By ALESSANDRA RIZZO, Associated Press PERUGIA, Italy (AP) — The investigators who collected the genetic evidence used to convict American student Amanda Knox of murder in Italy made a series of glaring errors, including using a dirty glove and not wearing caps, two independent forensic experts said Monday. The experts had been appointed by an Italian appeals court to review the DNA evidence used in Knox’s trial, including some found on a kitchen knife believed to be the murder weapon and some found on the clasp of the victim’s bra. That evidence played a crucial role in securing the convictions of Knox and her co-defendant Raffaele Sollecito in the 2007 murder of Meredith Kercher, a Briton who shared an apartment with Knox while they were both exchange students in the city of Perugia. Knox, 24, and Sollecito, 27, have denied wrongdoing and have appealed. The evidence review was granted at the request of their defense teams. In the first trial, prosecutors maintained that Knox’s DNA was found on the handle of the kitchen knife and Kercher’s DNA was found on the blade. They say Sollecito’s DNA was found on the clasp of Kercher’s bra. But the independent experts told the appeals court that the collection of evidence fell below international standards and may have resulted in contamination. They used slides to refer to international protocols for the collection and sampling of evidence, including one from the U.S. Department of Justice and others from various U.S. states. One of the two experts, Stefano Conti, cited dozens of cases of forensic police entering the crime scene or coming into contacts with objects there not wearing protective equipment such as masks or hair caps. He said that while evidence should be wrapped in paper or kept in a paper bags, police often used plastic bags, heightening the risk of contamination. “There are various circumstances do not adhere to protocols and procedures,” the forensic expert told the court. In footage and framegrabs shown to the court, two police officers collected the bra clasp, and the glove worn by one of the two appeared to be dirty on two fingers. Conti noted the bra clasp was collected 46 days after the Nov. 1, 2007 fatal stabbing of the 21-year-old Kercher. “Over those 46 days several objects were moved, and in at the same time several people will have come in and out,” he noted, again stressing the risk of contamination. The other expert, Carla Vecchiotti, explained to the court that the genetic profile on the knife’s blade that was attributed to Kercher is dubious and cannot be attributed with certainty. She said no blood traces were on the blade, and that the original testing did not follow recommendations of the international scientific community for dealing with DNA testing. Vecchiotti said the review concurred with the original testing in saying that the genetic profile on the knife’s black plastic handle could be attributed to Knox. The knife was found at Sollecito’s apartment. Kercher’s body was found at the apartment she shared with Knox. The hearing Monday was a tense one, with the parties frequently challenging the experts. The typically calm Claudio Pratillo Hellmann, the presiding judge, at one point slammed his hand on his desk and shouted, “Quiet!” The independent experts, both from La Sapienza University in Rome, will be questioned and cross-examined in the next hearing, scheduled for Saturday. That will be the last hearing before the summer break. The full review, a 145-document obtained by The Associated Press, was filed to the Perugia court last month. Defense lawyers immediately welcomed the report, hoping it will boost their clients’ chances of overturning their convictions. Knox’s mother, Edda Mellas, said Monday’s hearing marked a good day for her daughter, though she has repeatedly cautioned during the trial that she will only celebrate if Knox walks free when a verdict is reached in late September. Giulia Bongiorno, a lawyer for Sollecito, said that what had been so far only a defense theory — claiming that there was a risk of contamination and that DNA traces were too low to be attributed with certainty — has now been certified by independent experts. “These aren’t opinions, words. These are images,” she said, referring to the clips shown in court. But Francesco Maresca, a lawyer for the Kercher family, promised that a fierce cross-examination of the experts next week would prove the work of the forensic police had been up to snuff. He added: “The Kercher family is very worried over this inquisitorial atmosphere around the serious job done during the investigation.”
Continue reading …By ALESSANDRA RIZZO, Associated Press PERUGIA, Italy (AP) — The investigators who collected the genetic evidence used to convict American student Amanda Knox of murder in Italy made a series of glaring errors, including using a dirty glove and not wearing caps, two independent forensic experts said Monday. The experts had been appointed by an Italian appeals court to review the DNA evidence used in Knox’s trial, including some found on a kitchen knife believed to be the murder weapon and some found on the clasp of the victim’s bra. That evidence played a crucial role in securing the convictions of Knox and her co-defendant Raffaele Sollecito in the 2007 murder of Meredith Kercher, a Briton who shared an apartment with Knox while they were both exchange students in the city of Perugia. Knox, 24, and Sollecito, 27, have denied wrongdoing and have appealed. The evidence review was granted at the request of their defense teams. In the first trial, prosecutors maintained that Knox’s DNA was found on the handle of the kitchen knife and Kercher’s DNA was found on the blade. They say Sollecito’s DNA was found on the clasp of Kercher’s bra. But the independent experts told the appeals court that the collection of evidence fell below international standards and may have resulted in contamination. They used slides to refer to international protocols for the collection and sampling of evidence, including one from the U.S. Department of Justice and others from various U.S. states. One of the two experts, Stefano Conti, cited dozens of cases of forensic police entering the crime scene or coming into contacts with objects there not wearing protective equipment such as masks or hair caps. He said that while evidence should be wrapped in paper or kept in a paper bags, police often used plastic bags, heightening the risk of contamination. “There are various circumstances do not adhere to protocols and procedures,” the forensic expert told the court. In footage and framegrabs shown to the court, two police officers collected the bra clasp, and the glove worn by one of the two appeared to be dirty on two fingers. Conti noted the bra clasp was collected 46 days after the Nov. 1, 2007 fatal stabbing of the 21-year-old Kercher. “Over those 46 days several objects were moved, and in at the same time several people will have come in and out,” he noted, again stressing the risk of contamination. The other expert, Carla Vecchiotti, explained to the court that the genetic profile on the knife’s blade that was attributed to Kercher is dubious and cannot be attributed with certainty. She said no blood traces were on the blade, and that the original testing did not follow recommendations of the international scientific community for dealing with DNA testing. Vecchiotti said the review concurred with the original testing in saying that the genetic profile on the knife’s black plastic handle could be attributed to Knox. The knife was found at Sollecito’s apartment. Kercher’s body was found at the apartment she shared with Knox. The hearing Monday was a tense one, with the parties frequently challenging the experts. The typically calm Claudio Pratillo Hellmann, the presiding judge, at one point slammed his hand on his desk and shouted, “Quiet!” The independent experts, both from La Sapienza University in Rome, will be questioned and cross-examined in the next hearing, scheduled for Saturday. That will be the last hearing before the summer break. The full review, a 145-document obtained by The Associated Press, was filed to the Perugia court last month. Defense lawyers immediately welcomed the report, hoping it will boost their clients’ chances of overturning their convictions. Knox’s mother, Edda Mellas, said Monday’s hearing marked a good day for her daughter, though she has repeatedly cautioned during the trial that she will only celebrate if Knox walks free when a verdict is reached in late September. Giulia Bongiorno, a lawyer for Sollecito, said that what had been so far only a defense theory — claiming that there was a risk of contamination and that DNA traces were too low to be attributed with certainty — has now been certified by independent experts. “These aren’t opinions, words. These are images,” she said, referring to the clips shown in court. But Francesco Maresca, a lawyer for the Kercher family, promised that a fierce cross-examination of the experts next week would prove the work of the forensic police had been up to snuff. He added: “The Kercher family is very worried over this inquisitorial atmosphere around the serious job done during the investigation.”
Continue reading …Frank Schaeffer — the embittered liberal progeny of the late evangelical Christian scholar Francis Schaeffer — appeared on MSNBC's “Martin Bashir” program this afternoon where he availed himself the opportunity to spew forth more venom against American evangelicals , who tend to vote for conservative Republicans. Schaeffer was ostensibly brought on to react to new polling data that show 56 percent of Americans believe it's important for presidential candidates to have strong religious beliefs, even if those beliefs don't square with the voter's personal views. In the process of the interview, Schaeffer indirectly compared evangelical Christians to the Taliban as he slammed “faith-based politics” (emphasis mine): You can't win a [presidential] primary without the backing of the 25 percent of Americans who believe in a literal 6-day creation, think that gay people choose to be gay, believe everyone except them will go to Hell when they die because they didn't ask Jesus to accept them into His kingdom. Look, this is deformed American politics. We're in a war of religion you know in this country and it's not much different than Afghanistan.
Continue reading …Frank Schaeffer — the embittered liberal progeny of the late evangelical Christian scholar Francis Schaeffer — appeared on MSNBC's “Martin Bashir” program this afternoon where he availed himself the opportunity to spew forth more venom against American evangelicals , who tend to vote for conservative Republicans. Schaeffer was ostensibly brought on to react to new polling data that show 56 percent of Americans believe it's important for presidential candidates to have strong religious beliefs, even if those beliefs don't square with the voter's personal views. In the process of the interview, Schaeffer indirectly compared evangelical Christians to the Taliban as he slammed “faith-based politics” (emphasis mine): You can't win a [presidential] primary without the backing of the 25 percent of Americans who believe in a literal 6-day creation, think that gay people choose to be gay, believe everyone except them will go to Hell when they die because they didn't ask Jesus to accept them into His kingdom. Look, this is deformed American politics. We're in a war of religion you know in this country and it's not much different than Afghanistan.
Continue reading …Aiming to keep his “martyrdom operation” a secret, Anders Behring Breivik worked hard come across as a regular guy—and he succeeded at being forgettable. “He didn’t say anything you could remember,” an acquaintance tells the New York Times . “He’s one of the crowd, if you know what I mean….
