer is clear and that Obama grants migrant communities administrative relief. Kyle de Beausset is a pro-migrant blogger at Citizen Orange .
Continue reading …At Netroots Nation , Felipe Matos of the Trail of Dreams caught White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer in two lies, yesterday: (1) Obama “hears from DREAM Act Students all the time,” and (2) Obama “does not have the executive authority [to stop the deportations of DREAMers].” The first lie is probably the greatest disrespect to the migrant youth movement. It is not widely known that Obama refuses to meet with undocumented people himself. Undocumented youth have certainly confronted him at public events , but Obama refuses to meet with undocumented people to talk with them about an immigration system that is doing violence to them. Felipe Matos would know that Obama refuses to meet with undocumented people because he himself walked 1,500 miles from Miami, FL, to Washington, D.C. only to be denied a meeting with Obama. Obama has met with currently documented former DREAMers, but not with undocumented youth themselves. Felipe himself makes this clear in the video, only to be dismissed by Pfeiffer: Felipe Matos : He has spoken to people who are not DREAM Act-eligible, people who are not undocumented, because he has made it very clear that he doesn’t want to talk to undocumented people . Dan Pfeiffer : I don’t think that’s accurate. Felipe Matos : I mean I was in meetings with Valerie Jarrett when she told me that so I know it’s accurate. Netroots Nation (17 June 2011) While the first lie is disrespectful to the migrant youth movement, it is probably the second lie that does the most violence to migrant communities. Obama does have the power to grant administrative relief to migrant communities. The Immigration Policy Center has made that very clear. As a former teacher of constitutional law, and as the signatory of nearly 80 Executive Orders, President Obama understands that the role of the Executive branch of the U.S. government has never been limited to blindly enforcing laws passed by the Legislative branch. In fact, the effective implementation of any law (criminal law, tax law, environmental law, securities law, etc.), requires the Executive branch to interpret that law and develop strategies to implement it. Every new administration brings its own set of values and priorities to this task. That is why federal regulations, policies, and procedures change from administration to administration. This fundamental fact has been repeatedly recognized by the Obama Administration outside of the immigration context. Speaking in 2008, President Obama’s transition chief, John Podesta, noted: “There’s a lot that the President can do using his executive authority without waiting for congressional action, and I think we’ll see the president do that.” Speaking in 2010, White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer observed: “The challenges we had to address in 2009 ensured that the center of action would be in Congress. In 2010, executive actions will also play a key role in advancing the agenda.” Dan Pfeiffer lied to Felipe Matos, pure and simple, just as Obama has been lying to Latino voters across the country . I’m struggling a little bit with categorizing these as lies so blatantly right now, primarily because I feel an unproductive narrative of liberal anger at Obama is emerging from Netroots Nation. Were I to craft my own productive narrative of why Obama needs to provide administrative relief to migrant communities, it would go something like this: We’re not asking Obama to ignore the laws that are already on the books, as broken, unjust, and violent as we feel those laws are. What we are saying is that the Obama administration has limited resources to enforce the law, and that his administration should use those resources wisely. At a time when the federal government is struggling with a growing deficit, it makes no sense to spend thousands upon thousands of dollars detaining and deporting young people who know no other country as their home, or any undocumented people with strong and productive ties to their communities in the U.S. for that matter. Even with the Obama administration deporting over 400,000 people a year, now, the undocumented population continues to hover at around 11 million people. There’s even research to suggest ( pdf ) that heavy enforcement actually increases the undocumented population in the U.S., not because more people are coming in, but because less people want or are able to leave. If Obama continues to force pro-migrant voters to choose between helping to elect him, and stopping the deportations of our family members, friends, and peers, guess where we’re going to put our energy? Dreamers have regularly shown the ability to mobilize tens of thousands of people to stop their deportations one-by-one. Wouldn’t Obama prefer that they direct their energy at convincing or electing lawmakers who can change the laws, rather than have us continue to direct our energy at his administration? As it gets closer and closer to election time, pressure is going to increase on the pro-migrant movement to shut our mouths lest we help elect a nativist Republican to the presidency. It’s difficult to say where different pro-migrant groups will fall as that pressure increases but I can say that I certainly won’t help elect someone that continues to decimate my community. With Obama deporting more people that George W. Bush ever did, and now implementing a program, [In]Secure Communities, which would turn every local police officer into a border patrol agent by 2013 , there might even be situations where a Republican president would be better for the pro-migrant community. In other words, does Obama want to continue wasting limited resources and grassroots energy by continuing to deport folks who don’t need to be deported, or does he want to save money and direct that energy towards lawmakers who should be taking responsibility for fixing this unjust immigration system? I hope the answer is clear and that Obama grants migrant communities administrative relief. Kyle de Beausset is a pro-migrant blogger at Citizen Orange .
