General John Allen takes over amid further violence including assassination of Karzai aide and death of three Nato troops General David Petraeus has handed over command of American and coalition forces in Afghanistan to another US general, John Allen, who will assume responsibility as Washington and others draw up exit plans from the nearly 10-year conflict. The transfer on Monday came amid further violence: an aide to the Afghan president, Hamid Karzai, and an Afghan MP were assassinated in a Taliban-claimed attack in Kabul, while three Nato troops were killed in eastern Afghanistan. Allen said the reduction in US forces that started this month and the transition of some areas to Afghan control this week did not mean international forces were easing up in their campaign to defeat the Taliban insurgency. “It is my intention to maintain the momentum of the campaign,” the general said at the handover ceremony in Kabul. “There will be tough days ahead. I have no illusions about the challenges ahead.” US officials have heralded successes in reclaiming Taliban strongholds in southern Afghanistan and training Afghan security forces. But violent attacks have continued. On Monday morning, a bomb killed three international service members in eastern Afghanistan. Nato did not provide further details. Most of the troops in the east are American. At least 37 international troops have been killed so far this month in Afghanistan. Allen, who was promoted to a four-star general shortly before the handover ceremony, takes over from Petraeus, who commanded international forces in Afghanistan for one year and is retiring from the military to become the director of the CIA. The ceremony came hours after security forces in the capital killed the final attacker involved in the assassination of Karzai’s adviser Jan Mohammed Khan and a parliamentarian he was meeting in his house. The deaths were announced late on Sunday night, but fighting continued inside the house until early on Monday morning as police tried to take out the remaining assailant who had barricaded himself in. One police officer was killed, the interior ministry said. Afghan officials had originally said the attackers were wearing suicide vests but said on Monday that this was incorrect and they were armed only with guns. David Petraeus Afghanistan US military Nato United States Hamid Karzai Taliban guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Cash Cab Accident Kills Pedestrian Cash cab Discovery Channel Cash Cab Kills Pedestrian in Vancouver Canada – Driver get Diplomatic Immunity MarquisDonta says: @ZLameO_o serious as that cash cab was lol.. Yea true story
Continue reading …diablo III download crack keygen Update 3 July 2011 Download Link FarmVille Hack SECRETS_ Modern Warfare FIRST CAMPAIGN GAMEPLAY WyzeMusicLover says: i'm gonna go watch The Other Guys again Marky Mark's spaz fits are hilarious …not to mention he's hot, i wish Shooter was on
Continue reading …Type: Book Title: Venture Deals: Be Smarter Than Your Lawyer and Venture Capitalist See all customer reviews Product Description: An engaging guide to excelling in today’s venture capital arena Beginning in 2005, Brad Feld and Jason Mendelson, managing directors at Foundry Group, wrote a long series of blog posts describing all the parts of a typical venture capital Term Sheet: a document which outlines key financial and other terms of a proposed investment. Since this time, they’ve seen the series used as the basis for a number of college courses, and have been thanked by thousands of people who have used the information to gain a better understanding of the venture capital field. Drawn from the past work Feld and Mendelson have written about in their blog and augmented with newer material, Venture Capital Financings puts this discipline in perspective and lays out the strategies that allow entrepreneurs to excel in their start-up companies. Page by page, this book discusses all facets of the venture capital fundraising process. Along the way, Feld and Mendelson touch on everything from how valuations are set to what externalities venture capitalists face that factor into entrepreneurs’ businesses. Includes a breakdown analysis of the mechanics of a Term Sheet and the tactics needed to negotiate Details the different stages of the venture capital process, from starting a venture and seeing it through to the later stages Explores the entire venture capital ecosystem including those who invest in venture capitalist Contain standard documents that are used in these transactions Written by two highly regarded experts in the world of venture capital The venture capital arena is a complex and competitive place, but with this book as your guide, you’ll discover what it takes to make your way through it. See the details
Continue reading …Friends of the Earth is calling on MPs to block the government’s energy policy statement in parliament on Monday Dozens of new fossil-fuelled power stations are being planned by energy companies, triggering concerns among green campaigners of a new “dash for gas” that could crowd out wind and other cleaner energy projects, the Guardian can reveal. Friends of the Earth is calling on MPs to block the government’s prime energy policy statement, which comes before parliament on Monday amid a deluge of new planning applications or consents. Some plans are already queuing up in the public planning system. Scottish Power wants to construct a 1.2GW station at Avonmouth, near Bristol, while RWE npower is building a 2GW gas plant at Pembroke, south Wales, and a 2.4GW station at Willington in Derbyshire. It is also looking at a smaller facility at Fawley, near Southampton. Smaller schemes include ones by Welsh Power, which wants to construct an 850MW plant at Fleetwood in Lancashire, and Trafford Peaking Power is developing one in Manchester. The Guardian has unearthed as many as 30 potential gas schemes , which are either in late development stage or very early proposals, and which – if built could lock Britain into a higher carbon future at a time when it is trying to promote renewable power to cut emissions. Simon Bullock, a campaigner with FoE, says the national policy statement which will be debated in the Commons today would allow gas projects to be fast-forwarded on the basis that the UK has an “urgent” need for all new capacity to replace old nuclear and coal plants. “Instead of there being an ‘urgent’ need for new gas, there is in fact no need for new gas – beyond the capacity already being built or with planning permission. The new capacity the government says is needed by 2025 is already either under construction or has planning permission,” he argues. London-based consultancy, New Power, argued regulatory and financial uncertainty had slowed a dash for gas but it still believed “interest in new gas-fired plants remains high”. Gas is seen as attractive by developers because plants are relatively cheap and quick to construct but consumer groups are worried about soaring gas prices. A Department of Energy and Climate Change spokesman voting through the national policy statements were a vital part of the move to set Britain on a new course and rebuild out-of-date infrastructure. “The transition to low carbon energy can’t just happen overnight. Gas in particular will be needed to provide vital flexibility to support an increasing amount of low-carbon generation and to maintain security of supply,” he explained. “In the long term there is likely to be a role for gas plant equipped with carbon capture and storage, which is why new gas plants are required to be built carbon capture ready and the carbon capture and storage demonstration competition is open to gas plant as well as coal plant.” RWE npower, which The Guardian calculates could have nearly 9GW of gas-fired plants in action by 2020 and which revealed last week it was in wide-ranging talks with Gazprom of Russia, insists it has made no decisions on facilities such as Willington or Fawley. A spokesman said: “I would not say this a dash for gas as we are progressing renewable and other projects but we do believe in diversity because the future of energy is uncertain.” RWE said talks with Gazprom were at a very early stage but it admitted it could include an equity stake being released to the Russians and combined gas projects in the UK. Gazprom was at one stage linkled with the potential purchase of British Gas, something that caused political concern among some MPs. RWE is also among the companies looking at building nuclear power plants but said there was no question of Gazprom being involved in those schemes. Gas Energy industry Gas Renewable energy Carbon emissions Friends of the Earth Pollution Fossil fuels Energy Terry Macalister guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …NEW YORK — Time is running out for Washington to raise the country’s borrowing limit and avoid a default. Wall Street isn’t panicking yet. But if the unthinkable happens, a default could strike financial markets like an earthquake. “If we just get higher longer-term interest rates, we’d be lucky,” said John Briggs, Treasury strategist at the Royal Bank of Scotland. What might markets look like after a default? The tremors from even a short-lived default could take unpredictable paths. Stocks, bonds and the dollar would likely plummet in the immediate aftermath. There’s wide agreement among economists that a default would drive up borrowing costs for everybody. U.S. Treasury yields act like a floor for other lending rates, so raising them makes it more expensive for Americans to take out mortgages, for corporations to finance new spending and for local governments to borrow. But analysts say predicting exactly how a default would play out in stocks, bonds and currency in the hours and days following the Aug. 2. debt ceiling deadline is practically impossible. “If I were to draw a flow chart, it becomes so complex it’s impossible to analyze the impact of a default,” said Guy LaBas, chief fixed income strategist at Janney Montgomery Scott. When pressed, investors say the immediate aftermath could look like the financial crisis in September 2008. Stocks would lead the way down. In the month following Lehman Brothers’ bankruptcy, for instance, the Standard & Poor’s 500 index lost 28 percent. Gold may offer some refuge. Fear has driven traders into precious metals in droves in recent years, but gold is at a record $1,594 an ounce, without taking inflation into account. But two places where traders usually hide — the dollar and U.S. Treasurys — are likely to sink as the world’s investors flee the U.S. There would be few places to hide. A deeper fear is that a default could freeze the short-term lending markets that keep money moving throughout the global financial system. Treasurys and other government-backed debt are widely as used collateral for loans in these markets. A default and a downgrade of U.S. debt by rating agencies would shake the trust in that collateral, Briggs said. Lenders could respond by demanding borrowers to post more collateral, forcing them to sell other investments to meet those demands. A similar selling cycle spread turmoil across markets when Lehman Brothers collapsed in 2008. But the fallout from a U.S. default could be much worse. “I don’t even want to think of the ripple effects,” Briggs said. Indeed, most analysts agree that if the world’s largest economy reneges on its debts, the consequences would be catastrophic. That’s why so far they’ve trusted Congressional Republicans and President Barack Obama to reach a deal. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke certainly drew a dire picture in testimony before the Senate Banking Committee on Thursday. He said a default would be a “calamitous outcome” and “create a severe financial shock.” The global financial system relies on Treasurys, backed by the world’s largest economy and long considered one of the world’s safest bets. “A default on those securities would throw the financial system potentially into chaos,” Bernanke said. The widespread selloff that might trigger could have one benefit, Briggs and others say. Panic-selling might force Washington to quickly agree to raise the debt limit. Think back to September 2008 for some historical perspective. After the House of Representatives voted down the bailout bill to create the Troubled Asset Relief Program on Sept. 29, the Dow Jones industrial average nosedived 777 points. Congress made an about face and four days later passed the TARP bill. President George W. Bush quickly signed it into law. “We’re setting up for a TARP-like moment,” said Neil Dutta, U.S. economist at Bank of America-Merrill Lynch. “The politicians don’t come to a resolution, but the market forces a resolution.” Traders are still banking on a deal to increase the borrowing limit before the Aug. 2 deadline. That’s one reason stocks and bond yields have remained relatively stable thus far, even after Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s warned they may soon take away the country’s top credit rating. “What would shock is if Washington failed to beat the deadline,” said Tony Crescenzi, market strategist at Pimco. Crescenzi and other investors believe the negotiations could drag on until the last minute. Markets would likely greet a deal with a “relief rally,” analysts say. The effect would be the reverse of a default: Stocks, corporate bonds and the dollar all jump. “The market will react well to it,” said David Kelly, chief market strategist at J.P. Morgan Funds. Kelly said a deal would lift the uncertainty hanging over investors, especially those too worried to buy stocks now. After President Bush signed the TARP into law in 2008, for instance, the Dow made large jumps, adding as many as 946 points in a week. When Washington finally agrees to raise the debt ceiling, Treasurys could drop because investors would be more willing to take risks in other investments, Kelly said. That’s how they normally trade: Good economic news pushes Treasury prices down and yields up. The relief may not last long. If the agreement leads to deep spending cuts, Wall Street economists say it will likely drag down economic growth. Similarly, in late 2008, the wild gains evaporated as the financial crisis took hold. The S&P bottomed out in March 2009. Federal spending makes up 8 percent of gross domestic product, a broad measure of the economy. Goldman Sachs economists estimate that a deal to cut $2 trillion in spending could take 0.8 percentage points off economic growth next year. The bank already predicts modest real GDP growth of 3.1 percent in 2012. Knock off a quarter of that and the economy won’t look much better than it does now.
Continue reading …