Woman, who works as a journalist for the Press Association news wire service, arrested on Monday by appointment A 34-year-old woman was arrested by the Metropolitan police on Monday afternoon on suspicion of unlawfully intercepting mobile phone voicemail messages, Scotland Yard said. The woman, who works as a journalist for the Press Association news wire service, was arrested at around 3pm by appointment at a central London police station. She is currently being questioned by officers from Operation Weeting, the Met’s investigation into phone hacking that began at the start of the year. PA confirmed that one of its journalists had been arrested. She is the fifth person to be arrested as part of the current police inquiry. More details soon… Phone hacking Newspapers & magazines National newspapers Newspapers Press Association Privacy & the media Media law James Robinson guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Evidence of compromise over local government scheme, but unions say government talks failed to close ‘major gaps’ Public sector strikes will go ahead on Thursday after ministers failed to reach a settlement with union leaders over pension reforms despite appearing to offer a significant compromise over the local government scheme. The general secretary of the TUC, Brendan Barber, said strikes would go ahead in schools, colleges, universities, courts, ports and jobcentres on Thursday, after two hours of talks with ministers failed to resolve what he described as “major gaps” between them over the pension plans. He said there were still fundamental disagreements over the major plans to increase contributions, change the system of uprating schemes and increase the pension age in the public sector. PCS, the civil service union leading strikes on Thursday, called the talks a “farce” but the biggest public sector union, Unison, indicated they had been enough for them to delay their strike ballot until later in the summer, in the hope of further concessions. The government issued a statement insisting the talks had been constructive and indicating that they were preparing to offer concessions on the local government scheme, about which there has been serious concern. Some fear that higher contributions could trigger a mass opt-out and the scheme’s collapse. The minister for the Cabinet Office, Francis Maude, and the chief secretary to the Treasury, Danny Alexander, said in a joint statement: “Today’s meeting was constructive and was just one of a series of ongoing talks the government has committed to with the TUC on public service pensions; further meetings have been scheduled for July. This is a genuine consultation to which we are committed in order to try and agree a way forward with the unions, including on how to implement the changes on contributions set out in the spending review. “We recognise that the funding basis for the local government pension scheme is different. There are important implications for how the contributions and benefits interact, as both Lord Hutton and the unions have set out. On that basis, we have agreed to have a more in-depth discussion with local government unions and the TUC about how we take these factors into account. “While the talks are ongoing it is obviously disappointing that some unions have decided on industrial action. But what the recent ballot results show is that there is extremely limited support for the kind of strike action union leaders are calling for. Less than 10% of the civil service workforce has voted for strike actions and only about a third of teachers. “We can assure the public now that we have rigorous contingency plans in place to ensure that their essential services are maintained during the strike action on Thursday.” Barber said: “In some areas it’s clear that there is the possibility of agreement but in terms of some of the key issues there is clearly a major gap betwen our position and that of the government. “The strikes will be taking place on Thursday. Four unions balloted their members and reached that decision and that reflects the degree of anger and worry and real fear there is across everyone who works for public sectors that their pensions are under threat.” Mark Serwotka, the general secretary of the PCS civil service union, whose members are striking on Thursday, said: “It was disappointing that today’s meeting proved to be no different to any of the others. It was a farce. Again the government has shown no interest in actually negotiating on any of the key principles at the heart of this dispute. “And this is a dispute that is entirely of the government’s making. We did not ask for pensions to be cut; we did not ask for public servants to be told they must work years longer and pay more for much less in retirement. Every independent analysis shows that public sector pensions are affordable now and in the future, and costs are falling in the long term. “On Thursday we will see hundreds of thousands of civil and public servants on strike and, on the experience of today’s meeting and the last few months of government obstinacy, we fully expect to be joined by millions more in the autumn.” Dave Prentis, the head of Unison, said his union would not ballot until after further talks in the summer. “There was a sense that today we were in real negotiations,” he said. The Association of Teachers and Lecturers along with the PCS confirmed it would go ahead with strikes. Public sector pensions Trade unions Civil service Teaching Public services policy Polly Curtis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Officials say eight people, including two firefighters, have been hospitalized after a four-alarm fire caused the roof to collapse at a central Florida motel. (June 27)
Continue reading …Billy Ray Cyrus returns with a new patriotic album ‘I’m American’ and talks about living out his troubles in the public eye. (June 27)
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Bob Schieffer interviewed Rep. Michele Bachmann on Face The Nation yesterday and actually tried to pin her down on her many and numerous outright lies, as PolitiFact recently examined in some detail. And as usual, she did her usual blob-of-mercury routine: SCHIEFFER: I want to ask you about something else. A lot of your critics say you have been very fast and loose with the truth. You know, the po– PolitiFact, which is a website that won a Pulitzer, did an analysis of twenty-three statements that you made recently . Of these twenty-three, only one they said was completely true. Seven they call pants on fire kind of falsehoods. Four were barely true and two were half truths. How do you answer that criticism? Because here’s one of them, you know, you said on the record there had been only one offshore oil drilling permit during the Obama administration and, in fact at that time they had been two hundred and seventy. How do you explain that? BACHMANN: Well, you know, I think that what is clear more than anything is the fact that President Obama does — has not been issuing the permits, that he should have been issuing on offshore drilling that’s– SCHIEFFER: Well, it’s more than three hundred now. BACHMANN: Well — SCHIEFFER: At– at that time there had been two hundred and something. And you said there had been only one. BACHMANN: But as far as drilling goes, we hadn’t been drilling what we need to– that’s why we just this week– SCHIEFFER (overlapping): But that’s different, isn’t it? BACHMANN: Well, that’s why this week it’s– it’s ironic and sad that the President released all of the oil from the Strategic Oil Reserve because the President doesn’t have an energy policy. SCHIEFFER (overlapping): Do you think that was a good move? BACHMANN: He has a politically correct environmental policy. SCHIEFFER (overlapping): Was that a good thing? BACHMANN: It was a very bad move. It put– it has made the United States more vulnerable. There’s only a limited amount of oil that we have in the Strategic Oil Reserve. It’s there for emergencies. We do not– the emergency that we have is the fact that — the fact that– the President of the United States has failed to give the American people an energy policy. Here’s the good news that a lot of Americans don’t even realize. We are the number one energy resource rich nation in the world according to the Congressional Research Service. But the President of the United States has unfortunately put American energy resources off limits. SCHIEFFER (overlapping): Did– BACHMANN: We need to open those up so we can bring down the price of gasoline at the pump. The President has it exactly wrong when it comes to energy. SCHIEFFER Just quickly though, the– the original question I asked you is all of these statements that you have made that have later proven to be sort of true or– or totally false in some cases, what is your answer when people say that to you? Do you feel you have misled people? BACHMANN: No, I haven’t misled people at all. I think the question would be asked of President Obama. When you told the American people that if we borrow a trillion dollars from other countries and spend it on a stimulus that we won’t have unemployment go above eight percent and today as we are sitting here, it’s 9.1 percent and the economy is tanking. That is what’s serious. That’s a very serious statement that the President made. Did he mislead the American people? Not only did he mislead the American people, he’s caused our economy to go down to– SCHIEFFER (overlapping): All right. BACHMANN: –depths that we haven’t seen. That’s what’s serious. SCHIEFFER: Again, I have to say congresswoman, I asked you a question and you– you, to my knowledge I don’t believe you answered it , but I want to thank you. Indeed, Bachmann simply would not answer any of Schieffer’s points about her mounting record of falsehoods, trying instead to “pivot” the interview and make it about Obama’s supposed misleading statements. It’s like trying to talk to a trained robot, programmed never to admit to anything like lying — so of course, it lies in order to do so.
Continue reading …At theaters all across America this weekend, a new comedy starring Cameron Diaz and Jason Segal hit the big screens. While a movie debuting on a Friday is nothing new, the content of this film stands out from the rest. The Bad Teacher title gives a subtle hint about the plot, and the movie’s description reads, “Some teachers just don’t give an F.” It also describes Cameron Diaz’s character, a teacher, as someone who “drinks” and who “gets high.” Though comedies shouldn’t necessarily be taken seriously, a television advertisement for the movie is what caught my attention. The advertisement, which can be seen here, says that the United States used to have the number one educational system in the world, and we now rank 17th. The clip then proceeds to show Cameron Diaz’s character throwing a dodge ball at a child before the Bad Teacher title line appears. The implication for the ad spot is clear: America’s schooling has fallen because of bad teachers. The timing of such an ill-advised commercial couldn’t be worse for teachers, as educators across the United States are under attack from politicians and the media. New Jersey Governor Chris Christie has led a large portion of the fighting against teachers, claiming they make too much money, that they’re not effective, and that they’re too difficult to fire. He proposed a new way of judging teachers with his merit plan, a system that would judge the value of teachers based on student test data. His plan has received broad attention from media outlets, though the veracity of his boisterous arguments has either been ignored or hasn’t been sought out. Vanderbilt University, in one of the first scientific studies of such a merit educational system, tested the theory by offering math teachers in Nashville, Tennessee, between $5,000-$15,000 if their students scored higher on a state-based examination. The results? It didn’t work, and the students didn’t score higher even with hefty incentives for the teachers. As the report concluded, “The experiment was intended to test the notion that rewarding teachers for improved scores would cause scores to rise. By and large, results did not confirm this hypothesis.” Rather than report scientific evidence that appears to contradict popular notions like a merit system, the media has instead decided to focus on the failures of American schools. ABC’s 20/20, for example, did a special report on Abraham Lincoln High School in New York City. One student told ABC that teachers were dull to the point of students actually sleeping in class. Another school administrator complained that the teachers unions were too strong and that their district was having a hard time firing a teacher who allegedly sent sexually explicit emails to a 16-year-old student. ABC even spoke with proclaimed education experts, such as Jay Greene, author of Education Myths, who claimed that the issue of money for schools is a misnomer. “If money were the solution, the problem would already be solved,” Greene said, referencing the levels of increased government spending on schools the past 30 years. The claims made in the special were serious enough that they should be looked into. If there was one area the 20/20 segment was lacking, it was telling the story of the teachers. What did they think of the accusations being made against their lot? I attempted to answer those questions by contacting a teacher I’ll call “Alicia” who has taught in urban schools in central Florida as well as schools in Michigan. Her version of events painted a much different picture. Alicia dismissed the notion of students sleeping in class due to boring teachers. While she admitted there are “boring” teachers out there, she feels most of that is the product of teachers having their lesson plans down to a science. To help streamline the process of teaching material, many teachers will save their lessons from the previous year and teach them again. If an educator has been on the job many years, they’ve likely done the material so many times that it may even appear dull to themselves. Alicia suggests the best way to beat such a rut is to have “hands-on” lessons and to mix things up from time-to-time. Also, Alicia astutely quipped, if you ask students how they feel about school, odds are they’re going to say it’s boring. You won’t always learn about a subject that interests you, which is all a part of becoming a well-rounded member of society. Alicia refuted the criticism of unions being too strong as a chicken or egg situation. Officials claim the unions are too strong, yet teachers need a strong union to protect them from organizations that wish to cut their funding, salaries and health care. The unions may protect some who aren’t worthy of being educators but to use a potential pedophile and apply it to teachers generally is “not a fair situation for the good teachers,” and is insulting. Alicia seemed to take special offense to the claim money is a myth when it comes to education. She states: I do believe money can be a big deciding factor in which schools get more money. I taught in an urban, inner-city school where we received much less funding per pupil than a school five minutes down the road in a wealthy area. These upper-class students had parents who were involved. Of course they are going to succeed better than my school, where the kids don’t know where their next meal is coming from, except for school lunch. I believe the situation should be reversed. The schools that have a failing reputation due to low test scores need the money more than the schools who are producing high test scores and graduate rates. Reading the criticisms of the American school system and speaking with Alicia has shown there are fundamental faults with the current system. What isn’t fair, however, is to place all the blame on teachers, and a movie trailer implying educators are the reason our schools are falling apart is misinformed and in bad taste. I wish to thank the teachers, such as Mrs. Carey, my first grade teacher, who wouldn’t give up on me even when I had no desire to do my homework. I would like to thank the high school teachers who somehow managed to keep coming into school every day to teach a bunch of students who managed to unhinge the clock from our wall as a joke, or password protected our network computers so nobody could access them. I would like to thank the teachers who, when a quarter or dime hit the ground in the hallway and began to roll, would run in a full-blown sprint towards the change, shouting humorously that it would double their monthly salary. I would like to thank the teachers who pushed me to write even when I thought it was the most boring thing in the world — you helped me earn my Master’s degree and write for The Huffington Post. To all my teachers: you changed my life, and this post is for you. Scott Janssen is a recent graduate of Western Michigan University in Kalamazoo, Michigan, with a Master’s degree in Political Science. He can be reached at dnaprovesnothing@gmail.com.
Continue reading …Records of the Indiana Department of Child Services reveal that Christian Choate, a boy who authorities claim lived locked in a cage and died from savage abuse, wrote letters describing his situation and saying that he wanted to die. According to the Chicago Tribune, DCS visited with the Choate family in Gary, Indiana more than a dozen times starting in 1999, investigating allegations of abuse and neglect. Authorities never discovered what prosecutors claim was the true depth of the misery in which young Christian lived. Based on accounts from his sister and stepsister, Christian, who died in 2009 at age 13, spent much of the last year of his life locked in a three-foot-high dog cage, with little food and drink and few opportunities to leave. When he did get out of the cage, he endured savage beatings from his father Riley. One night in April of 2009, Christian was too weak to keep his food down. His father allegedly beat him to the point of unconsciousness, then locked his limp body in the cage. The next morning, his sister Christina found him dead. According to investigators, Riley then buried the boy in a shallow grave, covered his body in concrete, and moved with Christina to Kentucky, where he threatened to harm her if she ever told anyone about his death. It would be two years before his body was found. One of the reasons his absence wasn’t noticed was that his stepmother, Kimberly Kubina, took him out of school, saying that he was being home-schooled. The extent of that homeschooling was revealed in some letters found by DCS. When other children were out playing, Kubina would give Christian paper and tell him to write. “Christian wrote of why nobody liked him and how he just wanted to be liked by his family,” a DCS document wrote, according to the Chicago Sun-Times. “Christian stated that he wanted to die because nobody liked the way he ‘acted.’ Christian’s writings detail a very sad, depressed child who often wondered when someone, anyone, was going to come check on him and give him food or liquid. Christian often stated he was hungry or thirsty.” In a still more disturbing twist, the Northwest Indiana Times reveals some of the assignments his stepmother gave: Kubina wrote topics on top of some of the pages including, “Why do you want to play with your peter? Why do you still want to see your mom? Why can’t you let the past go? What does it mean to be part of a family?” DCS records state. Riley Choate and Kimberly Kubina have been charged with murder, battery, neglect of a dependent, confinement, obstruction of justice, moving a body from a death scene and failure to notify authorities of a dead body. They have both pleaded not guilty.
Continue reading …Type: Shoes Title: Wanted Shoes Women’s Daisy Wedge Sandal,Purple,8 M US See all customer reviews Product Description: Make your entrance in full bloom when you walk in the fantastic style of these Wanted Daisy wedge sandals. Faux leather upper in a casual platform wedge sandal style with a round open toe Strappy vamp with floral accents Ankle strap with adjustable metal buckle Smooth lining, cushioned footbed 1 inch cork and faux leather wrapped platform 4 inch wrapped wedge heel Rubber traction outsole See the details
Continue reading …Washington Post staffer Hank Stuever started off with a fair point in his review of the new HBO documentary “Hot Coffee.” But before his June 27 Style section front-pager was concluded, the Post TV critic was bashing conservatives and free marketeers for advocating tort reform. “We get a lot wrong in our media-transfixed culture, where a wry quip and populist outrage almost always trump any understanding of complicated facts,” Stuever opened his article, adding, “But rarely do we get someone as wrong as we got Stella Liebeck,” the “79-year-old woman who horribly scalded her upper legs and groin when she spilled a 49-cent cup of coffee purchased at a McDonald's drive-through in Albuquerque 19 years ago.” Liebeck, the subject of “first-time filmmaker” Susan Saladoff's “Hot Coffee” documentary, “sued only to cover her medical costs, but a jury awarded her $2.86 million in punitive damages,” Stuever noted, lamenting that the general public's view of Liebeck being greedy for gain was grossly unfair and that the punitive damages were ultimately “reduced and settled out of court for a mid-six-figure sum.” But Stuever couldn't resist turning his review into a political screed. It wasn't enough to praise Saladoff's work on its own merits, Stuever went into attack mode against conservatives and free market advocates: Saladoff is a former public interest lawyer, and while I’m sure that proponents of tort reform will cry foul at “Hot Coffee’s” tactics, they would be hard-pressed to make a documentary about their own stance seem as sensible or compelling.
Continue reading …tibbs81 says: RT @thomaslennon : MJ's “Thriller” jacket: 1.8 million. Marilyn's “7 Year Itch” dress: 4.8 Million. Cost to CLONE those real stars: 300K, shipping included.
Continue reading …