Employee sues for discrimination claiming she was fired over her refusal to dye her silver locks Sandra Rawline’s hair turned grey when she was in her early 20s. She stuck with it, proudly displaying her shoulder-length locks with their natural silver streaks. “This is who I am,” she said. But it seems that who she was, when it comes to grey hair in the workplace, was not satisfactory to her Texan employer. In August 2009 her boss approached her and told her to confect a more “upscale image” to go with her real estate firm’s move to a new headquarters in Galleria, Texas. Rawline, 52, said she was told to come to work wearing “younger, fancy suits” and lots of jewellery. And she had to dye that hair – her boss even offered to do the colouring. When she refused, the Houston Chronicle reports , she was fired within a week and replaced by a woman 10 years her junior. She has sued for discrimination in the Houston courts. Rawline told the paper her hair colour had never been an issue until that point since she joined the firm, Capital Title, in 2003. “I was really working hard for them,” she said, pointing out that she won the outstanding employee award in 2004 and 2005. Since being forced out of the company, Rawline’s income has fallen from $48,000 (£30,000) as a manager in Capital Title to $30,000 as a customer service worker in another firm. Capital Title, which acts as a clearing house for property deals, dismissed her allegations of age and hair discrimination as “completely baseless and preposterous”. The company’s chief executive, Bill Shaddock, told the Chronicle: “I’d hire a 150-year-old individual if they were worthy.” But Rawline said there had never been any complaints about her performance before she was so abruptly sacked. Her Houston-based lawyer, Robert Dowdy, said: “I don’t think anyone should be embarrassed or humiliated for growing older.” United States Discrimination at work Work & careers Ed Pilkington guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media (h/t David E at VideoCafe ) In the wake of John Boehner’s pullout from the budget talks, Bill Daley came on Christiane Amanpour’s show this morning to address the state of negotiations, where the Democrats stand, and what the president believes needs to be done to restore confidence in the economy. It is the first time I’ve heard a clear message coming from the White House in ages. Whatever Daley’s leanings are, he succeeded in getting these key points across: Democrats are not using Social Security as a deficit reduction tool Social Security and Medicare do need shoring up, but not at the expense of beneficiaries. Jobs are tied to uncertainty about the economy, which is why it’s important to do something more than apply a bandaid. If corporate America wants certainty, they can step up and put some pressure on the DC lunatics to get this done. Daley sent the whistle out loud and clear to Wall Street and the rest of the business community: If you want certainty and a deal, step on the people who are holding it up. (That would be the Republicans, in case you doubted that) AMANPOUR: Your long-standing relations and your history of professionalism here is with the business community to a large extent. What are you saying to them? You were meant to be able to sort of convince them to start investing and hiring people. Instead, they’re racking up profits, doing sort of cost-cutting and not hiring. And this is a problem for the employment rate. DALEY: There’s no question that there’s a tremendous amount of profit on the company’s books. But they are looking to see the signs of confidence for them to invest. Every major company does that. I talk to business leaders every day. They don’t have as negative an attitude about the economic situation, that they know it’s difficult, that Washington seems to have. On the other hand, they want to see leadership. What I say to the business community is, you complain and whine about the political system all the time. Get involved. Get involved and make the statement about the fact that you need a balanced approach to solve our fiscal problems. It is not going to be solved — it should not be solved on the backs of those who have given and are having a difficult time right now. AMANPOUR: So given what you say, their legitimate concerns, what is your prediction for employment next month and the month after? DALEY: Well, I’m not a predictor, nor would I be stupid enough to try to guess what the numbers are going to be. I think there’s plenty of signs. But whatever the numbers are, positive, we have come — we are coming through the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. When President Obama came in, there were almost 800,000 jobs a month were being lost. That’s the size of Charlotte, North Carolina. Four million jobs have been lost the previous, 13 months before he came into office. This country was in a crisis like very few people had ever seen. And we are slowly coming out of that. Albeit, it is frustrating to this president that it’s not coming fast enough. But a lot of that is based upon this dysfunction that seems to be going on in this town, and that gets felt throughout the country, and there’s a lack of confidence in whether these political leaders in this town will have the guts to stand up and do the tough things. I’m not sure I buy this notion of confidence being the barrier to economic growth, but I do like having someone actually stand up and put some pressure on these companies to quit sitting on their assets and start growing again. It was a pretty clear signal to business that they need to support a plan that involves taxing the rich as well as cutting budgets. Will they listen?
Continue reading …British and Hollywood royalty converged at Los Angeles’ Belasco Theatre on Saturday night as the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge hit the BAFTA “Brits To Watch” event. 42 up-and-coming talents from across the pond mingled with the headlining couple and a slew of red carpet regulars like Blake Lively, Jennifer Lopez and Nicole Kidman. For the occasion, Catherine picked a lilac McQueen dress (that we definitely spied earlier in the week) paired with earrings she borrowed from Queen Elizabeth and a Jimmy Choo clutch and sandals. William, who is also president of BAFTA (British Academy of Film and Television Arts), looked nothing less than dapper in his bow tie. He reportedly began his speech by saying, “Before I start, I’d just like to thank Colin Firth for my opening line: I have a voice,” a reference to “The King’s Speech.” Take a look at pics of the royal couple’s starry night. And for more of Will and Kate in California, head over here.
Continue reading …Divorce is an emotional rollercoaster, and when people are really hurting, particularly if they have been “swapped” for somebody else, self-preservation becomes all-important. For some, however, this state of mind can lead to an all-consuming desire for vengeance. After more than 25 years as a divorce attorney, little surprises me. Drawing upon my own experiences over the years, here are examples of the worst kinds of divorce tricks I have encountered. I wish to stress that none of them are recommended–in fact, some are illegal!
Continue reading …Does Walmart imitate life or does life imitate Walmart? The ubiquitous big-box chain is very often the setting for births, deaths, marriages, and strange events, reports the Wall Street Journal . Recent incidents include: a man dressed as a cow who stole 26 gallons of milk from a Virginia store in…
Continue reading …“I can’t believe I’m going to die a day after retiring,” thought Gary Wong, one of the survivors of last week’s Sea of Cortez sinking , as the 105-foot fishing boat went down. Wong and the other survivors recounted their harrowing ordeal to the AP , telling how they escaped the doomed…
Continue reading …Najib Razak’s administration urged by protesters to implement reforms and crack down on corruption Malaysia’s top opposition leader has warned the government that it may face a “hibiscus revolution” unless activists’ demands are met for electoral reform and an end to “dirty politics”. Anwar Ibrahim’s comments came a day after an estimated 20,000 people took to the streets to protest against alleged vote-rigging and other electoral abuses , defying a government ban and widespread use of teargas and water cannon filled with chemically laced water to deter the crowds. More than 1,400 people were arrested and 12 injured — including Anwar — as clashes between police and protesters broke out in Malaysia’s biggest protest since 2007. Speaking to a small group of young graduates on Sunday, the People’s Justice party leader warned prime minister Najib Razak’s government: “We will have to pursue – in parliament and outside of parliament – free and fair elections, even by rallying unless they change the electoral vote.” When asked whether Malaysia was in the middle of its own revolution, Anwar said: “We have no confidence left [in the government], so it is important for Najib to consider seriously that we are close [to that].” Najib, whose ruling party Barisan Nasional (National Front) has been in power since 1955, has dismissed Anwar as an opportunist who “will do everything, good or bad” to become prime minister himself. He has also claimed that Anwar might have been using Saturday’s rally – organised by the Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections, a loose group of 62 non-governmental organisations – for his own political gain. Najib’s government took extreme measures to prevent people from attending Saturday’s protest, including a city-wide lockdown that saw police suspend public transportation, seal off main roads, and threaten to arrest anyone wearing yellow, the colour of the coalition. Amnesty International denounced the government’s actions as “the worst campaign of repression we’ve seen in decades”. But Najib has since warned activists not to take to the streets again and claimed that his party, Umno, far outnumbered opposition groups. “Don’t doubt our strength,” he said. “If we want to create chaos, we can. Umno has 3 million members. If we gather 1 million members, it is more than enough. We can conquer Kuala Lumpur.” Such comments – along with images and videos of police brutality against peaceful protesters – are undermining the BN’s future, some say. “They made a very big mistake on Saturday, by assuming that arresting more people would make the rest of us scared,” said youth leader Khairul Anuar. “Actually, it has just made us more brave.” A similar rally in 2007 is widely credited with spurring on Malaysia’s opposition movement, which won a landslide victory in the 2008 elections. Many are hoping that Saturday’s rally could potentially topple the BN entirely in the next election, slated for as early as this year. But some analysts say the government may hold off in order to smooth things over. “From Najib’s perspective, holding elections any time soon would be a mistake because of the damage that has been done,” Bridget Welsh, Malaysia specialist at Singapore Management University, told Reuters. “The fact that such a large crowd turned up despite a crackdown shows that voter anger is deep and this is going to push a lot of people who are in the middle towards the opposition.” Malaysia guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Emission-cutting scheme to target country’s 500 worst polluting companies The Australian government has unveiled one of the world’s most ambitious schemes to tackle climate change, a plan to tax carbon emissions from the country’s worst polluters. After a bruising political battle to win support for the measure, the prime minister, Julia Gillard, said on Sunday that from July next year, 500 companies would pay $23 (£15) a tonne for their carbon emissions in the largest emissions trading scheme outside Europe. The government predicts that by 2029 the plan will lead to a reduction in emissions equivalent to taking 45m cars off the road. The government will fix the tax for three years, before moving to a market-set price in 2015. “It’s time to get on with this; we are going to get this done,” said Gillard. Australia generates more carbon pollution per head than any other developed country, thanks to its heavy reliance on coal-fired power stations. With a population of 22 million, Australia is responsible for 1.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions. By comparison, Britain, with nearly three times the population, produces just 1.7%. The package is expected to pass votes in both houses of parliament before the end of the year, but Gillard faces a furious backlash over the scheme, which 60% of the population opposes. Her government is the most unpopular in 40 years, and analysts say her political future depends on her ability to sell the tax to voters. “We’ve got to price carbon pollution to drive investment in innovation and to provide the incentive for energy efficiency,” she said. “Failing to do so means that we would be passing on lower living standards to our children and grandchildren.” The scheme provides for a $10bn clean energy fund, money for a biodiversity fund, and – crucially for Gillard’s political survival – compensation for voters. The average Australian household will see its bills increase by around $10 a week, and critics of the plan say ordinary voters will be unfairly burdened by higher costs passed on to them by the big polluters. But Gillard said 50% of the scheme’s revenue would be returned to households in the form of tax cuts and compensation worth more than $15bn. Two-thirds of all households would receive enough assistance to cover the entire financial impact of the tax, Gillard said. “This is pitched at low-income families because we know their budgets are tight,” she said. “I want people to understand that we are seizing a clean energy future.” Before last year’s election Gillard explicitly ruled out a carbon tax, in an attempt to distance herself from her predecessor, Kevin Rudd, who failed to get an emissions trading scheme through parliament. But she changed tack after the election returned a hung parliament and she had to build an alliance with the Green party. The leader of the opposition, Tony Abbott, has denounced the tax as “socialism masquerading as environmentalism” and called for an election which he said would be a referendum on the scheme. “It’s a package which is all economic pain for no environmental gain,” he said on Sunday. Australia’s parliament has twice rejected attempts to introduce a carbon tax. A high-profile campaign against the tax could further undermine the government, which faces elections in 2013. “I think this package is going to compound the trust issue which has dogged the prime minster ever since she assassinated Kevin Rudd and has dogged her since she was deceptive about the carbon tax before the last election,” said Abbott. Australia is the world’s biggest exporter of coal and iron ore, and its powerful resources sector is the bedrock of the buoyant economy. The tax package includes compensation for many trade-exposed industries, including steel and aluminium, with up to 94.5% of their permits granted for free. Moderate emitting exporters will get 66% of permits for free. But the Minerals Council of Australia says the resources sector will suffer a $25bn hit by 2020, with around 20,000 job losses. “This is taking a baseball bat to the Australian economy to raise another tax which will be a dead loss to the economy without any benefit to the environment,” said the council’s chief executive, Mitch Hooke. The Greens have been central in months of negotiations over the tax. Gillard relies on them to govern and, as of last week, they also control the balance of power in the upper house. The Greens’ deputy leader, Christine Milne, said: “This is the moment where Australia turns its back on the fossil fuel age, and turns its face towards the greatest challenge of the 21st century, and that is addressing global warming.” Australia Julia Gillard Carbon emissions Pollution Climate change Alison Rourke guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The Romney campaign released a new web video just hours after the the latest Labor Department’s employment report showed unmemployment jumped to 9.2% and the economy gained just 18,000 jobs in June – far below analysts’ expectations. The Audacity Of … Continue reading → Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Gateway Pundit Discovery Date : 09/07/2011 12:00 Number of articles : 2
Continue reading …The Romney campaign released a new web video just hours after the the latest Labor Department’s employment report showed unmemployment jumped to 9.2% and the economy gained just 18,000 jobs in June – far below analysts’ expectations. The Audacity Of … Continue reading → Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Gateway Pundit Discovery Date : 09/07/2011 12:00 Number of articles : 2
Continue reading …