Home » Archives by category » News (Page 3317)

From animal and road safety advocates comes a new rule of the road: Buckle up your pup. Business is picking up for pet-product firms that offer seatbelts for your dog, with one company pulling in $5 million in revenue last year, reports the Wall Street Journal . Police and lawmakers are…

Continue reading …
Facebook to launch in-browser video chat powered by Skype?

Microsoft’s $8.5 billion acquisition of Skype hasn’t closed yet, but it looks like Redmond is already working behind the scenes to make the service even more ubiquitous. According to some anonymous sources interviewed by TechCrunch , Facebook is going to introduce video chat next week, and that service will be powered by none other than Skype. And while the service will be browser-based, it’s also said to include a desktop component. We’d say none of that sounds too fantastical — video calls would be a logical extension of Facebook chat, a nd let’s not forget about the $240 million Microsoft invested in the site back in 2007. What’s more, Facebook sent out invites for an event next week, where Mark Zuckerberg was clear the outfit would unveil a new product from its Seattle team. That’s in Microsoft’s backyard, of course, the invites themselves have chat icons on ‘em, and, most tellingly, that Seattle office has been snapping up engineers specializing in desktop software. All told, that adds up to a likely true story to us, but we won’t know for sure until the long, beachy weekend is through. Facebook to launch in-browser video chat powered by Skype? originally appeared on Engadget on Sat, 02 Jul 2011 17:02:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Continue reading …
Justin Bieber Songs

12 year old boy singing black and yellow Vote for YouTube’s Top 5 Fave Bieber Songs! (Comment below, Options in movie) Little girl dancing and singing LoonyLaddie says: I'll miss your Justin Bieber songs , and your lesbian haircut, and your adorable siblings, and your guitar, and your dark roots…

Continue reading …

Everything is on the chopping block as Democrats and Republicans wage their battle over the budget, according to President Obama: “Nothing can be off-limits,” he said in his weekly address. Which might be news to Republicans, reports the AP, who are dug in on their stance that tax increases are…

Continue reading …

Kipling

No Comment
Kipling

Homes for Sale – 3925 Kipling Dr – Greensboro, NC 27407 – Ju goods train Homes for Sale – 44 Kipling Way – Manalapan, NJ 07726 – Iris JuliaDaniels3 says: Jocelyn Rose Kipling http://bit.ly/melp01

Continue reading …
Wildfires and Belt-Tightening Lead to Fewer Fireworks This July Fourth

Sparklers, fireworks, and light shows are all Independence Day staples. But this year, due to droughts, wildfires, floods, and tight finances, America should expect to see less of the dazzling displays. A result of various circumstances across the nation, many U.S. cities and towns find they must bar the use of private fireworks, and in