Continue reading …At Netroots Nation , Felipe Matos of the Trail of Dreams caught White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer in two lies, yesterday: (1) Obama “hears from DREAM Act Students all the time,” and (2) Obama “does not have the executive authority [to stop the deportations of DREAMers].” The first lie is probably the greatest disrespect to the migrant youth movement. It is not widely known that Obama refuses to meet with undocumented people himself. Undocumented youth have certainly confronted him at public events , but Obama refuses to meet with undocumented people to talk with them about an immigration system that is doing violence to them. Felipe Matos would know that Obama refuses to meet with undocumented people because he himself walked 1,500 miles from Miami, FL, to Washington, D.C. only to be denied a meeting with Obama. Obama has met with currently documented former DREAMers, but not with undocumented youth themselves. Felipe himself makes this clear in the video, only to be dismissed by Pfeiffer: Felipe Matos : He has spoken to people who are not DREAM Act-eligible, people who are not undocumented, because he has made it very clear that he doesn’t want to talk to undocumented people . Dan Pfeiffer : I don’t think that’s accurate. Felipe Matos : I mean I was in meetings with Valerie Jarrett when she told me that so I know it’s accurate. Netroots Nation (17 June 2011) While the first lie is disrespectful to the migrant youth movement, it is probably the second lie that does the most violence to migrant communities. Obama does have the power to grant administrative relief to migrant communities. The Immigration Policy Center has made that very clear. As a former teacher of constitutional law, and as the signatory of nearly 80 Executive Orders, President Obama understands that the role of the Executive branch of the U.S. government has never been limited to blindly enforcing laws passed by the Legislative branch. In fact, the effective implementation of any law (criminal law, tax law, environmental law, securities law, etc.), requires the Executive branch to interpret that law and develop strategies to implement it. Every new administration brings its own set of values and priorities to this task. That is why federal regulations, policies, and procedures change from administration to administration. This fundamental fact has been repeatedly recognized by the Obama Administration outside of the immigration context. Speaking in 2008, President Obama’s transition chief, John Podesta, noted: “There’s a lot that the President can do using his executive authority without waiting for congressional action, and I think we’ll see the president do that.” Speaking in 2010, White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer observed: “The challenges we had to address in 2009 ensured that the center of action would be in Congress. In 2010, executive actions will also play a key role in advancing the agenda.” Dan Pfeiffer lied to Felipe Matos, pure and simple, just as Obama has been lying to Latino voters across the country . I’m struggling a little bit with categorizing these as lies so blatantly right now, primarily because I feel an unproductive narrative of liberal anger at Obama is emerging from Netroots Nation. Were I to craft my own productive narrative of why Obama needs to provide administrative relief to migrant communities, it would go something like this: We’re not asking Obama to ignore the laws that are already on the books, as broken, unjust, and violent as we feel those laws are. What we are saying is that the Obama administration has limited resources to enforce the law, and that his administration should use those resources wisely. At a time when the federal government is struggling with a growing deficit, it makes no sense to spend thousands upon thousands of dollars detaining and deporting young people who know no other country as their home, or any undocumented people with strong and productive ties to their communities in the U.S. for that matter. Even with the Obama administration deporting over 400,000 people a year, now, the undocumented population continues to hover at around 11 million people. There’s even research to suggest ( pdf ) that heavy enforcement actually increases the undocumented population in the U.S., not because more people are coming in, but because less people want or are able to leave. If Obama continues to force pro-migrant voters to choose between helping to elect him, and stopping the deportations of our family members, friends, and peers, guess where we’re going to put our energy? Dreamers have regularly shown the ability to mobilize tens of thousands of people to stop their deportations one-by-one. Wouldn’t Obama prefer that they direct their energy at convincing or electing lawmakers who can change the laws, rather than have us continue to direct our energy at his administration? As it gets closer and closer to election time, pressure is going to increase on the pro-migrant movement to shut our mouths lest we help elect a nativist Republican to the presidency. It’s difficult to say where different pro-migrant groups will fall as that pressure increases but I can say that I certainly won’t help elect someone that continues to decimate my community. With Obama deporting more people that George W. Bush ever did, and now implementing a program, [In]Secure Communities, which would turn every local police officer into a border patrol agent by 2013 , there might even be situations where a Republican president would be better for the pro-migrant community. In other words, does Obama want to continue wasting limited resources and grassroots energy by continuing to deport folks who don’t need to be deported, or does he want to save money and direct that energy towards lawmakers who should be taking responsibility for fixing this unjust immigration system? I hope the answer is clear and that Obama grants migrant communities administrative relief. Kyle de Beausset is a pro-migrant blogger at Citizen Orange .
Continue reading …
PERUGIA, Italy — A convicted child murderer testified Saturday at the appeals trial for Amanda Knox, saying that a fellow inmate had told him the American student had nothing to do with her British roommate’s slaying. Witness Mario Alessi, who is serving a life sentence for one of Italy’s most shocking crimes, the kidnap-murder of an Italian toddler snatched from his home, was called by defense lawyers. His credibility was soon challenged in court. Knox was convicted of sexually assaulting and murdering British student Meredith Kercher in the house the two shared in Perugia, and sentenced to 26 years in prison. Her co-defendant and ex-boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito of Italy, was also convicted and sentenced to 25 years. They both deny wrongdoing and are appealing their convictions. Also convicted in a separate proceeding was Rudy Hermann Guede, an Ivorian man whose conviction has been confirmed by Italy’s highest criminal court. Guede also denies wrongdoing, but admitted being in Knox’s and Kercher’s apartment the night of the murder on Nov. 1, 2007. Alessi is being held in the same prison as Guede. He testified that the Ivorian told him that Knox and Sollecito are innocent, speaking in prison conversations in November 2009. That was about a month before Knox and Sollecito were convicted in the first trial and while Guede had already been convicted and was appealing. Alessi said Guede approached him during recreation time at the Viterbo prison. “Rudy links arms with me, inviting me to take a walk with him, he has something important to tell me,” Alessi testified. He quoted Guede as saying he was worried because “I don’t know whether to tell the truth or not,” and that the truth “is altogether different from what you hear on TV.” Alessi was called to testify by Sollecito’s defense. Guede has denied speaking to Alessi about the case. According to Alessi, Guede said he and a friend went over the house with the intent of having three-way sex with Kercher, who was 21. When she refused, the scene turned violent. Alessi said Guede told him he had gone to the bathroom and upon coming back he had seen his friend holding Kercher to the ground. Eventually, “a knife appeared, almost out of nowhere,” Alessi said, quoting Guede as saying that it was pointed at Kercher’s throat. As she was fighting, she got her throat slit, Alessi claimed. Guede tried to rescue her, Alessi said, but his friend stopped him, saying “We’ve got to finish her, otherwise we’ll rot in jail.” Guede did not reveal the identity of his alleged accomplice, according to the witness. Alessi said he and Guede had developed a friendship in prison but eventually Alessi broke it off as he realized that Guede “said two innocent people were in jail” but did nothing about it. Alessi then contacted the lawyers representing Sollecito. Alessi, a bricklayer, has been a notorious character since his conviction for the murder of 18-month-old Tommaso Onofri a few years back. Francesco Maresca, a lawyer for the Kercher family, tried to cast doubt on Alessi’s credibility, recounting his criminal record, then showing a picture of Onofri and asking Alessi if he knew him. “We do,” Maresca said, when Alessi muttered “No.” Three more witnesses were called to back up Alessi’s testimony, including police informant Marco Castelluccio, who took the stand behind a blue cover, guards around him. Castelluccio was also held at the Viterbo prison. He said he heard the story about Knox and Sollecito’s innocent mostly from Alessi. However, he said on one occasion when he was in his cell, he heard Guede say from a separate cell that Knox and Sollecito were innocent. Knox attended the session, as did her stepfather Chris Mellas and friend Madison Paxton.
Continue reading …
PERUGIA, Italy — A convicted child murderer testified Saturday at the appeals trial for Amanda Knox, saying that a fellow inmate had told him the American student had nothing to do with her British roommate’s slaying. Witness Mario Alessi, who is serving a life sentence for one of Italy’s most shocking crimes, the kidnap-murder of an Italian toddler snatched from his home, was called by defense lawyers. His credibility was soon challenged in court. Knox was convicted of sexually assaulting and murdering British student Meredith Kercher in the house the two shared in Perugia, and sentenced to 26 years in prison. Her co-defendant and ex-boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito of Italy, was also convicted and sentenced to 25 years. They both deny wrongdoing and are appealing their convictions. Also convicted in a separate proceeding was Rudy Hermann Guede, an Ivorian man whose conviction has been confirmed by Italy’s highest criminal court. Guede also denies wrongdoing, but admitted being in Knox’s and Kercher’s apartment the night of the murder on Nov. 1, 2007. Alessi is being held in the same prison as Guede. He testified that the Ivorian told him that Knox and Sollecito are innocent, speaking in prison conversations in November 2009. That was about a month before Knox and Sollecito were convicted in the first trial and while Guede had already been convicted and was appealing. Alessi said Guede approached him during recreation time at the Viterbo prison. “Rudy links arms with me, inviting me to take a walk with him, he has something important to tell me,” Alessi testified. He quoted Guede as saying he was worried because “I don’t know whether to tell the truth or not,” and that the truth “is altogether different from what you hear on TV.” Alessi was called to testify by Sollecito’s defense. Guede has denied speaking to Alessi about the case. According to Alessi, Guede said he and a friend went over the house with the intent of having three-way sex with Kercher, who was 21. When she refused, the scene turned violent. Alessi said Guede told him he had gone to the bathroom and upon coming back he had seen his friend holding Kercher to the ground. Eventually, “a knife appeared, almost out of nowhere,” Alessi said, quoting Guede as saying that it was pointed at Kercher’s throat. As she was fighting, she got her throat slit, Alessi claimed. Guede tried to rescue her, Alessi said, but his friend stopped him, saying “We’ve got to finish her, otherwise we’ll rot in jail.” Guede did not reveal the identity of his alleged accomplice, according to the witness. Alessi said he and Guede had developed a friendship in prison but eventually Alessi broke it off as he realized that Guede “said two innocent people were in jail” but did nothing about it. Alessi then contacted the lawyers representing Sollecito. Alessi, a bricklayer, has been a notorious character since his conviction for the murder of 18-month-old Tommaso Onofri a few years back. Francesco Maresca, a lawyer for the Kercher family, tried to cast doubt on Alessi’s credibility, recounting his criminal record, then showing a picture of Onofri and asking Alessi if he knew him. “We do,” Maresca said, when Alessi muttered “No.” Three more witnesses were called to back up Alessi’s testimony, including police informant Marco Castelluccio, who took the stand behind a blue cover, guards around him. Castelluccio was also held at the Viterbo prison. He said he heard the story about Knox and Sollecito’s innocent mostly from Alessi. However, he said on one occasion when he was in his cell, he heard Guede say from a separate cell that Knox and Sollecito were innocent. Knox attended the session, as did her stepfather Chris Mellas and friend Madison Paxton.
Continue reading …PERUGIA, Italy — A convicted child murderer testified Saturday at the appeals trial for Amanda Knox, saying that a fellow inmate had told him the American student had nothing to do with her British roommate’s slaying. Witness Mario Alessi, who is serving a life sentence for one of Italy’s most shocking crimes, the kidnap-murder of an Italian toddler snatched from his home, was called by defense lawyers. His credibility was soon challenged in court. Knox was convicted of sexually assaulting and murdering British student Meredith Kercher in the house the two shared in Perugia, and sentenced to 26 years in prison. Her co-defendant and ex-boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito of Italy, was also convicted and sentenced to 25 years. They both deny wrongdoing and are appealing their convictions. Also convicted in a separate proceeding was Rudy Hermann Guede, an Ivorian man whose conviction has been confirmed by Italy’s highest criminal court. Guede also denies wrongdoing, but admitted being in Knox’s and Kercher’s apartment the night of the murder on Nov. 1, 2007. Alessi is being held in the same prison as Guede. He testified that the Ivorian told him that Knox and Sollecito are innocent, speaking in prison conversations in November 2009. That was about a month before Knox and Sollecito were convicted in the first trial and while Guede had already been convicted and was appealing. Alessi said Guede approached him during recreation time at the Viterbo prison. “Rudy links arms with me, inviting me to take a walk with him, he has something important to tell me,” Alessi testified. He quoted Guede as saying he was worried because “I don’t know whether to tell the truth or not,” and that the truth “is altogether different from what you hear on TV.” Alessi was called to testify by Sollecito’s defense. Guede has denied speaking to Alessi about the case. According to Alessi, Guede said he and a friend went over the house with the intent of having three-way sex with Kercher, who was 21. When she refused, the scene turned violent. Alessi said Guede told him he had gone to the bathroom and upon coming back he had seen his friend holding Kercher to the ground. Eventually, “a knife appeared, almost out of nowhere,” Alessi said, quoting Guede as saying that it was pointed at Kercher’s throat. As she was fighting, she got her throat slit, Alessi claimed. Guede tried to rescue her, Alessi said, but his friend stopped him, saying “We’ve got to finish her, otherwise we’ll rot in jail.” Guede did not reveal the identity of his alleged accomplice, according to the witness. Alessi said he and Guede had developed a friendship in prison but eventually Alessi broke it off as he realized that Guede “said two innocent people were in jail” but did nothing about it. Alessi then contacted the lawyers representing Sollecito. Alessi, a bricklayer, has been a notorious character since his conviction for the murder of 18-month-old Tommaso Onofri a few years back. Francesco Maresca, a lawyer for the Kercher family, tried to cast doubt on Alessi’s credibility, recounting his criminal record, then showing a picture of Onofri and asking Alessi if he knew him. “We do,” Maresca said, when Alessi muttered “No.” Three more witnesses were called to back up Alessi’s testimony, including police informant Marco Castelluccio, who took the stand behind a blue cover, guards around him. Castelluccio was also held at the Viterbo prison. He said he heard the story about Knox and Sollecito’s innocent mostly from Alessi. However, he said on one occasion when he was in his cell, he heard Guede say from a separate cell that Knox and Sollecito were innocent. Knox attended the session, as did her stepfather Chris Mellas and friend Madison Paxton.
Continue reading …PERUGIA, Italy — A convicted child murderer testified Saturday at the appeals trial for Amanda Knox, saying that a fellow inmate had told him the American student had nothing to do with her British roommate’s slaying. Witness Mario Alessi, who is serving a life sentence for one of Italy’s most shocking crimes, the kidnap-murder of an Italian toddler snatched from his home, was called by defense lawyers. His credibility was soon challenged in court. Knox was convicted of sexually assaulting and murdering British student Meredith Kercher in the house the two shared in Perugia, and sentenced to 26 years in prison. Her co-defendant and ex-boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito of Italy, was also convicted and sentenced to 25 years. They both deny wrongdoing and are appealing their convictions. Also convicted in a separate proceeding was Rudy Hermann Guede, an Ivorian man whose conviction has been confirmed by Italy’s highest criminal court. Guede also denies wrongdoing, but admitted being in Knox’s and Kercher’s apartment the night of the murder on Nov. 1, 2007. Alessi is being held in the same prison as Guede. He testified that the Ivorian told him that Knox and Sollecito are innocent, speaking in prison conversations in November 2009. That was about a month before Knox and Sollecito were convicted in the first trial and while Guede had already been convicted and was appealing. Alessi said Guede approached him during recreation time at the Viterbo prison. “Rudy links arms with me, inviting me to take a walk with him, he has something important to tell me,” Alessi testified. He quoted Guede as saying he was worried because “I don’t know whether to tell the truth or not,” and that the truth “is altogether different from what you hear on TV.” Alessi was called to testify by Sollecito’s defense. Guede has denied speaking to Alessi about the case. According to Alessi, Guede said he and a friend went over the house with the intent of having three-way sex with Kercher, who was 21. When she refused, the scene turned violent. Alessi said Guede told him he had gone to the bathroom and upon coming back he had seen his friend holding Kercher to the ground. Eventually, “a knife appeared, almost out of nowhere,” Alessi said, quoting Guede as saying that it was pointed at Kercher’s throat. As she was fighting, she got her throat slit, Alessi claimed. Guede tried to rescue her, Alessi said, but his friend stopped him, saying “We’ve got to finish her, otherwise we’ll rot in jail.” Guede did not reveal the identity of his alleged accomplice, according to the witness. Alessi said he and Guede had developed a friendship in prison but eventually Alessi broke it off as he realized that Guede “said two innocent people were in jail” but did nothing about it. Alessi then contacted the lawyers representing Sollecito. Alessi, a bricklayer, has been a notorious character since his conviction for the murder of 18-month-old Tommaso Onofri a few years back. Francesco Maresca, a lawyer for the Kercher family, tried to cast doubt on Alessi’s credibility, recounting his criminal record, then showing a picture of Onofri and asking Alessi if he knew him. “We do,” Maresca said, when Alessi muttered “No.” Three more witnesses were called to back up Alessi’s testimony, including police informant Marco Castelluccio, who took the stand behind a blue cover, guards around him. Castelluccio was also held at the Viterbo prison. He said he heard the story about Knox and Sollecito’s innocent mostly from Alessi. However, he said on one occasion when he was in his cell, he heard Guede say from a separate cell that Knox and Sollecito were innocent. Knox attended the session, as did her stepfather Chris Mellas and friend Madison Paxton.
Continue reading …PERUGIA, Italy — A convicted child murderer testified Saturday at the appeals trial for Amanda Knox, saying that a fellow inmate had told him the American student had nothing to do with her British roommate’s slaying. Witness Mario Alessi, who is serving a life sentence for one of Italy’s most shocking crimes, the kidnap-murder of an Italian toddler snatched from his home, was called by defense lawyers. His credibility was soon challenged in court. Knox was convicted of sexually assaulting and murdering British student Meredith Kercher in the house the two shared in Perugia, and sentenced to 26 years in prison. Her co-defendant and ex-boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito of Italy, was also convicted and sentenced to 25 years. They both deny wrongdoing and are appealing their convictions. Also convicted in a separate proceeding was Rudy Hermann Guede, an Ivorian man whose conviction has been confirmed by Italy’s highest criminal court. Guede also denies wrongdoing, but admitted being in Knox’s and Kercher’s apartment the night of the murder on Nov. 1, 2007. Alessi is being held in the same prison as Guede. He testified that the Ivorian told him that Knox and Sollecito are innocent, speaking in prison conversations in November 2009. That was about a month before Knox and Sollecito were convicted in the first trial and while Guede had already been convicted and was appealing. Alessi said Guede approached him during recreation time at the Viterbo prison. “Rudy links arms with me, inviting me to take a walk with him, he has something important to tell me,” Alessi testified. He quoted Guede as saying he was worried because “I don’t know whether to tell the truth or not,” and that the truth “is altogether different from what you hear on TV.” Alessi was called to testify by Sollecito’s defense. Guede has denied speaking to Alessi about the case. According to Alessi, Guede said he and a friend went over the house with the intent of having three-way sex with Kercher, who was 21. When she refused, the scene turned violent. Alessi said Guede told him he had gone to the bathroom and upon coming back he had seen his friend holding Kercher to the ground. Eventually, “a knife appeared, almost out of nowhere,” Alessi said, quoting Guede as saying that it was pointed at Kercher’s throat. As she was fighting, she got her throat slit, Alessi claimed. Guede tried to rescue her, Alessi said, but his friend stopped him, saying “We’ve got to finish her, otherwise we’ll rot in jail.” Guede did not reveal the identity of his alleged accomplice, according to the witness. Alessi said he and Guede had developed a friendship in prison but eventually Alessi broke it off as he realized that Guede “said two innocent people were in jail” but did nothing about it. Alessi then contacted the lawyers representing Sollecito. Alessi, a bricklayer, has been a notorious character since his conviction for the murder of 18-month-old Tommaso Onofri a few years back. Francesco Maresca, a lawyer for the Kercher family, tried to cast doubt on Alessi’s credibility, recounting his criminal record, then showing a picture of Onofri and asking Alessi if he knew him. “We do,” Maresca said, when Alessi muttered “No.” Three more witnesses were called to back up Alessi’s testimony, including police informant Marco Castelluccio, who took the stand behind a blue cover, guards around him. Castelluccio was also held at the Viterbo prison. He said he heard the story about Knox and Sollecito’s innocent mostly from Alessi. However, he said on one occasion when he was in his cell, he heard Guede say from a separate cell that Knox and Sollecito were innocent. Knox attended the session, as did her stepfather Chris Mellas and friend Madison Paxton.
Continue reading …PERUGIA, Italy — A convicted child murderer testified Saturday at the appeals trial for Amanda Knox, saying that a fellow inmate had told him the American student had nothing to do with her British roommate’s slaying. Witness Mario Alessi, who is serving a life sentence for one of Italy’s most shocking crimes, the kidnap-murder of an Italian toddler snatched from his home, was called by defense lawyers. His credibility was soon challenged in court. Knox was convicted of sexually assaulting and murdering British student Meredith Kercher in the house the two shared in Perugia, and sentenced to 26 years in prison. Her co-defendant and ex-boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito of Italy, was also convicted and sentenced to 25 years. They both deny wrongdoing and are appealing their convictions. Also convicted in a separate proceeding was Rudy Hermann Guede, an Ivorian man whose conviction has been confirmed by Italy’s highest criminal court. Guede also denies wrongdoing, but admitted being in Knox’s and Kercher’s apartment the night of the murder on Nov. 1, 2007. Alessi is being held in the same prison as Guede. He testified that the Ivorian told him that Knox and Sollecito are innocent, speaking in prison conversations in November 2009. That was about a month before Knox and Sollecito were convicted in the first trial and while Guede had already been convicted and was appealing. Alessi said Guede approached him during recreation time at the Viterbo prison. “Rudy links arms with me, inviting me to take a walk with him, he has something important to tell me,” Alessi testified. He quoted Guede as saying he was worried because “I don’t know whether to tell the truth or not,” and that the truth “is altogether different from what you hear on TV.” Alessi was called to testify by Sollecito’s defense. Guede has denied speaking to Alessi about the case. According to Alessi, Guede said he and a friend went over the house with the intent of having three-way sex with Kercher, who was 21. When she refused, the scene turned violent. Alessi said Guede told him he had gone to the bathroom and upon coming back he had seen his friend holding Kercher to the ground. Eventually, “a knife appeared, almost out of nowhere,” Alessi said, quoting Guede as saying that it was pointed at Kercher’s throat. As she was fighting, she got her throat slit, Alessi claimed. Guede tried to rescue her, Alessi said, but his friend stopped him, saying “We’ve got to finish her, otherwise we’ll rot in jail.” Guede did not reveal the identity of his alleged accomplice, according to the witness. Alessi said he and Guede had developed a friendship in prison but eventually Alessi broke it off as he realized that Guede “said two innocent people were in jail” but did nothing about it. Alessi then contacted the lawyers representing Sollecito. Alessi, a bricklayer, has been a notorious character since his conviction for the murder of 18-month-old Tommaso Onofri a few years back. Francesco Maresca, a lawyer for the Kercher family, tried to cast doubt on Alessi’s credibility, recounting his criminal record, then showing a picture of Onofri and asking Alessi if he knew him. “We do,” Maresca said, when Alessi muttered “No.” Three more witnesses were called to back up Alessi’s testimony, including police informant Marco Castelluccio, who took the stand behind a blue cover, guards around him. Castelluccio was also held at the Viterbo prison. He said he heard the story about Knox and Sollecito’s innocent mostly from Alessi. However, he said on one occasion when he was in his cell, he heard Guede say from a separate cell that Knox and Sollecito were innocent. Knox attended the session, as did her stepfather Chris Mellas and friend Madison Paxton.
Continue reading …
Seattle’s Weather Seattle Weather and No Starbucks Makes Bergen a… SYAH | SEATTLE WEATHER | MUSIC VIDEO – HOT OR NOT ChunLum says: Yup, Seattle weather is definitely back. http://post.ly/2EiuZ
Continue reading …