Okay, so maybe it’s not the only reason that Chatroulette is due for a revival, but it certainly won’t hurt matters. SRI Technology has just announced that it’ll be providing image stabilization software to take the jiggles from your future Google Talk videocalls. ‘Course, you’ll need an Android 3.0+ device in order to take advantage, but the general consensus here seems fairly positive. SRI’s press release (embedded after the break) isn’t exactly laced with details, but GigaOM is reporting that this could also improve battery life, but only the heaviest of video chatters are apt to notice the difference. Looks like distracting yourself just got a whole lot less distracting. Continue reading Google Talk to use SRI technology for stabilizing video chats, revive Chatroulette Google Talk to use SRI technology for stabilizing video chats, revive Chatroulette originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:06:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …Looks like we won’t be seeing Law & Order: Rio de Janeiro anytime soon. The Brazilian state has racked up 60,000 murders over the last decade that have gone unsolved and unprosecuted. The number came to light as part of a departmental investigation related to a national plan to…
Continue reading …With the jobs picture bleak and getting steadily bleaker, President Obama needs to shed the tightly restrained list of options that the D.C. establishment considers it acceptable to consider. The things Republicans want to consider would be laughable if they weren’t so awful: more (and more and more and more) tax cuts for the wealthiest 1 percent and biggest corporations already awash in money they aren’t using to create jobs. The list of things establishment D.C. Democrats want to consider range from the good but politically impossible (like more fiscal stimulus) to the good but really small (such as tinkering here and there with small targeted tax credit ideas) to bad ideas taken from Republicans and modified to make them slightly less extreme. But there are ideas outside of this very narrow range of conventional wisdom in Washington that the Obama administration, along with key big states with Democratic Governors and legislatures, could do right now that could boost the economy significantly. Here are four big ideas that would make an immediate difference in pumping up the economy, things the Obama administration could do without going through Congress: 1. Use TARP. The economic crisis that spurred the creation of TARP may have stabilized, but it sure hasn’t ended. And TARP is still open for business: while most of the no-strings-attached big bank bailout money has been returned, TARP still is authorized to spend $475 billion. Since the big banks are hoarding their money and using it to give huge bonuses to their execs, why not turn the TARP money into a modern day Reconstruction Finance Corporation (the agency that FDR used to help lift us out of the Great Depression), and start lending TARP money out to small business entrepreneurs who actually planned to create jobs. This might also provide some competitive spur to the banks who are just sitting on their money. TARP is unpopular, and Republicans might score some short-term political points screaming about the money being used for this, but I think Obama would win the fight by saying that rather than investing in the big banks, it’s time to invest in small businesses that are actually going to use the money to create real jobs. 2. Fannie and Freddie. The Obama administration has virtually unlimited authority in bailing out Fannie and Freddie. The government runs Fannie and Freddie. And right now, Fannie and Freddie are acting as badly as any other big bank in foreclosing on homes and driving down housing prices for their own short-term gain. It is time to take advantage of actually being in charge of these two huge financial institutions, and run them in a way that keeps more people in their homes through mortgage writedowns and stabilizes the housing market as a result. This would do as much to stimulate the economy as any other thing that could be done right now. 3. Ratchet up pressure on Wall Street to write down mortgages. The Federal government does not run the six big banks that dominate our financial sector like they do Fannie and Freddie, but as they proved beyond a shadow of a doubt during the 2008-9 financial panic, they have the regulatory power to do whatever is needed in a crisis — and that is certainly what this kind of economy feels like to most Americans. This week, Treasury actually showed again that they do have that kind of muscle in writing a rule that will force banks to help unemployed homeowners trying to hang on to their homes. It was the best thing Treasury has done in a long time, and long overdue. Now they just need to take the idea further, and keep squeezing the banks to write down underwater mortgages of homeowners who still have jobs but are hanging on by a thread because the value of their house collapsed. By getting Fannie, Freddie, and the six biggest banks to writedown all of the underwater mortgages in the country, you would inject hundreds of billions of dollars into the economy because middle-income homeowners’ monthly mortgage payments go down. Plus you stabilize the entire housing market, giving homeowners more confidence and financial security, and allowing them more operating room to make other purchases and maybe even start new businesses. 4. Finally do something about Chinese currency manipulation. If the United States were to declare the Chinese in violation of fair trade rules under WTO because of currency manipulation, they could immediately impose tariffs against Chinese goods and provide an immediate and dramatic boost to America’s long ailing manufacturing sector, generating tons of good paying jobs very quickly. This isn’t protectionism, it is actually the exact opposite: demanding China operate under the trade rules every other country on Earth is expected to. And ironically, this wouldn’t generate much political heat, as big majorities in both Houses of Congress already are on record supporting this action. These four things, all of which could be done without having to go though Congress, would all provide immediate jolts to the Main Street economy, put money into the pockets of the hard pressed middle class, and create a lot of jobs quickly. They would show middle-class voters that the President was decisively and dramatically on their side. And who knows: they might even help compensate for all the damage that will done to the economy by the contractionary budget cuts in whatever bad deal the President finally agrees to in order to get the debt ceiling increased — because the only question isn’t whether this budget cutting deal will be bad, but just how bad will it be. The issue is that President Obama will have to go beyond the confines of the conventional wisdom economic advisers that dominate the halls of power in D.C., he will have to pick a big fight with Republicans, and he will have to make Wall Street very unhappy, because all four of these policy initiatives will make them mad. But he has to be bold to save this economy, and his own re-election chances. It is time to act.
