Home » Archives by category » News (Page 3526)
Saudi Arabian torment of migrant workers at mercy of abusive ‘madams’

Foreign workers in Saudi Arabia send £17bn to families back home annually. But for some, the cost in physical and mental abuse is too high, writes Jason Burke Shortly after dawn, as the sun rises over the hills behind the city, tens of thousands of women will wake in the Saudi Arabian port of Jeddah and go to work. Maybe 14 or 16 hours later, their day will be over. They are maids, almost all from the Philippines or Indonesia, working for £100-£200 a month. There are more than 500,000 of them in Saudi Arabia, among nearly nine million foreign workers who sweep roads, clean offices, staff coffee shops, drive the cars that women are banned from driving and provide the manpower on the vast construction projects. The story of the maids rarely receives attention, except when a new shocking incident reveals once again the problems many of them face. Last weekend a 54-year-old Indonesian maid was beheaded by sword for killing her female boss with a cleaver. Ruyati binti Sapubi had, an Islamic court heard, endured years of abuse before finally attacking her “madam”, as the maids call their employers, when denied permission to return home. Another Indonesian maid also faces execution for killing her boss whom she alleges tried to rape her. Other recent incidents include a Sri Lankan maid who had nails driven into her legs and arms by her employers, and another who was scalded with a hot iron. Every year, thousands of the maids run away from their employers in Saudi Arabia. Often physically or mentally scarred, they find themselves in a legal limbo. In Saudi Arabia, the consent of employers or “sponsors” is needed before any worker can leave the country. Last week the Observer was able to visit a secret shelter in Jeddah – there are others elsewhere in Saudi Arabia – where 50 women are being looked after by well-wishers. The shelter is tolerated by local authorities, but the women who stay there, often for months on end, are not allowed to leave once they have entered and cannot use mobile phones. Sixteen sleep in a single room. The maids say, however, that it is better than what they left behind. Most tell of fleeing employers who did not pay their wages; many talk of physical, mental or sexual abuse. Rose, a 40-year-old from the island of Leyte, in the far south of the Phillipines, has spent five months in the shelter after fleeing from her employers after her “madam” threw keys into her face, narrowly missing an eye. “I don’t know why she did it. She lost her temper,” said Rose, whose wages were consistently in arrears. Many exist in an illegal netherworld in the sprawling city itself. Muneera, a 33-year-old from the Muslim south of the Philippines – from where many of the maids in deeply conservative Saudi Arabia come – told the Observer that she was sleeping on friends’ floors after fleeing her employers. The family she worked for was “kind”, Muneera said, but the hours were unbearable. “I worked from 5am to 1am, almost every day. I got up to make the children breakfast and get them ready to go to school and then cleaned the house all day, and in the evening my employers would go out and come back at midnight and want dinner. Finally it was just too much,” she said. Beth Medina, a 46-year-old maid, said she ran away after two months. “I had no idea what it was going to be like. If there was a single hair on the floor, madam was angry at me. The only food I got was leftovers from their dinner. If there wasn’t any, I got bread,” she told the Observer . Few of the maids, who are often recruited by agencies in the Philippines, have much idea about where they are going or what will be expected of them. Terms of employment are also variable. As domestic workers, they are not protected by Saudi labour law. Riyadh recently rejected demands from Manila for medical insurance for maids and for information on employers to be supplied before their departure. For their part, Philippine officials refused to accept a cut in the minimum wage for maids from $400 a month to $200. The result is a moratorium on the hiring of maids. Indonesia has also stopped its citizens travelling to Saudi Arabia following the execution last week. Yet the governments are likely to come to some arrangement. There have been such standoffs before, and in relative terms the foreign workers generate huge sums of cash, most of which is sent to needy families at home and provides important revenues for developing nations. Saudi Arabia was the source of £17bn of such “remittances” last year, second only to the US. Entire states in some countries depend on the funds flowing in. Money from the Gulf has transformed parts of India, particularly the Keralan coast, where many Muslims who work in Saudi Arabia live, for example. With such huge sums at stake, the plight of the odd “camel shepherd who dies unnoticed in the desert for a wage of $50 per week” is seen as unimportant, said Mohammed Iftikar, an Indian who works on behalf of foreign workers in Jeddah. But the problems are growing. The number of foreign workers in the kingdom has been edging up, from a quarter of the total population a decade ago to nearly a third today. At the same time, youth unemployment in Saudi Arabia is approaching 30%. The Saudi government is now trying to impose tight restrictions on the number of foreigners any company can hire and clamping down on long-term overseas workers. “We have a young population. We need to generate 6.5 million jobs. At the moment we have jobs that people don’t like to do. So either we create jobs that people like, or we try to convince people to accept the jobs that are available,” Dr Abdul Wahid bin Khalid al-Humaid, the vice-minister of labour, told the Observer in an interview in Riyadh last week. Analysts say it is unlikely, however, that Saudis will replace the foreigners soon. Many foreign workers arrive illegally, smuggled in from Qatar, Kuwait or Yemen. There are estimated to be tens of thousands of “absconders” – as those who have run away from the jobs for which their residence permits were issued are called – from Nepal alone. And the wealth of Saudi Arabia, where the per capita GDP is more than £15,000, continues to attract more people. Many workers both enjoy their time in Saudi Arabia and are grateful for the opportunity employment there gives them. Their example encourages others to travel too. Eileen, a 44-year-old maid from Iloilo in the Philippines, said her employers always paid her monthly wage of £400 on time and even “invited [her] to eat with them sometimes”. Though she gets up at 5.30am and works until late in the evening, she has some time off in the day and each summer travels with the family on holiday to Europe. With the money she earns, Eileen supports the four children of her brother, who died in a car accident last year. “Maybe I am lucky,” she said. One result of the huge foreign population is a cosmopolitanism that lightens the otherwise severe and puritanical atmosphere in Saudi Arabia. Every major city has its “immigrant quarter”, where people from a score or more countries fill cheap restaurants serving food from across Asia and further afield or simply sit on street corners where a dozen different languages can be heard. In Jeddah, it is the old city, Balad. On a Friday night, its car-choked streets were full of Filipino care workers in embroidered headscarves bringing colour to their obligatory black, Saudi-style, abbaya gowns; Indian labourers smoking enthusiastically; Sudanese teenagers earning a few riyals by washing windscreens; and Afghan children begging. Recent arrivals from central Africa collected cardboard packaging to sell for recycling. In the Selamat Datang cafe, Indonesian hotel workers downed traditional dishes from home – with rice, a bowl of soup and a Pepsi – for 14 riyal (£2.30). For Rose, the maid stuck in the secret shelter, and Muneera, the runaway sleeping on friend’s floors, such scenes hold little attraction. Their needs, they say, are simple. Muneera just needs a way out of the trap she has fallen into. She says she will go to the Philippine consulate and seek help. Rose just wants an exit visa, the money for a flight home and enough cash left over to allow her three children to go back to school. “I hope I will go soon,” she said. Saudi Arabia Domestic violence Middle East Philippines Indonesia India Kerala Jason Burke guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Saudi Arabian torment of migrant workers at mercy of abusive ‘madams’

