EU fisheries chief hopes phasing out ‘discarding’ and agreeing plans with member states will preserve Europe’s fish stocks The biggest shake-up of European fisheries regulation in four decades was unveiled on Wednesday in Brussels, intended to preserve dwindling fish stocks. Maria Damanaki, the EU fisheries chief, told policymakers in Brussels that strong and urgent action was needed if stocks were not to face collapse. She said: “Action is needed now to get all our fish stocks back into a healthy state to preserve them for present and future generations. Only under this precondition can fishermen continue to fish and earn a decent living out of their activities.” The central plank of her radical proposals is an attempt to ensure all European fish stocks are “at sustainable levels” by 2015 – a difficult task, as most stocks in the region are already overfished. She aims to achieve this by phasing out the wasteful practice of discarding healthy fish at sea – a perverse consequence of the current fishing quota systems – and agreeing with member states’ long-term management plans for their stocks, but giving the states the freedom to decide how to implement those policies. She is also likely to face opposition, as the reforms to the common fisheries policy – the roots of which date back to the Treaty of Rome of 1957 at the founding of the European Union – will mean short-term pain for fishermen, even as they should preserve the long-term future of some. Fishing groups have attacked her proposals in their draft form, arguing that their fleets will be unfairly penalised and that not enough attention has been given to possible solutions such as adjusting fishing gear. But Damanaki has made it clear she will stick to her proposals. She said: “We have to manage each stock wisely, harvesting what we can but keeping the stock healthy and productive for the future. This will bring us higher catches, a sound environment and a secure seafood supply. If we get this reform right, fishermen and coastal communities will be better off in the long run. And all Europeans will have a wider choice of fresh fish, both wild and farm produced.” The proposals also include targets and time frames to stop overfishing; ways to allow fishermen to trade their quotas with one another, which will help some fishermen to leave the industry; support measures for small-scale fisheries; better collection of data; and new rules for fish farms. Damanaki’s proposals will also replace the current annual shouting match among countries over the size of the quota they should get. At present, ministers vie for the biggest quota with a decision taken each December. But under the new plans, these annual contests would be replaced with long-term management plans, giving greater certainty for the future and less of the wrangling that can result in fisheries losing out. Day-to-day decision making would also be devolved from Brussels to the regions. Europe’s fishing fleet is too large and too efficient, according to the European Commission. This has led to drastic overfishing. Chris Davies, the UK Liberal Democrat MEP, pointed to recent academic studies suggesting Europe’s fish stocks were less than 10% of their post-war levels. Damanaki has made clear in the past few months her intention to phase out the wasteful practice of discarding healthy fish , which fishermen are forced to do under the current rules, for instance if they exceed their quota or because they catch fish for which they do not hold a quota. But she has come under pressure from fishing groups and some member states who are concerned that ending discards and forcing fishermen to land all they catch could result in lower profits for fishing crews. They could end up having to sell lower value fish or species for which there is less demand, meaning their catches may be worth less than if they could discard at will. Damanaki has acknowledged the problem, telling a meeting of the European parliament’s cross-party Fish for the Future group that some reduction in employment in fisheries was inevitable, but that without change to protect fish stocks the loss of jobs would be even greater, because Europe’s seas are so depleted. She would like help from member states to compensate fishermen for some of their lost income, and has supported pilot schemes in which fishermen would turn their boats to other uses, such as tourism or collecting plastic litter for recycling . Member states would also be encouraged to let the owners of large vessels exchange fishing rights, because there are too many boats hunting too few fish. Damanaki also wants to reform the fishing agreements that some member states have with developing countries, allowing EU vessels to fish there. These agreements have attracted controversy because, in extreme cases, they can stifle the growth of indigenous fisheries in poorer countries. Davies said: “Commissioner Damanaki might have been expected to back down in the face of opposition from those who resist change, but she seems fearless and determined to push ahead with reforms that may be the saving of our seas, of the fishing industry, and of coastal communities. “Our waters are capable of supporting many times more fish than now exist. It is not too late for the situation to be reversed, but we have now reached a crisis point. Overfishing must cease or there will be no more fish on the plate.” Fishing Food Wildlife Conservation Animals Marine life European Union Europe Fish Fiona Harvey guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …quickie Mad Hatter tutorial Why do we love pirates? Pirates of the Caribbean 4 On Stranger Tides Movie Review Yarrghghhhhh Skookum86 says: Johnny Depp , Disney developing two films – Yahoo! News http://bit.ly/onKWB9 RT @ BigBenArt
Continue reading …OUCH!! Charlie Sheen Found Dead (EXCLUSIVE VIDEO) OMG Charlie Sheen’s lifeless body was found dead!! Charlie Harper Is Dead, But Sheen May Be Winning (VIDEO) allyourcelebs says: currency: charlie sheen dead http://www.currenciesofworld.com/ charlie – sheen – dead /