Continue reading …(CNN) — A heat wave is building and could reach dangerous levels in parts of the Midwest, the Plains and the Southeast this week. Fifteen states are under heat advisories, which means temperatures are expected to exceed 105 degrees Fahrenheit. Kansas City and St. Louis in Missouri are under an excessive heat warning, along with Tulsa, Oklahoma; Memphis, Tennessee; and Evansville, Indiana….
Continue reading …At a time when the government is facing billions of dollars in cuts to programs that many Republicans deem as wasteful, it seems that the only spending Democrats want to address is Rep. Paul Ryan's expensive taste in wine, even though they have past ignored a number of instances of wasteful Democratic spending on the taxpayer's dime. Last Friday, Talking Points Memo published a piece criticizing Ryan for sipping a glass of wine from a $350 bottle of Pinot Noir. Onlooker Susan Feinberg, an associate business professor at Rutgers, took pictures of Ryan and his two economist friends sipping the wine before approaching Ryan and asking how he could live with himself for dropping hundreds of dollars on wine while arguing for cuts to programs benefitting the poor and elderly. As it turns out, the two bottles of $350 wine were ordered by Ryan's friends, and Ryan only indulged in one glass. When approached by TPM about the choice of wine, Ryan responded “A.) I didn't order it. B.) I had no idea what it would cost, and C.) …I bought one of these bottles even though I drank a glass, and I always pull my own weight for my meals,” noting he would never have chosen a bottle of wine “anything close to 100 dollars.” With a net worth pegged at somewhere between $590,092 to $2,425,000, placing him as the 147th richest congressman, Ryan's supposedly lavish lifestyle pales in comparison to a number of high-ranking Democrats. Fourteen members of congress have net worths exceeding $100 million , ten of whom are Democrats. Ryan's expensive wine brings to mind a number of Democrats spending wastefully in their personal lives. You might remember President Barack Obama's tens of thousands of dollars date weekend to New York City paid for largely by taxpayers, first lady Michelle Obama's luxurious trip to Spain by military jet paid for with taxpayer money, or as Jonathan H. Adler points out , Rep. Nancy Pelosi's extravagant use of Air Force One on the taxpayer's dime to the tune of $2,100,744.59 over two years plus $101,429.14 for “in-flight expenses.” Perhaps most ironically, as explained by Jim Hoft at the Gateway Pundit , is that the same liberal complainers were silent when a taxpayer-funded state dinner in January served $399 bottles of wine to accompany an already expensive meal. Of course, the difference between these instances and Ryan's is that unlike the Democrats, Ryan paid for the wine that he didn't even order with his own money that he worked to earn, not passing along the cost to taxpayers. Some might say Ryan's actions are still hypocritical given the cuts he is proposing, but he lives within his own means in his personal life, just as he is pushing for the government to function within its own means.
Continue reading …Moammar Gadhafi’s regime is in talks with France, or so says one of Gadhafi’s sons in a newspaper interview. “The truth is that we are negotiating with France and not with the rebels,” Seif al-Islam told an Algerian paper. But France rejects the claim, al-Jazeera reports. “We pass (the Libyan…
Continue reading …Gay marriage has gotten its due; but now it’s time to pave the way for monkey marriage. The small village of Talwas, deep in the forests of India, seems to be mixed up in some serious monkey business of its own. The tiny Indian village just recently became home to two monkeys tying the knot.
Continue reading …A vehicle packed with schoolchildren returning home from a soccer tournament crashed into a canal in southeastern Bangladesh today, killing at least 40, a police official says. About 60 children between ages 8 and 12 were in the cargo truck that crashed, and the death toll may rise as more…
Continue reading …(CNN) – Sarah Palin said she can win a national election, but has yet to decide if she will take…
Continue reading …RebelPundit set up an opportunity for attendees at the Chicago Printer’s Row Literature Festival in June. They put together a board with the covers from books written by these writers: The authors of the books we offered to ban were Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin, Ann Coulter, Andrew Breitbart, Ayn Rand, Michael Savage, Bill Clinton, Michael Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Real Revo Discovery Date : 11/07/2011 18:45 Number of articles : 3
Continue reading …