The human eye may be an even more amazing thing than we realize, capable of acting as a compass by sensing the Earth’s magnetic field, new research suggests. Cryptochrome, a protein believed to give animals like migratory birds and sea turtles their ability to navigate, is present in the human…
Continue reading …celeb gossip 2 Scandalous!!! Tattoo Crashes The Hangover Part 2 Release Getting a tattoo jordanstone says: Warner Bros. Settles 'Hangover 2' Tattoo Lawsuit http://t.co/iEcJfPU via @popeater
Continue reading …• Transport secretary says deal ‘sticks in the gullet’ • Departed chief executive warned over pay last year Transport secretary Philip Hammond has condemned Network Rail for handing former chief executive Iain Coucher a £1m payoff, warning that it will “stick in the gullet” of taxpayers and farepayers. The government-backed owner of Britain’s rail tracks and stations will stoke the row over public sector pay by announcing a payoff of more than £1m for Coucher on Thursday. Coucher stepped down as chief executive last year after a three-year reign that was peppered with complaints from trade unions and politicians about the company’s remuneration regime. Network Rail’s annual report, published on Thursday, will reveal that Coucher received just over £1m as part of a package that included a year’s pay in lieu of notice and a settlement related to the company’s long-term incentive plan. Fellow executives are also expected to receive sizeable payments under the plan. Hammond weighed into the debate on Wednesday in apparent fury that his public warnings last year over Network Rail bonuses had been ignored. He said: “This payoff will stick in the gullet of every farepayer and taxpayer who think they pay too much to use our railway. The payoff is based on his contractual rights but most people will feel it doesn’t sit well given the difficult times most families are facing. “I will be seeking assurances that this is the last chapter in the sorry saga of the old Network Rail as set up by Gordon Brown. We have made clear that any future incentive system should focus on rewarding exceptional and sustained long-term outperformance and be based on the principle that bonuses are not an automatic right.” Network Rail relies on the taxpayer for its funding and received £3.7bn from the Department for Transport last year in a financial arrangement that regularly exposes its executive team to pay rows. In 2010, Coucher received a salary and bonus package worth £1.25m, drawing an intervention from Hammond, who questioned whether it was “appropriate” for Network Rail executives to share more than £2m in bonuses when the rest of the population was entering a period of austerity. However, Coucher has consistently argued that Network Rail needed to reward managers charged with turning round a railway system that was on its knees when the company inherited Railtrack’s responsibilities in 2002 following the botched privatisation of the rail network. The announcement comes a month after Coucher was cleared of misusing public funds following an independent investigation. Antony White QC, an expert in asset tracing and employment law, was appointed by the company to investigate allegations that public money had been spent illicitly on perks. White severely criticised the “astonishing” behaviour of Peter Bennett, Network Rail’s head of human resources, who called an employee complaining of sex discrimination a “silly cow”. Network Rail’s chairman, Rick Haythornthwaite, has moved to answer concerns over the company’s governance by requesting another review. The review’s author, Saratha Rajeswaran, a former adviser to rail minister Theresa Villiers, said the company had a “real problem” with accountability to the rail industry and government, adding: “Network Rail has been insulated from real-time economic and political concerns – leading to criticisms that it is arrogant or out-of-touch with the reality for the industry, passengers, the government and taxpayers.” However, the review does not recommend radical changes to the governance of Network Rail, which is technically a private business as a company limited by guarantee, meaning that it has no share capital or shareholders. The role of the latter is performed by Network Rail’s 92 “members”, who are drawn from the transport industry and the public. The Rajeswaran review does not call for an enhancement of members’ powers over pay, instead leaving their role as a purely symbolic one with a vote on the remuneration report at the annual meeting. Nonetheless, the review warns that bonuses will continue to be a “contentious” issue. Meanwhile, Network Rail is now beginning formal discussions over its next funding settlement under its new chief executive, Sir David Higgins, former chief executive of the Olympic Delivery Authority. The company is under pressure to reduce costs following an independent report into rail industry expenditure by Sir Roy McNulty, former chair of the Civil Aviation Authority, who has recommended cutting £1bn from the sector’s annual expenditure by the end of the decade. Nonetheless, Network Rail is optimistic that it can secure a funding settlement for 2014-2019 that is similar to the £30bn it won for 2009-2014 at the height of the previous government’s public spending largesse. Network Rail Executive pay and bonuses Travel & leisure Transport Dan Milmo guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Fresh from his record-breaking win at the US Open, Rory McIlroy met the press and fans at his home town golf club in Northern Ireland Wednesday. McIlroy won his first major by eight strokes, and won’t play again until The British Open in July. (June 22)
