That super thin Eee PC X101 that we manhandled back at Computex is just about ready to make its retail debut. Starting in July you’ll be able to pick one up one of these MeeGo -running crimson clamshells for $199 or, if you’re a fan of desktop apps, Windows 7 versions (X101H) starting at $310. Inside the base model you’ll find a 1.33GHz, single-core Atom N435, a six-cell battery, and a small SSD (probably of the 16GB variety). Unfortunately, the two most important details — can it cut a cake and will it blend — remain unanswered. Slim ASUS Eee PC X101 to hit shelves next month originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:47:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …A South Carolina mother has been busted for for killing her 6-week-old baby with drug-tainted breast milk. Stephanie Greene, 37, is a pill addict, and had so much morphine in her system that her baby overdosed, reports the New York Daily News . Greene began using Fentanyl and Hydrocodon in 2009,…
Continue reading …(YouTube link) For some reason, possibly to achieve a viral video, this guy puts his GoPro camera down on the ground, running. The temptation was too much for a seagull in Cannes, France. It snatched the bait and took off, saying “Mine. Mine. Mine.” There is no information on how he got the camera back. -via Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Neatorama Discovery Date : 25/06/2011 19:03 Number of articles : 3
Continue reading …French president says post-Fukushima abandonment of nuclear ‘makes no sense’ as he announces push for new technology The French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, has bucked the anti-nuclear trend following Japan’s Fukushima disaster by pledging €1bn of investment in atomic power. Despite growing worldwide concern about the safety of nuclear plants, Sarkozy said the moratorium on new nuclear reactors adopted by certain countries since the Japanese nuclear crisis in March “makes no sense”. “There is no alternative to nuclear energy today,” he told journalists on Monday. “We are going to devote €1bn to the nuclear programme of the future, particularly fourth-generation technology,” Sarkozy said. Sarkozy also promised “substantial resources” to strengthen research into nuclear safety and a further €1.3bn (£1.2bn) investment in renewable energy. The announcement confirming France’s commitment to atomic power came as neighbouring Germany drew up plans to shut all its nuclear stations by 2022. It also came 24 hours after thousands of anti-nuclear protesters formed a human chain outside France’s oldest nuclear power station to demand its closure. The plant at Fessenheim in Alsace, on France’s border with Germany, has become the focus of a fierce debate over nuclear safety. At the weekend, demonstrators from France, Germany and Switzerland surrounded the plant calling for its number one reactor, in operation since 1977, to be taken out of service, claiming it was vulnerable to flooding and earthquakes. The plant is operated by French power group EDF. The German chancellor, Angela Merkel, announced in May that Germany would phase out its 17 nuclear reactors, which provide up to 40% of the country’s energy, by 2022 at a cost of €40bn. She said Germany would concentrate on renewable energy sources. “We want to end the use of nuclear energy and reach the age of renewable energy as fast as possible,” Merkel said. Switzerland has also decided not to replace its five existing nuclear reactors, which supply around 40% of its energy, when they reach the end of their working life. The last of the nuclear stations is expected to end production by 2034, leaving time for Switzerland to develop alternative power sources. Italy’s prime minister, Silvio Berlusconi, sought to restart his country’s nuclear programme, abandoned in the 1980s. But 94% of Italian voters rejected the idea in a referendum earlier this month. France has 58 nuclear reactors, which supply 74% of its electricity, and is the world’s largest net exporter of electricity from nuclear sources. Sarkozy said France was known to be “considerably ahead” of other countries in terms of atomic power technology and safety. “Our power stations are more expensive because they are safer,” he said. Following the Fukushima nuclear accidents, caused by a combination of earthquake and tsunami, the French prime minister, François Fillon, asked the nuclear safety authority to carry out an “open and transparent” audit of the country’s nuclear installations, examining the risks of flood and earthquake damage, loss of power and cooling, and emergency accident procedure, to examine if any improvements could be made. Its conclusions are expected in September. All 143 working nuclear power plants in the EU’s 27 member states are facing new safety tests in the wake of the Fukushima disaster. French ecology minister Nathalie Kosciusko-Morizet said no decision on the future of Fessenheim would be made before the nuclear safety watchdog submitted its report. France Nuclear power Nicolas Sarkozy European Union Europe Energy Kim Willsher guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Let doctors whine all they want — we all know many doctors are turning away Medicaid patients, especially if they’re specialists. We’re not going to figure out how to solve this problem by simply guessing at how widespread the practice is: WASHINGTON — Alarmed by a shortage of primary care doctors, Obama administration officials are recruiting a team of “mystery shoppers” to pose as patients, call doctors’ offices and request appointments to see how difficult it is for people to get care when they need it. The administration says the survey will address a “critical public policy problem”: the increasing shortage of primary care doctors, including specialists in internal medicine and family practice. It will also try to discover whether doctors are accepting patients with private insurance while turning away those in government health programs that pay lower reimbursement rates. Federal officials predict that more than 30 million Americans will gain coverage under the health care law passed last year. “These newly insured Americans will need to seek out new primary care physicians, further exacerbating the already growing problem” of a shortage of physicians in the United States, the Department of Health and Human Services said in a description of the project prepared for the White House. Plans for the survey have riled many doctors because the secret shoppers will not identify themselves as working for the government. “I don’t like the idea of the government snooping,” said Dr. Raymond Scalettar, an internist in Washington. “It’s a pernicious practice — Big Brother tactics, which should be opposed.” In other words, he wants to take public money when it suits him, but he doesn’t want any serious oversight? According to government documents obtained from Obama administration officials, the mystery shoppers will call medical practices and ask if doctors are accepting new patients and, if so, how long the wait would be. The government is eager to know whether doctors give different answers to callers depending on whether they have public insurance, like Medicaid, or private insurance, like Blue Cross and Blue Shield.
Continue reading …SAN FRANCISCO — The photograph on Home Depot’s website shows a line of smiling soldiers unloading a truck stacked with power tools and other company wares. The company says this shows “federal dollars go farther at The Home Depot.” San Francisco Attorney Paul Scott says the photo also shows the company providing Chinese-made products in violation of the Buy American Act, and the U.S. Department of Justice is investigating. A federal judge in April refused Home Depot Inc.’s bid to toss a whistle blower lawsuit Scott and other attorneys filed against the Atlanta-based company. Now the country’s largest home improvement retailer is the latest company accused of running afoul of the Buy American Act, a 1933 law aimed at protecting U.S. jobs. The law requires that all materials used in construction of public projects originate in the United States or “designated countries.” Like most protectionist trade provisions, the Buy American Act has its supporters and detractors. Proponents support the act as a way to boost the economy and preserve U.S. jobs. Critics complain the law limits the government’s ability to make the best purchase on price and quality. Further, they argue that complying with the letter of the law is difficult, given the many exemptions and the reality that the component parts of many products originate in multiple countries. In addition, the law’s critics say it’s especially difficult for large companies such as Home Depot that carry thousands of products to ensure it follows the law with every government transaction. The law has been through many revisions, and trade agreements with Canada, Israel and several other countries allow for use of material made in those countries. In the decades after its enactment, the law was little used. But with the explosion of international trade a number of companies have been accused of violating the Buy American Act over the last several years. Earlier this year, the national hardware distributor Fastenal Co. agreed to pay $6.25 million to resolve DOJ claims made after a government audit found among other things that it violated its contract with the General Services Administration by providing Chinese-made goods. Fastenal said in a statement that it settled because “we continue to believe that we complied with our obligation under the GSA contract in all material respects. However, we felt a continuation of our dispute with the DOJ and GSA was not the best use of our resources.” In the last six years, Staples Inc., Office Depot Inc. and OfficeMax Inc. have paid a combined $22 million to settle government claims they violated the act. In 2008, the Department of Justice announced that W.W. Grainger Inc. agreed to pay $6 million to settle claims the company overcharged the government and provided it with Chinese and Taiwanese products in violation of the Buy American Act. At issue in the Home Depot case are GSA “schedule” contracts. Those contracts authorize any government agency to purchase tens of thousands of products from the company’s website. The lawsuit alleges that up to half of those products are made in China and other non-designated countries. The lawsuit was filed by two employees of another government contractor in 2008 that claimed their employer, the Actus Lend Lease Co., supplied noncompliant material in several military housing projects. Before Actus was dropped from the case this year after paying an undisclosed amount of money to settle, lawyers discovered allegations that one of its corporate partners – Home Depot – was also violating the law. The two Actus employees initially filed the so-called whistleblower lawsuit under seal, as all such claims on behalf of the government are filed. That gives the DOJ a chance to investigate the claims and decide if it wants to take over the lawsuit, which seeks to recover damages on behalf of the government. All damages recovered are split between the government and the plaintiffs filing the lawsuit, with the government always receiving a larger amount. Last year, the judge denied the government’s request to keep the lawsuit under seal so it could continue its investigation. After the lawsuit was made public, Home Depot asked the judge to dismiss the case, noting the government’s non-intervention in the case. In March, federal prosecutors fired back at Home Depot with a court filing stating that it “would be erroneous to assume that the government’s lack of intervention reflects its conclusion that the case lacks merit.” The DOJ continues to investigate the issue and still has not decided whether to join the case. In court filings and a brief interview, Home Depot officials argue they have complied fully with the terms of the contract and the Buy American Act. “We would never knowingly sell prohibited goods under any circumstances, and we have been cooperating with the government to provide requested information,” said Home Depot spokesman Stephen Holmes. “We believe the plaintiffs have an inaccurate view of the facts, so we look forward to presenting our side of this case as the process moves forward.” A judge has scheduled a trial for early next year.
Continue reading …The unpredictable hacker group known as Lulz Security may be throwing in the towel after 50 days of almost constant cyberattacks. On Saturday, LulzSec posted what it claimed to be “our final release.” (They also tweeted a link to what may be their very last data dump.) From the post: For the past 50 days we’ve been disrupting and exposing corporations, governments, often the general population itself, and quite possibly everything in between, just because we could. All to selflessly entertain others – vanity, fame, recognition, all of these things are shadowed by our desire for that which we all love. The raw, uninterrupted, chaotic thrill of entertainment and anarchy. It’s what we all crave, even the seemingly lifeless politicians and emotionless, middle-aged self-titled failures. You are not failures. You have not blown away. You can get what you want and you are worth having it, believe in yourself. The group has claimed responsibility for hacking websites of government-run organizations like the CIA, FBI partner InfraGard and the Arizona police, as well as entertainment companies like Sony–all while brandishing the slogan “Laughing at your security since 2011.” The group has repeatedly claimed that their primary goal for hacking has been simply “for the lulz.” However, LulzSec’s apparent retirement statement noted the group’s commitment to “Operation Anti-Security,” a collaboration with politically bent hacktivist collective Anonymous. “Again, behind the mask, behind the insanity and mayhem, we truly believe in the AntiSec movement,” LulzSec’s Saturday statement read. “We believe in it so strongly that we brought it back, much to the dismay of those looking for more anarchic lulz. We hope, wish, even beg, that the movement manifests itself into a revolution that can continue on without us. The support we’ve gathered for it in such a short space of time is truly overwhelming, and not to mention humbling. Please don’t stop. Together, united, we can stomp down our common oppressors and imbue ourselves with the power and freedom we deserve.” Is this really the end of Lulzec? Read the group’s entire post at Pastebin, and leave your thoughts in the comments (below).
Continue reading …Floodwaters have poured over a berm surrounding a Nebraska nuclear power plant, forcing a shut down of electricity controlling cooling systems. Emergency generators were used until an off-site power supply could be connected to the Fort Calhoun plant, and officials say there has been no danger to the public, reports…
Continue reading …• Follow every moment of Andy Murray’s match • Or keep tabs through Xan Brooks’ live blog • Send your thoughts to simon.burnton@guardian.co.uk First set: Murray 6-6 Gasquet A sense of impending doom grips the audience as Murray twice pulls out of his service action before the game gets under way, and though the Scot does win the game he doesn’t look particularly good in doing so, and he lands few first serves. Gasquet has a strange habit of standing four yards (or more) behind the baseline for many of Murray’s second serves, which is widely regarded as being the biggest chink in his armour. Then every now and then he’ll hit one from a yard inside the baseline. Puzzling. What he’ll do every time he can, though, is rip beautiful backhands down the line. Anyway, tiebreakarama. First set: Murray* 5-6 Gasquet Another easy hold for Gasquet, who – though Murray helps by providing him with the ammunition – produces a few great shots, the highlight being another stunning down-the-line backhand winner. “I like the cut of Gasquet’s jib,” notes David Savage. “Not only does he wear a proper (collared) tennis shirt, he hits proper (one-handed) backhands too. If only he had a double-barrelled surname, he’d be a certainty for the title.” First set: Murray 5-5 Gasquet* Now Gasquet wastes a challenge – the players have lost all of their three appeals so far. Other than man v hawk-eye, which isn’t going so well, this is on a knife-edge. First set: Murray* 4-5 Gasquet A weirdly easy service game, held to love – with Murray barely offering a shot to give away the final point. First set: Murray 4-4 Gasquet* Murray’s first-serve percentage in his first three service games was a very underwhelming 60% – Gasquet’s average over his first four service games was 77%. But that was better from Murray – slower serves, but greater accuracy. First set: Murray* 3-4 Gasquet Having twice decided not to challenge (wrongly), Murray finally has a go (also wrongly). It looks set to be another very standard service game as Gasquet goes 40-0 up, but one brilliant return and a fluffed volley later (er, and another point), it’s deuce. This allows Gasquet to produce a brilliant drop-half-volley on his way to winning the game anyway. First set: Murray 3-3 Gasquet* Three big serves win the game; Gasquet lands three returns and wins two of those points. There have been a lot of attempted lobs already today, I’m noticing. Something to do with attempting to bewilder your opponent by forcing them to confront the presence of a sun, I’m guessing. Not something they had to deal with very often in week one. First set: Murray* 2-3 Gasquet Gasquet has a go at attacking the net – several goes, to be fair. This allows Murray to unleash one great passing shot, but then the Frenchman stays back and creams a brilliant backhand down the line. And Gary Naylor, with some inevitability, wins the competition to produce a “blowing Gasquet” pun that doesn’t seem smutty and crude. “So McEnroe, who often blew a gasket at Wimbledon, is advising Murray on how to blow away a Gasquet at Wimbledon,” he writes. “Quite an important preposition in that sentence, I feel.” First set: Murray 2-2 Gasquet* Gasquet wins the first point after Murray’s first serve was called long – incorrectly, and again unappealed. A sense of gentle sparring pervades, at least until game point when Gasquet attacks a forehand for the first time. A fine shot, but then Murray serves an ace and wins the game anyway. First set: Murray* 1-2 Gasquet Murray’s having some calibration issues with his radar, the upshot being that Gasquet holds to love in a game that revealed little about anything, but did give the line judges a fairly remorseless work-out. First set: Murray 1-1 Gasquet* McEnroe is making a big deal about the importance of not counterpunching, despite that being both players’ natural game. Though you’d have thought that if a tactic is good enough to take a player to No4 in the world it would probably be good enough to take him past the No13. Anyway, Murray’s problem here isn’t so much counterpunching it’s where he’s counterpunching the ball – into the net, quite often, and straight at a French bloke the rest of the time. He’s not helped by an incorrect and unappealed call at 15-15, and before long he’s facing his first break point. It’s saved, though, and the game duly won with a lovely trademark drop shot. First set: Murray* 0-1 Gasquet Murray wins the first point but that’s where the good times end, and three unforced errors hand Gasquet the game. 1.12pm: The players are warmed up. Gasquet to serve. 1.09pm: There are genuine royals in the royal box! I’m talking about the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, or Prince William and Mrs William as they’re otherwise known. Preamble Welcome, then, to Andy Murray’s latest step on his route to world domination. Today’s straightforward conquest is Richard Gasquet, the French No17 seed, whom Murray has soundly thrashed every time they’v … hang on … he’s only gone and lost the last two. So who is Richard Gasquet, then? He’s 25, his hero is Zinedine Zidane. He tested positive for Cocaine in 2009 but successfully blamed it on a waitress he kissed in Miami. He doesn’t have dandruff . And he’s a decent outside bet to win Wimbledon if our Andy doesn’t (though it might be worth holding off your trip to the bookies for a couple of hours). They’ve met at Wimbledon once before, in 2008, when Murray fought back from two sets and a break down to win, improbably, 5-7, 3-6, 7-6, 6-2, 6-4, in what Murray calls “the best moment I’ve ever had on a tennis court”. More drama like that, please. Only slightly less dramatic. Wimbledon 2011 Wimbledon Andy Murray Tennis Simon Burnton guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …