Home » Archives by category » News (Page 3054)
Geithner: Debt Showdown Means Tough Choices

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner says the United States will need to find savings across all aspects of government, and demonstrate to the American people that it can use their tax dollars more efficiently. (July 12)

Continue reading …
Raw Video: Astronauts on Final Shuttle-era Walk

Astronauts stepped out for the last spacewalk of NASA’s shuttle era. Space station astronauts Michael Fossum and Ronald Garan Jr. ventured out nearly 250 miles above Earth Tuesday. (July 12)

Continue reading …
Norway in a Hurry

(YouTube link) The Norwegian Coastal Express cruise on the Hurtigruten from Bergen to Kirkenes is 2600 kilometers and normally takes 134 hours. This version only take five minutes, but you’ll have to skip the karioke night. The actual-speed version was aired on Norwegian public TV, which took a week. Link -via The Daily What Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Neatorama Discovery Date : 12/07/2011 14:55 Number of articles : 3

Continue reading …
Ahmed Wali Karzai killing sparks fears of turmoil in Kandahar

Brother of Afghan president Hamid Karzai shot dead by security guard was seen as keystone of security in the south Ahmed Wali Karzai, the powerful half-brother of the Afghan president, Hamid Karzai, has been killed by one of his security guards inside his house in Kandahar, raising the prospect of turmoil in a city widely seen as the key to the war in Afghanistan. The president confirmed the death at a press conference in Kabul intended to mark the visit of the French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, to the capital. “Ahmed Wali Karzai was killed at about 11.30am,” General Abdul Razaq, Kandahar’s chief of border police, said. “He was killed by his bodyguard inside his house.” Officials said the assassin, named as Sardar Mohammed, reportedly Ahmed Wali Karzai’s chief of security, had been killed on the spot. “After Sardar Mohammed killed Ahmed Wali Karzai, other bodyguards shot Sardar Mohammed,” Colonel Mohammad Mohsen, of the Afghan national army 205 Atal (Hero) Corps in Kandahar, said. “The bodies have been taken to the [local] hospital. We expect some officials including President Karzai to come to Kandahar for his brother’s funeral.” Razaq said an investigation into the assassination was under way, but according to initial reports from Kandahar, Sardar entered his boss’s home and approached him with papers to sign, shooting him at close range with a pistol concealed under the papers. The Taliban claimed responsibility for the assassination, saying it was one of their “biggest and most successful” operations. However, western officials said it was possible that he could have been killed as part of a settling of scores among tribal leaders or drug traffickers. Ahmed Wali Karzai had frequently been accused by western officials of being a regional kingpin and warlord in the opium trade. He also faced allegations of being on the CIA’s payroll. He rejected all the charges, claiming they were made by western forces to cover their own shortcomings. Ahmed Wali Karzai was a powerful figure in Afghan politics. He had been a member of the provincial council in Kandahar since 2005 and was its chief at the time of his death, although his family, tribal and business contacts gave him influence far beyond his official title. “He was the president of Kandahar,” said provincial elder Abdul Samat Zarih. “The governor, police chiefs and other officials all had to discuss things with him before they made a decision.” Zarih added that Ahmed Wali Karzai had many enemies, including the Taliban. “Maybe the Taliban killed him because he was close to the government. Maybe he didn’t obey or follow whatever the foreigners said to him. It’s a situation in which you can’t figure out what is going on,” he said. Ahmed Wali Karzai was also seen as a keystone of security in the south and his assassination will raise fears about a potential power and security vacuum in the insurgent-ridden region. President Karzai also valued him as a trusted liaison between the government in Kabul and the nation’s second-biggest city. “People are asking what tomorrow will bring,” said a senior US official, speaking on condition of anonymity. “Who is capable of replacing Ahmed Wali on the provincial council? As an intermediary between Kabul and Kandahar? Who is going to try and keep at bay the different rivalries bandaged over for the last few years? Who will fill the various holes occupied by AWK? These are all important questions.” He added his death was “first and foremost a setback for Afghanistan as a whole”. Other western officials predicted that although there would be “turbulence” in the short term, while a new power structure took shape in Kandahar, in the longer term the absence of Ahmed Wali Karzai as a power broker could provide an opportunity to strengthen legitimate local government. Ahmed Wali Karzai had been the target of previous assassination attempts. In 2009 four suicide bombers stormed the provincial council office in Kandahar, killing 13 people. Departing US commander General David Petraeus said the International Security Assistance Force had halted the Taliban’s momentum in key areas. However, the Taliban strategy of targeted assassinations in Kandahar province demonstrates its continued ability to strike Isaf and the Afghan government where it hurts. The Kandahar deputy governor, Abdul Latif Ashna, and provincial police chief, General Mohammad Mojayed, were killed in suicide attacks this year. The Taliban claimed responsibility for both deaths. The Isaf spokesman, Carsten Jacobson, agreed it was not yet certain the Taliban had carried out the attack. He denied the assassination was a setback for Isaf. “We must find out how he was killed,” Wahid Mujda, a former member of the Taliban turned analyst, said. “We don’t know whether it was carried out by a power rival or by the Taliban.” Mujda added the death would have an impact on the government and the progress being made in reconciliation talks with the Taliban. Karzai supported the peace process and had chalked up a few reintegration successes in the province. Haji Padsha, an elder of the Alikozai tribe in Kandahar province, said Karzai had been shot on his return from a meeting with foreigners at the former house of Mullah Mohammed Omar, the fugitive leader of the Afghan Taliban. Karzai had come under criticism in the past from Afghans for renting the property to international officials. It was reported in the New York Times in 2009 that he received rent from the CIA and American special operations forces for allowing them to occupy a large compound outside the city that is the former home of Mullah Mohammed Omar. The Kandahar Strike Force, a militia run by the CIA, also shares the compound. Hamid Karzai Afghanistan Julian Borger guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Government backs Labour call for Murdoch to ditch BSkyB bid

MPs from all parties likely to support motion calling on News Corporation to withdraw bid in wake of phone-hacking scandal The government will support Labour’s motion asking MPs to call on Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp to withdraw its BSkyB bid in a Commons debate on Wednesday. MPs from all sides seem likely to back the motion, which reads: “The house believes that it is in the public interest for Rupert Murdoch and News Corporation to withdraw their bid for BSkyB.” The vote would constitute an expression of Commons opinion and not be binding on a private company. However, Ed Miliband said it was necessary sometimes for parliament to speak on behalf of public opinion. Government sources said the Competition Commission review would continue for now and News Corp declined to comment. Shortly after the wording of the motion emerged the prime minister’s spokesman said: “We are intending to support it.” Asked whether the government believed that News Corp should heed the will of parliament, the spokesman replied: “Ultimately, that is a decision for News Corp but we would always expect people to take seriously what parliament has said.” News Corp withdrew on Monday an offer to spin off Sky News, triggering a referral of its bid to the Competition Commission. The commission’s inquiry will take a minimum of six months and then be referrred to the culture secretary, Jeremy Hunt. Many Liberal Democrat MPs will also support the motion, regarded as in order by the parliamentary clerks It also emerged that Miliband would meet David Cameron and Nick Clegg on Tuesday night to discuss the terms of reference of two government inquiries – one judicially led – into the multiplying scandals. Miliband is trying to ensure that the judicially-led inquiry in which witnesses will give evidence under oath, is broadly drawn, looking at relations between police and newspapers across Britain, as well as phone hacking and other illegal activities in all newspapers, not just the now closed News of the World. Miliband is also calling for the judicial inquiry to look more broadly at relations between the media and politicians. At his Friday press conference, David Cameron suggested the planned terms of reference meant that the non-judicial inquiry would look into issues of press culture and regulation, as well as media relations with politicians. Miliband said: “There are times when the House of Commons has got to rise to the occasion and speak for the public. “We have said the purchase of BSkyB should not proceed until after the criminal inquiries are complete. The simplest way to achieve this is for the Rupert Murdoch to recognise the feelings of the public and the will of the House of Commons and withdraw this bid. I am calling on parliament to show its will tomorrow.” One reason for the motion is that it would allow the bid to be deferred at least until the criminal investigation into phone hacking at News International has been completed, and even until the judicial inquiry has reported – which might take two years. Hunt has no power to defer a Competition Commission inquiry that will take between six and nine months. He can then take as long as he wishes to decide whether to accept the findings of the commission inquiry. If the motion is passed on Wednesday, the Murdoch group of companies will have to decide whether they want to defy parliament and press ahead with the bid. A long deferral of the bid would have damaging commercial consequences for the company because the full takeover of BSkyB is seen as important to create synergies across its worldwide satellite investments. Miliband added that a clear vote would be seen as a way of telling Hunt that the Commons regards a Murdoch takeover of BSkyB as not in the public interest, at the least until the extent of the criminality has been discovered. Phone hacking Newspapers & magazines National newspapers Newspapers Ed Miliband David Cameron Jeremy Hunt News International News Corporation Media business BSkyB Television industry Patrick Wintour guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Contractor Accused of Negligence in Troop Death

Caption: Families of soldiers killed by an interpreter working for Ohio-based contractor Mission Essential Personnel sue for wrongful death 18 months after he kills two and injures a third during a shooting spree inside a US base in Afghanistan. (July

Continue reading …
Ex-PM Brown Alleges Murdoch Paper Used Criminals

Former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown accuses Rupert Murdoch’s newspapers of employing criminals to obtain confidential information about his family, his private financial affairs and the lives of ordinary people. (July 12)

Continue reading …
Arizona State Senator Points Loaded Pink Pistol At Journalist

enlarge About the time you think Arizona might be getting its sanity back now that Russell Pearce will face a recall election, they prove you wrong. Via the Arizona Guardian : Republican Sen. Lori Klein was showing off her raspberry-pink handgun when she aimed it at a journalist who was interviewing her in the lounge just outside the Senate chambers. According to the story that was published Sunday in the Arizona Republic, Klein’s .380 Ruger was loaded and did not have a safety to keep the gun from going off. But Klein told the reporter, Richard Ruelas, that he didn’t need to worry because, “I just didn’t have my hand on the trigger.” Cool. That makes me feel soooo much better.

Continue reading …
Kid Meets First Gay Couple

Update: Unfortunately, the video has been removed due to a copyright violation, and the rightful owner has chosen to no longer make the clip available. It’s a shame, as we thought the message of the video was extremely special. Original Post: If only everyone had such a reasonable reaction to gay marriage. This kid meets his first gay couple, deconstructs what marriage means, is surprised but cool with it, then invites the guys to play ping pong with him. Foreign diplomats could learn a thing or two from this boy. Also, the idea that being married means you love someone is probably one of the more wholesome messages a child can receive. So thumbs up to the kid, his parents and his new ping pong friends. VIDEO REMOVED

Continue reading …
CNN’s Cooper, Borger Rhapsodize On ‘Adult’ Obama Who ‘Did Not Raise Taxes’

CNN's Anderson Cooper and Gloria Borger took turns casting President Barack Obama as the centrist 'adult' in a room teeming with unruly Republican children who would rather invite economic calamity than compromise on a debt-reduction plan. Discussing a topic that would have made a perfect “Keeping Them Honest” segment, Cooper insisted, incorrectly, on Monday's “AC 360″ that the Democratic president has never raised taxes since taking office in 2009: “Now, in fact the stimulus was about one-third tax cuts. So in fairness, he did not raise taxes. He and Congress later passing a payroll tax holiday that is in effect right now. A year later he and Congress did approve tax breaks to help employers hire more people.” According to Politifact, Cooper is way off base in claiming the president “did not raise taxes.” In February, the fact-checking website gave Obama's claim that “I didn't raise taxes once” a “false” rating. Citing tax hikes on cigarettes, indoor tanning, and Medicare for families that make more than $250,000 per year, Politifact asserted, “The idea that Obama did not raise taxes is just plain wrong.” Cooper had the opportunity to fact check Obama himself in his “Keeping Them Honest” segment that aired only moments earlier, but the CNN anchor decided instead to focus on a pledge signed by Republican presidential candidates Michele Bachmann and Rick Santorum. After Cooper implied Obama is a moderate, Borger attempted to erase any doubt: “The president was offering [Republicans], you know, a very, very good deal here.” CNN's senior political analyst later marveled at Obama's centrist leadership: “Right now, I think the Republicans are kind of up against the wall here because the president looks like the adult. He's put something on the table.” Unfortunately for Borger, the president didn't produce a detailed plan: he gave a speech at a press conference. And as CBO Director Dough Elmendorf pointed out, the Congressional Budget Office doesn't estimate speeches . Unlike Obama, who hasn't put much of anything on the table – at least nothing the CBO can score – House and Senate Republicans have put forward a number of cost-saving measures in their plan to ” cut, cap, and balance .” House Speaker John Boehner said as much during his rebuttal press conference on Monday: The American people will not accept, and the House cannot pass, a bill that raises taxes on job creators. The House can only pass a debt limit bill that includes spending cuts larger than the hike in the debt limit as well as real restraints on future spending. My colleagues and I feel we should enact a balanced budget amendment to keep the federal government from spending us into the same situation again. I think we also need real reductions in spending right now and spending caps to ensure that progress we make is not undone in the future… A bill that doesn’t meet these tests can’t pass the House of Representatives. ( H/T RedState ) Borger can claim the GOP is “up against the wall,” but it was the Obama administration that called for a “clean” vote on raising the debt ceiling without cutting spending. Since then, the debate has shifted from whether Congress will cut spending to how much and how soon. Yet Borger still maintains the pragmatic president has outmaneuvered the recalcitrant Republicans. A transcript of the segment can be found below: CNN AC 360 July 11, 2011 10:14 p.m. ET ANDERSON COOPER: “Raw Politics” tonight: just 22 bargaining days until the U.S. Treasury runs out of money to pay the bills, throwing the country into default and the economy into a greater crisis. President Obama and congressional leaders met for a second straight day trying to hammer out a deficit-reduction deal. Republicans have said without such a deal they won't allow vote to allow more borrowing to raise the debt ceiling. Now, bear in mind lawmakers have always griped, but they've have never failed to do that ever. They will talk again tomorrow. Today, the President called for action. BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States: I have been hearing from my Republican friends for quite some time that it is a moral imperative for us to tackle our debt and our deficits in a serious way. I have been hearing from them that this is one of the things that's creating uncertainty and holding back investment on the part of the business community. And so, what I have said to them is, “Let's go.” COOPER: Unclear though whether he can deliver the left wing of his own party. Unclear also whether the Tea Party Republicans will sign on to any deal with any revenue increasers beyond selling government property and other fairly minor measures. House Speaker Boehner, who seemed receptive to a grand compromise which might have included tax concessions from Republicans in exchange for cost savings in Medicare and Social Security from the White House, backed away on Saturday. Today he said, no tax increases or no deal. Rep. JOHN BOEHNER, Speaker of the House: The American people will not accept and the House cannot pass a bill that raises taxes on job creators. Now, the House can only pass a debt limit bill that includes spending cuts larger than the hike in the debt limit as well as real restraints on future spending. COOPER: His colleague Majority Leader Eric Cantor standing firm too, holding up a quote from President Obama back in 2009 about not raising taxes during a recession. Now, here's what the President said back then in 2009 to NBC's Chuck Todd in response to a voter's question. OBAMA: First of all, he's right. Normally, you don't raise taxes in a recession, which is why we haven't and why we have instead cut taxes. So I guess what I would say to Scott is, his economics are right. You don't raise taxes in a recession. We haven't raised taxes in a recession. COOPER: Now, in fact the stimulus was about one-third tax cuts. So in fairness, he did not raise taxes. He and Congress later passing a payroll tax holiday that is in effect right now. A year later he and Congress did approve tax breaks to help employers hire more people. Now, you can decide for yourself whether that's a tax cut or the kind of wasteful spending through the tax code the president says he's now against when it comes to corporate jets. In any case, here's how Mr. Obama today reconciled that 2009 statement with his current position on taxes. OBAMA: I want to be crystal clear: nobody has talked about increasing taxes now. Nobody has talked about increases – increasing taxes next year. We're talking about potentially 2013 and the out years. COOPER: The question is what will the economy look like then? The answer to that depends heavily on what happens now. Here to talk about it is chief political analyst Gloria Borger and David Walker, former head of the Government Accountability Office. Currently he's president and CEO of the Comeback America Initiative. David, is there any case to be made for not raising the debt ceiling? DAVID WALKER, former United States comptroller general: No, there really isn't. We have to raise the debt ceiling because the fact is we don't know what the markets would do, what would to happen to the stock markets, what would to happen to the interest rates. And for every one percent or 100 basis point increase in interest rates, it's $150 billion a year on our total debt. COOPER: So how do you see the debate that is happening now? I mean what's your take on it? WALKER: Well, both sides have agreed that they're going to raise the debt ceiling limit, but it looks like it's going to be a smaller deal rather than a bigger deal because the Republicans don't want to do anything that could even be called remotely a tax increase. I think after the 2012 elections, we're going to get comprehensive tax reform that will broaden the base, lower rates and generate more revenues, among other things, along with starting to deal with entitlement reforms. But I think right now, we're going to get a smaller deal and kick the can down the road with regard to the tough stuff. COOPER: Gloria, politically, is that what it seems like, a smaller deal? GLORIA BORGER, CNN senior political analyst: Yes, it does, Anderson. And I think if you sort of step back for a moment and take a look at this it seems to me really to be a defining moment for the Republican Party here. The base of this party is conservative and it's anti-tax. And you had the House speaker, a Republican, the president of the United States, sitting down and believing that they could try to cut a huge deal that would actually go a long way towards solving the deficit problem. But John Boehner, the Speaker, took that back to his conservative Republicans in the House, which I believe represent the base of the party, and they said, absolutely no way, because 230 of those Republicans in the House have taken a no-tax pledge, no-new-tax pledges and they're going to stick by it. And I think things may change after the next election, but as for now, the Republican Party is stuck and they can't even accept a good deal. The president was offering them, you know, a very, very good deal here. You know, $3 in spending cuts for every dollar of tax increases. WALKER: Well, John Boehner is correct that the base of the Republican Party will not support any type of tax increases, even if it's eliminating tax expenditures where there can be a bipartisan agreement. He's wrong to say the American people won't. He's just wrong. And right now the President has got the high ground because he's basically saying, let's go for a long-term deal. I will put Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security on the table. All you need to do is to put tax expenditures on the table. By the way, we have the lowest revenues as a percentage of GDP in decades. It's less than 16 percent. Nonetheless, we are where we are and I think both parties are going to have to go to the electorate in 2012. COOPER: But can you get a compromise without some sort of tax-increasing revenues somehow? WALKER: I can come up – I can come up with $2 trillion to $3 trillion worth of deficit reduction without any tax increases, ok? BORGER: You know, Anderson, I was talking to a senior White House adviser today, for example, who suggested that perhaps they could get a deal, a smaller deal of closing some of these tax loopholes and extending the payroll tax holiday for a certain period of time, so there would be no net tax increase. So a little bit of trickery, but maybe they could do it that way. COOPER: Just politically, Gloria, how does this play out, do you think? I mean, obviously we have this presidential election coming up. David is saying Obama seems like he's perceived as taking the high ground. BORGER: He does. COOPER: Clearly he's interested in getting independents on board. BORGER: Right. COOPER: He's lost a lot of independent support over the years. How does this play for both sides? BORGER: Well, I think the President as you point out is clearly talking to independent voters. Independent voters care about the deficit and they also want Washington to work together, which is what we heard the President talk about an awful lot today in his press conference. It kind of reminded me a little bit of Bill Clinton there. In the end, I think they all know they have to get something done or they will all suffer. Right now, I think the Republicans are kind of up against the wall here because the president looks like the adult. He's put something on the table. I'm not sure that he have could have sold it to his own party, but he put it on the table. So it's up to the Republicans now to come back and he told them today to go home, do your homework and tell me how we're going to make up the rest of this money we have got to raise without – without those revenues. So they're on the spot. COOPER: Do you think this goes – do you think this goes to August 2nd or do you think this is going to be done sooner, David? WALKER: Well, I think they can do it before August 2nd. I mean, you know, it depends upon how big a deal they're trying to do. You have to turn this into legislative language and frankly you have to sell it to the caucuses. I mean they're not going to take a fait accompli deal. And that's one of the reasons why Congress has to stay in session until a deal is done and until there's agreement. BORGER: And complicating all of this, Anderson, is the fact that you've got Republican presidential candidates out there saying don't raise the debt limit. Tim Pawlenty said he was hoping and praying that they would vote against raising the debt limit. So that plays into the Republican congressional discussions as well. COOPER: Never easy to work out this stuff in the midst of an election year? WALKER: You have to work it out. The stakes are too high. Quite frankly anybody who says – I don't care who they are – who says they will vote against the debt ceiling increase irrespective of the deal is irresponsible. COOPER: David Walker, I appreciate it. It's always good to have you on. Gloria Borger as well. Thank you very much. –Alex Fitzsimmons is a News Analysis intern at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.

Continue reading …