Continue reading …Home Office proposes minimum income threshold for those wishing to bring a spouse, partner or dependents to the country British citizens who are poor or unemployed could be prevented from marrying the spouse of their choice if new family migration proposals become law. The government wants to introduce a new minimum income threshold for those looking to sponsor a spouse, partner or dependants to come to the UK. Under the proposals the unemployed or those living on less than around £5,000 a year would be banned from doing so, while the probation period before spouses and partners can apply for settlement in Britain will be raised from two to five years. A Home Office consultation paper published on Wednesday also proposes making it more difficult for families to bring dependant grandparents to live with them in the UK. Instead, it encourages people to send money to support them abroad. The shake-up of the family migration route to Britain, under which 48,900 visas were granted last year, is the fourth phase of the government’s plan to curb immigration abuse and reduce net migration to below 100,000 a year. However, the Oxford University-based Migration Observatory estimates the plans contained in the paper would reduce annual net migration by no more than 8,000 per year. Restrictions on the number of non-European skilled workers and overseas students have already been announced, and there will a reduction in the rights of temporary workers who wish to settle in the UK. The immigration minister, Damian Green, said the proposals would encourage “better family migration” and were designed to end abuses and send a message that “if you can’t support your foreign spouse or partner, you cannot expect the taxpayer to do it for you”. The majority of those who come to Britain under the family route are women from Pakistan, India and Bangladesh. The consultation proposes tougher English language standards and a more ‘rigorous’ approach to sham marriages including a new test to establish whether relationships are genuine by investigating whether the couple live together, speak the same language and knew each other before getting married. Ministers also want to change the wording of article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights – which protects the right to family life – to allow even genuine wives and husbands to be deported if they had been living in the UK illegally. As revealed in the Guardian earlier this year, the consultation contains plans to scrap the right of appeal for visitor’s visas, which would end 40% of all immigration appeals. The family migration plan is expected to be implemented this autumn. Immigration and asylum Damian Green Alan Travis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Home ministry confirms three terrorist attacks, two in south Mumbai, in the Opera House district and Zaveri bazaar and one in Dadar in central city 3.38pm: The blasts occurred about an hour ago. At least 60 people have been injured, according to the Maharashtra home secretary (Maharashtra is the state in which Mumbai lies). The Maharastra government is not describing the blasts as terrorist attacks at the moment but the home ministry in Delhi has unequivocally said that the explosions were acts of terrorism. Mumbai was of course the scene of 2008 terrorist attacks by gunmen, which killed 166 people. 3.28pm: Three explosions have rocked Mumbai during rush hour, in a series of coordinated terrorist attacks on the city, India’s home ministry said. There were no confirmed numbers of fatalities or injuries but NDTV quoted reports saying 10 people have been killed . Two of the explosions took place in the Opera House district in South Mumbai at Opera House and in Zaveri bazaar. A third occurred in Dadar in the centre of the city. Six people have died in the Dadar blast and four in the explosion at Zaveri Bazaar, according to NDTV. NDTV has rolling television coverage here. India Global terrorism Mumbai terror attacks Haroon Siddique guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …New York City police say remains believed to be those of a little boy who disappeared while walking home from a Brooklyn camp were found in a refrigerator Wednesday inside the home of a man being questioned by detectives. (July 13)
Continue reading …The Federal Election Commission, which serves to govern the financing of federal elections, ended its second quarter for presidential fundraising on June 30. Of the Republican candidates who released their numbers, former Gov. Mitt Romney led the Republican presidential hopefuls with $18.3 million, trailed by Rep. Ron Paul with $4.5 million, former Gov. Tim Pawlenty with $4.2 million, and former ambassador and Gov. Jon Huntsman with $4.1 million. Earlier this morning, Obama 2012 campaign manager Jim Messina previewed President Barack Obama's fundraising numbers and placed his fundraising sum at $86 million, far overshadowing any of his GOP competitors. While the number appears ominous to his rivals, it isn't as staggering as it seems, and might even place Obama behind the mark of where he hopes to be. As National Review's Jim Geraghty explains , Obama's fundraising is actually behind his 2008 pace, and if he keeps the same pace for the remaining seven quarters, will not come close to achieving his goal of $1 billion. Check out more of Geraghty's analysis after the break, and let us know your thoughts in the comments. The first point Geraghty brings up is Obama's fundraising total is actually the sum of money raised by his campaign plus money raised for the Democratic National Committee. When the DNC dollars are subtracted out, Obama's campaign total falls to $47 million. Also, GOP contributions are split among a number of candidates instead of funneled behind one, and do not include RNC fundraising dollars. As Geraghty explains, Is Obama ahead in fundraising? Yes, and probably by quite a bit. But the comparison is not Obama and the DNC’s $86 million against Romney’s $18.3 million. The comparison is Obama and the DNC’s $86 million against Romney [or your preferred candidate] + $12 million for the RNC in April and May + the RNC’s June total. Will Obama still be comfortably ahead? Of course. And he probably should be, considering how he’s an incumbent president who has hit the fundraising trail with a fast and furious pace. Further, the money raised, even with DNC fundraising included, is not at par with his 2008 fundraising, much less his goal of $1 billion. But again, to match his $750 million from the 2008 cycle, Obama would need to average $107 million for seven quarters. Obviously, it is possible that Obama can make up ground in the next few quarters. But to hit that hyped $1 billion number, Obama would need to raise a bit more than $142 million per quarter. As impressive as the $86 million figure is, it’s below those markers. As Hot Air points out , the number also falls behind former President George W. Bush's third quarter fundraising, which raked in $49.5 million. What do you think the slowed fundraising pace means for Obama? Do you think it's a sign of trouble for his campaign, or just a sign of a weaker economy than 2008?
Continue reading …The IdeaPad K1′s long, crazy journey of near-availability looks to finally be at an end. Lenovo’s ethereal Honeycomb tablet has been popping up in online retail sites since May , teasing us with availability in June , and finally offering the promise of pre-order earlier this month. It seems that the plucky 10.1 inch Tegra 2 slate has taken the final step separating itself from the hands of consumers: getting sent out for shipment. One tipster passed along shipping confirmation from Office Depot that has the device lined up for delivery today — assuming, of course that the recipient is there to answer the door in the eight and a half hour delivery window provided. [Thanks, Dan] Lenovo IdeaPad K1 begins shipment odyssey, courtesy of Office Depot originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:24:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …Rodney King was arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence yesterday after officers observed him committing “multiple infractions,” TMZ reports. The 46-year-old King—whose videotaped beating by LAPD officers led to the 1992 Los Angeles riots—has had multiple run-ins with the law in the years since the riots….
Continue reading …Tehran fury at ‘internet in a suitcase’ prompts upgrade to web filtering system blocking forbidden websites Iran has stepped up online censorship by upgrading the filtering system that enables the Islamic regime to block access to thousands of websites it deems inappropriate for Iranian users. The move comes one month after the United States announced plans to launch new services facilitating internet access and mobile phone communications in countries with tight controls on freedom of speech, a decision that infuriated Tehran’s regime and prompted harsh reactions from several Iranian officials. The upgrade had at first appeared as a relaxation of the censorship machine. Iran’s online community said on Monday that filtering was temporarily lifted for the entire country, giving users access to banned websites such as Twitter and Facebook. But hopes for an end to censorship were dashed when news agencies reported later in the day that the respite was due to the process of making the upgrade. Despite the filtering, many Iranians access blocked addresses with help from proxy websites or virtual private network (VPN) services. The upgrade is aimed at stopping users bypassing censorship. More than 5 million websites are filtered in Iran. Media organisations including the Guardian, BBC and CNN are blocked, though access to the New York Times website is allowed. On Google, the Farsi equivalents for words such as “condom”, “sex”, “lesbian” and “anti-filtering” are filtered out. Iran is believed to be worried about the influence of the internet and especially social networking websites as pro-democracy activists across the Middle East use them to promote and publicise their movements. Iran’s semi-official Fars news agency quoted an unnamed official as saying: “The ministry of communications and information technology is strengthening the filtering system and recent disruptions were the result of this upgrade.” At the same time, Nasimonline.ir , an agency that publishes short Twitter-style bursts of news, said it had received information that “a new filtering system that targets Google and Yahoo search engines” had been installed and tested on Monday. “I think that the new upgrade in the filtering system is a signal from Iran that the regime is prepared to stop any attempt by the US to challenge the country’s online censorship,” said an Iranian who spoke to the Guardian by phone from Tehran on condition of anonymity. The New York Times reported last month that the Obama administration is leading a global effort to deploy what is known as “shadow internet” or “internet in a suitcase” by spending $2m (£1.25m) on secretive projects to create “independent cellphone networks inside foreign countries”. The aim is to provide services that allow “wireless communication over a wide area with a link to the global internet” in support of dissidents in countries that have tightened their grip on freedom of speech. In reaction to the US move, Iran’s intelligence minister, Heidar Moslehi, was quoted by Fars as saying: “We had predicted these actions, such as the internet in suitcase, and we have planned proper ways to combat them.” In an interview with the semi-official Mehr news agency, Iran’s minister for communications and information technology, Reza Taghipour, accused the US of “cyber terrorism” for its plans to launch “internet in suitcase”. In April, the Tehran government announced that it intended to launch “halal internet”, a country-wide intranet and a parallel network that conforms to Islamic values with the ultimate goal of substituting for the global internet. Iran’s opposition believe that Iran is buying its filtering technology from China. In September 2009 Iran’s powerful Revolutionary Guards, a body under the direct control of the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, purchased 51% of the Telecommunications Company of Iran, which monitors internet filtering in the country. Iran Internet United States Censorship Freedom of speech Saeed Kamali Dehghan guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …