Megan Fox was theoretically dating now-husband Brian Austin Green while filming Transformers , but that apparently didn’t stop co-star Shia LaBeouf. Asked by Details if he ever hooked up with Fox, LaBeouf nods and explains, “Look, you’re on the set for six months, with someone who’s rooting to be attracted to…
Continue reading …The debt-ceiling drama is getting very tedious, and some of the op-eds penned by writers such as Eugene Robinson are especially annoying. Matt Browner Hamlin debunks him pretty easily in his post, “That’s not a compromise.” The bipartisan fetish in the D.C. Beltway is getting worse by the minute. They are panicking more than Wall Street, so even Robinson starts writing garbage. Why do the Villagers allow Republicans to get away with the negotiating practice of “it’s either my way or the highway” tactics? Paul Krugman simply writes: So, here’s where we are on the debt limit discussions : Democrats have agreed to large spending cuts, but are holding out for doing something about a rule that lets businesses value their inventory at less than they bought it for in order to lower their tax burden, a loophole that lets hedge-fund managers count their income as capital gains and pay a 15 percent marginal tax rate, the tax treatment of private jets, oil and gas subsidies, and a limit on itemized deductions for the wealthy. And Republicans walked out. Think about it. There’s a significant chance that failing to raise the debt limit could provoke a renewed financial crisis — and Republicans would rather take that chance than allow a reduction in tax breaks on corporate jets. What this says to me is that Obama cannot, must not, concede here. If he does, he’s signaling that the GOP can extract even the most outrageous demands; he’s setting himself up for endless blackmail. A line has to be drawn somewhere; it should have been drawn last fall; but to concede now would effectively mean the end of the presidency. After the debt ceiling there’s the 2012 budget talks coming. What will the Democrats give up next if they allow Republicans to carve them up on the debt ceiling when they know it must be raised, or if it’s not, then unconscionable harm will come to the economy of the U.S.? I thought this article was a joke, but maybe not : For their part, Obama and Reid appear prepared to reach much higher, putting substantial Medicare savings on the table if Republicans would accept added revenues. With the House GOP leadership in New York, all of Monday’s White House maneuvering was Senate-centric. But Obama’s hope is that Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), with whom he met privately last week, will be intrigued by a bolder package that might also help neutralize the Medicare issue now hurting the GOP among elderly voters Why would the Dems even consider giving Republicans cover on the Medicare issue? mcjoan writes: Maybe Reid has already decided they can’t defend the Dem Senate majority, so what the hell, give in now and maybe get something in return down the road from Republicans. Because that has already worked out so well for him. It’s hard to say what Obama is thinking. But “substantial Medicare savings,” beyond what we know is already on the table, can only mean benefit and provider cuts. Which is giving up not just a big chunk of this critical program for seniors and the disabled, but all of the ground gained against House Republicans for voting for Ryan’s disastrous budget. Nobody knows what they are thinking, but unless the unemployment rate drops significantly, Obama will have a tough time selling himself to the American people if they give up on seniors by cutting benefits to either medicaid, Medicare or Social Security even if Michele Bachmann is the GOP candidate. Democrats not standing up and fighting for longstanding Democratic positions on our social safety net will only lead to ruin.
Continue reading …Thanks to Photoshop — and, of course, the unyielding comparisons between the two women — Princess Diana and Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, cover the most recent issue of Newsweek. Inside, Tina Brown imagines what Diana would be like at age 50 — great looking, perhaps slightly Botoxed, J.Crew-clad and friends with Prince Charles. And what about her relationship with her new daughter-in-law? Quoth Brown: The rising public adoration of Kate would have afforded Diana some tricky moments. Pleased, yes. But, like Frances Shand Kydd–who, days before Diana’s wedding, suddenly burst out, “I have good long legs, like my daughter”–Diana would have had to adjust to a broadening of the limelight. Her edge over Kate, of course, was her own epic of princessly suffering, which would always make Diana’s story more interesting. (“Happily ever after” will never have the same allure to the press as “It all went horribly wrong.”) Diana, rejoicing in her flawless Spencer pedigree, would have positioned herself as a firm defender of the Middletons against the palace snobs and ostentatiously made Carole Middleton, Kate’s dynamic mother, her new BFF. Take a look at the cover below and tell us what you think. To read the rest, head over to Newsweek.com.
Continue reading …CHICAGO (AP) — Rod Blagojevich, who won two terms as Illinois governor before scandal made him a national punch line, was convicted Monday of a wide range of corruption charges, including trying to sell President Barack Obama’s Senate seat. The verdict, coming after his first trial ended last year with the jury deadlocked on most charges, was a bitter defeat for Blagojevich, who spent 2 1/2 years professing his innocence on reality TV shows and later on the witness stand. His defense team insisted that hours of FBI wiretap recordings were just the ramblings of a politician who liked to think out loud. Blagojevich becomes the second straight Illinois governor convicted of corruption. His predecessor, George Ryan, is now serving 6 1/2 years in federal prison. When sentenced later this year, Blagojevich is virtually certain to get a significant prison term that experts said could be 10 to 15 years. After hearing the verdict, Blagojevich turned to defense attorney Sheldon Sorosky and asked “What happened?” His wife, Patti, slumped against her brother, then rushed into her husband’s arms. Before the decision was read, the couple looked flushed, and the former governor blew his wife a kiss across the courtroom, then stood expressionless, with his hands clasped tightly. The verdict capped a long-running spectacle in which Blagojevich became famous for blurting on a recorded phone call that his ability to appoint Obama’s successor to the Senate was “f—ing golden” and that he wouldn’t let it go “for f—ing nothing.” The 54-year-old Democrat, who has been free on bond since shortly after his arrest, spoke only briefly with reporters as he left the courthouse, saying he was disappointed and stunned by the verdict. “Well, among the many lessons I’ve learned from this whole experience is to try to speak a little bit less, so I’m going to keep my remarks kind of short,” Blagojevich said, adding that the couple wanted “to get home to our little girls and talk to them and explain things to them and then try to sort things out.” His two daughters are 8 and 14. The case exploded into scandal when Blagojevich was awakened by federal agents on Dec. 9, 2008, at his Chicago home and was led away in handcuffs. Federal prosecutors had been investigating his administration for years, and some of his closest cronies had already been convicted. Blagojevich was swiftly impeached and removed from office. The verdict provided affirmation to U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald, one of the nation’s most prominent prosecutors, who, after the governor’s arrest, had condemned Blagojevich’s dealings as a “political corruption crime spree.” On Monday, he said the key question for the jury was whether to accept the defense suggestion that Blagojevich’s activities amounted to “the kind of political wheeling and dealing that is common in Illinois and around the country.” “That,” said Fitzgerald, his voice rising, “couldn’t be any further from the truth. … Selling a Senate seat, shaking down a children’s hospital and squeezing a person to give money before you sign a bill that benefits them is not a gray area. It’s a crime.” Fitzgerald also addressed a question that has hung over the case ever since Blagojevich was arrested: Why did authorities not wait until the governor actually made a deal for the Senate seat? Doing so might have helped ensnare other conspirators. A U.S. Senate seat “should not be put up for sale. You should not let the sale happen. … Our job is to try to prevent crime, not just prosecute crime,” he said. Fitzgerald pledged to retry the governor after the first jury failed to reach a decision on all but the least serious of 24 charges against him. On Monday, the jury voted to convict on 17 of 20 counts after deliberating nine days. Blagojevich also faces up to five additional years in prison for his previous conviction of lying to the FBI. Blagojevich was acquitted of soliciting bribes in the alleged shakedown of a road-building executive. The jury deadlocked on two charges of attempted extortion related to that executive and funding for a school. Judge James Zagel has barred Blagojevich from traveling outside the area without permission. A status hearing to discuss sentencing was set for Aug. 1. The charges carry a possible sentence up to 300 years in prison, but federal guidelines mean he will serve only a fraction of that. Judges have enormous discretion in sentencing and can factor in a host of variables, including whether a defendant took the stand and lied. Prosecutors have said that Blagojevich did just that. Two legal experts speculated that Blagojevich would probably receive around 10 years in prison, with little chance that he would get more than 15. Former prosecutor Jeff Cramer estimated that Blagojevich would get between six and 12 years. Another former assistant U.S. attorney, Phil Turner, guessed closer to six years. All 12 jurors – 11 women and one man – spoke to reporters after the verdict, identifying themselves only by juror numbers. Their full names were to be released Tuesday. Jurors said the evidence that Blagojevich tried to secure a high-paying, high-powered position in exchange for the appointment of Obama’s successor in the Senate was the clearest in the case. “There was so much more evidence to go on,” said Juror No. 140. Jury members said they listened and re-listened to recordings of Blagojevich’s phone conversations with aides. They also acknowledged finding the former governor likable. “He was personable,” Juror No. 103 said. “It made it hard to separate what we actively had to do as jurors.” Still, Juror No. 140 said she found Blagojevich’s testimony over seven days at times “manipulative.” “Our verdict shows that we didn’t believe it,” she said. The quiet Blagojevich who left the courthouse Monday was a sharp contrast with the combative politician who emerged after his arrest. Back then, he called federal prosecutors “cowards and liars” and challenged Fitzgerald to face him in court if he was “man enough.” Over the months that followed, he engaged in what many saw as embarrassing indignities for a former governor. He sent his wife to the jungle for a reality television show, “I’m a Celebrity, Get Me Out of Here,” where she had to eat a tarantula. He later showed his own ineptitude at simple office skills before being fired on Donald Trump’s “Celebrity Apprentice.” For the second trial, prosecutors streamlined their case, and attorneys for the former governor put on a defense – highlighted by a chatty Blagojevich taking the witness stand for seven days to portray himself as a big talker but not a criminal. Richard Kling, a professor at Chicago-Kent College of Law who watched much of the trial, said the defense had no choice but to put Blagojevich on the stand, even though doing so was risky. “The problem was with some of his explanations,” Kling said. “It reminded me of a little kid who gets his hand caught in a cookie jar. He says, `Mommy I wasn’t taking the cookies. I was just trying to protect them and to count them.’” Robert Grant, head of the FBI’s Chicago office, said the agency’s eavesdropping helped seal the verdict. “A famous artist once said that lady justice is blind, but she has very sophisticated listening devices, and that was certainly the case in this matter,” Grant said. Blagojevich seemed to believe he could talk his way out of trouble from the witness stand. He sought to counteract the blunt, greedy man he appeared to be on FBI wiretaps and apologized to jurors for the four-letter words that peppered the recordings. He said the wiretaps merely displayed his approach to decision-making: to invite a whirlwind of ideas – “good ones, bad ones, stupid ones” – then toss the ill-conceived ones out. When a prosecutor read wiretap transcripts where Blagojevich seems to speak clearly of trading the Senate seat for a job, Blagojevich told jurors, “I see what I say here, but that’s not what I meant.” Lead prosecutor Reid Schar started his questioning of Blagojevich with a quick verbal punch: “Mr. Blagojevich, you are a convicted liar, correct?” After the judge overruled a flurry of defense objections, Blagojevich eventually answered: “Yes.”
Continue reading …Up to 25% of people who take antidepressants gain weight. Is there anything you can do about it?
Continue reading …The wedding industry boasts some of the most lucrative enterprises in the United States, and New York City’s newly-engaged clientele just got bigger. On June 24, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo signed the Marriage Equality Act, allowing same-sex couples to wed legally in the state for the first time. As the legislation was met with
Continue reading …In its battle with Google, Apple’s hearing echoes of the 1990s: Android activations are blowing iPhone, iPad, and iPod Touch activations out of the water. Some 500,000 Android phones and tables get activated daily across the world, says Google’s boss for the platform—and that figure is climbing 4%…
Continue reading …Culture minister says country will take serious action over films that ‘ruin Muslims’ sanctity’ Iran’s minister of cultural and Islamic guidance has attacked an upcoming BBC2 documentary series on the life of the founder of Islam, the prophet Muhammad, saying the “enemy” was attempting to “ruin Muslims’ sanctity”. The three-part series, The Life of Muhammad, presented by Rageh Omaar, a Somali-born British Middle East correspondent for Al Jazeera English, is scheduled to be broadcast on BBC2 in mid-July and has been drawing increasing criticism from senior figures in Iran. The documentary makers say it seeks to “retrace the actual footsteps of the prophet” from his birthplace in the Saudi Arabian city of Mecca, his struggles with his prophetic role and divine revelations, his migration to Medina and establishment of the first Islamic constitution before his final return to Mecca following armed conflicts. But the Iranian culture minister, Mohammad Hosseini, who has not seen the programme, said in an interview on Monday that he was worried about the BBC film. Speaking to Iran’s semi-official Fars news agency, he said: “The BBC’s decision to make a documentary on the life of [the] prophet Muhammad seems dubious and if our suspicions are proved to be correct, we will certainly take serious action.” Hosseini added: “What the enemy is trying to do in ruining the Muslims’ sanctity is definitely much more than causing us to react and unfortunately, some Islamic countries are not taking this issue seriously. One way to show objections is to express condemnation of the West over their despicable actions.” Iran and the West have previously clashed, famously, over publication of Salman Rushdie’s The Satanic Verses in 1988 and more recently in the row over threats to burn the Qur’an by a US pastor. It is thought officials in Iran, where the population is predominantly Shia, could be worried that the BBC2 documentary might only be limited to a Sunni interpretation of Muhammad’s life. But Aaqil Ahmed, the BBC’s commissioning editor for religion and ethics, told the Guardian that they had consulted a Shia scholar for
Continue reading …