Seagate’s latest addition to its GoFlex line of hard drives is dubbed the Cinema and, as you’ve probably guessed, it’s designed to hook up to your home entertainment system. Inside is a set of spinning platters up to 3TB in size, and around back are HDMI, composite, and S/PDIF hookups. This isn’t just some hard drive with a marketing gimmick though. The hardware itself is capable of pumping out 1080p video in a slew of different formats (including MKV and MP4 amongst others), and even comes packaged with a remote for perusing your media collection fro the comfort of your milk crate couch. The GoFlex Cinema is available now in Europe, starting at €99 ($136) for the 1TB version and climbing to €179 ($246) for the 3TB model. No word yet on US pricing or availability. Seagate GoFlex Cinema puts up to 3TB of media files at your TV’s disposal originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 13 Oct 2011 02:22:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …A simple saliva test may one day help doctors diagnose people with pancreatic cancer before it has started to spread.
Continue reading …GOP candidates for President took another night out of their schedules to get smeared by smug liberal journalists. The low-point of the night was when Charlie Rose and JournOlister Karen Tumulty used a 30 second clip of Ronald Reagan to suggest that the Gipper was all about raising taxes in the interest of compromise. The Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Big Government Discovery Date : 02/10/2011 23:35 Number of articles : 13
Continue reading …GOP candidates for President took another night out of their schedules to get smeared by smug liberal journalists. The low-point of the night was when Charlie Rose and JournOlister Karen Tumulty used a 30 second clip of Ronald Reagan to suggest that the Gipper was all about raising taxes in the interest of compromise. The Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Big Government Discovery Date : 02/10/2011 23:35 Number of articles : 13
Continue reading …GOP candidates for President took another night out of their schedules to get smeared by smug liberal journalists. The low-point of the night was when Charlie Rose and JournOlister Karen Tumulty used a 30 second clip of Ronald Reagan to suggest that the Gipper was all about raising taxes in the interest of compromise. The Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Big Government Discovery Date : 02/10/2011 23:35 Number of articles : 13
Continue reading …Home secretary wants curfews to create ‘no-go’ areas during serious outbreaks of disorder The home secretary, Theresa May, is to press ahead with seeking public order curfew powers for the police to create “no-go” areas during riots. The powers are expected to include immediate curfews over large areas to tackle the kind of fast-moving disturbances that swept across many of England’s major cities in August. May also wants to extend existing powers to impose curfews on individual teenagers aged under 16. The launch of official consultation on wider public order powers is being announced as May and Iain Duncan Smith, the work and pensions secretary, host an international forum on gangs with experts from six countries. They include Bill Bratton, the retired US police chief. The consultation paper includes stronger police powers to order protesters and rioters to remove face masks. The home secretary first suggested this in March after the anti-cuts march in London in which 56 police officers were injured. May said in August that existing dispersal orders, which have to be applied for in advance, were no longer adequate to meet the fast-moving nature of modern public disorder. Human rights groups predicted that blanket curfews would prove ineffective in a riot situation and criticised the idea as a “headline-grabbing initiative”. The consultation will look at repealing section 5 of the 1986 Public Order Act, which outlaws “insulting words or behaviour”. There are claims the provision hampers free speech and it has been the subject of a strong Liberal Democrat campaign. Parliament’s joint human rights committee has called for the removal of the word “insulting” to raise the threshold of the offence, citing a case in which a teenager was arrested for calling Scientology a cult. Those supporting the reform say it would still cover threatening, abusive or disorderly behavour. Evangelical Christians have complained about the use of section 5 to fine street preachers who proclaim that homosexuality is sinful or immoral. The Home Office forum on tackling gangs is one of the initiatives announced by David Cameron immediately following the riots. The victims’ commissioner, Louise Casey, has been named as head of the government’s unit to tackle 120,000 of the most troubled families as one of the measures. This week Bratton denied he had been appointed by Cameron as his “gangs tsar” and said he was acting only as a consultant to the Home Office conference. Police UK riots Theresa May Alan Travis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Care Quality Commission says too many staff fail to feed patients properly or treat them with dignity Too many hospital staff do not ensure older patients eat and drink properly, fail to respect their dignity and talk to them in a condescending manner, the NHS watchdog warns. In a highly critical report the Care Quality Commission said that more than half of all hospitals in England were not meeting key standards for dignity and nutrition in elderly people, a finding it called “truly alarming and deeply disappointing”. It castigated a handful of them for providing “unacceptable care”. Of 100 acute hospitals that received unannounced visits by inspectors between March and June, 45 met the NHS’s standards relating to both patients’ dignity and nutrition. Thirty-five did met both standards but needed to make improvements in one or both areas. And 20 – one in five – did not meet either one or both of them. Too often staff did not treat patients with kindness and compassion, it found. Campaigners for the elderly seized on the findings – the latest evidence of poor care of older patients who are often seriously ill or physically incapacitated. “Nearly one in five hospitals completely fails to ensure that patients are eating and treated with dignity and in total nearly half of all hospitals are not doing enough,” said Age UK’s charity director Michelle Mitchell. “This shows shocking complacency on the part of those hospitals towards an essential part of good healthcare and there are no excuses.” At Sandwell general hospital in West Bromwich inspectors witnessed a patient who had been incontinent not being washed for 90 minutes, despite requesting help. The hospital later shut the ward concerned and replaced it with two other specialist wards. The behaviour of staff at Alexandra hospital in Redditch, Worcestershire, prompted inspectors to decide there were major concerns about its levels of care, though improvements were then made. And after identifying moderate concerns about nutrition and dignity at James Paget university hospitals foundation trust in Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, on a follow-up visit the commission found some patients were not receiving enough support with eating and drinking and that some who needed intravenous fluids were not getting it. The regulator issued the trust with a warning notice telling it to make urgent improvements or risk being prosecuted or having restrictions put on its operating licence. In hospitals where essential standards were not being met inspectors found patients’ call bells being put out of their reach or not responded to quickly enough, staff talking to them in a condescending or dismissive way, patients not receiving the help they needed to eat and people being interrupted during a meal and thus not finishingit. Dame Jo Williams, the commission’s chair, said: “Too often our inspectors saw the delivery of care treated as a task that needed to be completed. Those responsible for the training and development of staff, particularly in nursing, need to look long and hard at why the focus has become the unit of work rather than the person who needs to be looked after – and how this can be changed. Task-focused care is not person-centred care. Often what is needed is kindness and compassion, which cost nothing.” The entire NHS needed to ensure that it made big improvements to end the scandal of poor care, she added. Poor leadership in NHS organisations had let “unacceptable care … become the norm”, while the attitude of some staff resulted in “too many cases where patients were treated by staff in a way that stripped them of their dignity and respect”, said the report. Inspectors also found unacceptable care on well-staffed wards and, equally, excellent care on understaffed ones. Age UK wants the commission to undertake more spot checks and for ministers to force hospitals to publish accessible information showing rates of malnutrition on their wards. Health secretary Andrew Lansley, who asked the commission to carry out the research, said poor care needed to be identified and stamped out. “Everyone admitted to hospital deserves to be treated as an individual, with compassion and dignity. We must never lose sight of the fact that the most important people in the NHS are its patients. The CQC saw some exemplary care, but some hospitals were not even getting the basics right. That is simply unacceptable.” In future the planned new local HealthWatch organisations should be able to carry out their own unannounced inspections, he suggested. NHS Health Andrew Lansley Denis Campbell guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Shelter reveals that families are being priced out of the ‘out-of-control’ rental market in 55% of English local authorities Families have been priced out of rental property in the majority of local authorities in England, according to the homeless charity Shelter . The Shelter Rent Watch found that average private rents were unaffordable for ordinary working families in 55% of local authorities in England. Typical rents charged by private landlords were more than a third of median take-home pay, the widely accepted measure of affordability. Shelter said research showed that 38% of families with children who were renting privately had cut down on food to pay their rent. Although renting has traditionally been regarded as a cheaper alternative to home ownership, the credit