Continue reading …A toxicology report shows that ‘Jackass’ star Ryan Dunn had a blood-alcohol content more than twice the legal limit when he died in a fiery car crash outside Philadelphia Monday morning. (June 22)
Continue reading …Jose Antonio Vargas, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and former senior contributing editor for The Huffington Post, has revealed that he is an undocumented immigrant. In an article in the New York Times Magazine and an interview with ABC News, Vargas says that his mother sent him to the U.S. from the Phillippines when he was twelve, telling him that she would soon join him. But she never did, and Vargas only realized that he was an undocumented immigrant when someone at his local DMV told him his green card was fake. He writes: Over the past 14 years, I’ve graduated from high school and college and built a career as a journalist, interviewing some of the most famous people in the country. On the surface, I’ve created a good life. I’ve lived the American dream. But I am still an undocumented immigrant. And that means living a different kind of reality. It means going about my day in fear of being found out. It means rarely trusting people, even those closest to me, with who I really am. It means keeping my family photos in a shoebox rather than displaying them on shelves in my home, so friends don’t ask about them. It means reluctantly, even painfully, doing things I know are wrong and unlawful. And it has meant relying on a sort of 21st-century underground railroad of supporters, people who took an interest in my future and took risks for me. Vargas used a fake driver’s license when he first became a staff writer at The Washington Post. That license protected him for years; he even used it to get into the White House. He also used fake documents when he worked for The Huffington Post. Vargas told ABC’s Dan Harris that he is making the risky decision to admit his undocumented status as a way to fight for immigrant rights, as well as the passage of the DREAM Act, which would help undocumented children gain citizenship if they join the military or attend college. “We all have a responsibility,” he said. “…You can call me whatever you want to call me, but I am an American.” WATCH: Vargas also announced that he has launched a new website and campaign about immigration called “Define American.”
Continue reading …Avid watchers of tech know that Apple is almost as good at requesting patents (though, its record of defending them is somewhat less impressive ) as it is at actually creating compelling products. Three years after initially filing for the design of a “portable multifunction device” with a multitouch interface, the USPTO has awarded the Cupertino crew a rather broadly worded patent that’s sure to raise few eyebrows amongst its competitors. The language could easily be interpreted to cover practically any device with a multitouch screen, be it tablet or smartphone — which we’re sure Jobs and co. are excited to add to their growing stockpile of claims to gestures and capacitive displays . Whether or not Apple actually uses its recently granted patent to go lawsuit loony against its market rivals remains to be seen but, chances are, it’ll stay quiet for the time being — those battles with Sammy and Lodsys are already consuming plenty of precious resources. Apple granted broad patent for ‘portable multifunction devices’ with multitouch screens originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:17:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …Coalition forces in Afghanistan say their efforts to avoid collateral damage are paying off. Insurgents, by their estimates, are now responsible for 85% of civilian deaths and injuries in the war, up from 75% of deaths and 78% of injuries last year. “The vast majority of civilian casualties are caused…
Continue reading …While students have long contested (and whined about) the dreaded standardized test — a new study shows the ACT test may not be a valid predictor of college success. The study from the National Bureau of Economic Research found that parts of the ACT standardized test — the science and reading sections, which are the
Continue reading …China’s best known artist, looking thinner after 81 days in detention, says ‘I’m fine … I’m on bail. Please understand’ After 81 days in detention, China’s best-known artist, Ai Weiwei, returned home a considerably thinner and noticeably quieter man. “I’m fine. I’m out,” the 54-year-old artist told the Guardian in a telephone call shortly after his release on bail. “I’m back with my family. I’m very happy.” The state news agency, Xinhua, said police had released him “because of his good attitude in confessing his crimes” and a chronic illness. Speaking from his home in north Beijing, the usually outspoken artist said he could not comment any further, adding: “I’m on bail. Please understand.” Ai’s sister Gao Ge said: “I’m very, very happy … we thank everyone, including our media friends, for all their help and support so far.” His mother, Gao Ying, told NPR that the family “won’t sleep tonight”. The artist’s disappearance on 3 April sparked international condemnation, with political leaders calling for his release and sustained protests throughout the art world. He vanished after he was stopped by officials at Beijing airport, where he was due to board a flight to Hong Kong. Officials later said police were investigating him on suspicion of economic crimes, although police never formally notified his family of his detention, which they are supposed to do within a day of seizing a suspect. The Xinhua report on Ai’s release said: “The decision comes also in consideration of the fact that Ai has repeatedly said he is willing to pay the taxes he evaded, police said. The Beijing Fake Cultural Development Ltd, a company Ai controlled, was found to have evaded a huge amount of taxes and intentionally destroyed accounting documents, police said.” Ai’s works include helping design the Olympic Bird’s Nest stadium in Beijing and last year’s Sunflower Seeds installation in Tate Modern’s turbine hall. But he has become as well known for his activism as for his art – although he suggested it was not easy to draw a line between the two. He is the most high profile of dozens of activists and dissidents arrested, detained or harassed in recent months in what campaigners called China’s most severe crackdown on human rights in over a decade. Several are still held and many of those who have been freed are understood to have been released under strict conditions. The decision to bail Ai comes days before Chinese premier Wen Jiabao visits Europe, where leaders were expected to press the case for the release. It is impossible to know whether the events are connected. Although China has often released dissidents on the eve of major political visits, it has not done so recently. A message on the official Twitter feed for the EU president, Herman Van Rompuy, read: “Happy to learn that Ai Weiwei has been released.” Ai’s only contact with the outside world during his detention – a brief 20-minute visit by his wife Lu Qing – was arranged by police on the eve of Van Rompuy’s visit to China last month. At the time Lu said he had looked mentally conflicted and tense despite appearing to be in good physical health and receiving treatment for diabetes and high blood pressure. Nicholas Bequelin, Asia researcher for Human Rights Watch, welcomed Ai’s release. “His detention was political and his release is political. It is the result of a huge domestic and international outcry that forced the government to this resolution … I think Beijing realised how damaging it was to hold China’s most famous artist in detention,” he said. Although in theory police are able to take further action on a case for up to a year after a suspect is bailed, in practice detainees who are released do not usually face trial unless they are judged to have reoffended. Bequelin said Ai would probably have to report to police and would probably not be allowed to travel abroad without official permission. US state department deputy spokesman Mark Toner told a news conference: “It’s always a good thing when an individual who is only in prison for exercising his internationally recognised human rights is released.” Speaking before Ai’s release, Germany’s foreign minister, Guido Westerwelle, said it “would be a big relief for the artist and his family, even though the reported circumstances of his release on bail continue to appear depressing”. Patrick Poon, executive secretary of the Chinese Human Rights Lawyers Concern Group, tweeted: “It’s ‘good news’ for Ai Weiwei and for all of us who support Ai Weiwei and other human rights defenders, but the Chinese government’s handling of Ai Weiwei’s case once again proves that China is miles away from the real ‘rule of law’.” The Chinese government has said Ai’s case was nothing to do with human rights, while his family believed it was retaliation for his social and political activism. But some human rights campaigners thought the economic allegations offered officials room for manoeuvre, whereas they would not have felt able to drop political charges. Catherine Baber, Amnesty International’s Asia-Pacific deputy director, said: “Ai Weiwei must now be granted his full liberty, and not be held in illegal house arrest as has been the pattern with so many others recently released from arbitrary detention.” She also called for the immediate release of his four associates – Wen Tao, one of his friends, Zhang Jinsong, his driver and cousin, Hu Mingfen, an accountant, and Liu Zhenggang, a designer – who went missing shortly after him . Wen’s girlfriend Shi Jing, who had volunteered at Ai’s studio, said: “For both [Ai's] friends and family, it is positive news. “As for Wen Tao, his family hasn’t got any information so far … I still feel anxious, but since Ai is going to be bailed, there will probably be information about the others. They got into this because of Ai’s case, so there should also be news about them.” Ai Weiwei China Human rights Tania Branigan guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …