As if the looming federal probe weren’t bad enough, Google is now facing antitrust investigations from a number of states. California, New York, and Ohio have begun inquiries into the possible anti-competitive threat posed by Google’s search dominance, jumping on a bandwagon Texas started last year, the Financial Times reports….
Continue reading …A new government survey shows that Americans are getting more free time but using it for leisure, reports the Wall Street Journal. This means Americans are working less, sleeping more, and watching a lot of television. (LISTS: Top 10 Reality TV Shows) On average, Americans age 15 or older spent about three hours and 58
Continue reading …The Chinese Communist party’s 90th birthday is the perfect excuse for a modern campaign to glorify the values of the past On a sultry summer afternoon, Mao Zedong and Chiang Kai-shek stand face to face in Beijing’s Longtan Park. In spite of the oppressive heat and the vicious civil war they waged, the chairman gazes at his old foe with serene benevolence. For a moment, the passing tourists freeze. Then they break into grins and crowd around China’s best-known figure for photographs and handshakes. “We saw him on television and were impressed, but this time it was for real, standing in front of us. We’re really honoured to meet him in person,” said 40-year-old Wang Fei. Mao is not, of course, quite the person he was. Thirty-five years after his death, his shoes are filled by impersonator Shang Qingrui. And as the Communist party of China (CPC) prepares for its 90th anniversary , demand for his services has boomed, with guest appearances already lined up at a string of official events. The CPC has plenty to celebrate. It began in 1921 when 13 men gathered on a boat in eastern China to create an illegal organisation. Today it is the world’s largest and most powerful political party, with more than 80 million members and control of the world’s second largest economy. Despite this, it seems necessary to keep today’s members in awe of the glory of the past, hence a busy campaign complete with revolutionary tours, red song concerts and a new patriotic movie that sprinkles its account of the party’s creation with a host of star cameos aimed at younger viewers . As the party moves ever further from its roots – the new film is co-sponsored by Cadilllac – it exploits them to bolster its relentless, Leninist grip on political power. “This is an absurd era,” Professor He Bing of the China University of Politics and Law told graduates in a bold speech this month. “They encourage you to sing revolutionary songs, but do not encourage you to make revolution; they encourage you to watch [the new movie] The Great Achievement of Founding The Party, but they do not encourage you to establish a party.” He Bing’s view is clearly not part of the official campaign. “Let history tell the future!” booms Shang, in between drags on a cigarette that seems as much prop as habit. The impersonator is reliving the highlights of his last engagement – a party for cadres in Inner Mongolia – where he paid tribute to young red heroines who lost limbs to frostbite fighting to save a herd of sheep. His next booking is at a Beijing jail, to raise the morale of staff and re-educate prisoners. He also takes on corporate work although he drew the line at promoting a spa, judging it too undignified. He is one of several “Mao Zedongs”. When it comes to the impersonation business, you could almost say that Mao is China’s Elvis. They even share slicked-back, jet-black hair and instantly recognisable uniforms – although the chairman’s two piece is rather more sombre than the King’s jewelled jumpsuits. But imitating Mao is no joke: this act is deadly serious. Shang, who has also played the leader in television dramas, is hired not for boozy weddings but staid official events. Others make their living impersonating Song Qingline, revolutionary and widow of Sun Yat-sen, and Deng Xiaoping, who began China’s economic reform in the 1980s. But what does it take to become a successful impersonator? “First we need a person to look like them, and then we need the right character and a high level of thought like the great leaders,” said Shang. “Even though China is huge, it’s not easy to find someone combining those aspects.” Only bushy-eyebrowed former Chinese premier Zhou Enlai – Zheng Jianshan to friends – actually belongs to the party. But Shang, 56, sees their work as a vocation. “In Mao’s generation, the spirit was to serve the people. Now everyone has got their eyes on money,” he said. “We grew up learning this culture. It is my responsibility to pass it on, otherwise it will be lost and young people will be lost.” Others believe the real problem is too much reverence for an imagined past. Last month the Caixin website published a taboo-breaking essay on Mao by influential liberal economist Mao Yushi – no relation. It accused the chairman of wrecking the country and unleashing the turmoil of the cultural revolution to avoid blame for the Great Famine – observations commonplace to Westerners but heretical in China. While the party has admitted Mao made mistakes, it cannot dwell on them without jeopardising its own position. Though swiftly deleted, the piece sparked a mass petition demanding the arrest of the “traitorous” author. Some even threatened the 82-year-old with violence . For these Maoists, many of whom are relatively young and stand against what they see as capitalist excesses and foreign influence, this competing version of history represents a struggle between left and right. This is different from the paternal, patriotic, almost apolitical image of the party promoted by current leaders such as Bo Xilai, Chongqing province’s ambitious party secretary . Some think the red culture drive makes the rise of “princelings” such as Bo – the children of revolutionary leaders – look less like inherited opportunity and more like the continuation of a glorious tradition. But it also reflects his populist touch. While many young people dismiss the campaign as dull and irrelevant, others warm to its message of togetherness and the sense of something “purer” than individual consumerism. “The party may have moved far away from some elements of Marxism and Maoism, including the focus on class struggle,” said historian Jeffrey Wasserstrom, author of China in the 21st Century: What Everyone Needs to Know. “But it is easy to see why, when many people feel it stands for nothing other than maintaining its own position of authority, its leaders might want to invoke memories of a more ideological time.” China Communism Tania Branigan guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Director of public prosecutions says Bellfield trial raised ‘fundamental questions’ about all aspects of victim support The family of Milly Dowler has attacked the justice system for their “truly horrifying” experience during the trial of the 13-year-old’s murderer, Levi Bellfield, saying that they had paid “too high a price” for his conviction. After their angry, emotional statements on the steps of the Old Bailey, Keir Starmer, the director of public prosecutions, said the trial had raised “fundamental questions”, which would be examined during a Ministry of Justice review into all aspects of victim support. Surrey police apologised for failings made in the initial investigation when Milly was snatched by Bellfield nine years ago. Earlier the judge who sentenced “cruel and pitiless” Bellfield to life for her murder and kidnap dismissed the jury, which was still deliberating on allegations that Bellfield had tried to abduct another girl, Rachel Cowles, then 11, the day before Milly vanished. Jurors were discharged following what the defence said was an “avalanche” of prejudicial media reports after the Milly verdicts, and the charge was ordered to lie on file. There will be no retrial and the attorney general, Dominic Grieve, will consider whether newspaper and broadcast editors must face contempt of court prosecutions. Milly’s parents, Bob, 59, and Sally, 51, and her sister Gemma, 25, made highly charged statements outside the court on the eve of what would have been Milly’s 23rd birthday. Her father, who like her mother was subjected to brutal cross-examination by Bellfield’s defence, said: “We despair of a justice system that is so loaded in favour of the perpetrator of the crime. “We do not see this as true justice for Milly, merely a criminal conviction. My family has had to pay too high a price for this conviction.” Bellfield, 43, a former club doorman, from West Drayton, Middlesex, denied the abduction and murder of Milly, who vanished while walking home from school in Walton-on-Thames, Surrey, on 21 March, 2002, just yards from where Bellfield was renting a flat. A jury took seven hours to convict him unanimously on Thursday. Surrey police have apologised to the Dowlers, and to Cowles, now 21, for missed opportunities early on in the police investigation which might have led to Bellfield being caught sooner. He went on to murder students Amelie Delagrange, 22, and Marsha McDonnell, 19, and he attempted to murder Kate Sheedy, 18, a convent school head girl. Bob Dowler said the trial had been “a truly mentally scarring experience on an unimaginable scale” and he and his wife both felt as if “we were on trial”. He condemned Bellfield, who refused to give evidence or appear in the dock for sentence, as “spineless and gutless” for hiding behind his defence QC and challenging the testimony of every witness. “Where is the fairness in a system which allows such behaviour?” he said. Starmer said of the Dowlers’ experience: “Those questions require answers and we will be contributing to the review by the Ministry of Justice into all aspects of victim support.” The Crown Prosecution Service said the adversarial nature of the trial system was “designed to test the evidence given by witnesses,” but it would consider the issues raised by the trial. The former home secretary David Blunkett said the case gave pause for thought. “Barristers have to ask themselves the question: are they merely the conduit, are they merely a paid cipher whose job is to do whatever hatchet job they can?” But Peter Lodder, QC, the chairman of the Bar, said: “This was an exceptional case. Whilst, naturally, our sympathy is with the family of the victim, we must be careful to recognise that the right of an accused person to defend himself is absolute.” Milly’s mother, a maths teacher at her daughter’s school in Weybridge, gave vent to her anger and disgust with Bellfield. “I hope whilst he is in prison he is treated with the same brutality he dealt out to his victims and that his life is a living hell.” She broke down after giving evidence, and physically collapsed after the verdict, and described the trial as an “awful experience,” that had violated the family’s privacy. “To actually see that man in court, a man capable of such a vile and inhuman crime, has been grotesque and distressing.” It was unfair, she added, the “length the system goes to protect his human rights” compared to what their family had endured. “For a mother to bury her child in any circumstances is truly agonising, but to bury your child when you know she died in such an appalling way is unutterably awful.” Milly’s sister, Gemma, said: “In my eyes, justice is ‘an eye for an eye’. You brutally murder someone then you pay the ultimate price … ‘a life for a life’. So in my eyes no real justice has been done. Seeing her parents cross-examined “was the worst day of my life”, worse, even than when she heard that Milly’s remains had been found. They had been put through “mental torture”. The way her sister was portrayed “as a depressed teenager has shocked me terribly”. Addressing the Dowler family as he passed sentence, Mr Justice Wilkie said he appreciated the trial process had been “excruciating for them by reason of the issues the defendant instructed his lawyers to raise in his defence”. “I understand that they feel let down by the trial process in that respect. Unfortunately given the nature of the defence it was unavoidable,” he added. Cowles, who sobbed in court as the jury was released, said she was “extremely hurt and angry that some of the media reporting of this case has now robbed me of the chance for justice for what happened in 2002″. The Dowlers said there had been times when the police investigation had left the family “in despair”. Detective chief inspector Maria Woodall said while it was “highly unlikely” that even a perfect initial investigation would have identified Bellfield, Surrey police acknowledged there was “poor initial response” to Rachel Cowles’s allegation of attempted kidnap the day before Milly went missing. The force also admitted that house-to-house inquiries following Milly’s disappearance “although extensive, were not exhaustive”, after it was revealed that they knocked 10 times on Bellfield’s rented flat without response, but did not follow it up. McDonnell’s uncle, Shane, said the family now wanted an inquiry into police handling of the Dowler case to see if lives could be saved. Milly Dowler UK criminal justice Crime Caroline Davies guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The 83-year-old, Emmy-winning actor best known for creating the role ‘Columbo,’ has died. (June 24)
Continue reading …THECLUBHEROS says: Missy Elliott graves disease stabilized: That is some good news for the world of Hip Hop. Missy Elliot explains … http://bit.ly/lgjVF1
Continue reading …It certainly wasn’t staged: New video has emerged showing the moments leading up to the now-legendary kiss at the Vancouver riots—and it’s clear that police knocked the couple down, hovered briefly over them, and moved on. The video shows a distraught Alexandra Thomas being comforted by Scott Jones at…
Continue reading …President Obama spoke at an LGBT fundraiser this evening in New York City, just as the New York Senate prepares to take up marriage equality legislation. Obama addressed the measure directly, reiterating his position that marriage is best left to the states: OBAMA: Part of the reason that DOMA doesn’t make sense is that traditionally Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Think Progress Discovery Date : 24/06/2011 01:36 Number of articles : 4
Continue reading …Booklet was distributed to EU leaders as they sat down to dinner at a Brussels summit on Thursday evening David Cameron seized on an opportunity to voice “immense frustration” at the lavish spending of the Brussels elite after being handed a glossy brochure promoting the European council’s soon to be finished €300m (£270m) headquarters. The brochure was distributed to EU leaders as they sat down to dinner at a Brussels summit on Thursday evening, with Europe facing one of the gravest crises in memory amid predictions of the breakdown of Greece and the potential death of the euro single currency. Herman Van Rompuy of Belgium, the European council president, opened the dinner by passing round the booklet. A lavish, eco-friendly glass and steel construction which will function as a glowing lantern after dark, the Europa Building will house Van Rompuy’s offices and will be the venue for the summits after its completion in 2014. With the EU ordering Greece to cut billions in public spending and undertake a €50bn privatisation round, while itself struggling to generate a €100bn bailout fund to save the country, Van Rompuy’s brochure met with strong criticism. “The prime minister didn’t think this was very well-judged,” said a Downing Street source. “Taxpayers won’t thank us for reminding them how much it costs.” The Downing Street entourage ensured that the pictures were made available to the British media, amid expressions of outrage from government sources. At the press conference after attending his seventh EU summit, Cameron said: “I’m a practical, positive person. But when you see a document being circulated with a great glossy brochure about some great new building for the European council to sit in, it is immensely frustrating. “You do wonder whether these institutions actually get what every country, what every member of the public, is having to go through as we cut budgets and try to make our finances add up.” An aide to Van Rompuy was unapologetic. “This was decided years ago, before the crisis. It will cost more now to cancel than to complete. It’s good value.” Cameron said he found the current summit venue adequate: “I’ve only been to this building seven times in the last year, but it seems to do a perfectly good job of housing the European council.” He conceded that there was little prospect of halting the project – the contracts were awarded in 2005 – but said it should proceed with “economy and efficiency”. He said the European commission and the European institutions had to demonstrate greater frugality. “Our voters, our constituents, our publics want to see us saving, not spending, money.” In Brussels it is already clear that cutting the cost of the EU will be the central campaign of Cameron’s EU policy in the years ahead. The prime minister emphasised the point by announcing that Sir John Cunliffe, his official civil servant adviser on Europe, and the architect of the “five tests” used in 1997 by Gordon Brown when chancellor to keep Tony Blair from taking Britain into the euro, would be the UK ambassador to the EU from January. “The prime minister wanted to make sure that a hard Treasury man was coming over to negotiate” the seven-year EU budget, an official said. The commission in Brussels outlines its 2014-2020 budget proposals next week, signalling the start of an 18-month battle over rebates, farm spending and tax-raising powers. Cunliffe, said Cameron, is “a hugely accomplished civil servant with a great grasp of European issues”. European Union Europe David Cameron Ian Traynor guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Syria denies allegations as EU imposes sanctions against Iranian Revolutionary Guard commanders EU sanctions imposed upon close relatives and business associates of President Bashar al-Assad over the repression in Syria have also targeted commanders of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard. Syria has denied that Iran has been helping to crush unrest, despite claims by western governments and Syrian opposition groups, so the measures against regime figures in Tehran and Damascus, announced in Brussels on Friday, sent a strong message to both countries. Britain denounced Iran’s support for its Arab ally as “absolutely unacceptable” and “blatant hypocrisy”. General Muhammad Ali Jafari, the Revolutionary Guard commander, and General Qasem Soleimani, who leads its elite al-Quds force, both now face EU asset freezes and travel bans. They are already subject to US sanctions. The EU document cites three Iranians as “providing equipment and support to help the Syrian regime suppress protests”. Hossein Taeb is described as the Revolutionary Guard’s deputy commander for intelligence. The guard answers directly to Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and works closely with Iran’s allies in Iraq, Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Palestinian Islamist movement Hamas. It is a priority target for western intelligence agencies. Iran is accused of equipping Syria to block the internet, drawing on its own extensive experience of crushing protests, especially after its disputed 2009 elections. Israeli sources have claimed Iran supplied sniper rifles to Syria and organised a protest march by Palestinians to the occupied Golan Heights. Turkish media reported this week that President Assad’s brother Maher, who has masterminded the military crackdown, is working with Iranian intelligence organisation Savama, which has also been tracking Syrian opposition figures in Turkey. The Sabah daily also claimed Maher has recruited former Iranian Revolutionary Guards for $5,000 (£3,100) a month. Reports from Syrian troublespots have described mysterious bearded men who did not speak Arabic, or others speaking Arabic in the accent of Ahwaz, capital of Iran’s Khuzestan province. Others suggest Lebanese Hezbollah militiamen, allies of Syria, have been involved. Iran has denied any role and accused the US and Israel of “provoking terrorist groups in Syria and the region to carry out terrorist and sabotage operations”. Britain’s foreign secretary, William Hague, said: “The Iranian government’s provision of equipment and technical advice to help suppress peaceful protests is absolutely unacceptable. “Iran’s actions are in stark contrast to the will of the Syrian people. They also highlight again Iran’s blatant hypocrisy, claiming publicly to support freedom in the Arab world, while privately assisting in violent repression.” Western governments say the latest sanctions are designed to increase political and economic pressure on the Assad regime. They apply to Zou al-Hima Shalish, the president’s cousin and security chief who controls a huge contracting firm; Riyad Shalish, his brother and director of military housing, and Khalid Qaddur and Raif al-Quwatli, both business associates of Maher al-Assad. The EU has also targeted four Syrian business entities, two of them owned by Assad’s cousin Rami Makhlouf, the country’s richest businessman, who said last week he intended to make his profits available for public use. EU leaders adopted a declaration condemning the “unacceptable and shocking violence the Syrian regime continues to apply on its own citizens”. “By choosing a path of repression instead of fulfilling its own promises on broad reforms, the regime is calling its legitimacy into question,” it said. “Those responsible for crimes and violence against civilians shall be held accountable.” Iran Arab and Middle East unrest Syria Middle East Europe European Union Bashar Al-Assad Ian Black guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …