Earlier this week, environmental activists spread oil on themselves and begin an “oil orgy” at an energy summit in protest of the United Kingdom’s opposition to European legislation that would “label tar sands oil as highly polluting.” Canada has been lobbying for its role in providing a source of reliable and abundant energy through tar sands, a dense form of petroleum called bitumen mixed in sand… Broadcasting platform : Vimeo Source : The Business Insider Discovery Date : 12/10/2011 00:57 Number of articles : 4
Continue reading …Home secretary Theresa May backs police power to declare no-go areas for first time since Riot Act was repealed The police will be given a public order power allowing them to clear the streets and tell the public to leave an area during a riot or other disorder, under proposals for curfews outlined by the Home Office. The power entitles a police superintendent to declare a specific district a public “no go” area for a limited time – for the first time since the Riot Act was removed from the statute book for England and Wales in 1973. A Home Office consultation paper published on Thursday stops short of making it a criminal offence to be outdoors in a curfew zone, but says it would be an offence to refuse a police instruction to leave the area. It leaves open the question of what penalty might be imposed. The plan, which has the backing of the home secretary, Theresa May, is published alongside proposals to give the police stronger powers to order rioters and protesters to remove face masks, and for the police to impose curfews on individuals as part of a conditional caution. The consultation paper also includes a controversial proposal to remove the word “insulting” from section 5 of the 1986 Public Order Act, which makes it an offence for the public to use words likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress. The measure has been used recently against Christian street-preachers who were arguing that homosexuality was sinful, against a teenager who claimed Scientology was a dangerous cult, and against an Oxford University student who told a mounted police officer his horse was gay. Liberal Democrat MPs have been pressing for section 5 to be repealed for undermining free speech, though the mayor of London, Boris Johnson, wants it retained to ensure that anyone who insults police officers can be prosecuted. The crime and security minister, James Brokenshire, said it was essential to give the police all necessary legal powers to enable them to maintain public order, protect the streets and keep the public safe. “But we must also make sure any new powers do not trample upon traditional British freeedoms – that is why we are seeking public views on the powers the police really need to keep our communities safe,” he said. Civil liberties campaigners were appalled by the proposed curfew powers. Isabella Sankey, the policy director of Liberty, said: “Whatever happened to the ‘civil liberties’ coalition that abolished ID cards and sought to restore rights and freedoms? It’s all gone cat-flaps and curfews. As a result of Liberty’s victory in the court of human rights , government is reforming blanket stop-and-search powers. How on earth will blanket powers to impose curfews on peacetime Britain cut the mustard against the same tests of legality and proportionality?” The consultation paper says the aim of the proposed general curfew power would be to keep the public off the streets in a given location, for a given period of time, to prevent or address serious disorder. The paper says: “This could be used instead of dispersal powers in situations that could potentially involve large numbers of people, or where the police need to empty an area of people quickly for safety and security reasons.” The Home Office envisages a senior police officer taking the decision to clear streets based on “credible intelligence of a serious threat of such disorder in that place and at that time”. The paper recognises that it would be necessary to give appropriate notice to people within the curfew zone and to make arrangements for those who need to be outside for justifiable reasons, such as emergency workers. This move evokes a historical parallel with the 1714 Riot Act, which was last “read” in England in 1919 and was repealed in 1973. The paper states that there would need to be independent oversight of the use of the power. But while prior judicial approval could be necessary, it acknowledges that there will be circumstances where that is not possible. Police Theresa May UK civil liberties UK riots Stop and search Kettling Alan Travis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Nearly 30,000 had to wait for treatment for longer than NHS target in August, a rise of 48% on previous year The number of patients waiting more than the recommended maximum of 18 weeks to be treated by the NHS has soared by almost half since last year, official data shows . A total of 28,635 patients in England who were treated in an NHS hospital during August had been waiting more than 18 weeks, compared with 19,355 in the same month in 2010 – a rise of 48%. The figures, released by the Department of Health, confirm that despite repeated ministerial pledges that the NHS would stick to waiting time targets despite growing financial pressure, the number of people having to wait beyond the department’s own recommended maximum time is rising. The 28,635 is the largest number since the coalition came to power last year, when the health secretary, Andrew Lansley, reviewed or eased several NHS waiting time targets. The data also shows that 45 hospital trusts failed to meet the 18-week target in August, compared with 18 in May 2010, the month the coalition took office. The 28,635 who waited more than 18 weeks in August represented 11.3% of all the patients treated that month, whereas the 19,355 in the same position in August 2010 were 7.1% of that month’s total. Andy Burnham, Labour’s shadow health secretary, said: “The figures published today are yet more evidence that David Cameron has put our NHS in the danger zone. “After years of improvement under Labour, more patients have had to wait longer for treatment since David Cameron came to power. “It is particularly alarming that 45 trusts are now missing the target for 90% of patients treated within 18 weeks.” The Patients Association said the latest figures showed that Cameron had not honoured his personal pledge, made earlier this year, to ensure that the 18-week target was met. Treatment within 18 weeks is enshrined in the NHS constitution. However, the Department of Health said that while the number of inpatients waiting more than 18 weeks had risen, the proportion treated within that time was 90.4%, just over the 90% target. The biggest year-on-year rises were seen in trauma and orthopaedics, in which 23.2% of patients in August had waited more than 18 weeks, up from 12.6% a year earlier. In neurosurgery, 20.2% of treated patients had waited at least 18 weeks, up from 7.9%; and in ear, nose and throat treatment, 13.2% of those treated in August had waited that long, compared with 8% a year before. A total of 301,245 NHS patients were treated during August. Of those, 281,569 were treated in an NHS hospital and the other 19,676 by an independent provider, at the NHS’s expense. The department said the NHS had stuck to its two targets in August of treating at least 90% of inpatients and 95% of outpatients within 18 weeks. Although the crucial 90% standard was missed last spring, possibly due to the usual winter pressures on the health service, it was 90.4% in August. Some 97.3% of outpatients were treated, above the 95% target. But Thursday’s data for outpatients shows that 23,511 patients in August had been waiting over 18 weeks, 38.6% more than a year ago. That number represents 2.7% of the total, compared with 2.0% in August 2010. Burnham said Labour’s analysis showed that since the election, a total of 378,850 more patients have waited longer than the guarantees for treatment as inpatients or in A&E, compared with the equivalent period under Labour. Katherine Murphy, the Patients Association’s chief executive, said: “Their [the department's] own figures show that the number of people waiting for longer than 18 weeks for treatment has increased by a shocking 48% since August 2010. Over a tenth of patients are now waiting for longer than 18 weeks to be treated. “The prime minister made a personal promise to ensure that the right to be treated within 18 weeks, enshrined in the NHS constitution, was upheld. He has utterly failed to live up to that promise. The £20bn of so-called ‘efficiency savings’ being demanded of the NHS are bringing the health service to its knees. Yet £1m is still being thrown away every single day on a reform plan that is opposed by doctors, nurses, patients and NHS managers .” Patients unable to have a hip or knee operation or surgery to remove cataracts were among the most frequent callers to the association’s helpline, Murphy said. The data relates to NHS consultant-led “referral to treatment” (RTT) waiting times. A Department of Health spokesman said that the number of people on the waiting list for treatment in England, a separate measure of the NHS’s performance, had fallen from 2.65 million in August 2010 to 2.61 million this August, a drop of 40,000 patients. The Department of Health said: “Average waiting times are low and remain stable. The vast majority of patients still receive treatment within 18 weeks. “We are committed to driving improvements in performance and the quality of care that the NHS provides – including keeping waiting times low.” Dr Mark Porter, chair of the British Medical Association’s consultants committee, said: “The rise in waiting times is one of the consequences of the huge financial strains on the NHS. It is cause for serious concern. As well as the obvious distress caused to patients, longer waiting times can decrease the likelihood of treatments being effective. There are also financial consequences for individual hospital trusts, which are losing funding as a result of the pressures on the NHS to reduce activity. “There has been an assumption that savings in the NHS can be achieved through greater efficiency, and that levels of activity can be maintained. Instead of this happening, services are being cut or downgraded to reduce costs, risking a reduction in the quality of service to patients.” NHS Public services policy Health policy Conservatives David Cameron Liberal Democrats Denis Campbell James Ball guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The number of Americans filing first-time claims for jobless benefits inched down last week, but remains high. Four hundred and four thousand people filed initial unemployment claims, the Labor Department said. That’s down by just 1000 from last week. Analysts had predicted a slightly bigger decline, to around 401,000. Economists say that with weekly claims
Continue reading …Shawnee County District Attorney Chad Taylor announced Wednesday that he will resume prosecuting domestic battery and other misdemeanors in Topeka, Kan., after a national outcry from domestic violence activists. Taylor announced on Sept. 8 that due to budget cuts, he would not longer prosecute Topeka’s misdemeanors. Topeka city council members said they did not have
Continue reading …An outbreak of listeria in cantaloupe is now linked to 23 deaths, making it the deadliest known outbreak of foodborne illness in the US in more than 25 years. (Oct. 13)
Continue reading …The long-time partner of a woman who was killed when a helicopter carrying them on a birthday celebration crashed into the East River also has died from her injuries. (Oct. 13)
Continue reading …Still bummed about the delay in getting your Xoom back from its trip to the shop ? Well, it appears Verizon may be looking to smooth things over with those who have been waiting the longest. One of our readers let us know, that because they were “among the first” to send off for the 4G LTE / Honeycomb 3.2.2 upgrade, the carrier sent back a Standard Dock (worth $50) along with the juiced up slate. Is it enough to make up for the extra wait time? That depends on your Xoom addiction — but we have to admit, it’s a pretty nice gesture from ol’ Big Red. [Thanks, Nazir] Update: We’re hearing from many of you that the Dock was part of the original update process while supplies lasted. You can still consider yourself somewhat lucky if you were quick enough got one. Verizon sending Xoom docks back with delayed, updated slates originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:32:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …On Wednesday's the Ed Show, MSNBC host Ed Schultz berated centrist Democratic Senators Ben Nelson and Jon Tester as “turncoast Democrats” for voting against President Obama recent economic plan, lambasted Democrats for not doing more to call out their centrist colleague and support and Occupy Wall Street Movement, and advised Democrats to embrace the term “tax and spend liberal.” Schultz: Here's what the Dems need to do. You're damn right I'm a tax and spend liberal. It's time to tax the top one percent and spend it on the working folk of America who need a job, who need a school, who need some health care, all of this. Yes, I like that. I'm a tax and spend liberal. I want to tax those who've had all the breaks over the past 30 years and I want to make sure the working folk of America have a shot. He ended up accusing Democrats of letting down the 20-somethings who supported Obama: How many new people were brought into the process, the 20-somethings that lived with Bush, that lived with Cheney and saw what they did to this country. And president obama brings in all these new people and you damn Democrats, all you've done is let them down. A lot of these protesters down at Wall Street and around the country are 20-somethings who feel disenfranchised because they were meant to believe that they could make a difference. And then they see all this obstruction, and then they see Democrats who don't have the guts to stand up to the wealthiest americans in this country and tell them they need to pay more. Below is a transcript of the relevant portion of the Wednesday, October 12, The Show on MSNBC: ED SCHULTZ: Senate Republicans and two turncoat Democrats – and that's exactly what they are – turncoat Democrats are standing in the way of creating millions of Americans jobs. Late Tuesday night, the Senate stopped the American jobs bill dead in its tracks. The 99 percent, I think, have every reasonin the world to be out on the streets after this vote. Washington is completely dysfunctional because elected officials, they are brain dead to what the American people really want and need. It's no wonder that congress has a record low approval rating of 13 percent. Not a single Republican voted to fund schools, build roads, or give middle class Americans a freaking tax break. Just a little tax break. Freshman Democratic Senator John Tester along with all-time sellout Senator Ben Nelson voted against taxing millionaires in their back yard of Montana and Nebraska respectively. Nelson didn't vote for the $447 billion package because, quote, “it represents billions of dollars in new spending and more taxes.” You know, that reminds me of the old bullet point, so we got to hold it right there, folks. This is the, I think, perfect time for liberals to destroy the tax and spend bullet point that the Democrats have had to put up with for years. Here's what the Dems need to do. You're damn right I'm a tax and spend liberal. It's time to tax the top one percent and spend it on the working folk of America who need a job, who need a school, who need some health care, all of this. Yes, I like that. I'm a tax and spend liberal. I want to tax those who've had all the breaks over the past 30 years and I want to make sure the working folk of America have a shot. President Obama, although, is not focused on Nelson or tester. He's laying the blame on the feet of the Republicans. [PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA] SCHULTZ: President Obama needs to just keep hammering the Republicans for their record number of filibusters. Lay it out there every day, Mr. President. Tonight on the Ed Show, we're making every no vote accountable for the American jobs they rejected. For the next hour, watch the ticker at the botto of the screen to see how many jobs are being obstructed by the Senate. The numbers come from WhiteHouse.gov. California Congresswoman Linda Sanchez nailed the obstructors in the Senate on my radio show today. REP. LINDA SANCHEZ (D-CA) AUDIO: These are not patriots. People who love this country want to see jobs created. SCHULTZ AUDIO: They don't love this country? SANCHEZ AUDIO: No, I don't think they love this country. They're not concerned about the economic well being of the country as a whole. SCHULTZ AUDIO: And they are so infatuated with defeating President Obama that they have, you would label them as not patriotic? SANCHEZ AUDIO: Yes, absolutely. SCHULTZ, BACK ON SCREEN: You know, if you had every Democrat talking like that, maybe there wouldn't be any Wall Street outcry protests around the country. I completely agree with Congresswoman Sanchez. These people are not patriots. Now, the people I met in the streets of Chicago and lower Manhattan, you know, they do love this country. They want a break. The 99 percent, they're the patriots for taking it to the streets to fight for economic and social justice. Republicans in the Senate along with Tester and Nelson are completely ignoring what the American people really want. Look at the numbers. According to a new Bloomberg/Washington Post poll, 68 percent of Americans want to raise taxes on the wealthiest Americans. Over 80 percent of Americans want Congress to protect Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid. Even Republicans want to tax the top two percent and protect the social safety net. The public is with you. Over in the House, John Boehner praised the Senate for turning their backs on the American people. HOUSE SPEAKER JOHN BOEHNER: Yesterday, the Senate acted in a bipartisan manner to reject the President's tax increase on job creators in our country. SCHULTZ: Bipartisan? So that means that the stimulus package that President Obama got, that was bipartisan too, right? Boehner has completely failed to bring one job to America in ten months. That's all he's been crying about. But he hasn't created anything. The entire Republican Party is morally corrupt on the jobs issue.
Continue reading …Introduction of Zip Codes – United States Postal Service Promo (1960s) Review QuickMove Part 3 – Zip Code Finder Zip Code FInder awitinmusic says: With a smile by Eraserheads in Circus @ http://t.co/BJzXE0W7 # zip code finder
Continue reading …