A massive water main break in the Bronx is causing headaches for New York City commuters. Firefighters waded through knee-deep water and subway and bus services had to be re-routed. (July 27)
Continue reading …Family and friends say a final farewell to Amy Winehouse; McQueen’s will shows his love for dogs and charities; U2 to open Toronto Film Festival. (July 27)
Continue reading …On Election Day 2010, then-CBS Early Show anchor Harry Smith posed a hypothetical question about newly-elected Republicans to Ann Coulter: “There’ll be a routine vote, for instance, to increase the debt ceiling and the Tea Party guys are going to say, ‘Over my dead body,’ and the government comes to a screeching halt. Then what happens?” The conservative author confidently predicted: “Well, the media will blame the Republicans.” And that’s precisely what has occurred. A Media Research Center study of the Big Three network evening and morning programs finds that, when it came to assigning blame for lack of a debt ceiling resolution, ABC, CBS and NBC’s coverage has placed the overwhelming majority of the blame on Republicans’ doorstep. MRC analysts watched all 202 stories on the debt ceiling from July 1 through July 22, looking for statements which assigned blame or responsibility for the failure to reach a settlement. Of the 85 stories that included such statements, the skew was lopsidedly anti-Republican, with 56 stories (66%) mainly assigning them the blame for the impasse. Even though Democrats control both the Senate and the White House, only 17 network stories (20%) suggested they bore more responsibility, a greater than three-to-one disparity (see chart). Twelve stories offered a balanced discussion of which party ought to be blamed. [METHOD: Analysts reviewed each story, then tallied all reporter statements and soundbites which clearly assigned responsibility to Republicans or Democrats. If the majority of statements within that story assigned blame to one party or the other, it was scored as “blaming Republicans” or “blaming Democrats.” If the story contained a balanced number of statements, it was recorded as “balanced.” ] Of the Big Three networks, NBC was the most likely to pin the blame on the GOP, by a 27 to 6 margin (with four stories assigning equal blame).
Continue reading …President Obama is just trying to scare the American people with his talk of serious consequences if no agreement can be reached on the debt ceiling, according to Sarah Palin. The Alaskan, appearing on Greta Van Susteren’s Fox News show, dismissed the situation as “more Obama drama,” ABC News reports….
Continue reading …Tom Condliff’s claim that his human rights were breached was dismissed by appeal court judges A 22-stone, “morbidly obese” ex-policeman has lost his latest attempt to force the NHS to pay for stomach surgery, despite his lawyers saying he might have less than a year to live. Tom Condliff, who is 62 and 1.8m (6ft 2in) tall, had claimed that North Staffordshire primary care trust (PCT) was denying him his human rights by refusing to fund the operation. But while judges at the appeal court in London on Wednesday expressed sympathy for Condliff’s “desperate” situation, they dismissed his attempt to overturn an April high court decision in the trust’s favour. Condliff, from Talke, Staffordshire, who has diabetes and other associated illnesses, had argued he needed a laparoscopic gastric bypass operation. Condliff’s lawyers had argued that the PCT had applied a funding policy that was legally flawed and breached his human rights. The appeal judges – Lord Justice Maurice Kay, Lady Justice Hallett and Lord Justice Toulson – ruled that the funding policy did not breach human rights laws, although Toulson added: “Anyone in his situation would feel desperate.” Richard Clayton QC, for Condliff, had said his health was deteriorating and doctors feared he could have less than a year to live. He had a “severe needle phobia” and, over a number of years, insulin had not been delivered as effectively as it might have been. Condliff had developed a “gross appetite” and had started to “gorge himself” following a course of insulin. His weight had increased and his health problems multiplied. Clayton told a previous hearing: “He tried all other relevant, non-surgical interventions, including dietary and lifestyle and drug interventions, for his gain in weight, but was not successful.” The funding policy of the trust breached Condliff’s right to respect for his private and family life under article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Clayton argued. But David Lock QC, for the trust, said the case involved difficult decisions about healthcare funding priorities, and that the trust was entitled to make such decisions without taking into account non-clinical and social factors. Toulson said there was no doubt that Condliff’s state of health “is having a seriously adverse effect on his private and family life in the most basic ways, which without bariatric surgery will continue and is likely to become worse”. But there was no violation of the European Convention of Human Rights, however harsh that might seem to Condliff, said the judge. Clayton had in effect argued that there should be “positive discrimination”, and that “private life” matters should be taken into account, which were “not clinically significant when making decisions on the allocation of funds for medical treatment”, the judges said. Toulson said: “Mr Condliff’s witness statement shows that his condition has seriously compromised his independence and dignity of life in ways which have an inevitable impact on his relationship with his wife. It is unnecessary to go into more intimate details. His life expectancy has been severely reduced. Anyone in his situation would feel desperate. “The sad fact remains that the [trust], on proper medical advice, does not consider his condition to be exceptional for someone with his diabetes, obesity and co-morbidities. As a medical judgment that is not challenged. “In my judgment the [high court] judge was right in his reasoning and his conclusion that the adoption of the policy did not contravene the [human rights] convention. I would therefore dismiss the appeal.” The other judges agreed. Condliff was refused permission to take his case to the supreme court. NHS Human rights Health James Meikle guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Foreign secretary William Hague declares Libya’s national transitional council the country’s ‘sole governmental authority’ Britain is expelling the Libyan chargé d’affaires and all eight remaining Libyan embassy staff in London after David Cameron and William Hague ruled that Libya’s national transitional council (NTC) was now the “sole governmental authority” in the country. The chargé was summoned to a meeting at the Foreign Office, where he was given three days to leave Britain. Other diplomats at the Libyan People’s Bureau, in Knightsbridge – which has been under heavy police guard since the launch of the military campaign in March – have been told to leave over the course of the summer. Hague announced the expulsions at a Foreign Office press conference on Wednesday as he invited the NTC to nominate an ambassador and other diplomats to take over the Libyan mission. The foreign secretary said: “The prime minister and I have decided that the United Kingdom recognises and will deal with the national transitional council as the sole governmental authority in Libya. “This decision reflects the national transitional council’s increasing legitimacy, competence and success in reaching out to Libyans across the country. “Through its actions, the national transitional council has shown its commitment to a more open and democratic Libya, something that it is working to achieve in an inclusive political process. This is in stark contrast to Gaddafi, whose brutality against the Libyan people has stripped him of all legitimacy.” Hague said Britain – which has temporarily closed its embassy in Tripoli – now runs its largest diplomatic mission in north Africa after Cairo in the Libyan rebel stronghold of Benghazi. This will be designated as an embassy if the NTC requests an upgrade. The decision to recognise the NTC as sole governmental authority led to the unfreezing of £91m in UK assets belonging to the Arabian Gulf Oil Company, a Libyan oil firm under the NTC’s control. Foreign Office sources said the assets were unfrozen after the NTC gave assurances that the funds would be used to purchase fuel and not arms, which would be illegal under UN security council resolutions. Hague also announced at his press conference that: • The appearance on Libyan television of the Lockerbie bomber, Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, showed it had been a mistake by the Scottish justice minister to release him in 2009. • Britain only decided to recognise the NTC after it was certain that Libyan students in Britain, who are funded by their embassy, would continue to be supported. • No deadline has been set for the military campaign against the Gaddafi regime. British military chiefs have advised ministers they can continue with the bombing indefinitely. The decision to recognise an opposition group is a rare step for Britain, which declined to follow the example of the French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, who recognised the NTC at the start of the conflict. Britain said at the time it could not recognise the NTC because it recognises states rather than governments. It decided to relax its position after the international Libya contact group decided at a recent meeting in Istanbul “to deal with the national transitional council … as the legitimate governing authority in Libya”. A Foreign Office source said Britain would continue to abide by the convention by which it recognises states rather than governments, saying: “These are exceptional circumstances. It was an anomaly that we had these people here still representing Gaddafi. “We dragged in the chargé d’affaires. He and his colleagues are now packing their bags.” Hague, who appeared to indicate earlier this week that Britain was more relaxed about Gaddafi’s personal future, made it clear that it would be better if he left Libya. The foreign secretary said, however, that Britain could not dictate the outcome of a political settlement to the Libyan people. “Let’s point out though, at the same time, that the view of the chairman of the NTC is that any successful political settlement does involve Gaddafi leaving Libya and that is what we continue to say is the best solution,” he said. “So don’t make any mistake about that, but we’re saying we can’t impose that or guarantee that.” Hague also said Britain was committed to ensuring that Gaddafi faces justice before the international criminal court. The foreign secretary denied that discussions about Gaddafi were part of a back channel communication with the regime, but did not deny that such a channel existed. The renewed diplomatic offensive comes as British aircraft stepped up the bombing against Gaddafi’s security and intelligence apparatus before the start of Ramadan on 1 August. Libya Muammar Gaddafi Middle East Africa Arab and Middle East unrest Foreign policy Nicholas Watt guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Tarvaris Jackson, Seattle Seahawks Agree To Deal (HIGHLIGHTS) Tarvaris Jackson, Seahawks Agree To Contract (VIDEO) Tarvaris Jackson, Seattle Seahawks Agree To Deal MattCarter7 says: Sources: Hasselbeck leaving Seattle; Jackson in http://t.co/TMudrPM
Continue reading …2011 Fantasy Football: The Dynasty Impact of Tarvaris Jackson Joining Seattle (VIDEO) Tavaris Jackson Reportedly Has Deal With Seattle Seahawks (VIDEO) NFL Free Agency: Tarvaris Jackson, Seahawks Agree To Contract!! MattCarter7 says: Sources: Hasselbeck leaving Seattle; Jackson in http://t.co/TMudrPM
Continue reading …I know there’s not a lot for conservative hate-radio jocks to talk about these days except the debt ceiling, how Obama created the deficit and how cutting taxes and deficits creates an incredible amount of jobs. But even by their loony standards, this is off the wall. No, not The Wall North of Winterfell . Limbaugh: People Believe In Global Warming Because Air Conditioners Make Their Homes Cool Doesn’t Limbaugh work in Florida? I bet you they have one of the highest air-conditioner-per-residence ratios in the country. It’s why so many pro athletes come out of Florida, because outdoor sports like baseball and football can be played almost year round because of the absence of what northerners call “winter.” This conspiracy by RushBo is certifiably insane, so I imagine Rep. John Boehner and Paul Ryan will be picking up on it and repeating it for the teevee soon. I’m sure they’ll agree with this thinking.
Continue reading …