Continue reading …
Demand to curb ‘casino banking’ risks splitting the coalition

Liberal Democrats warn that George Osborne’s ringfencing could prove too weak to protect customers Senior Liberal Democrats are demanding drastic action to break up UK banks into separate retail and investment divisions, as banking reform threatens to cause a new rift in the coalition. In a letter to the Observer on the eve of the deadline for industry groups to respond to a government-commissioned report on reform, peers, MPs and senior figures in the national party insist that chancellor George Osborne’s suggested approach falls short of what is needed. The Lib Dems join a list of more than 50 politicians, academics and economists to demand that the party honours its commitments – most recently made at its spring conference – to achieve a full breakup. The group, drawn together by the centre-left pressure group Compass and the New Economics Foundation, says that the Greek financial crisis, and the exposure of British banks to it, highlights the urgent need for action to promote financial stability. Raising concerns that the chancellor is ready to accept only limited reform, as recommended in an initial report by the economist Sir John Vickers, they say that far tougher action is needed. “Ringfencing retail and investment banking through ‘chinese walls’ in the manner suggested and endorsed by the chancellor, George Osborne, will not produce a banking system that is safe and fit-for-purpose,” they write. “If companies can continue to move capital between retail and investment banking, the latter could still endanger the former. As a first step, full separation of banking functions is needed to better insulate the taxpayer against failure. Full separation would provide depositors with institutions they can trust.” The letter suggests that senior Lib Dem and Labour figures are now prepared to work together on banking reform as part of a “progressive alliance” against key Tory policies. The signatories include the Lib Dem MP Adrian Sanders and Labour MPs Yasmin Qureshi and Jon Cruddas. Other Lib Dems who signed the letter include Lord Trevor Smith, Linda Jack of the Liberal Democrat Federal Policy Committee, Prof Richard Grayson, a former head of policy, and Stephen Knight, leader of the Liberal Democrat group in the London borough of Richmond upon Thames. Many Lib Dems believe disagreements over banking reform could cause a coalition split similar to that over the proposed NHS reforms. Splitting up the banks was a cause célèbre for Vince Cable when he was a radical critic of Labour’s handling of the financial crisis. However, the issue was fudged when the coalition agreement was struck after the general election, with both parties signing up to the idea that an independent commission would report on the future of the banks. Led by Vickers, Warden of All Souls College, Oxford, the commission issued its first report in April, calling for a “ringfence” around customers’ deposits to stop them being used to fund risky investment banking activities, derided as “casino banking” by Cable in opposition. Osborne surprised financial markets by using his Mansion House speech last month to suggest that he would accept the proposals before the final Vickers report is produced in the autumn. But now his hope of drawing a line under the financial sector controversy looks in trouble as a growing number of politicians and experts are warning that the proposals lack teeth. Former chancellor Nigel Lawson said that he expected the Vickers commission to shrug off Osborne’s efforts to pre-empt its final conclusions. Lawson believes the ringfence suggested in Vickers’s preliminary report – and apparently endorsed by Osborne – is not sufficiently radical. “My fear is that it works on paper, but it would not work in the real world,” he said. “I think there needs to be a structural solution.” Paul Fisher, a director at the Bank of England, conceded last week that uncertainty about regulatory reform was weighing on financial markets. The government has faced relentless lobbying from City banks threatening an exodus from the Square Mile and Canary Wharf if a full-blown breakup went ahead. But the bank’s governor, Sir Mervyn King, has called for a “clean” solution to the problem of banks that have become “too big to fail”. The New Economics Foundation’s Tony Greenham warned that the Vickers proposal, involving Chinese walls protecting retail banking, would be bureaucratic and complex. “Behavioural remedies are never as effective as institutional remedies,” he said. “You can create a set of rules to help people behave in a certain way, but they will find ways around that — that’s what highly paid bankers do. It would be a much less bureaucratic solution just to split them up.” Liberal-Conservative coalition Banking Liberal Democrats Conservatives George Osborne Bank of England Toby Helm Heather Stewart guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Demand to curb ‘casino banking’ risks splitting the coalition

Liberal Democrats warn that George Osborne’s ringfencing could prove too weak to protect customers Senior Liberal Democrats are demanding drastic action to break up UK banks into separate retail and investment divisions, as banking reform threatens to cause a new rift in the coalition. In a letter to the Observer on the eve of the deadline for industry groups to respond to a government-commissioned report on reform, peers, MPs and senior figures in the national party insist that chancellor George Osborne’s suggested approach falls short of what is needed. The Lib Dems join a list of more than 50 politicians, academics and economists to demand that the party honours its commitments – most recently made at its spring conference – to achieve a full breakup. The group, drawn together by the centre-left pressure group Compass and the New Economics Foundation, says that the Greek financial crisis, and the exposure of British banks to it, highlights the urgent need for action to promote financial stability. Raising concerns that the chancellor is ready to accept only limited reform, as recommended in an initial report by the economist Sir John Vickers, they say that far tougher action is needed. “Ringfencing retail and investment banking through ‘chinese walls’ in the manner suggested and endorsed by the chancellor, George Osborne, will not produce a banking system that is safe and fit-for-purpose,” they write. “If companies can continue to move capital between retail and investment banking, the latter could still endanger the former. As a first step, full separation of banking functions is needed to better insulate the taxpayer against failure. Full separation would provide depositors with institutions they can trust.” The letter suggests that senior Lib Dem and Labour figures are now prepared to work together on banking reform as part of a “progressive alliance” against key Tory policies. The signatories include the Lib Dem MP Adrian Sanders and Labour MPs Yasmin Qureshi and Jon Cruddas. Other Lib Dems who signed the letter include Lord Trevor Smith, Linda Jack of the Liberal Democrat Federal Policy Committee, Prof Richard Grayson, a former head of policy, and Stephen Knight, leader of the Liberal Democrat group in the London borough of Richmond upon Thames. Many Lib Dems believe disagreements over banking reform could cause a coalition split similar to that over the proposed NHS reforms. Splitting up the banks was a cause célèbre for Vince Cable when he was a radical critic of Labour’s handling of the financial crisis. However, the issue was fudged when the coalition agreement was struck after the general election, with both parties signing up to the idea that an independent commission would report on the future of the banks. Led by Vickers, Warden of All Souls College, Oxford, the commission issued its first report in April, calling for a “ringfence” around customers’ deposits to stop them being used to fund risky investment banking activities, derided as “casino banking” by Cable in opposition. Osborne surprised financial markets by using his Mansion House speech last month to suggest that he would accept the proposals before the final Vickers report is produced in the autumn. But now his hope of drawing a line under the financial sector controversy looks in trouble as a growing number of politicians and experts are warning that the proposals lack teeth. Former chancellor Nigel Lawson said that he expected the Vickers commission to shrug off Osborne’s efforts to pre-empt its final conclusions. Lawson believes the ringfence suggested in Vickers’s preliminary report – and apparently endorsed by Osborne – is not sufficiently radical. “My fear is that it works on paper, but it would not work in the real world,” he said. “I think there needs to be a structural solution.” Paul Fisher, a director at the Bank of England, conceded last week that uncertainty about regulatory reform was weighing on financial markets. The government has faced relentless lobbying from City banks threatening an exodus from the Square Mile and Canary Wharf if a full-blown breakup went ahead. But the bank’s governor, Sir Mervyn King, has called for a “clean” solution to the problem of banks that have become “too big to fail”. The New Economics Foundation’s Tony Greenham warned that the Vickers proposal, involving Chinese walls protecting retail banking, would be bureaucratic and complex. “Behavioural remedies are never as effective as institutional remedies,” he said. “You can create a set of rules to help people behave in a certain way, but they will find ways around that — that’s what highly paid bankers do. It would be a much less bureaucratic solution just to split them up.” Liberal-Conservative coalition Banking Liberal Democrats Conservatives George Osborne Bank of England Toby Helm Heather Stewart guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Eric Pickles warns Cameron of rise in homeless families risk

A leaked letter, from the office of Eric Pickles has warned that welfare reform will make 40,000 more people homeless David Cameron has been warned by one of his most trusted cabinet ministers that his welfare policies risk making 40,000 families homeless. The extraordinary claim, in a letter to the prime minister from the office of Eric Pickles, the communities secretary, exposes deep splits at the heart of government over plans to cap benefit at £500 a week per family. The letter, leaked to the Observer , reveals Pickles’s belief that the cap – announced with great fanfare at last year’s Tory conference – will increase the burden on taxpayers, because thousands of families will be unable to pay their rent and will have to seek local government help. It blows apart the government’s public insistence that a limit on benefit payments will have little impact on homelessness and child poverty. Written by Nico Heslop, Pickles’s private secretary, at the clear instigation of the minister, the letter lays bare fears of mass homelessness “disproportionately impacting on families”. It says: ■ 40,000 families will be made homeless by the welfare reforms, putting further strain on services already “seeing increased pressures”. ■ An estimated £270m saving from the benefits cap will be wiped out by the need to divert resources to help the newly homeless and is likely to “generate a net cost”. ■ Half of the 56,000 affordable homes the government expects to be constructed by 2015 will not be built because developers will realise they will not be able to recoup even 80% of market rates from tenants. The leak is the first time that disagreements over welfare cuts have surfaced within the Tory high command. Liam Byrne, the shadow work and pensions secretary, said the letter suggested ministers had not come clean over the effects of their policy. “We were assured by ministers that costs wouldn’t rise. Now top-level leaks reveal the truth. Iain Duncan Smith has promised the House of Commons he will not U-turn on the benefits cap. Perhaps now David Cameron will order him to think again.” Jenny Willott, the Liberal Democrat welfare spokeswoman who has already warned that a rigid cap would increase child poverty, said she remained “very worried” about the proposals, which are due to come into effect in 2013. Last month, employment minister Chris Grayling rebuffed an attempt by Labour to protect those facing homelessness from the benefit cap. Dismissing a Labour amendment to the welfare reform bill, he said: “It is not yet clear to what extent they would be affected by the overall benefit cap.” The bill has since passed to the Lords, although the revelations will only fuel existing concerns among Liberal Democrat and Labour peers. Labour MP Karen Buck, who sits on the Commons committee, said Pickles’s letter proved there was confusion and division at the centre of government. “The housing department and the benefits department are pursuing policies which don’t just cut across, but actively undermine, each other,” she said. Campbell Robb, chief executive of Shelter, the charity for the homeless, said: “With 21% of people struggling to meet housing costs, it’s naive to think you can cut support without putting some people at risk of losing their home. The coalition government should stop bulldozing through badly thought-through policies while ignoring independent evidence, its own expert panel and the views of those who will deal with the very real impact on people.” Enver Solomon, policy director at the Children’s Society, said: “The social costs of the cap are huge and would have disastrous consequences for many children.” The leaking of the letter will be a source of considerable embarrassment to the government. It was sent by Heslop to Cameron’s private secretary, Matthew Style – the normal channel of communication used by cabinet ministers for formal matters of policy. Over two pages, the fears of the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) are spelled out over “some very serious practical issues for DCLG priorities”. The letter says: “Our modelling indicates that we could see an additional 20,000 homelessness acceptances as a result of the total benefit cap. This on top of the 20,000 additional acceptances already anticipated as a result of other changes to the housing benefit. We are already seeing increased pressures on the homelessness services.” It adds: “We are concerned that the savings from this measure, currently estimated at £270m [per year] from 2014-2015, does not take account of the additional costs to local authorities (through homelessness and temporary accommodation). In fact we think it is likely that the policy as it stands will generate a net cost.” The letter then claims that with the reduction in the benefit families can claim, developers will not be able to recoup anything close to a market rent and so will not have an incentive to build homes. “Initial analysis suggests that of the 56,000 new affordable rent units up to 23,000 could be lost,” the letter says. “And reductions would disproprortionately affect family homes rather than small flats.” Of a proposed policy that families would be required to divert part of the general benefits, such as child benefit, to cover housing costs, it adds: “It is important not to underestimate the level of controversy that this would generate.” A spokesman for Pickles said: “We are fully supportive of all the government’s policies on benefits. Clearly action is needed to tackle the housing benefit bill which has spiralled to £21bn a year under Labour.” Welfare Eric Pickles David Cameron Iain Duncan Smith Child benefit Communities Children State benefits Daniel Boffey Toby Helm guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Eric Pickles warns Cameron of rise in homeless families risk

A leaked letter, from the office of Eric Pickles has warned that welfare reform will make 40,000 more people homeless David Cameron has been warned by one of his most trusted cabinet ministers that his welfare policies risk making 40,000 families homeless. The extraordinary claim, in a letter to the prime minister from the office of Eric Pickles, the communities secretary, exposes deep splits at the heart of government over plans to cap benefit at £500 a week per family. The letter, leaked to the Observer , reveals Pickles’s belief that the cap – announced with great fanfare at last year’s Tory conference – will increase the burden on taxpayers, because thousands of families will be unable to pay their rent and will have to seek local government help. It blows apart the government’s public insistence that a limit on benefit payments will have little impact on homelessness and child poverty. Written by Nico Heslop, Pickles’s private secretary, at the clear instigation of the minister, the letter lays bare fears of mass homelessness “disproportionately impacting on families”. It says: ■ 40,000 families will be made homeless by the welfare reforms, putting further strain on services already “seeing increased pressures”. ■ An estimated £270m saving from the benefits cap will be wiped out by the need to divert resources to help the newly homeless and is likely to “generate a net cost”. ■ Half of the 56,000 affordable homes the government expects to be constructed by 2015 will not be built because developers will realise they will not be able to recoup even 80% of market rates from tenants. The leak is the first time that disagreements over welfare cuts have surfaced within the Tory high command. Liam Byrne, the shadow work and pensions secretary, said the letter suggested ministers had not come clean over the effects of their policy. “We were assured by ministers that costs wouldn’t rise. Now top-level leaks reveal the truth. Iain Duncan Smith has promised the House of Commons he will not U-turn on the benefits cap. Perhaps now David Cameron will order him to think again.” Jenny Willott, the Liberal Democrat welfare spokeswoman who has already warned that a rigid cap would increase child poverty, said she remained “very worried” about the proposals, which are due to come into effect in 2013. Last month, employment minister Chris Grayling rebuffed an attempt by Labour to protect those facing homelessness from the benefit cap. Dismissing a Labour amendment to the welfare reform bill, he said: “It is not yet clear to what extent they would be affected by the overall benefit cap.” The bill has since passed to the Lords, although the revelations will only fuel existing concerns among Liberal Democrat and Labour peers. Labour MP Karen Buck, who sits on the Commons committee, said Pickles’s letter proved there was confusion and division at the centre of government. “The housing department and the benefits department are pursuing policies which don’t just cut across, but actively undermine, each other,” she said. Campbell Robb, chief executive of Shelter, the charity for the homeless, said: “With 21% of people struggling to meet housing costs, it’s naive to think you can cut support without putting some people at risk of losing their home. The coalition government should stop bulldozing through badly thought-through policies while ignoring independent evidence, its own expert panel and the views of those who will deal with the very real impact on people.” Enver Solomon, policy director at the Children’s Society, said: “The social costs of the cap are huge and would have disastrous consequences for many children.” The leaking of the letter will be a source of considerable embarrassment to the government. It was sent by Heslop to Cameron’s private secretary, Matthew Style – the normal channel of communication used by cabinet ministers for formal matters of policy. Over two pages, the fears of the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) are spelled out over “some very serious practical issues for DCLG priorities”. The letter says: “Our modelling indicates that we could see an additional 20,000 homelessness acceptances as a result of the total benefit cap. This on top of the 20,000 additional acceptances already anticipated as a result of other changes to the housing benefit. We are already seeing increased pressures on the homelessness services.” It adds: “We are concerned that the savings from this measure, currently estimated at £270m [per year] from 2014-2015, does not take account of the additional costs to local authorities (through homelessness and temporary accommodation). In fact we think it is likely that the policy as it stands will generate a net cost.” The letter then claims that with the reduction in the benefit families can claim, developers will not be able to recoup anything close to a market rent and so will not have an incentive to build homes. “Initial analysis suggests that of the 56,000 new affordable rent units up to 23,000 could be lost,” the letter says. “And reductions would disproprortionately affect family homes rather than small flats.” Of a proposed policy that families would be required to divert part of the general benefits, such as child benefit, to cover housing costs, it adds: “It is important not to underestimate the level of controversy that this would generate.” A spokesman for Pickles said: “We are fully supportive of all the government’s policies on benefits. Clearly action is needed to tackle the housing benefit bill which has spiralled to £21bn a year under Labour.” Welfare Eric Pickles David Cameron Iain Duncan Smith Child benefit Communities Children State benefits Daniel Boffey Toby Helm guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …