The judge in the murder trial of a Casey Anthony scolded prosecutors and defense attorneys Monday, warning them they may face punishment when the trial concludes, then he abruptly halted proceedings for the day. (June 20)
Continue reading …The world’s biggest air show begins today, but Airbus won’t be showing off the gem of its fleet—the superjumbo A380 has been grounded after it collided with a taxiway building, damaging its wingtip. It’s just one of several Paris Air Show embarrassments for the Boeing rival, the AP reports:…
Continue reading …[Keith Ellison gives the Netroots keynote on Saturday: the Minnesota politician the Star-Tribune chose to ignore.] I sat down to have a nice departing breakfast at my hotel in Minneapolis yesterday morning after a satisfying Netroots Nation, and as is my custom on such occasions, I bought the local Sunday paper. In this case, that meant buying a copy of the Star-Tribune. Now, I will admit I am impressed that the paper has thus far refused to succumb to the Shrinkage phenomenon that is reducing modern papers to the size of postage stamps. The Star Tribune is still printed on standard old broadsheet paper, and it is graphically quite appealing as well. But what I went there to read was to see what coverage they had of Netroots — easily the largest gathering of political bloggers in the country, and one of the most powerful gatherings of progressive activists in the country as well. Now, I expect that local readers will tell me that the Minneapolis paper is a long-established right-wing Republican rag, and gauging from their Sunday editorial-page lineup, that certainly is the impression I came away with. And no doubt it is despised by the PowerLines of the world for not being right-wing enough, which then becomes their excuse — “See? Both sides hate us! Therefore, we must be exactly right in the middle!” So to be honest, I wasn’t really surprised to see that the Star-Tribune, as I perused it over my coffee and hashbrowns this morning, had actually completely ignored the presence of Netroots Nation in their city and carried not a single word about events there. And indeed, if you check their archives, they couldn’t even be bothered to send a single reporter over to the convention center this week to write about the many luminaries there. Instead, their coverage consisted entirely pieces filed by Associated Press reporters. Oh, wait — there was one piece by a columnist that talked about Netroots and its deeper meaning without any indication he’d ever set foot in the convention. That’s just embarrassing. But then I nearly blorted my coffee out onto the rag when I came across Bob Von Sternberg’s loving coverage of the Republican luminaries at the Right Online conference, complete with big pictures of Michele Bachmann and Tim Pawlenty, which meant that they not only sent a reporter, there was a Star-Trib photographer there as well. ( Von Sternberg wrote a second piece, for online readers, about Right Online as well. There was no indication whatsoever that the Star-Trib was aware that Right Online has ALWAYS been a deliberately imitative gathering — they follow Netroots Nation around like a pathetic wannabe girlfriend, a creepy stalker, setting up shop in whatever city we gather in. Which means that next year, they’ll be in Providence, Rhode Island too, no doubt. Previous gatherings were truly pathetic. They first tried this in Austin, and it was hilariously tiny. The same thing happened in Pittsburgh and in Vegas last year. But this year they made it ridiculously cheap for anyone to attend, thanks to heavy Koch Brothers underwriting, as Tina Dupuy observes. So they were able to boast some decent attendance numbers — I saw one site claim there were in excess of 1,200 people, and my independent sources inform me that’s probably correct (and not in the realm of the mythical 1.7 million who marched at the GlennBeckpalooza in Washington that in fact gathered about 90,000 people). Moreover, the story did end with this nugget that in fact is almost completely wrong: Meanwhile, a couple of blocks away, at the Minneapolis Convention Center, RightOnline’s liberal counterpart, Netroots Nation, was holding its own conference with Sen. Al Franken headlining. Yep, that’s the entirety of the Star Tribune reporting staff’s coverage of Netroots Nation. Meanwhile, Right Online gets two long pieces, photos in the print edition, and several videos in the online edition. Moreover, it’s true that Franken was indeed the keynote speaker Saturday morning — but he was only one of several keynoters throughout the conference weekend. The “headliner” at the convention, if anyone, was Rep. Keith Ellison on Saturday night . Now, I can just hear the Star-Trib’s reporters and editors explaining their thinking: Pawlenty and Bachmann are from Minnesota, after all, and deserve priority for their readers, right? That sounds good. Until you realize that both Franken and Ellison are from … wait … I need to look this up … oh yeah! Minnesota! Huh! Whoda thunk? You know, I love when mainstream reporters whine that blogs ruined their business and made them irrelevant. Incidents like this demonstrate just how they have managed to do that all by themselves. Bloggers just are filling the vacuum created by the black holes remaining in the spaces that were supposed to be occupied by their journalistic standards. You may want to share your thoughts with the folks at the Star-Tribune about those standards. You can call their front desk at (612) 673-4000, or you can write Von Sternberg at vonste@startribune.com and let him know what you think. It might be useful to make your feeling known to Political Editor Patricia Lopez too. Please be polite and thoughtful. It makes a difference.
Continue reading …It’s true that George Eliot and Charlotte Bronte used male pen names so that their work would be taken seriously (and so they could publish at all). But as I learned while researching my new book, “Nom de Plume: A (Secret) History of Pseudonyms,” the motives behind this tradition are often more complicated and mysterious than you might imagine. I learned that pen names are not merely functional–they are often bound up in profound ways with a writer’s creativity and identity, not to mention issues of guilt and shame. There are more than a few good reasons (and sometimes many at once) to adopt a nom de plume.
Continue reading …In the evangelical community, the year 2011 has brought a resurgence of debate over evolution. The current issue of Christianity Today asks if genetic discoveries preclude an historical Adam. While BioLogos, the brainchild of NIH director Francis Collins, is seeking to promote theistic evolution among evangelicals, the president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary recently argued that true Christians should believe the Earth is only a few thousand years old. As someone raised evangelical, I realize anti-evolutionists believe they are defending the Christian tradition. But as a seminary graduate now training to be a medical scientist, I can say that, in reality, they’ve abandoned it. In theory, if not always in practice, past Christian theologians valued science out of the belief that God created the world scientists study. Augustine castigated those who made the Bible teach bad science, John Calvin argued that Genesis reflects a commoner’s view of the physical world, and the Belgic confession likened scripture and nature to two books written by the same author. These beliefs encouraged past Christians to accept the best science of their day, and these beliefs persisted even into the evangelical tradition. As Princeton Seminary’s Charles Hodge, widely considered the father of modern evangelical theology, put it in 1859: “Nature is as truly a revelation of God as the Bible; and we only interpret the Word of God by the Word of God when we interpret the Bible by science.” In this analysis, Christians must accept sound science, not because they don’t believe God created the world, but precisely because they do. Of course, anti-evolutionists claim their rejection of evolution is not a rejection of science. Phillip Johnson, widely considered the leader of the Intelligent Design movement, states that all he’s rejecting is the atheistic lens through which evolutionary scientists view the world. Evolution, he argues, is “based not upon any incontrovertible empirical evidence, but upon a highly philosophical presupposition.” And to a certain extent, this line of argument makes sense. Science is not a neutral enterprise. Prior beliefs undoubtedly influence interpretation. If one believes God created vertebrates with a similar design plan, one can acknowledge their structural similarities without believing in common descent. No amount of radiocarbon dating evidence will convince someone the Earth is 4.5 billion years old if that person believes God created the world to look old, with the appearance of age. But beyond a certain point, this reasoning breaks down. Because no amount of talk about “worldviews” and “presuppositions” can change a simple fact: creationism has failed to provide an alternative explanation for the vast majority of evidence explained by evolution. It has failed to explain why birds still carry genes to make teeth, whales to make legs, and humans to make tails. It has failed to explain why the fossil record proposed by modern scientists can be used to make precise and accurate predictions about the location of transition fossils. It has failed to explain why the fossil record demonstrates a precise order, with simple organisms in the deepest rocks and more complex ones toward the surface. It has failed to explain why today’s animals live in the same geographical area as fossils of similar species. It has failed to explain why, if carnivorous dinosaurs lived at the same time as modern animals, we don’t find the fossils of modern animals in the stomachs of fossilized dinosaurs. It has failed to explain the broken genes that litter the DNA of humans and apes but are functional in lower vertebrates. It has failed to explain how the genetic diversity we observe among humans could have arisen in a few thousand years from two biological ancestors. Those who believe God created the world scientists study, even while ignoring most of the data compiled by those who study it, might as well rip dozens of pages out of their Bibles. Because if “nature is as truly a revelation of God as the Bible,” it’s basically the same thing. Many think the widespread rejection of evolution doesn’t really matter. Evolution is about what happened in the past, the argument goes, so rejecting it doesn’t have an impact on policies we make today. And aside from school curricula, they may be right. But the belief that scientists can discover truth, and that, once sufficiently debated, challenged and modified, it should be accepted even if it creates tensions for familiar belief systems, has an obvious impact on decisions that are made everyday. And it is that belief Christians reject when they reject evolution. In doing so, they’ve not only led America astray on questions ranging from the value of stem cell research to the etiology of homosexuality to the causes of global warming. They’ve also abandoned a central commitment of orthodox Christianity.
Continue reading …We were hoping it wouldn’t happen, but it appears that Verizon CFO Fran Shammo’s summer foreboding of his company’s dreaded tiered data plans could be right on the money. Droid-Life is reporting the magic date will be July 7 and has provided supposed pricing details: data plans without tethering would start at $30 for 2GB, while 5GB and 10GB will cost $50 and $80 respectively. Tethering will cost an extra $20 and adds another 2GB to the pool. There’s said to be no notable separation between 3G and 4G — you’d be billed exactly the same whether you’re packing a Droid X2 or a Droid Charge . These new plans wouldn’t affect anyone currently under contract, though it’s still unknown if customers can hang onto them when it’s time to renew. While this remains filed in the “grain of salt” cabinet for now, it may be a good time to at least start checking out your next phone. [Thanks to everyone who sent this in] Verizon tiered data plans coming July 7, starting at $30? originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:01:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …BELLEVILLE – Zack Sparks’ sophomore season had been trending upward entering Wednesday, but now he’s definitely arrived.
Continue reading …Sony Ericsson has issued the latest update on its progress to bring Google’s Gingerbread Android update to Xperia X10, announcing that the device will receive Facebook inside Xperia functionality, keep its camera user interface and other Sony Ericsson style tweaks. This means that X10 owners will be able to connect their smartphones to Facebook and Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Next Web Discovery Date : 20/06/2011 16:18 Number of articles : 3
Continue reading …Sony Ericsson has issued the latest update on its progress to bring Google’s Gingerbread Android update to Xperia X10, announcing that the device will receive Facebook inside Xperia functionality, keep its camera user interface and other Sony Ericsson style tweaks. This means that X10 owners will be able to connect their smartphones to Facebook and Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Next Web Discovery Date : 20/06/2011 16:18 Number of articles : 3
Continue reading …Sony Ericsson has issued the latest update on its progress to bring Google’s Gingerbread Android update to Xperia X10, announcing that the device will receive Facebook inside Xperia functionality, keep its camera user interface and other Sony Ericsson style tweaks. This means that X10 owners will be able to connect their smartphones to Facebook and Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Next Web Discovery Date : 20/06/2011 16:18 Number of articles : 3
Continue reading …