crunch and high house prices have forced many potential homebuyers to remain as tenants. At the same time, growing numbers of people who would normally qualify for social housing have been pushed into the private sector by an acute shortage of local authority and housing association property. The number of tenants renting privately has increased by nearly one million in the past five years. The increased demand has pushed up rents , particularly in London boroughs, which are the most expensive in England. At £1,360, an average rent for a two-bedroom home in the capital is almost two-and-a-half times the average in the rest of the country (£568). The least affordable local authority area outside London is Oxford, where typical rents account for 55% of average earnings. Tenants on benefits in these areas are already having problems finding properties to rent within the new local housing allowance limits , implemented in April for new tenants and from the beginning of next year for those in existing tenancies. Shelter said tenants in many rural areas were also bearing the brunt of high rents and low earnings. It found it is cheaper to rent in Manchester, Liverpool and Birmingham than in north Devon, north Dorset or Herefordshire. In Yorkshire, properties in Bradford and Sheffield are more affordable to rent than in the rural areas of Ryedale and Richmondshire. Shelter’s analysis showed that in England 8% of local authorities were extremely unaffordable to rent in, with a median rent of 50% or more of median full-time take-home pay; 21% were very unaffordable with a median rent equivalent of 40% to 49% of median full-time take-home pay; and 29% were fairly unaffordable with the median rent equivalent to 35% to 39% of the median full-time take-home pay. Campbell Robb, chief executive of Shelter, said: “With huge differences in affordability across the country, there are now worrying signs that families are likely to be displaced by our out-of-control rental market. “We have become depressingly familiar with first-time buyers being priced out of the housing market, but the impact of unaffordable rents is more dramatic. With no cheaper alternative, ordinary people are forced to cut their spending on essentials like food and heating, or uproot and move away from jobs, schools and families.” Robb said it was time for the government to urgently consider how private renting could become a stable, affordable option for families “and not a heavy financial burden that makes parents choose between buying food for their children and paying the rent.” Alice Barnard, chief executive of the Countryside Alliance , said the lack of affordable housing to rent or buy was one of the most pressing issues facing rural communities. “The countryside has seen its population grow at twice the rate of urban areas, which has driven up prices, forcing families to make sacrifices to meet spiralling rental costs and pricing young families out of the communities in which they have grown up,” she said. “If we want our rural communities to flourish then the government needs to urgently review the rental market in rural areas to enable rural communities to meet their housing needs.” Melissa Brown, a part-time yoga teacher, and her husband David*, a college lecturer, found it impossible to rent a decent affordable property when their landlord decided to sell their existing home. The couple, who live in Brighton with their three children, had been renting a three-bedroom terrace house for £1,250 a month for two-and-a-half years but last January were told they had to move out because the landlord wanted to sell up. It took them six months to find somewhere that was still close enough to their children’s school and they ended up moving in September into a three-bedroom house for £1,550 a month. The house is in a poor state of repair with damp and needs decorating and other work, but Melissa said that most of the properties they looked at was “eye-wateringly bad”. “Most of the rented houses around here are not suitable for families because the lounges have been turned into bedrooms so landlords can put students in there and make more money. Even groups of professionals are living in shared houses with no lounge,” she said. “We’ve been renting for years and it’s never been as bad as this. It’s all driven by greed.” She added: “We did ask about repairs to this house and the landlord is paying for paint, but she has been told she could rent the house out to students for £1,650 a month and already thinks she’s doing us a favour.” Their couple’s household income is about £2,000 a month and they are already really struggling to make ends meet. The family is planning to use the loft area as an extra bedroom for a lodger to raise money. Melissa said: “The landlord doesn’t mind how we raise the rent, so we are considering becoming landlords ourselves. If you can’t beat them join them.” *The names have been changed in this case study Renting property Property First-time buyers House prices Housing Housing benefit Jill Insley guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Shelter reveals that families are being priced out of the ‘out-of-control’ rental market in 55% of English local authorities Families have been priced out of rental property in the majority of local authorities in England, according to the homeless charity Shelter . The Shelter Rent Watch found that average private rents were unaffordable for ordinary working families in 55% of local authorities in England. Typical rents charged by private landlords were more than a third of median take-home pay, the widely accepted measure of affordability. Shelter said research showed that 38% of families with children who were renting privately had cut down on food to pay their rent. Although renting has traditionally been regarded as a cheaper alternative to home ownership, the credit crunch and high house prices have forced many potential homebuyers to remain as tenants. At the same time, growing numbers of people who would normally qualify for social housing have been pushed into the private sector by an acute shortage of local authority and housing association property. The number of tenants renting privately has increased by nearly one million in the past five years. The increased demand has pushed up rents , particularly in London boroughs, which are the most expensive in England. At £1,360, an average rent for a two-bedroom home in the capital is almost two-and-a-half times the average in the rest of the country (£568). The least affordable local authority area outside London is Oxford, where typical rents account for 55% of average earnings. Tenants on benefits in these areas are already having problems finding properties to rent within the new local housing allowance limits , implemented in April for new tenants and from the beginning of next year for those in existing tenancies. Shelter said tenants in many rural areas were also bearing the brunt of high rents and low earnings. It found it is cheaper to rent in Manchester, Liverpool and Birmingham than in north Devon, north Dorset or Herefordshire. In Yorkshire, properties in Bradford and Sheffield are more affordable to rent than in the rural areas of Ryedale and Richmondshire. Shelter’s analysis showed that in England 8% of local authorities were extremely unaffordable to rent in, with a median rent of 50% or more of median full-time take-home pay; 21% were very unaffordable with a median rent equivalent of 40% to 49% of median full-time take-home pay; and 29% were fairly unaffordable with the median rent equivalent to 35% to 39% of the median full-time take-home pay. Campbell Robb, chief executive of Shelter, said: “With huge differences in affordability across the country, there are now worrying signs that families are likely to be displaced by our out-of-control rental market. “We have become depressingly familiar with first-time buyers being priced out of the housing market, but the impact of unaffordable rents is more dramatic. With no cheaper alternative, ordinary people are forced to cut their spending on essentials like food and heating, or uproot and move away from jobs, schools and families.” Robb said it was time for the government to urgently consider how private renting could become a stable, affordable option for families “and not a heavy financial burden that makes parents choose between buying food for their children and paying the rent.” Alice Barnard, chief executive of the Countryside Alliance , said the lack of affordable housing to rent or buy was one of the most pressing issues facing rural communities. “The countryside has seen its population grow at twice the rate of urban areas, which has driven up prices, forcing families to make sacrifices to meet spiralling rental costs and pricing young families out of the communities in which they have grown up,” she said. “If we want our rural communities to flourish then the government needs to urgently review the rental market in rural areas to enable rural communities to meet their housing needs.” Melissa Brown, a part-time yoga teacher, and her husband David*, a college lecturer, found it impossible to rent a decent affordable property when their landlord decided to sell their existing home. The couple, who live in Brighton with their three children, had been renting a three-bedroom terrace house for £1,250 a month for two-and-a-half years but last January were told they had to move out because the landlord wanted to sell up. It took them six months to find somewhere that was still close enough to their children’s school and they ended up moving in September into a three-bedroom house for £1,550 a month. The house is in a poor state of repair with damp and needs decorating and other work, but Melissa said that most of the properties they looked at was “eye-wateringly bad”. “Most of the rented houses around here are not suitable for families because the lounges have been turned into bedrooms so landlords can put students in there and make more money. Even groups of professionals are living in shared houses with no lounge,” she said. “We’ve been renting for years and it’s never been as bad as this. It’s all driven by greed.” She added: “We did ask about repairs to this house and the landlord is paying for paint, but she has been told she could rent the house out to students for £1,650 a month and already thinks she’s doing us a favour.” Their couple’s household income is about £2,000 a month and they are already really struggling to make ends meet. The family is planning to use the loft area as an extra bedroom for a lodger to raise money. Melissa said: “The landlord doesn’t mind how we raise the rent, so we are considering becoming landlords ourselves. If you can’t beat them join them.” *The names have been changed in this case study Renting property Property First-time buyers House prices Housing Housing benefit Jill Insley guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Defence secretary’s allies describe Adam Werritty as a Walter Mitty figure who had exaggerated his connections The battle to keep Liam Fox in office is in disarray as allies of the defence secretary began to distance themselves from his close friend Adam Werritty, describing him as a Walter Mitty figure who had exaggerated his connections as Fox’s adviser. It is understood that the briefings were not sanctioned by Fox or Downing Street, and were regarded as unhelpful to the embattled defence secretary. The cabinet secretary, Sir Gus O’Donnell, is now due to decide in days rather than weeks how serious he regards Fox’s apparent multiple breaches of the ministerial code. Fox’s cause is regarded as terminal if it is shown he knew Werritty was being paid by defence-related interests. It is understood that Werritty claims that his work, including his multiple global trips, was funded by ideologically sympathetic philanthropists, without any direct connection to specific defence contracts. Some of them were introduced to Werritty by Fox. Senior figures in the Ministry of Defence said Fox’s chances of survival were 50-50. “If he goes, it will not be because of security leaks or his private life. It will be due to money.” The initial attempt to denigrate Werritty by describing him as a fantasist is in part an attempt to argue that Fox neither knew nor condoned the extent to which Werritty was claiming he worked for Fox. “Essentially, he was masquerading as something he was not, ” said one official. “He [Werritty] shouldn’t have been acting that way. Liam has told him to tell the truth and not to hide anything.” The Guardian understands that Werritty has admitted to the inquiry that he may have unintentionally misled some of his business associates about the role he played with Fox, allowing them to form the impression he was an official aide. Werritty was interviewed on Tuesday by the Cabinet Office’s director of propriety and ethics, Sue Gray, who has asked him to provide documents setting out his business arrangements. The inquiry has been told Werritty was being funded by ideological allies of Fox, both in the UK and the US. One senior Whitehall official told the Guardian it was “inconceivable” that the defence secretary did not know that his friend was passing himself off as his unofficial envoy. Fox also continued to see Werritty even after he had reprimanded him for using a business card declaring he was an adviser to Fox, a fact that Fox did not tell his permanent secretary, Ursula Brennan, until she read it in a Guardian article. A few days later Fox and his wife still went on holiday to Spain with Werritty. It is also unlikely that Fox would have allowed “a Walter Mitty figure” to sit alongside him when he sat down for a social dinner with commander designate for Nato in Afghanistan at a Steakhouse in Tampa Florida.David Cameron said at prime minister’s questions that he was waiting for the O’Donnell inquiry before deciding whether to sack Fox. “I ask people to have a little patience and wait for the facts to be established,” he said. In a separate development, Conservative headquarters insisted there had been no attempt to cover up the fact that a man was staying with Fox when his home was burgled during the 2010 election campaign. Fox had a laptop, a mobile phone and keys to a Skoda taken, and the Skoda was driven away. At the time, journalists were told that Fox was alone, but Fox says he told the police a friend was staying with him. A Conservative spokesperson said: “As Liam Fox said last night, he told police at the time of the burglary that a friend was staying in his guest room, and that he does not know why the media were given the impression he was alone. We have looked into how incorrect information was briefed out. We have established that it was released in good faith and that it was the result of a genuine misunderstanding.” Friends of Fox, such as Chris Grayling, the employment minister, under pressure from the media, stressed that Fox was a “happily married” man. Grayling said: “If you look around the Westminster village, you will find all kinds of wild gossip about all kinds of individuals in all parties. That doesn’t mean they are not good at their jobs. I’ve known Liam for many years, I’ve known Liam and his wife, they’ve always struck me as being a very happily married couple. The reality is that the gossip is certainly circulating. “I thought we had got past the point in politics though where we needed to worry about people’s private lives. The question is, is somebody doing an important and capable job?” Liam Fox and Adam Werritty links Liam Fox Adam Werritty Ministry of Defence Defence policy Patrick Wintour Nick Hopkins Rupert Neate guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …