More than 500 females of various ages armed to the teeth and swearing loyalty are paraded in front of international media Screaming and chanting his name, the 500 women and girls vowed their undying love for one man. Not a pop star or Hollywood actor, but Libya’s Colonel Muammar Gaddafi. “Kill all the people in Libya first, then come for Muammar Gaddafi,” said 14-year-old Fatima Hassan. “I will kill myself if Muammar Gaddafi is killed. I know our people will kill themselves if he dies.” The event in Tripoli on Sunday was billed as a graduation ceremony for women who had been given weapons training in defence of the regime. Around 50 international journalists, invited and escorted by government minders, arrived to find them clapping, singing, ululating, punching the air and waving green flags in a tented hall set up with chandeliers and two colossal flatscreen TVs. There were elderly women and little girls in the hall, and every age in between. Some held aloft pictures of a luminous Gaddafi, one framed in green Christmas tinsel. A woman waved a green flag and wore a sparkly green cape, green scarf and green bandana with badges showing Gaddafi’s face. Next to her was a woman wearing a watch that displayed his image. Reporters pondered whether the event had been stage managed entirely for their benefit. The Gaddafi groupies painted the first dozen rows green, but behind them were hundreds of empty seats. Outside was a rattle of gunfire as some enthusiastic graduates fired their new weapons into the air with little regard for where the ammunition might land. There was also much idolatry, most of all from the teenager Fatima, who said her father is an engineer and she attended an international school near Edgware Road in London. “We love Muammar Gaddafi and we want to save our country,” she said. “He made us happy. He makes us eat and makes the country free to do what we want. Before, we weren’t free. My grandparents tell us that before Gaddafi, it was bad, there was no bread. He saved us.” Pledging to fight for the man depicted on her necklace, she explained: “There are no women and children now.” Fatima claimed her five brothers have gone to fight for the regime against rebels in Benghazi and Misrata. Asked how she would feel if they were killed, she replied: “It doesn’t matter. I don’t care. It’s for the leader.” With government minders hovering nearby, there was similar fervour from Habib Abdul Qasem, 39, a nanny dressed in military fatigues. “Of course I will defend myself and my country,” she said. “We are an armed nation; everyone in this country has weapons. I keep a gun in my house. I’ve never used it but if the conditions change I will use it against the Crusasders.” Nadia Ali, 30, an unemployed interior designer, added: “We want a Libya that’s strong. Muammar Gaddafi is our father. There is some problem in the rebels’ head. Muammar Gaddafi is a good man who loves the Libyan people. He gave us something.” Gaddafi’s detail of female bodyguards has become the stuff of legend during his near 42-year rule. It is not yet clear what role the newly-trained women will play militarily and whether they could be pressed into action if the Libyan army is overstretched. Moussa Ibrahim, a government spokesman, said: “Libyan women are now joining the armed forces against Nato. We are training them. Their main role is defending homes. We have no plan to send them to the front line. They are not trained for that, and our army is very effective.” But he added with a rhetorical flourish: “We are going to make sure that every mother, the symbol of love and creation, is a bomb, a killing machine.” Ibrahim insisted that the regime is stronger than ever and there has been no discussion of surrender. “We are prepared to give 1.2m weapons away and we have been training many, many, many ordinary Libyans.” The set piece over, journalists were shepherded back to their official bus, but it remained stationary for long minutes as the celebratory gunfire came ever closer. There was growing anxiety on board over the potential for stray bullets. When this was expressed to a government minder, he replied tartly: “Your planes are bombing the Libyan people and you are afraid of a bullet?” Libya Middle East Middle East Muammar Gaddafi David Smith guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …WASHINGTON — A cellphone of Osama bin Laden’s trusted courier recovered in the U.S. raid last month that killed both men in Pakistan contained contacts to a militant group that is a longtime asset of Pakistan’s intelligence agency, The New York Times reported late Thursday. In a story posted on the Times website, senior American officials and others briefed on the findings said the discovery indicates bin Laden used the group, Harakat-ul-Mujahedeen, as part of his support network inside Pakistan. It raises questions about whether the group and others helped shelter and support the al-Qaida leader on behalf of Pakistan’s spy agency. The officials and analysts told the Times that Pakistan’s intelligence agency had mentored Harakat and allowed it to operate in Pakistan for at least 20 years. In tracing the calls on the cellphone, U.S. analysts have determined that Harakat commanders had called Pakistani intelligence officials, the senior American officials said. One said they had met. The officials added that the contacts were not necessarily about bin Laden and that there was no “smoking gun” showing that Pakistan’s spy agency had protected bin Laden. Beyond providing leads about why bin Laden was able to live comfortably for years in Abbottabad, a town dominated by the Pakistani military just 35 miles from the capital city of Islamabad, the discovery also may help shed light on bin Laden’s secret odyssey after he slipped away from U.S. forces in the Tora Bora region of Afghanistan nearly 10 years ago. Harakat has especially deep roots in the area around Abbottabad, analysts familiar with the group told the Times. Its leaders have strong ties with both al-Qaida and Pakistani intelligence, known as Inter-Services Intelligence. The senior American officials did not identify the commanders whose numbers were in the courier’s cellphone but said the militants were in South Waziristan, where al-Qaida and other groups had been based for years. Harakat’s network would have allowed bin Laden to pass on messages and money to Qaida members there and in other parts of Pakistan’s tribal areas, analysts and officials said. Bin Laden and his courier, Ibrahim Saeed Ahmed, was discovered by U.S. intelligence through a chance interception of an Ahmed phone call. That set in motion the secret CIA search of the Abbottabad region, culminating with the May 2 raid by Navy SEALs that killed bin Laden, Ahmed’s brother Abrar and two other people.
Continue reading …Daniel Craig & Rachel Weisz Marry : From Her Famous Baby Daddy! On Live Video Daniel Craig & Rachel Weisz Marry — Right After She Splits From Her Famous Baby Daddy! Breaking News: Rachel Weisz, Daniel Craig Get Married! blakhoode says: oh wow! rachel weisz is trending! she's always been one of my top 5 hollywood loves. what a shame she's trending for marrying 007.
Continue reading …This year marks the 20th anniversary of the film adaptation of Dave Stevens’ Rocketeer comics, and John Banana has created an animated tribute that’s pretty dang awesome. Check it out. Broadcasting platform : Vimeo Source : Robot 6 Discovery Date : 24/06/2011 19:00 Number of articles : 4
Continue reading …This year marks the 20th anniversary of the film adaptation of Dave Stevens’ Rocketeer comics, and John Banana has created an animated tribute that’s pretty dang awesome. Check it out. Broadcasting platform : Vimeo Source : Robot 6 Discovery Date : 24/06/2011 19:00 Number of articles : 4
Continue reading …Attorneys for the Florida mother charged with murdering her 2-year-old daughter were expected to continue calling witnesses on Saturday. But after meeting with lawyers from both sides, the judge announced that court would adjourn until Monday. (June 26)
Continue reading …Attorneys for the Florida mother charged with murdering her 2-year-old daughter were expected to continue calling witnesses on Saturday. But after meeting with lawyers from both sides, the judge announced that court would adjourn until Monday. (June 26)
Continue reading …Click here to view this media After Van Jones gave his speeches both at Netroots Nation 2011 and with his Rebuild the Dream movement , I was glad to see him get some air time on MSNBC to talk about the political games the Republicans are playing with their hostage taking on raising the debt ceiling. We’d be well served if we had more of their Democratic counterparts speaking this clearly and succinctly as Jones and former adviser to Vice President Joe Biden, Jared Bernstein did here. I really liked Jones’ hand grenade analogy on Medicare. I actually think the Republicans are cynical enough to try to force the Democrats to make cuts to the program and then try to run against them on it in 2012 and hope that the public is uninformed enough along with a complicit media that would help with that factor for them to get away with it. As Jones noted, they need to get out there and defend the program if they don’t want that hand grenade to blow up in their face. I don’t know about anyone else, but as someone who has been following this issue, I’m sick to death of the Republicans throwing temper tantrums and telling the public that they’d be willing to let the world’s economy crash if they don’t get their way on tax cuts whether it be Cantor or McConnell of any of the rest of them. It’s long past time for the majority of our media to start calling out these hostage takers if they would like to still have a country worth living in, and not one in the middle of another depression, which there’s some argument about whether we’re already there now. For far too many Americans sadly, we may as well be. O’DONNELL: In the House, they walked out of the budget negotiations. Cantor, simply because they were talking about tax expenditures. No one, the Democrats, the Vice President, no one was talking about raising income tax rates of any kind, just going after the expenditures. BERNSTEIN: That is a key point, that is a key, I wrote about that on my blog today. It’s a key point. No one was, the thing that you hear Republicans inveigh against the most and the conservative supply side theory economist, the thing they inveigh against the most is an increase in tax rates, but if you broaden the base and close loopholes, you’re not increasing rates. And so that’s the way, that’s the direction that this panel needs to head now I think. O’DONNELL: Van, Sen. Chuck Schumer said today that they were looking at possibilities in Medicare, the what they call the delivery system in Medicare. There might be some ways to shave things there. Not cuts that would in any way affect beneficiaries. This is the kind of cuts that Democrats have done many times before. President Clinton did $200 billion in that his first six months in office, he did a big Medicare cut, but it was all on the provider side of the equation. If the Democrats go into Medicare in that way, will that undercut any of the argument they’ve been making against Paul Ryan? JONES: You know, we’re going to have to get all the way through this process, because I will say this. Somebody throws you a hand grenade, you can try to fiddle with it, or you can throw it back. And part of the problem is, that we get so earnest trying to figure out, well maybe we can do this, maybe we can do that, and we are holding the hand grenade they want us to hold. Here’s the bottom line, Medicare, the main threat to Medicare, is coming from the Republican Party, that’s the main threat. And Democrats need to stand up and defend the basic principles of this program, which is a sound program. When we begin to accept the terms of debate of the other side and start to fool around and fiddle with the hand grenade, we always wind up with the explosion in our face. O’DONNELL: Jared Bernstein, have the Democrats accepted, as Van says, too many of the terms of the debate set by the other side? BERNSTEIN: Look, the Democrats have held fast on this issue of revenues. Someone who makes an argument that the Democrats have been spineless and self-negotiating and folded too soon, I don’t think they can make that case here. Because I think the Democrats, President Obama, Vice President Biden, everyday I read in the paper that they’re holding fast on the revenue piece of this. And that’s critical. And when they sat down at the table, they didn’t have a fifty fifty spending cut revenue plan. They actually had three dollars in spending cuts to one dollar of revenue. So they’ve been bargaining in good faith from the very beginning. JONES: That’s what we think. O’DONNELL: What do you do when Republicans say, alright, we’ve talked about what we want to talk about, spending cuts. We may have reached a few tentative areas of agreement, just not specific agreements, but now, if you want to talk about revenues, you want to talk about anything involving the tax code, we’re leaving. How do you have the next conversation with them? JONES: Well, I tell you what. I think that the American people, ordinary folks, I’ve been out in the country, we just launched this new campaign called RebuildTheDream.com. The whole point of it is, most Americans get it. They know we’re going to have to have a more balanced approach. The polls show it that we can’t just have this lopsided cut, cut, cut. You know, frankly, the private sector already imposed an austerity program on us, that was Wall Street, the crash, it’s called the great recession. We don’t need a public austerity program imposed upon us on top of the private sector austerity program. What we need to do is to make sure that we have a balanced approach going forward. And I think that the pain that ordinary people are going through already in the country, these veterans who are coming home to no jobs, no hope and nothing, these kids who are graduating this spring into the worst job market in two generations, homeowners who are underwater desperately, and these banks that we rescued won’t even let them renegotiate the principals or the rates, that level of pain, needs to be heard from in Washington D.C. and instead what we hear is, we’re going to destroy Medicare and if you to raise one penny more of revenue from the richest people in America, we’re going to walk out on you. And you and I both know, we can deal with the deficit, just by within ten years, just by going back to Bill Clinton’s good, smart tax policies and military expenditure levels and we’d be done. So my concern is this point. If we have these kind of shenanigans going on in Washington D.C. and the American people are hurting, that at some point we’re going to have to stand up and bring some good wisdom and get this back to Washington D.C. O’DONNELL: Jared a quick last word. BERNSTEIN: I couldn’t agree more. I mean, it’s the wisdom of the American people that ultimately have to solve this deal. You know the Paul Ryan budget takes $3 trillion from low income programs and gives a trillion dollars to the richest people who are already the only ones who are actually doing okay right now. I can’t imagine why that’s okay with people when they know what it’s really about. Those twenty plus million on and underemployed people, I guarantee you there’s a number of tea parties in that group too. It’s time for the politicians to hear from the American people that this behavior is wholly unacceptable. Sit down at the table. Get the deal done. Get past the debt ceiling and get back to work.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media After Van Jones gave his speeches both at Netroots Nation 2011 and with his Rebuild the Dream movement , I was glad to see him get some air time on MSNBC to talk about the political games the Republicans are playing with their hostage taking on raising the debt ceiling. We’d be well served if we had more of their Democratic counterparts speaking this clearly and succinctly as Jones and former adviser to Vice President Joe Biden, Jared Bernstein did here. I really liked Jones’ hand grenade analogy on Medicare. I actually think the Republicans are cynical enough to try to force the Democrats to make cuts to the program and then try to run against them on it in 2012 and hope that the public is uninformed enough along with a complicit media that would help with that factor for them to get away with it. As Jones noted, they need to get out there and defend the program if they don’t want that hand grenade to blow up in their face. I don’t know about anyone else, but as someone who has been following this issue, I’m sick to death of the Republicans throwing temper tantrums and telling the public that they’d be willing to let the world’s economy crash if they don’t get their way on tax cuts whether it be Cantor or McConnell of any of the rest of them. It’s long past time for the majority of our media to start calling out these hostage takers if they would like to still have a country worth living in, and not one in the middle of another depression, which there’s some argument about whether we’re already there now. For far too many Americans sadly, we may as well be. O’DONNELL: In the House, they walked out of the budget negotiations. Cantor, simply because they were talking about tax expenditures. No one, the Democrats, the Vice President, no one was talking about raising income tax rates of any kind, just going after the expenditures. BERNSTEIN: That is a key point, that is a key, I wrote about that on my blog today. It’s a key point. No one was, the thing that you hear Republicans inveigh against the most and the conservative supply side theory economist, the thing they inveigh against the most is an increase in tax rates, but if you broaden the base and close loopholes, you’re not increasing rates. And so that’s the way, that’s the direction that this panel needs to head now I think. O’DONNELL: Van, Sen. Chuck Schumer said today that they were looking at possibilities in Medicare, the what they call the delivery system in Medicare. There might be some ways to shave things there. Not cuts that would in any way affect beneficiaries. This is the kind of cuts that Democrats have done many times before. President Clinton did $200 billion in that his first six months in office, he did a big Medicare cut, but it was all on the provider side of the equation. If the Democrats go into Medicare in that way, will that undercut any of the argument they’ve been making against Paul Ryan? JONES: You know, we’re going to have to get all the way through this process, because I will say this. Somebody throws you a hand grenade, you can try to fiddle with it, or you can throw it back. And part of the problem is, that we get so earnest trying to figure out, well maybe we can do this, maybe we can do that, and we are holding the hand grenade they want us to hold. Here’s the bottom line, Medicare, the main threat to Medicare, is coming from the Republican Party, that’s the main threat. And Democrats need to stand up and defend the basic principles of this program, which is a sound program. When we begin to accept the terms of debate of the other side and start to fool around and fiddle with the hand grenade, we always wind up with the explosion in our face. O’DONNELL: Jared Bernstein, have the Democrats accepted, as Van says, too many of the terms of the debate set by the other side? BERNSTEIN: Look, the Democrats have held fast on this issue of revenues. Someone who makes an argument that the Democrats have been spineless and self-negotiating and folded too soon, I don’t think they can make that case here. Because I think the Democrats, President Obama, Vice President Biden, everyday I read in the paper that they’re holding fast on the revenue piece of this. And that’s critical. And when they sat down at the table, they didn’t have a fifty fifty spending cut revenue plan. They actually had three dollars in spending cuts to one dollar of revenue. So they’ve been bargaining in good faith from the very beginning. JONES: That’s what we think. O’DONNELL: What do you do when Republicans say, alright, we’ve talked about what we want to talk about, spending cuts. We may have reached a few tentative areas of agreement, just not specific agreements, but now, if you want to talk about revenues, you want to talk about anything involving the tax code, we’re leaving. How do you have the next conversation with them? JONES: Well, I tell you what. I think that the American people, ordinary folks, I’ve been out in the country, we just launched this new campaign called RebuildTheDream.com. The whole point of it is, most Americans get it. They know we’re going to have to have a more balanced approach. The polls show it that we can’t just have this lopsided cut, cut, cut. You know, frankly, the private sector already imposed an austerity program on us, that was Wall Street, the crash, it’s called the great recession. We don’t need a public austerity program imposed upon us on top of the private sector austerity program. What we need to do is to make sure that we have a balanced approach going forward. And I think that the pain that ordinary people are going through already in the country, these veterans who are coming home to no jobs, no hope and nothing, these kids who are graduating this spring into the worst job market in two generations, homeowners who are underwater desperately, and these banks that we rescued won’t even let them renegotiate the principals or the rates, that level of pain, needs to be heard from in Washington D.C. and instead what we hear is, we’re going to destroy Medicare and if you to raise one penny more of revenue from the richest people in America, we’re going to walk out on you. And you and I both know, we can deal with the deficit, just by within ten years, just by going back to Bill Clinton’s good, smart tax policies and military expenditure levels and we’d be done. So my concern is this point. If we have these kind of shenanigans going on in Washington D.C. and the American people are hurting, that at some point we’re going to have to stand up and bring some good wisdom and get this back to Washington D.C. O’DONNELL: Jared a quick last word. BERNSTEIN: I couldn’t agree more. I mean, it’s the wisdom of the American people that ultimately have to solve this deal. You know the Paul Ryan budget takes $3 trillion from low income programs and gives a trillion dollars to the richest people who are already the only ones who are actually doing okay right now. I can’t imagine why that’s okay with people when they know what it’s really about. Those twenty plus million on and underemployed people, I guarantee you there’s a number of tea parties in that group too. It’s time for the politicians to hear from the American people that this behavior is wholly unacceptable. Sit down at the table. Get the deal done. Get past the debt ceiling and get back to work.
Continue reading …