Click here to view this media Holy cow, Bill Kristol actually said something two weeks in a row on Fox News Sunday that I agree with — we don’t need to be lowering the corporate tax rates when these companies are sitting on hoards of cash already and are not hiring. BREAM: Well, if they have such a hard time doing things like getting the continuing resolution, getting a budget done, getting this debt ceiling done, I mean, who thinks they have the appetite for actually tackling the tax code? EASTON: Actually, as James Baker said to me not long ago, doing that is actually — you have gives on both sides, because Democrats get to close loopholes and Republicans get a lowering (ph) of the corporate tax rate. So it actually is — there is a — (CROSSTALK) KRISTOL: I’m the only, like, conservative Republican in the country that actually does not think lowering the corporate tax rate is really the key to America’s future. BREAM: You’re the one. KRISTOL: Corporations have trillions of dollars. If the corporate tax rate is such a burden, how come they have all this money? They’re not hiring. The tax rates on labor are much more onerous, in my view, than the tax rates on corporations. But in any case, this is a heterodox view among conservatives. But nonetheless, this is why this deal can’t happen in a year. I mean, there’s a lot of debates that have to happen among Republicans. I think Michele Bachmann probably has a slightly different view of our tax future than Mitt Romney, and this isn’t going to happen before November, 2012.
Continue reading …As he normally does on “Inside Washington,” PBS's Mark Shields Friday was waxing moronic about Republican plans to balance the budget. Not pleased by the fictional account on display, syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer challenged his fellow panelist saying, “Democrats have not even produced a budget for 2012. What’s their budget?” (video follows with transcript and commentary): MARK SHIELDS: Consistency has not been a problem with Republicans. They have endorsed the Ryan plan, which of course does not provide for a balanced budget, and now they are pushing for a balanced budget. 103 House Republicans have already gone on record as saying they will not vote to raise the debt ceiling unless there is a cap of eighteen percent of government spending, federal spending, which is seven percent below what we're spending right now. In addition to that, they insist on a constitutional amendment and to cut spending by half, the deficit by half next year, all of which are impossible. Every serious person who has looked at this, whether in a group or a study group or commission or whatever, knows that there have to be revenue enhancements, taxes raised, as well as spending cuts. And the idea of just trying to do it with spending cuts alone is just irrational. CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: Democrats have not even produced a budget for 2012. SHIELDS: The, the, the, the… KRAUTHAMMER: What’s their budget? SHIELDS: The case is there. The President is on… KRAUTHAMMER: Where are their numbers, where is the plan? SHIELDS: The President has… KRAUTHAMMER: Where are their numbers and where is the plan? SHIELDS: It’s right there in the President… KRAUTHAMMER: Where? SHIELDS: Look, I mean, the president in the dealings with Joe Biden, and the sixth, and the Senators and Congressmen. It is there. What nonsense. The inconvenient truth for liberal media members is Congressional Democrats haven't proposed a budget since the fiscal 2010 one was passed on April 3, 2009. That's 27 straight months without a budget proposal from a Democrat in either the House or the Senate, and people like Shields have the gall to go on television and complain about proposals from Congressional Republicans. The idea that in the midst of a serious budget crisis in this country, one political party has completely abdicated its primary responsibility should be drawing media ire on a daily basis. Instead, these shills point fingers at the only party trying to rectify the situation. It really makes you wonder how they look themselves in the mirror when they brush their teeth.
Continue reading …A new poll indicates that French people are divided over whether Dominique Strauss-Kahn should re-enter French politics after the weakening of the sexual assault case against the former International Monetary Fund chief. Forty-nine percent of those surveyed in the Harris Interactive poll for French newspaper Le Parisien responded “yes” to…
Continue reading …Producing Busiess Cards MANGOSTEENPRINT XANGO BUSINESS CARDS Need mixtape cover designs Supreme Gfx edenspodek says: Cannot believe the number of businesses without any online presence or stale contact info. on supposedly current business cards …
Continue reading …On July 3, 1971, Jim Morrison died of heart failure in his Paris bathtub. The sultry poet, musician and leather pants aficionado lived for only 27 years (which, eerily, is also how long Janis Joplin and Jimi Hendrix lived)—and he spent just a handful of those making music with the Doors—but he had a profound
Continue reading …Opposition says post-surrender deal could allow Gaddafi to remain in Libya under international supervision Muammar Gaddafi can live out his retirement in Libya if he surrenders all power, the country’s opposition leader has said. Gaddafi is facing an international arrest warrant and has resisted all demands to step down, but members of his inner circle have indicated they are ready to negotiate with the rebels, including on the Libyan leader’s future. Mustafa Abdel Jalil, who heads the rebels’ national transitional council, told Reuters: “As a peaceful solution we offered that he can resign and order his soldiers to withdraw from their barracks and positions, and then he can decide either to stay in Libya or abroad. “If he desires to stay in Libya, we will determine the place and it will be under international supervision. And there will be international supervision of all his movements.” Speaking in the rebels’ eastern Libyan stronghold of Benghazi, Jalil, who was formerly Gaddafi’s justice minister, said he made the proposal about a month ago through the UN but had yet to receive any response from Tripoli. He said one suggestion was that Gaddafi could spend his retirement under guard in a military barracks. The Libyan government has repeatedly insisted that Gaddafi is a symbolic figurehead who has no involvement in the day-to-day running of the country. The regime’s spokesman, Moussa Ibrahim, said it was willing to “set down in writing” that Gaddafi would have no political or military powers under a new constitution. Asked if this would leave Gaddafi’s role comparable to that of the Queen in the UK, Ibrahim added: “Maybe for the sake of argument, something like that.” But pressed on the latest concession by Jalil he was dismissive, saying that any such decisions should be left to the Libyan people. “What we are doing is legally and morally and politically far more convincing,” he said. “We are saying Libyans should decide for everyone on the position of the leader. Now who is more democratic, us or the rebels?” Gaddafi’s daughter Aisha has said her father would be prepared to cut a deal with the rebels though he would not leave the country, and his son, Saif al-Islam, said the leader would step down if that was the will of the Libyan people. Turkey, which had close economic ties to Gaddafi before the uprising, has pledged £125m in aid for the rebels in addition to the £62m it announced in June. “Public demand for reforms should be answered, Gaddafi should go and Libya shouldn’t be divided,” Turkish foreign minister Ahmet Davutoglu told Reuters in Benghazi, adding that he saw the rebel council as the “legitimate representative” of the people. The conflict in Libya is close to deadlock, with rebels on three fronts unable to make a decisive advance towards Tripoli and growing strains inside Nato about the cost of the operation and lack of a military breakthrough. Libya Muammar Gaddafi Middle East Africa Arab and Middle East unrest David Smith guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Opposition says post-surrender deal could allow Gaddafi to remain in Libya under international supervision Muammar Gaddafi can live out his retirement in Libya if he surrenders all power, the country’s opposition leader has said. Gaddafi is facing an international arrest warrant and has resisted all demands to step down, but members of his inner circle have indicated they are ready to negotiate with the rebels, including on the Libyan leader’s future. Mustafa Abdel Jalil, who heads the rebels’ national transitional council, told Reuters: “As a peaceful solution we offered that he can resign and order his soldiers to withdraw from their barracks and positions, and then he can decide either to stay in Libya or abroad. “If he desires to stay in Libya, we will determine the place and it will be under international supervision. And there will be international supervision of all his movements.” Speaking in the rebels’ eastern Libyan stronghold of Benghazi, Jalil, who was formerly Gaddafi’s justice minister, said he made the proposal about a month ago through the UN but had yet to receive any response from Tripoli. He said one suggestion was that Gaddafi could spend his retirement under guard in a military barracks. The Libyan government has repeatedly insisted that Gaddafi is a symbolic figurehead who has no involvement in the day-to-day running of the country. The regime’s spokesman, Moussa Ibrahim, said it was willing to “set down in writing” that Gaddafi would have no political or military powers under a new constitution. Asked if this would leave Gaddafi’s role comparable to that of the Queen in the UK, Ibrahim added: “Maybe for the sake of argument, something like that.” But pressed on the latest concession by Jalil he was dismissive, saying that any such decisions should be left to the Libyan people. “What we are doing is legally and morally and politically far more convincing,” he said. “We are saying Libyans should decide for everyone on the position of the leader. Now who is more democratic, us or the rebels?” Gaddafi’s daughter Aisha has said her father would be prepared to cut a deal with the rebels though he would not leave the country, and his son, Saif al-Islam, said the leader would step down if that was the will of the Libyan people. Turkey, which had close economic ties to Gaddafi before the uprising, has pledged £125m in aid for the rebels in addition to the £62m it announced in June. “Public demand for reforms should be answered, Gaddafi should go and Libya shouldn’t be divided,” Turkish foreign minister Ahmet Davutoglu told Reuters in Benghazi, adding that he saw the rebel council as the “legitimate representative” of the people. The conflict in Libya is close to deadlock, with rebels on three fronts unable to make a decisive advance towards Tripoli and growing strains inside Nato about the cost of the operation and lack of a military breakthrough. Libya Muammar Gaddafi Middle East Africa Arab and Middle East unrest David Smith guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Latest volumes of former spin doctor’s diary reveal fears that rivalry risked harming Britain’s interests on the world stage MI6 handed Tony Blair a private intelligence assessment which showed that the French and German governments drew up plans to exploit his divisions with Gordon Brown, according to Alastair Campbell. In a sign of how the rivalry risked harming British interests on the world stage, Campbell wrote in his diary that Blair was told by “the spooks” that Paris and Berlin hoped to use his rivalry with Brown to “divide them even further”. The latest volumes of Campbell’s diaries, serialised in the Guardian today, will also undermine the attempt by Ed Balls to claim that he was not a divisive figure during Blair’s premiership, after damaging private papers were published recently by the Daily Telegraph. Blair repeatedly told Campbell that Balls, then Brown’s chief lieutenant, was a highly disruptive influence who used to treat him like a junior official. “TB … said he had just about had enough of Ed Balls talking to him like something on his shoe,” Campbell wrote on 25 April 2001. Balls breached Treasury rules by leaking details of the government’s response to the fuel duty protests – that fuel duty would be frozen for two years – before Brown’s pre-budget report in November 2000, according to Campbell. “It was wrong to leak tax measures … it was misleading,” Campbell wrote after Brown outlined plans for Balls to brief the Times and the Mirror. But the diaries also show that Balls and Brown helped save Britain from direct involvement in the current Greek euro debt crisis after Blair made clear in private – at one point even to the Sinn Féin leadership – that he would take Britain into the euro. Brown campaigned hard against Blair on the euro and in October 1999, as they finalised plans for the launch of the Britain in Europe group, said to his face: “Do you want to be held responsible for mass unemployment?” Campbell left much of the Blair-Brown tensions out of the first condensed version of his diaries, which were published in 2007 shortly after Blair stood down as prime minister. But in the latest volume, covering the years 1999-2001, Campbell provides vivid details of their turbulent relationship. He reveals that: • Brown put pressure on Blair to give a date for his departure before the 2001 election – earlier than had been thought. In April 2001 Brown told Blair he was “crap” and that he should stand down to allow for the restoration of cabinet government. • Just two months before the 2001 election Brown accused Blair of having “betrayed” him when he stood for the Labour leadership in 1994 and of having taken “that job away from me”. • Before the 2001 election Blair said he expected Brown to strike against him. He appealed to Campbell to remain on board on the grounds that he was his “Exocet”. • On the day before the 2001 general election Blair told his inner circle he had “sadly, very sadly” reached the conclusion that Brown was working against him. But he said it was impossible to sack him or move him from his position as chancellor. • Relations became so fraught that in 2000 Blair asked Lord (Richard) Attenborough, the veteran actor and film director, to mediate. Attenborough was told by the Brown camp that Blair needed to say in 2003 when he would stand down. • Blair said that Brown lied to him in 2001 when he tried to secure money for schools and hospitals. • Blair turned “white with fury” – and later rebuked Brown in private – when his chancellor responded with “venom and contempt” to his question at a presentation by Treasury officials. • On 9/11 Blair declined to invite Brown to a smaller ministerial meeting in Downing Street, following the main Cobra crisis meeting, because his answers had become “monosyllabic” in recent discussions. Campbell believed that the splits were being picked up in Europe. On 12 October 2000 he wrote: “TB showed me a piece of intelligence which showed that the Germans assessed our problems on Europe not as one of public opinion, or the Tories, but a sense that TB and GB were on a different track to each other. So it was out there, probably picked up when some Foreign Office people were in Berlin.” A few months later at an EU summit in Nice, on 7 December, Campbell wrote: “The French and Germans, according to the spooks, were exploiting the fact that GB was seen as a rival to TB, to try to divide them further.” Campbell also shows that Brown had never reconciled himself to Blair’s election as Labour leader in 1994 after he stood aside as part of the “Granita pact”. Brown saw this as a noble and selfless act; Blair saw it as a recognition of his status as the frontrunner. Nearly a decade later this was on Brown’s mind even at the height of the foot and mouth crisis. On 11 April 2001 Campbell wrote: “He [TB] said on Monday, GB had started a conversation with him straight out with the words: ‘You betrayed me. You said you would never challenge me and you took that job away from me.’ TB said GB was still very sore, and operated on the basis there was a genuine grievance, which TB did not accept. GB was back to saying TB had an operation ready to roll in 1994.” The diaries also show that Brown was the decisive strategic thinker in the government who often outshone Blair in cabinet. Blair regarded him as one of the top five politicians of the 20th century, on a par with Lloyd George. Campbell told the Guardian on Sunday that, for all his faults, Brown was indispensable. Campbell said: “As Tony made clear in his book, he viewed Gordon as both brilliant and impossible. What is interesting from these extracts is that even when we felt Gordon was wanting Tony out, and the division was causing real damage, Tony was always able to see the strengths that made him want to keep him as chancellor and later support him as leader. “I shared that ambivalence which is why even though I lived through some of these difficulties and divisions, when push came to shove I went back to try to help Gordon in the last election campaign. He could be a complete nightmare, but he could also be absolutely brilliant and it is important people remember that. Tony was always the more rounded figure, and in my view a remarkable political leader, but Gordon also had formidable strengths.” Tony Blair Gordon Brown Ed Balls Alastair Campbell MI6 Labour Nicholas Watt guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Latest volumes of former spin doctor’s diary reveal fears that rivalry risked harming Britain’s interests on the world stage MI6 handed Tony Blair a private intelligence assessment which showed that the French and German governments drew up plans to exploit his divisions with Gordon Brown, according to Alastair Campbell. In a sign of how the rivalry risked harming British interests on the world stage, Campbell wrote in his diary that Blair was told by “the spooks” that Paris and Berlin hoped to use his rivalry with Brown to “divide them even further”. The latest volumes of Campbell’s diaries, serialised in the Guardian today, will also undermine the attempt by Ed Balls to claim that he was not a divisive figure during Blair’s premiership, after damaging private papers were published recently by the Daily Telegraph. Blair repeatedly told Campbell that Balls, then Brown’s chief lieutenant, was a highly disruptive influence who used to treat him like a junior official. “TB … said he had just about had enough of Ed Balls talking to him like something on his shoe,” Campbell wrote on 25 April 2001. Balls breached Treasury rules by leaking details of the government’s response to the fuel duty protests – that fuel duty would be frozen for two years – before Brown’s pre-budget report in November 2000, according to Campbell. “It was wrong to leak tax measures … it was misleading,” Campbell wrote after Brown outlined plans for Balls to brief the Times and the Mirror. But the diaries also show that Balls and Brown helped save Britain from direct involvement in the current Greek euro debt crisis after Blair made clear in private – at one point even to the Sinn Féin leadership – that he would take Britain into the euro. Brown campaigned hard against Blair on the euro and in October 1999, as they finalised plans for the launch of the Britain in Europe group, said to his face: “Do you want to be held responsible for mass unemployment?” Campbell left much of the Blair-Brown tensions out of the first condensed version of his diaries, which were published in 2007 shortly after Blair stood down as prime minister. But in the latest volume, covering the years 1999-2001, Campbell provides vivid details of their turbulent relationship. He reveals that: • Brown put pressure on Blair to give a date for his departure before the 2001 election – earlier than had been thought. In April 2001 Brown told Blair he was “crap” and that he should stand down to allow for the restoration of cabinet government. • Just two months before the 2001 election Brown accused Blair of having “betrayed” him when he stood for the Labour leadership in 1994 and of having taken “that job away from me”. • Before the 2001 election Blair said he expected Brown to strike against him. He appealed to Campbell to remain on board on the grounds that he was his “Exocet”. • On the day before the 2001 general election Blair told his inner circle he had “sadly, very sadly” reached the conclusion that Brown was working against him. But he said it was impossible to sack him or move him from his position as chancellor. • Relations became so fraught that in 2000 Blair asked Lord (Richard) Attenborough, the veteran actor and film director, to mediate. Attenborough was told by the Brown camp that Blair needed to say in 2003 when he would stand down. • Blair said that Brown lied to him in 2001 when he tried to secure money for schools and hospitals. • Blair turned “white with fury” – and later rebuked Brown in private – when his chancellor responded with “venom and contempt” to his question at a presentation by Treasury officials. • On 9/11 Blair declined to invite Brown to a smaller ministerial meeting in Downing Street, following the main Cobra crisis meeting, because his answers had become “monosyllabic” in recent discussions. Campbell believed that the splits were being picked up in Europe. On 12 October 2000 he wrote: “TB showed me a piece of intelligence which showed that the Germans assessed our problems on Europe not as one of public opinion, or the Tories, but a sense that TB and GB were on a different track to each other. So it was out there, probably picked up when some Foreign Office people were in Berlin.” A few months later at an EU summit in Nice, on 7 December, Campbell wrote: “The French and Germans, according to the spooks, were exploiting the fact that GB was seen as a rival to TB, to try to divide them further.” Campbell also shows that Brown had never reconciled himself to Blair’s election as Labour leader in 1994 after he stood aside as part of the “Granita pact”. Brown saw this as a noble and selfless act; Blair saw it as a recognition of his status as the frontrunner. Nearly a decade later this was on Brown’s mind even at the height of the foot and mouth crisis. On 11 April 2001 Campbell wrote: “He [TB] said on Monday, GB had started a conversation with him straight out with the words: ‘You betrayed me. You said you would never challenge me and you took that job away from me.’ TB said GB was still very sore, and operated on the basis there was a genuine grievance, which TB did not accept. GB was back to saying TB had an operation ready to roll in 1994.” The diaries also show that Brown was the decisive strategic thinker in the government who often outshone Blair in cabinet. Blair regarded him as one of the top five politicians of the 20th century, on a par with Lloyd George. Campbell told the Guardian on Sunday that, for all his faults, Brown was indispensable. Campbell said: “As Tony made clear in his book, he viewed Gordon as both brilliant and impossible. What is interesting from these extracts is that even when we felt Gordon was wanting Tony out, and the division was causing real damage, Tony was always able to see the strengths that made him want to keep him as chancellor and later support him as leader. “I shared that ambivalence which is why even though I lived through some of these difficulties and divisions, when push came to shove I went back to try to help Gordon in the last election campaign. He could be a complete nightmare, but he could also be absolutely brilliant and it is important people remember that. Tony was always the more rounded figure, and in my view a remarkable political leader, but Gordon also had formidable strengths.” Tony Blair Gordon Brown Ed Balls Alastair Campbell MI6 Labour Nicholas Watt guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …They are the envy of America’s space program: Christopher Ferguson, Douglas Hurley, Rex Walheim, and Sandra Magnus will zip into space on Friday aboard NASA’s 135th and final shuttle mission. The smallest crew since 1983 amounts to an afterthought: They were initially groomed as a rescue mission in case of…
Continue reading …