Foreign workers in Saudi Arabia send £17bn to families back home annually. But for some, the cost in physical and mental abuse is too high, writes Jason Burke Shortly after dawn, as the sun rises over the hills behind the city, tens of thousands of women will wake in the Saudi Arabian port of Jeddah and go to work. Maybe 14 or 16 hours later, their day will be over. They are maids, almost all from the Philippines or Indonesia, working for £100-£200 a month. There are more than 500,000 of them in Saudi Arabia, among nearly nine million foreign workers who sweep roads, clean offices, staff coffee shops, drive the cars that women are banned from driving and provide the manpower on the vast construction projects. The story of the maids rarely receives attention, except when a new shocking incident reveals once again the problems many of them face. Last weekend a 54-year-old Indonesian maid was beheaded by sword for killing her female boss with a cleaver. Ruyati binti Sapubi had, an Islamic court heard, endured years of abuse before finally attacking her “madam”, as the maids call their employers, when denied permission to return home. Another Indonesian maid also faces execution for killing her boss whom she alleges tried to rape her. Other recent incidents include a Sri Lankan maid who had nails driven into her legs and arms by her employers, and another who was scalded with a hot iron. Every year, thousands of the maids run away from their employers in Saudi Arabia. Often physically or mentally scarred, they find themselves in a legal limbo. In Saudi Arabia, the consent of employers or “sponsors” is needed before any worker can leave the country. Last week the Observer was able to visit a secret shelter in Jeddah – there are others elsewhere in Saudi Arabia – where 50 women are being looked after by well-wishers. The shelter is tolerated by local authorities, but the women who stay there, often for months on end, are not allowed to leave once they have entered and cannot use mobile phones. Sixteen sleep in a single room. The maids say, however, that it is better than what they left behind. Most tell of fleeing employers who did not pay their wages; many talk of physical, mental or sexual abuse. Rose, a 40-year-old from the island of Leyte, in the far south of the Phillipines, has spent five months in the shelter after fleeing from her employers after her “madam” threw keys into her face, narrowly missing an eye. “I don’t know why she did it. She lost her temper,” said Rose, whose wages were consistently in arrears. Many exist in an illegal netherworld in the sprawling city itself. Muneera, a 33-year-old from the Muslim south of the Philippines – from where many of the maids in deeply conservative Saudi Arabia come – told the Observer that she was sleeping on friends’ floors after fleeing her employers. The family she worked for was “kind”, Muneera said, but the hours were unbearable. “I worked from 5am to 1am, almost every day. I got up to make the children breakfast and get them ready to go to school and then cleaned the house all day, and in the evening my employers would go out and come back at midnight and want dinner. Finally it was just too much,” she said. Beth Medina, a 46-year-old maid, said she ran away after two months. “I had no idea what it was going to be like. If there was a single hair on the floor, madam was angry at me. The only food I got was leftovers from their dinner. If there wasn’t any, I got bread,” she told the Observer . Few of the maids, who are often recruited by agencies in the Philippines, have much idea about where they are going or what will be expected of them. Terms of employment are also variable. As domestic workers, they are not protected by Saudi labour law. Riyadh recently rejected demands from Manila for medical insurance for maids and for information on employers to be supplied before their departure. For their part, Philippine officials refused to accept a cut in the minimum wage for maids from $400 a month to $200. The result is a moratorium on the hiring of maids. Indonesia has also stopped its citizens travelling to Saudi Arabia following the execution last week. Yet the governments are likely to come to some arrangement. There have been such standoffs before, and in relative terms the foreign workers generate huge sums of cash, most of which is sent to needy families at home and provides important revenues for developing nations. Saudi Arabia was the source of £17bn of such “remittances” last year, second only to the US. Entire states in some countries depend on the funds flowing in. Money from the Gulf has transformed parts of India, particularly the Keralan coast, where many Muslims who work in Saudi Arabia live, for example. With such huge sums at stake, the plight of the odd “camel shepherd who dies unnoticed in the desert for a wage of $50 per week” is seen as unimportant, said Mohammed Iftikar, an Indian who works on behalf of foreign workers in Jeddah. But the problems are growing. The number of foreign workers in the kingdom has been edging up, from a quarter of the total population a decade ago to nearly a third today. At the same time, youth unemployment in Saudi Arabia is approaching 30%. The Saudi government is now trying to impose tight restrictions on the number of foreigners any company can hire and clamping down on long-term overseas workers. “We have a young population. We need to generate 6.5 million jobs. At the moment we have jobs that people don’t like to do. So either we create jobs that people like, or we try to convince people to accept the jobs that are available,” Dr Abdul Wahid bin Khalid al-Humaid, the vice-minister of labour, told the Observer in an interview in Riyadh last week. Analysts say it is unlikely, however, that Saudis will replace the foreigners soon. Many foreign workers arrive illegally, smuggled in from Qatar, Kuwait or Yemen. There are estimated to be tens of thousands of “absconders” – as those who have run away from the jobs for which their residence permits were issued are called – from Nepal alone. And the wealth of Saudi Arabia, where the per capita GDP is more than £15,000, continues to attract more people. Many workers both enjoy their time in Saudi Arabia and are grateful for the opportunity employment there gives them. Their example encourages others to travel too. Eileen, a 44-year-old maid from Iloilo in the Philippines, said her employers always paid her monthly wage of £400 on time and even “invited [her] to eat with them sometimes”. Though she gets up at 5.30am and works until late in the evening, she has some time off in the day and each summer travels with the family on holiday to Europe. With the money she earns, Eileen supports the four children of her brother, who died in a car accident last year. “Maybe I am lucky,” she said. One result of the huge foreign population is a cosmopolitanism that lightens the otherwise severe and puritanical atmosphere in Saudi Arabia. Every major city has its “immigrant quarter”, where people from a score or more countries fill cheap restaurants serving food from across Asia and further afield or simply sit on street corners where a dozen different languages can be heard. In Jeddah, it is the old city, Balad. On a Friday night, its car-choked streets were full of Filipino care workers in embroidered headscarves bringing colour to their obligatory black, Saudi-style, abbaya gowns; Indian labourers smoking enthusiastically; Sudanese teenagers earning a few riyals by washing windscreens; and Afghan children begging. Recent arrivals from central Africa collected cardboard packaging to sell for recycling. In the Selamat Datang cafe, Indonesian hotel workers downed traditional dishes from home – with rice, a bowl of soup and a Pepsi – for 14 riyal (£2.30). For Rose, the maid stuck in the secret shelter, and Muneera, the runaway sleeping on friend’s floors, such scenes hold little attraction. Their needs, they say, are simple. Muneera just needs a way out of the trap she has fallen into. She says she will go to the Philippine consulate and seek help. Rose just wants an exit visa, the money for a flight home and enough cash left over to allow her three children to go back to school. “I hope I will go soon,” she said. Saudi Arabia Domestic violence Middle East Philippines Indonesia India Kerala Jason Burke guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Apple product managers respond to Final Cut Pro X criticism

During our call to discuss Final Cut Pro X earlier this week, an Apple product manager boasted about the product’s low price, media management, and ground-up redesign. Unfortunately, when starting from scratch, developers seem to have overlooked a few features that professional users have come to depend on, prompting widespread backlash — both on internet forums and even on Apple’s own App Store, where the $300 download-only app currently has a rating of just 2.5 stars (out of five), including nearly 500 one-star ratings. (Note: you must purchase the app before submitting a rating or review.) The New York Times spoke to product managers about these issues, which include an inability to import old FCP files, no multicamera editing, no support for RED cameras, and no ability to specify QuickTime export settings, among many others. Apple says there are (pricey) workarounds available, or fixes on the way for all but the first issue, but head over to the source link for the full rundown at NYT . Apple product managers respond to Final Cut Pro X criticism originally appeared on Engadget on Sat, 25 Jun 2011 14:48:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Continue reading …

Suspected mobster and longtime flight risk James “Whitey” Bulger will be cooling his heels in lockup after a federal judge denied him bail in his first court appearance yesterday. Bulger, who had $800,000 stashed in his Santa Monica apartment, asked to be declared indigent so that he could get…

Continue reading …
Empire State Building

The Oficial idontuserockets Respone to All Trols New York City 2010 Empire State Building @ New York City TigerCapriceDHB says: It's points you need check out sex video Paris Hilton http://bit.ly/lfEqjP?e=14 #ineedtostop Empire State Building #youcantdateme

Continue reading …

Mj

No Comment
Mj

Michael Jackson’s Dying Wish to Live Forever..flv Billie Jean Cover (In memory of MJ The King) :’) Michael Jackson’s This Is It Review xoxok1tk4txoxo says: RT @justinbieber : MJ deserves to be remembered for how he affected our lives with his music and how he has influenced all of us. That will NEVER die. #RIPMJ

Continue reading …
Jersey Shore Cast

Episode 6: Kim’s Ass is Real? Jersey Shore Cast FIRED After Season 5 I met the jersey shore cast milionaireinfo says: Tattle: Mass eviction for the 'Jersey Shore' cast?: By MOLLY EICHEL COULD THE CURRENT cast of “Jersey Shore” be … http://bit.ly/myGLEH

Continue reading …
Syria reinforces northern border as Turkey loses patience with Assad

Advance on Khirbet al-Jouz seen as a warning after Ankara seeks reforms and end to crackdown on Syrian protesters Syrian officials have ordered military units to step up patrolling near the Turkish border in a warning to its increasingly irate northern neighbour not to establish a buffer zone inside Syria. Diplomats in Ankara and Beirut believe the Syrian advance on the border village of Khirbet al-Jouz, initially portrayed as a sweep against dissidents, was a veiled threat to Turkey, which is steadily turning on President Bashar al-Assad as his regime’s crackdown on dissent continues. In the wake of Assad’s speech last week, Turkish officials gave him one week to start reforms and stop the violent suppression of protests, which is estimated to have killed more than 1,400 people in less than four months. At least 18 were killed and dozens more wounded during nationwide protests on Friday – a relatively low toll compared with the past few Fridays. But the pattern of activists being attacked by the security forces remains the same. British government officials travelled during the week to the south of Turkey to interview Syrian refugees. A Foreign Office official told the Observer that diplomats are compiling accounts of what happened in Jisr al-Shughour and the villages around it during the first two weeks of this month, when the Syrian army mounted a series of raids, followed by an assault that led almost every resident of the 41,000-strong town to flee, first for the nearby hills, then to Turkey. Among the allegations being investigated are claims that Iranian soldiers operated alongside Syrian units – especially the Fourth Division of the army, which is led by Assad’s brother Maher and has a reputation for ruthlessness. The European Union last week adopted sanctions against three leading officers of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, among them Qassem Suleimani, commander of the elite Al-Quds force, who is widely regarded as the leader of all the Iranian military’s clandestine missions abroad. A senior diplomat in Beirut said on Friday that intelligence agencies had evidence that Iran sent weapons to Syria, but had not yet determined whether there had been an actual Iranian presence at demonstrations. In a further sign of Turkish unease with Damascus, officials from the country’s Red Crescent who run the five refugee camps along the border no longer seem to be banned from talking to reporters. Embarrassment to Syria has clearly become less of a concern. Refugee accounts are being used to compile a referral to the international criminal court, which will be asked to prosecute Assad and key regime officials for crimes against humanity. The referral is being prepared by several rights groups, including Insan, which is also compiling testimonies from defecting Syrian soldiers. Turkey’s growing diplomatic anger at Syria has made Istanbul an attractive hub for the Syrian opposition movement, which has received scores of defectors in recent weeks. Beirut, which is less than three hours’ drive from Damascus and offers easy access to Syrian citizens, is now considered too dangerous for anti-regime dissidents. “It is a clearing house only,” said one Syrian activist who directs a network of dissidents across the border. “There are many ways that the regime can get to people here – they don’t even have to be here themselves. They just use their proxies.” One Syrian journalist who fled to Beirut has told the rights group Avaaz of his capture by Lebanese military intelligence officers. The journalist says he was seized from a coffee shop in Jounieh, 25km north of Beirut. He said he was first asked by a stranger to step outside for a conversation, then seized and taken to a fetid barracks where he was interrogated for several days. “During the days I spent in Beirut, some other Syrian activists were kidnapped and extradited to the Syrian security police,” he said. “The Lebanese authorities have also captured the few fugitive Syrian soldiers who had fled Syria through the borders, and then turned them in to Syria, claiming that it had to because of the security agreement signed between the two countries.” At least 1,000 refugees crossed into Lebanon at the Wadi Khalled border point on Friday, including five men with gunshot wounds, after an assault on the Syrian city of Homs, according to Lebanese officials. A resident of the border village told the Observer that Syrian army units had opened fire towards the wounded as they attempted to enter Lebanon. Syria Turkey Bashar Al-Assad Lebanon Arab and Middle East unrest Iran Middle East Europe Martin Chulov guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
New York: Activists celebrate gay marriage victory, but the fight goes on

Republicans in New York senate who agreed with reform now face onslaught from embittered members of their own party Gay rights activists in America were celebrating yesterday after New York became the biggest state in the country to allow same-sex couples to marry. It has become the sixth state in America where gay marriage is legal, but this only happened after a ferocious battle that had put its government on virtual hold as the issue was fought over. The nail-biting decision in the state’s senate had been debated and delayed for weeks and was eventually passed by just four votes late on Friday, in a move that triggered celebrations by gay men and women and their supporters. The first gay weddings are expected to be held in the state in just 30 days. On the streets of the West Village in Manhattan – and especially around the gay-friendly pubs and clubs of Christopher Street, where the modern gay rights movement was born – people celebrated and danced in the streets. Crowds of gay and straight people sang and cheered as the news spread. Mayor Michael Bloomberg also welcomed the development. “Today we are stronger than we were yesterday,” he said. Gay rights activists had focused on New York as the biggest battle so far in their continuing fight to give gay couples the same rights and status as heterosexual ones in America. It became a powerful symbolic battleground for both gay people and their opponents, especially as several high-profile Republican presidential candidates are using the issue in their nascent campaigns. New York’s Democratic governor, Andrew Cuomo, had made gay marriage a key pledge, but activists had to get a vote through the Republican-controlled state senate. Huge efforts were put into persuading a handful of wavering Republicans to join Democrats in passing the law. One of them, Stephen Saland, had voted against gay marriage in 2009, but gave a speech outlining his change of heart. “My intellectual and emotional journey has ended here today and I have to find doing the right thing as treating all persons with equality,” he said. Another senator, Mark Grisanti, explained his motives for going back on a campaign vow to oppose the move. “I cannot deny a person, a human being, a taxpayer, a worker, the same rights I have with my wife,” he said. The move made New York’s senate the first Republican-controlled legislative body in America to vote in favour of gay marriage. It is a huge win for gay rights groups, who poured millions of dollars and thousands of hours’ work into the campaign. Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign, said: “History was made today in New York. This victory sends a message that marriage equality across the country will be a reality very soon.” Others pointed out the huge difference it will make to gay New Yorkers’ personal lives. Herndon Graddick, a senior director at the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, said: “At the heart of this vote are loving and committed New Yorkers who simply want the same thing all Americans want: the ability to take care of the people they love and to protect their families.” However, the fight in America is far from over. While New York joins the states of New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa and Vermont, as well as Washington DC, as places where gay marriage is legal, in most parts of the country the issue remains fraught. California and Maine allowed same-sex marriage, only to have critics fight back and outlaw it again. Opponents of gay marriage vowed to do the same in New York and promised that Republicans who had helped pass the vote would pay for it at the ballots. The National Organisation for Marriage swore to spend at least $2m (£1.25m) in 2012 campaigning against Republicans who had switched sides. “Politicians who campaign one way on marriage, and then vote the other, need to understand: betraying and misleading voters has consequences, too. We are not giving up, we will continue to fight to protect marriage in New York,” said the NOM president, Brian Brown. Other NOM officials fumed at the state’s Republican party in language reflecting feelings of anger and betrayal. “The New York Republican party is dysfunctional,” said NOM chairwoman Maggie Gallagher. “The Republican party in New York is responsible for passing gay marriage, and sadly it’s the families of New York who will pay the worst price of the new government-backed redefinition of marriage.” Opponents of gay marriage have been largely social conservatives and religious groups. New York’s Roman Catholic church has campaigned openly against the idea, drawing criticism from liberal commentators, who contrast its concern for the poor and other vulnerable minorities with its attitudes towards gay people. But church leaders were not backing down. “The passage by the legislature of a bill to alter radically and forever humanity’s historic understanding of marriage leaves us deeply disappointed and troubled,” said the New York State Catholic Conference in a statement. But even that organisation seemed to tacitly admit that, in New York at least, the tide of history and public opinion was turning against it when it came to believing that marriage could only be between a man and a woman. “This definition cannot change, though we realise that our beliefs about the nature of marriage will continue to be ridiculed,” it added in the statement. In recent years the issue of gay marriage has become one of the biggest topics in American politics. Supporters have framed it as a modern civil rights issue continuing the tradition of the 1960s movement to get voting rights for black Americans. Opponents, however, have seen it as an attack on traditional values and conservatives have successfully used it as a rallying cry to mobilise their base. Republicans have used proposals to ban gay marriage to bring out conservative voters. Leading politicians, such as presidential candidate Michele Bachmann, have made their anti-gay marriage attitudes a cornerstone of their agenda. However, the vote in New York represents a big victory for Cuomo, a rising star of the Democratic party. Though he has been criticised by progressives for being too hard on trade unions in seeking to curb state spending, passing gay marriage will help to cement his support among liberals. It will also contrast with the official position of President Barack Obama. Many gay voters supported Obama in his 2008 election campaign but have since been disappointed by his refusal to back gay marriage. Just last week Obama faced angry gay supporters at a New York political fundraiser where he failed to publicly back the state’s planned law. Critics of his position say Obama is unwilling to risk alienating the political centre in 2012 by embracing gay marriage. New York Gay rights United States Catholicism Paul Harris guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

They say you can tell a lot about a society by how it treats its old people. These politicians in their deficit frenzy are cutting into the bone for a lot of people, especially for older women. If a woman gets $1,100 a month at age 65, replacing the current cost of living adjustment with the chained CPI mean $56 less per month and $672 less per year at age 80. That’s a lot of money for people who are scraping by: (Washington, D.C.) Today the National Women’s Law Center (NWLC) released a new report that shows how deficit reduction proposals to change the way cost of living adjustments (COLAs) are calculated in federal benefit programs—such as Social Security—underestimate the effect of inflation on the elderly and would especially harm women. The proposed switch to a new measure of inflation may appear to be a mere technical adjustment, but this report shows how the change will result in significant cuts to Social Security benefits that deepen over the years and dramatically increase economic insecurity among the elderly—especially women. The proposed change delivers a triple whammy to women, according to NWLC’s report, Cutting the Social Security COLA by Changing the Way Inflation is Calculated Would Especially Hurt Women (view the report: http://www.nwlc.org/resource/cutting-social-security-cola-changing-way-inflation-calculated-would-especially-hurt-women). Since women live longer than men, they face deeper cuts in their Social Security benefits under the proposed new measure of inflation, known as the “chained Consumer Price Index,” because the cuts from this reduced COLA get deeper each year . Women rely more on income from Social Security, so these cuts would represent a larger share of their total retirement income. And since older women are already more economically vulnerable than older men, these cuts would leave many of them unable to meet basic needs. “This proposal is a stealth attack on the economic security of older women,” said Joan Entmacher, NWLC Vice-President for Family Economic Security. “That is a shameful way to solve our nation’s deficit problem.” Various deficit-reduction plans call for switching to the chained CPI, and it is reportedly being considered in the deficit talks convened by Vice President Joe Biden.

Continue reading …