Continue reading …NARRAGANSETT, R.I. (AP) — Twenty dollars for a parking place wasn’t going to ruin Ellen Majka’s day at the beach. But she was still taken aback when she arrived at Rhode Island’s popular Scarborough state beach and learned that parking fees had nearly doubled. “It seems a little steep to me,” said Majka, of Westfield, Mass. “Add in the price of gas and it starts to add up. But I didn’t come two hours to turn back over $20.” As states and municipalities continue to grapple with the recession’s fallout, few turned to big, noticeable tax hikes this year. Instead, they’re slashing spending and turning to more modest, narrowly crafted increases in fees and fines — nickel-and-diming their way to a balanced budget. Louisiana and South Dakota raised state park fees, while California increased vehicle registration costs and Wisconsin started charging more to retake the state driving exam. Georgia raised fees on day care licenses, fireworks permits and traveling circuses. Oregon raised fees on medical marijuana, while Rhode Island imposed taxes on over-the-counter drugs, sightseeing tours and smartphone applications. Fines are going up in many places too. Tennessee lawmakers increased traffic fines. Wyoming raised fines for trucks exceeding weight limits. New York city increased fines for taxi drivers caught talking on a cellphone while driving. In Maryland, fee increases were common solutions this year as lawmakers struggled to balance the books without across-the-board tax increases. Not even newborns went unaffected, as birth certificate fees doubled from $12. The fee for a vanity license plate doubled from $25. A surcharge on filing land records will double from $20. Kim Malle, who lives on Maryland’s Eastern Shore, isn’t only unhappy about the recently approved fees; she’s also concerned about rising tolls that are under consideration. The Grasonville resident may have to pay more to take the Bay Bridge across the Chesapeake Bay when the toll rises from $2.50 to $5 on Oct. 1 and up to $8 by 2013. “I think this state has too many fees, definitely,” Malle said after walking out of a Motor Vehicle Administration Office, where she was returning tags for a vehicle that she had sold. “I don’t mind certain things, but I just think the state overdoes it.” Julio Reyes, who was at the same office to pay the certificate of title fee, said the recent jump from $50 to $100 to title a new car was too much, too fast. “I think maybe $20 more; that’s OK,” Reyes said. “100 percent? Too much.” Fee increases can be an attractive alternative for lawmakers worried about losing political points or increasing hardships by raising income or sales taxes across the board. Professional license fees are a cost of doing business. Recreational fees are paid only by users. Don’t want to pay a tax on a new smartphone app? Don’t download it. “The folks who run government weren’t born yesterday,” said Larry Gerston, a political science professor at San Jose State University. “When they see a fee that has a built-in user base, in times of difficulty they’ll do whatever they can to extract revenue from that base. Raising fees is often easier than raising taxes. They can avoid the controversy and the public backlash.” Or, as Maryland Democratic state Sen. Richard Madaleno of Montgomery puts it: “Politically, it does appear that fees are certainly something that are more feasible — no pun intended.” But some lawmakers are tiring of the practice of using fees to avoid the dreaded T-word. Texas state Rep. Richard Pena Raymond proposed a bill this year that would require lawmakers to officially label any proposed fee increase a tax increase. “They say, `Look, it’s not a tax, it’s a user fee,’” said Raymond, a Laredo Democrat. “I say that’s bull. The public is cynical already. We have to be honest and call it what it is: a tax.” Only two states opted for across-the-board tax increases this year to resolve budget deficits, according to Susan Urahn, managing director of the Pew Center on the States. Illinois lawmakers passed a 67 percent across-the-board income tax increase, while Connecticut legislators voted to raise the state’s sales tax rate from 6 percent to 6.35 percent and impose it on new services including manicures, pet grooming and yoga classes. For the majority of states, spending cuts and focused fine and fee increases were the preferred approach. States aren’t alone in raising fees. Colleges and universities have increased fees — and tuition — to make up for funding cuts. Cities, too, are getting into the game. On Tybee Island, Ga., beach tourists are shelling out about $870,000 a year more for parking meters and tickets than they did just four years ago. After a series of increases to hourly rates and fines, parking now competes neck-and-neck with property taxes as the island city’s top source of revenue. Meters and parking are projected to raise $2.15 million a year for the island city; property taxes revenues are projected to raise $2.16 million. “It seems like everywhere they can find a place, they want to stick a meter. They’re hungry for revenue,” said Doug Hall, who’s been told by city officials they’re looking to convert eight free parking spots to metered spaces in front of the small shopping center he owns. Providence, R.I., recently enacted a fee for disposing of a mattress. Philadelphia hiked parking meter fees as part of an aid package for schools, which were facing a shortfall created in part by cuts in state aid. Greensboro, N.C., doubled fines for parking in a fire lane from $25. Lawmakers say the new fees and fines are just keeping up with the times. Rhode Island, a summer playground for many in the Northeast, last raised its beach fees in 2002. Smartphone applications didn’t even exist when lawmakers imposed the sales tax on the purchase of software at a retail computer store. Rhode Island lawmakers said they only endorsed fee increases after exhausting the list of state services or programs that could be cut. They say a bigger, across-the-board income or sales tax increase would have been a far greater burden on taxpayers: the fee and tax increases will only raise $20 million in new revenue for a state budget of $7.7 billion. Earlier in the year, lawmakers balked at an ambitious call by independent Gov. Lincoln Chafee to expand the sales tax to raise $165 million. Critics of fee increases say lawmakers who favor them often believe taxpayers won’t notice a small fee increase. Rhode Island state Rep. Robert Watson disputes that, saying consumers often will change their behavior to avoid higher fees. “I think people make decisions based on being nickeled and dimed,” said Watson, an East Greenwich Republican. “People will drive across town to save a dollar. I absolutely think people might decide to go to a certain beach because the fee is lower.” Some disgruntled fee-payers are considering even bigger moves. Tom Tompkins was blunt when asked about the fee increases while walking out of a motor vehicle office in Annapolis, Md. “I want to move to Delaware,” said Tom Tompkins, 63, of Glen Burnie, Md. Tompkins, who is retired, cited an increase in Maryland’s sales tax rate from 5 to 6 percent, approved in 2007. The lifelong Maryland resident said Delaware, which has no sales tax, looks more inviting all the time. “It’s more than annoying,” Tompkins said of his state’s new taxes and fees. “I mean, if you figure that you pay state income taxes and then you have all these fees and taxes on top of what you have left after you pay state and federal income tax, it’s pretty substantial, and I’m very serious about relocating to a state that’s more tax friendly.” Witte reported from Annapolis, Md. Contributing to this report were Associated Press writers Jonathan Cooper in Salem, Ore.; Chet Brokaw in Pierre, S.D.; Julie Carr Smyth in Columbus, Ohio; Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pa.; Melinda Deslatte in Baton Rouge, La.; and Russ Bynum in Savannah, Ga.
Continue reading …A security researcher claims to have found a new security flaw in Apple laptops that could allow hackers to ruin laptop batteries, infect them with malware or potentially cause them to overheat and catch fire. Charlie Miller, principal research consultant at Accuvant Labs, said he has found a way to manipulate chips embedded inside Apple laptop batteries. The chip monitors the battery’s temperature and level of charge, among other things. Those chips can be remotely controlled by hackers using a default password that Miller found on a website of the chip’s creator, Texas Instruments. Apple never changed the default password, Miller said. Miller’s discovery, first reported by Forbes.com, is the latest potential security flaw found in Apple’s product line. Earlier this month, security experts disclosed a bug in Apple’s iOS operating system that could allow criminal hackers to gain remote access to iPhones, iPads and iPod Touch devices, Reuters reported. Apple said it is fixing that issue in an upcoming software update. At the very least, Miller found he could ruin laptop batteries by altering the chip’s code. Not wanting to set his home on fire, Miller stopped there. But he imagines darker possibilities for hackers if Apple does not fix the security flaw. “I have full access to the battery and I can make any changes I want,” Miller told The Huffington Post. For example, hackers could install malware on the battery that would not be detected by anti-virus software because it would not appear on the hard drive, he said. The malware could attack the laptop’s operating system again and again, even after the user installed a new hard drive. “The battery would keep attacking it,” he said. Miller, a former security researcher for the National Security Agency, said it’s possible that Apple has taken extra security measures to prevent that from happening, or worse, causing a battery to overheat and catch fire. He said he reported his findings to Apple but did not hear back. An Apple spokeswoman did not return a call for comment. Since his discovery, Miller said he has received some criticism. “People thought maybe I had blown up batteries, but I haven’t blown up anything,” he said. “It’s a step in that direction, but I don’t really know what all the implications are.” Miller said he wrote a paper on the security flaw that he plans to present at the Black Hat security conference in August in Las Vegas, where he also plans to unveil a solution called a “Caulkgun” that changes the battery’s default password. While the security flaw presents a potential danger, Miller said most users should not be overly concerned about a hacker taking over their laptop battery. “It’s really only for people who are very paranoid,” he said.
Continue reading …People are used to the idea that celebrities are followed around wherever they go. Stand in a grocery store line for longer than one minute and you’ll get to see at least three different headlines showing A-listers at their worst. These photos were no doubt snapped as these people were attempting to go about their The Side of Celebrity Cosmetic Surgery We Rarely See is a post from: Daily World Buzz
Continue reading …